We the people have inherent natural preexisting inalienable unalienable Creator-given rights that existed thousands of years before the fiction called “government”;
“Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them.” (C.R. 1795, (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54))
Now, ask yourself: Then how can a fiction rule over a living wo/man? And, the answer is by numerous frauds of conversion and semantic deceit (legalese) as highlighted in the following Public Notice:
Theory of Government
The theory of government is supposed to be that we have surrendered some of our rights to government so that the government protects the rights that we have not surrendered; that is the sole purpose of government: to protect our rights! Not lord over us.
The government derives its powers from the consent of the governed; the fiction is that we have consented to the surrender of ALL our rights; the reality is that our rights have been stolen from us because the government monopolises force; it’s a sad and terrible reality;
And, just because we have only listed some rights in our SA People’s Bill of Rights , it does not mean that there are not others; And, just because we have given some powers to the federal government, it does not mean we have kept the rest for ourselves, we have; that’s the concept of limited government; the government must stop! When it wants to touch our natural rights, whatever we think our natural rights are; because these are the things that we all yearn as human-beings to do; to be free from interference by the government;
If my rights belong to me as my fingers belong to me then they cannot be taken away by majority vote; they cannot be taken away by legislation; they cannot be taken away by command of the executive; they can only be taken away if I give them up myself!!!
BUT, the truth is that since 1994 we have no lawful government; lawful government is in fact vacant and we must re-populate it; RSA Inc. is merely a foreign privately owned company; our Republic has been hijacked by the usual suspects; see: https://giftoftruth.wordpress.com/rsa-inc/
The correct term for RSA Inc. is a foreign “corporate services provider” and is in fact a “Division” of the UN, IMF, FED, London, Rome, New World Order. They claim to own us and our Republic and are now providing us with “services” so we can take care of it for them until they decide they need it.
Now, a Republic is a non-profit Public Trust and we the people are the lawful creditors, priority claimants and shareholders thereof; whereas a corporation is private and exploits the public for the gain of it’s private shareholders. It’s time to claim back our Republic;
Introducing the SA Jural Assembly; a people’s court of conscience by, for and of the people:
History of rights
Since mankind lived in co-operative, non-coercive, non-hierarchical, self-organizing and self-governing tribal societies we were never without a common law – which means to exchange together;
If , our Creator has made us with reason to govern ourselves, then it makes no sense at all for corporate fictions fronting as government and for London, Rome, Washington DC and New York to interfere with our independence and claim authority over us with unrestrained power;
When rights become subjected to unrestrained power, respect for natural law and natural justice is destroyed, and rational self-government is impossible;
What is sovereignty?
Do we, the people work for Government? OR Does Government work for US?
“Sovereignty itself is… not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law… while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts.” Justice Thomas Stanley Matthews in Yick Wo v. Hopkins [p. 370]:
Sovereignty remains with the people, by whom all government exists and acts;
Download PDF: ON SOVEREIGNTY – 2017.04.23
SA People Sovereignty Explained:
Inalienable Unalienable Rights
Unalienable rights now called inalienable rights are inherent pre-existing Creator-given natural rights that cannot be taken away by any court, law or government unless I give them up myself; and, can never be changed or lowered or commodified by any agency of THE STATE; only before a fair hearing of equals and peers; nor, can rights can be taken away by any contract or waiver;
- the right to life, freedom and happiness;
- the right to trade freely without let or hinder;
- the right to a fair exchange for the sweat of one’s labour;
- the unlimited right to contract or not to contract;
- the right to neither be deemed, nor pledged as ‘human’ capital;
- the right to travel freely without let or hinder;
- the right to be presumed innocent without arrest, detention, harm or loss of private property before a fair trial;
- the right to establishing the truth as the “that without which not” of any dispute;
- the right to be informed of all subject-matter and jurisdiction;
- the right to challenge the jurisdiction of any court;
- the right to a fair trial in a community court free from the BAR legal system;
- the right to a fair trial before equals and peers;
- the right to a fair trial according to principles of restorative justice;
- the right to true justice which is seeking reconciliation and not retribution;
- the right to use natural law and natural justice as a restraint against tyranny;
- the right to equality as a people according to un-enacted law-of-the-land;
- the right to be free from any and all legal fiction;
- the right of freedom and to never suffer the indignity of detention or imprisonment which is for slaves; and, slavery has been abolished;
- the right to not consent to harm or loss;
- the right to educate and inform all people as to their rights;
- the right to any belief and religion; and, to keep it private;
- the right to have offspring and family and clothe, feed, protect and shelter them;
- the right to claim custodianship of land one lives on and works, without trespass;
- the right to not have to pay for the use of land;
- the right of every community to self-determination and self-governance;
- the right to lawful rebellion against economic apartheid, colonial domination, alien occupation and or racist regimes.
- the right to lawful self-defence as a last resort when self-preservation is at risk;
- the right to declare law-of-war subject to law-of-peace to prevent invasion;
- the right to peace and the right to be left alone when law-abiding and peaceful;
- the right to declare and establish any other right we deem fit for the protection of our unalienable rights;
The law does not protect those that slumber on their rights;
Download PDF: UNALIENABLE RIGHTS – 2017.04.23
What is Government?
“What is government itself but the greatest of all reflections on human nature? If men were angels no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary.” – James Madison
SUPREME COURT RULING – NO CORPORATE JURISDICTION OVER THE NATURAL MAN: Supreme Court of the United States 1795,
“Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them.” S.C.R. 1795, (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54)
Government is merely a legal fiction which was created solely to protect peoples’ rights, property and natural resources; and, to provide the people with services, not to lord over them.
Ask yourself, how can a piece of paper rule over real living tangible people? It cannot, dear people; only by our consent;
It has no jurisdiction over the tangible as affirmed by the above ruling.
The Real Problem is Government
By Doug Casey; extracts; 2016-04-15
Does the U.S. government serve any useful purpose? I give a good number of speeches each year. For some time I’ve asked audiences a question: “What useful purpose does the U.S. government serve?” I do that not to be challenging or provocative, but to actually find out if anyone else can think of a useful purpose the government serves. The question at first shocks, then amuses and then perplexes almost everyone because it is both so obvious and outrageous that no one ever thinks of asking it. Most people accept the institution of government because it has always been there; they have always assumed it was essential. People do not question its existence, much less its right to exist.
Government sponsors untold waste, criminality, and inequality in every sphere of life it touches, giving little of value in return. Its contributions to the commonweal are wars, pogroms, confiscations, persecutions, taxation, regulation, and inflation. And it’s not just some governments of which that are true, although some are clearly much worse than others. It’s an inherent characteristic of all government…
Governments can be much more dangerous than the mobs that give them birth. The Jacobin regime of the French Revolution is a prime example.
Download the PDF from: http://www.caseyresearch.com/go/u44a6-2/MAN
James Otis on the right of the people to alter their government (1764)
The Massachusetts lawyer and revolutionary pamphleteer James Otis (1725–83) argued as early as 1764 that people had a natural right to alter their government and should so by agreement or “compact”:
The form of government is by nature and by right so far left to the individuals of each society, that they may alter it from a simple democracy or government of all over all, to any other form they please. Such alteration may and ought to be made by express compact: But how seldom this right has been asserted, history will abundantly show. For once that it has been fairly settled by compact; fraud force or accident have determined it an hundred times. As the people have gained upon tyrants, these have been obliged to relax, only till a fairer opportunity has put it in their power to encroach again.
Otis drew upon the ideas of John Locke in an important political pamphlet “The Rights of the British Colonies Asserted and Proved” (1764) which he wrote at a very early stage in the American Revolution when there was no consensus about independence from Britain. This was to come some 12 years later when Tom Paine wrote the best-selling “Common Sense” in 1776. In the opening section, Otis examines the origin of government and concludes that every person, when they came of age, had a natural right “to chuse what society he will continue to belong to”. He even seem to presage a version of Herbert Spencer’s notion of “the right to ignore the state” when he admits the right of “the Hermit” to “separate himself” from society. Another quite radical notion was the idea that any new form of government had to be the result of an “express compact” among the people, even though this would be a unique event in history, as governments had always been the result of “fraud force or accident.” Otis may not have fully grasped the significance of what he was arguing for but he helped pave the way for Paine who also had a very radical section in “Common Sense” on the origin of governments.
Everyone should be able to comprehend the law
What you need to know. — Most lawyers don’t have a clue about law! They learn manipulation and procedure. Today Gav shares keys to understanding real law.
What is Law?
Every form of law has it’s boundaries and limits; in legal speak it is called jurisdiction.
In order to comprehend the nature of our rights, it is MOST IMPORTANT to know the basic principles of law. See: https://giftoftruth.wordpress.com/what-is-law/
Once authorities and our governing institutions are seen for what they are, upon which all their exploitation is dependent, belief in authority evaporates and along with it all the power the predatory authority figures hold.
Source extracts from: http://humansarefree.com/2016/02/the-catholic-church-admitted-in-writing.html
Liberty Defined – Ron Paul
It’s all about peoples’ liberty and really nothing else. Congressman and three times Presidential candidate Senator Ron Paul of Texas enjoys a national reputation as the premier advocate for liberty in politics today. This is an excerpt from the introduction of Ron Paul’s book Liberty Defined: 50 Essential Issues that Affect Our Freedom and clearly explains the real problems that every country in the world is facing right now in this US-dominated global hegemony.
04/07/2016 by Ron Paul.
Liberty means to exercise human rights in any manner a person chooses so long as it does not interfere with the exercise of the rights of others. This means, above all else, keeping government out of our lives. Only this path leads to the unleashing of human energies that build civilization, provide security, generate wealth, and protect the people from systematic rights violations. In this sense, only liberty can truly ward off tyranny, the great and eternal foe of mankind…
The crisis demands an intellectual revolution. Fortunately, this revolution is under way, and if one earnestly looks for it, it can be found. Participation in it is open to everyone. Not only have our ideas of liberty developed over centuries, they are currently being eagerly debated, and a modern, advanced understanding of the concept is on the horizon. The Revolution is alive and well.
The goal is liberty. The results of liberty are all the things we love, none of which can be finally provided by government. We must have the opportunity to provide them for ourselves, as individuals, as families, as a society, and as a country.
Read full article at: https://mises.org/library/liberty-defined-2
Download as pdf: LIBERTY DEFINED – RON PAUL
The Presumption of Liberty
The source of pre-existing rights is the nature of Man himself found in natural law, which has a presumption of liberty described in the pdf link below. The purpose of law is to protect the rights of society, carefully tailored so that it does not restrict any pre-existing rights further than necessary to remedy the perceived harm. Download pdf at: http://www.naturallawremedy.com/articles/Section48-The-Presumption-of-Liberty.pdf
What is a ‘man of straw’?
Unbeknownst to most people, government created another type of ‘CITIZEN’ such as ‘JANE DOE’ in an ALL CAPITALS NAME that sounds exactly like Jane Doe’s family name, but it is NOT her! The following clip called “Meet Your Strawman is 5 minutes and explains it perfectly;
The Birth Certificate – Kurt Kallenbach
How to Find Your Strawman Account in the National Treasury
Click on “Individuals”, go to “Tools”, go to “Savings Bonds Calculator” (paper bonds only)”, click “Get Started”,
go to calculator and in “Series” click “Savings Notes’” and denomination $50;
In “Bond Serial Number” type in your birth certificate number ad then your “Issue date” of the birth certificate – month & year of birth, e.g 01/1969;
If you can’t find it in “Savings Bonds”, go to “EE Bonds” and follow the same process.
The following is another way of explaining the difference between a “person” and a “people”; this semantic deceit is happening in every country in the world; it is the one world system;
A Worthy Question— A Name or a Name? – Anna von Reitz
Names in the form: John Mark Doe have to function both on the land and at sea.
On the land they are Trade Names. At sea they are Foreign Situs Trusts. You can’t tell the difference between land jurisdiction Trade Names and sea jurisdiction Foreign Situs Trusts just by looking at them. They appear to be identical.
That’s why FDR’s fraud scheme worked so very well.
So what the Certificate of Assumed Name does is establish the “permanent domicile” of the Name on the land and soil of whichever state, and then goes on to claim the Name in Maritime and Admiralty jurisdictions, too. In those jurisdictions the Name (Admiralty) and the NAME (Maritime) represent corporate and incorporated entities, respectively.
On the land the Name is unincorporated, in Admiralty it is corporate, and in Maritime it is incorporated.
This is the difference between Anna (unincorporated being/ “natural person”), The Anna Company (private company), and Anna, Inc. (corporation).
Visually it looks like this: Anna Maria Riezinger (Trade Name on the land), Anna Maria Riezinger (Foreign Situs Trust on the High Seas), and ANNA MARIA RIEZINGER (incorporated Cestui Que Vie Trust in commerce)…
It will be well-worth your while to study this little discussion and discern the necessity of figuring out the jurisdiction at any given time—and clearly stating the jurisdiction. It’s easy to tell the difference between “Anna Maria Riezinger” and “ANNA MARIA RIEZINGER” —- but you have to define whether that “Anna Maria Riezinger” is standing on the land or floating on the High Seas, because in that case, we could be referencing the Trade Name of a living woman standing on dry land, or we could be referencing a Foreign Situs Trust belonging to a private company operating on the High Seas.
In the Certificate of Assumed Name we are specifically and purposefully addressing the latter case—the Foreign Situs Trust(s) named after the original land jurisdiction Trade Name, and then we go on to address the derivative Municipal corporation franchises dba ANNA MARIA RIEZINGER, ANNA M. RIEZINGER, RIEZINGER, ANNA M. and so on. If you don’t put in your claim for “The Anna Company” version Name and claim the Foreign Situs Trust on the High Seas, you have no standing in their courts and they can “administer” your “Foreign Situs Trust” however they please. Preventing that and retaining control over your name and placing it in proper ownership and character as belonging to an American civilian is the whole reason behind the Certificate of Assumed Name.
Judge Anna von Reitz
The rats seize upon your given name while you are still a babe in your cradle, and they establish a false copyright on it, claiming that it is the name of a debtor to their corporation. They then set up an ACCOUNT in your GIVEN NAME to service the debt. Then throughout your life they have addressed claims against that NAME and they have hired the American Bar Association to operate their corporate tribunals as debt collection agencies under color of law, disguised as American public courts, to collect those debts.
That is the essence of the daily fleecing of America.
It is a little hard to wrap your head around the first go, so let’s examine it step by step and a bit deeper.
A baby— let’s give him the name “Paul Anthony Mitchell” is born in Hennepin County, Minnesota.
What should happen is that his name should be recorded as a land asset. He comes from the land and returns to the land —- “For dust thou art, and to dust returneth”.
This is a recording — not a “registration”.
A recording is a public record of an event or testimony or ownership interest in private property, etc., while a “registration” involves international commerce and involves giving up all or part of your ownership interest in the asset being registered.
Little Paul Anthony Mitchell is the “Holder in Due Course” of the name and estate. His interest must be recorded by his parents or there is no public record in his favor. Instead, the local federal franchise “state” doing business in this case as the “State of Minnesota” registers his name instead, and in so doing, makes him a “ward of the state”.
Once he is a “ward of the state” he becomes property belonging to the state corporation and not to his parents. When he comes of age, if he does not correct this “presumed” political status, he remains a “ward of the state” for the rest of his life—-and the state “inherits” all the benefit of his name and estate. He remains a chattel property and dependent.
This de facto process of undisclosed enslavement has been used against virtually all Americans and this form of slavery has been continuously practiced by the “United States Government” since the 1860’s, first against black people and “rebels” and later against virtually everyone on this continent.
In promoting this practice the vermin responsible have violated both international law and the actual Constitution we are all owed at birth—-and, importantly, they have infringed upon your Common Law Copyright guaranteed by the Copyright Act of 1790.
With the Autograph
From an excellent website to learn from called – Living in the Private
Only you can reserve your natural rights.
Your Living Jurisdiction is declared in your written and spoken words. If you fail to declare your private Living Jurisdiction in the Common Law – the National Law of the Land, the public “legal person actors” will invariably make the “presumption” that you are “acting” as an “accommodation party” in “joinder” to a dead artificial legal “person” NAME, in the Admiralty Maritime Jurisdiction – the International Law of the Sea.
Any registered NAME created by joining a Given appellation (“Given name”) and a Family name, often prefixed with a fictional title such as “Mr/Mrs/Miss” etc., always forms an artificial legal “person”, i.e. MR JOHN DOE, and John Doe, are both dead artificial legal “persons”
The NAME can be described as a “person”, “legal person”, “legal personality”, “artificial person”, “legal fiction”, “ens legis”, “company”, “trade-name”, “vessel in commerce”, “transmitting utility”, “creature of the law”, “Ward of the State”, “employee of the State”, “public servant”, “Estate trust”, “Foreign Situs Trust”, “Cestui Que Vie Estate Trust”, “deceased Estate”, “decedent”, “corporation”, “corpse”, “franchise”, “bankrupt”, “surety”, “accommodation party”, “debtor”, or “debt ledger”. All legally generated fictions are debtors by default, because they are created without any inherent productive capacity.
On any document, to avoid the presumption of “joinder” to one of those dead fictional things, it is at least necessary to use proper grammar, and ideally reserve all your rights. For example: By: John: of the family Doe. All Rights Reserved.
On commercial paper, to avoid the presumption of “joinder” to one of those dead fictional things, bearing liability, it is necessary to separate yourself from the fictional entity by making an unambiguous declaration of your living standing as, for example, the “authorised agent”. This invokes the Common Law of Agency, in which the general rule is that the agent is not liable for the fictional entity/principal, if he/she makes it clear that he/she is the agent. For example: By: John: of the family Doe. Authorised Agent for MR JOHN DOE.
Importantly, a living man or woman is not evidenced by a “signature”. Section 3-401 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), states that a signature can be made (i) manually or by means of a device or machine, and (ii) by the use of any name, including any trade or assumed name, or by any word, mark, or symbol executed or adopted by a “person”. Thus, it is any mark of a corporation.
A “signature” is a “sign” that merely suggests the existence of something else not actually there – it is not evidence of substance and living capacity. Someone who makes a “signature” is an “accommodation party” in “joinder” to an artificial legal “person” NAME, with Dead Status, serving as surety for the corporate national debt in the Admiralty Maritime Jurisdiction – the International Law of the Sea.
Whereas an “autograph” is a graphic from your living hand as a sentient, flesh and blood man or woman – it provides evidence of substance and living capacity, which is why a thumbprint is the ultimate “autograph” for a living man or woman. Someone who makes an “autograph” declares that they are a sovereign man or woman, with Living Standing, in the Common Law Jurisdiction – the National Law of the Land.
Autograph ink is red (life), blue (sea), or purple (royal). Black ink indicates debt and death. For handwritten autographs, the declaration of Living Standing is more important than the colour of the ink, however a thumbprint autograph is always in red ink denoting your lifeblood.
The declaration of Living Standing beneath an autograph can be handwritten, typed, or rubber stamped, and can refer to the Universal Commercial Code (UCC).
Including a reference to the UCC is important if you are autographing paperwork that may later go into a commercial court, because you are citing to the Judge the relevant UCC remedy/recourse for a man or woman in the court’s Admiralty Maritime Jurisdiction – the International Law of the Sea, whereas you wish to retain your standing as a living man or woman in the Common Law Jurisdiction – the National Law of the Land. (They will not admit the jurisdictional difference between an artificial “legal person” and a living “man” or “woman”, because that would disclose that they are deceptively administering the international bankruptcy of your YOURNATION.INC., for which the artificial “legal person” is “surety”.)
Write/print/stamp under your autograph: WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to UCC 1-308
When you use “Without Prejudice UCC 1-308” in connection with your autograph, you are saying: “I reserve my right not to be compelled to perform under any contract, commercial agreement or bankruptcy, that I did not enter knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally. And furthermore, I do not and will not accept the liability of the compelled benefit of any unrevealed contract or commercial agreement or bankruptcy.”
Universal Commercial Code, Article 1, Sub-Section 1-308:
1-308. Performance or Acceptance Under Reservation of Rights.
(a) A party that with explicit reservation of rights performs or promises performance or assents to performance in a manner demanded or offered by the other party does not thereby prejudice the rights reserved. Such words as “without prejudice,” “under protest,” or the like are sufficient.
UCC 1-308 (old 1-207) also states:
The making of a valid Reservation of Rights preserves whatever rights the person then possesses, and prevents the loss of such rights by application of concepts of waiver or estoppel. (UCC 1-308 (old 1-207).7)
When a waivable right or claim is involved, the failure to make a reservation thereof, causes a loss of the right, and bars its assertion at a later date . (UCC 1-308 (old 1-207).9)
The Sufficiency of the Reservation – Any expression indicating an intention to reserve rights, is sufficient, such as “WITHOUT PREJUDICE.” (UCC 1-308 (old 1-207).4)
It is always best to reserve your rights in advance.
“Actually, it is better to use a rubber stamp, because this demonstrates that you had previously reserved your rights. The simple fact that it takes several days or a week to order and get a stamp shows that you had reserved your rights before ‘autographing’ the document.” – The UCC Connection
We have adapted the Emancipation process for people of Southern Africa;
Removing your name from the voter’s roll is removing your consent;
MESSAGE TO POPE FRANCIS TO END WORLD SLAVERY
All current laws are derived from ecclesiastical canons of the Holy See which are merely a continuation of the Holy Roman Empire and much has been transliterated from Babylonian commerce and law which has usurped Mosaic law. Many legal terms of today such as ‘republic’ and ‘citizen’ are derived from Roman law.
Most people do not know that we are still under the yoke of papal bulls and edicts stretching back into the mists of time; remember, Ecclesiastes tell us that ‘nothing under the sun is new’.
The birth certificate upon which corporations and government makes their claim is nothing more than a Roman slave certificate as best described by a fellow truth-seeker:
We, the people in every country and nation know through painful experience that freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed. The answer lies in the fact that there are two types of laws: just and unjust.
We would be the first to advocate the obeying of just laws. People have moral and ethical responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. Gandhi promoted non-violent, yet non-compliant disobedience and declared disobedience of unjust laws a sacred duty. St. Augustine is attributed with saying: “An unjust law is no law at all.”
Judge Anna von Reitz
For many generations, the Doctrine of Scarcity has been enshrined in the politics of the Roman Catholic Church. It has been a core teaching of the Church that the poor are blessed and that there is something precious and noble about the suffering of poverty, starvation and deprivation of all kinds.
Being poor was thought to be a virtue, indeed, a necessity of virtue.
Everything related to a healthy human life– the need to eat and drink and have sex and even wash our bodies— has been denied in the name of the Doctrine of Scarcity.
You have said that you want a “poor Church”. That’s fine. Divest it of its riches, its pomp, its self-adoring and venal glories. Make of it what it was meant to be, a simple fellowship bound together by the Holy Spirit and the teachings of Jesus. Let all the Orders stand in awe of the Franciscans and the other Mendicants, who have placed their faith so utterly beyond the grasp of Mammon.
Indeed, Francis, if there is any virtue in poverty it is simply this—that by being poor, the poor give us the opportunity to grow beyond our own selfishness.
They give the rest of us someone to give to, someone to help who needs help.
And that is a great service to humanity.
I don’t miss the point, I simply know that the same lessons can be learned by other means and that there is no reason to cling to the Doctrine of Scarcity any longer.
This is why I have placed the Credit of Jesus on the books of the Vatican Chancery Court, declared the beginning of the Thousand Years of Peace, authorized the payment of any debts held against any Names, or NAMES, and have initiated the Doctrine of Abundance.
There is no longer any logic to the idea that many must be downcast in order for humanity to be lifted up.
The Doctrine of Scarcity has been a manure pile and yes, from it, our Father has grown roses; but the Doctrine of Abundance is the truth and the law of our Father in Heaven, who has provided far more than enough for all his children to have health and happiness on earth.
So let it be that peace reigns instead of war. Let the truth of abundance overwhelm the lie of scarcity. Let the true knowledge of our Father fill the earth as it has been decreed. And let us enter into the Thousand Years of Peace.
Also from Judge Anna,
YOU KNOW SOMETHING IS WRONG WHEN…
“If you really are serious about knowing how to restore the Republic and your freedom you need to put some effort into knowing how our freedoms are being robbed from us by fraud, deception, threat, duress, coercion, and intimidation every day of our lives and have been for over 100 years by the criminals who have hijacked our government, wealth, and heritage for their own gain and evil intentions.” – Judge Anna von Reitz
Knowledge is power, and the ultimate civil power resides in we, the people. Her website is focused on the U.S.A., but the African story is very similar in it’s essence.
Anna has two books. They are both very important to freedom. Here are the links.
“Disclosure 101” is a compilation of some of her earlier writings: Disclosure 101
“You Know Something Is Wrong When… An American Affidavit of Probable Cause“ is the blockbuster you need to read.
This book blows the lid off the corrupt corporate entity calling itself our government, and shows the entire history of Fraud, Deception, Threat, Duress, Coercion, and Intimidation the perpeTRAITORS have used to steal our entire heritage and prosperity for over 150 years: Get it Here at Amazon
Here are some of her most educational posts:
The Nut is Cracked http://www.annavonreitz.com/nutiscracked.pdf
For a Deeper Understanding http://www.annavonreitz.com/deeperunderstanding.pdf
Defined: The Source of the Fraud! From the Beginning! http://www.annavonreitz.com/defined.pdf
US Corporation Fraud: Why the Courts are at Fault http://www.annavonreitz.com/courtsatfault.pdf
What is the Constitution? http://www.annavonreitz.com/constitution.pdf
Your Offer to Contract is Rejected http://www.annavonreitz.com/youroffertocontract.pdf
Did you give your Consent to any of this? http://www.annavonreitz.com/classicdisinformation.pdf
Judge Anna and her people have filed a commercial lien on the U.S. BAR ASSOCIATION at the end of 2015 and which has now been perfected.
The actual document of the Affidavit of Obligation and Commercial Lien against the American Bar Association http://annavonreitz.com/commerciallien.pdf
Why All Contracts Are Void and Fraud By Nature — Language and Parse Syntax http://annavonreitz.com/voidcontracts.pdf
Are You a Hue-Man? The Entrapment Game on a Global Scale
By Anna Von Reitz
Homo Vishnu Ignoramous Defined
June 11, 2016 by
HUMAN BEING From Latin Humanus= “a lesser/inferior man or woman defined legally as an animal and/or monster as distinct from the ancient (pre Vatican) Roman term homo = man “. A key rule of Law from the 14th Century describing a fundamental legal fiction –that is the notion of an inferior man or woman as an animal (as defined by Papal Decree) and therefore not subject to the laws of free men, but the laws of property. The decision to create a 2nd word for Homo (man), denoting an inferior “animal” man was crucial to the legal implementation of the Vatican global slave trade from the 14th Century–to overcome the questions of legality and morality of the Vatican slave trade. Therefore, unbaptized indigenous populations were legally defined as “humans” –therefore animals. Legally, the name of a human must always be in CAPITALS to identify that individual as property as distinct from a free man.
Humanoid sheep who bear no witness but their programmed delusions…
And who’s their “daddy”;
HOLY SEE – The common English name of the highest legal PERSONALITY under ROMAN LAW and COMMON LAW being the SEDES SACRORUM (Latin Sedes for seat/see, Sacrorum for holy/ holy right) otherwise known as Santa Sede and the “SS.” founded in the 13th Century by AntiPope Innocent IV and Venetian Doge Giovanni (a.k.a. Francis of Assisi). Under both ROMAN LAW and COMMON LAW, all PERSONALITIES are “owned” by the Holy See, also commonly known as the VATICAN which encompasses the legal apparatus by which the ROMAN CULT Pope and its Curia of Bishops claim SOVEREIGNTY over the whole Earth.
The King of Mystery Babylon.
But slavery ended you says? No I says, they perfected servitude so you wouldn’t see it..
From 13th Century Latin status meaning “circumstances, conditions and/or temporary attributes of a PERSON or THING”. In 14th Century, State as defined in English state, French estat and German staat inherited the additional legal meaning of “physical condition as regards form or structure of country, supreme civil power and/or government as a PERSONALITY”. In 17th Century, the word state was further refined in terms of a legal personality by the meaning “a semi-autonomous political entity having legal PERSONALITY subject to higher legal authority”.
From 13th Century as the official mark (brand) of the Sedes Sacrorum (HOLY SEE), especially on official documents. Its presence on a document, design or as part of a uniform has always denoted the object having the full legal rights and effect of ROMAN LAW–a documented legal practice for over 700 years. Since the 17th Century, the mark “SS.” of the HOLY SEE has been most commonly used on official legal documents issued under CHARTER for lands ultimately “owned” by the Vatican. The deliberate fiction created by authors of the earliest LAW DICTIONARIES that such a mark means “to wit; namely” is generally regarded as representing neither historic fact, nor sensible etymological reasoning. The Legal effect of “SS.” on any document signed by an individual, particularly where CONSENT is given is to be treated as a PERSON is to transfer temporal and often “spiritual” ownership to the “SEE”. The most famous use of the official mark of “SS.” of the Holy See was an official ensignia of the Papal Army of the Holy Inquistion also known as the “Knights of the Holy See” or “Nazi SS”.
Do You SEE yet.. You signed over your Spirituality to them..
The Creed of Freedom
– G. Edward Griffin
I believe that only individuals have rights, not the collective group; that these rights are intrinsic to each individual, not granted by the state; for if the state has the power to grant them, it also has the power to deny them, and that is incompatible with personal liberty.
I believe that a just government derives its power solely from the governed. Therefore, the state must never presume to do anything beyond what individual citizens also have the right to do. Otherwise, the state is a power unto itself and becomes the master instead of the servant of society. http://creedoffreedom.com/
Red Pill University
Red Pill University is an outreach project of Freedom Force International.
G. Edward Griffin On The United Nations
The LAWFUL Remedy to Tyranny
How You Lost Your Rights, and How You Can Get Them Back
By Richard Walbaum
Introducing the book…
See the blog.
Paperback and ebook are available: http://www.naturallawremedy.com/
How to Disobey Unjust Laws
Uploaded on Feb 22, 2012
Disobedience is the lawful and recommended remedy to any arbitrary, unreasonable, or unjust law, based upon natural law which is the foundation upon which our nation and constitution were founded. Natural law provides a legal basis to resist tyranny that can be argued in court. This video is based on the book “The LAWFUL Remedy to Tyranny,” available at http://NaturalLawRemedy.com
An example of a Statement of Truth and Lawful Claim:
Denis-Peter has taken steps to prove he is not a Persona, or legal fiction.
These steps are here on Public notice which was neIther challenged, or rebutted:
Your Rights – Southern Africa
We must never forget that the RSA apartheid era and the laws of the 1950s and earlier were “legal”; before that, since the 1910 Union of South Africa era, colonial rule by force of law was “legal”. Since 1994, we have unfortunately drifted away from the 1955 Freedom Charter and 1994 RDP Policy Framework, both which signify the will of many of the people of Southern Africa, towards the Washington Consensus which is also “legal”;
In the 1950s the people could no longer tolerate the racial apartheid regime and united under the Defiance Campaign and the 1955 Freedom Charter is wherein the will of we, the people was established. From this flowed the 1994 Reconstruction & Development Programme Policy Framework.
Since 1994, in the new constitutional era, governance is supposed to be based on the will of the people; the Bill of Rights is supposed to be the supreme law of the land and supposed to be enshrined within the Constitution of South Africa and any conduct or law contrary to the Bill of Rights is supposed to be null and void back to the beginning.
Read further at: https://giftoftruth.wordpress.com/constitutional/
Now, consider that it is the SAME central banking system since 1910 AND the SAME bar associations, law societies, courts and legal system THROUGHOUT ALL 3 ERAS!!! How can we expect a different outcome using the same model.? Every country has its’ own story;
UNITED STATES OF SOUTH AFRICA
This book needs updating but not sure if there will be the time; an Affidavit of Probable Cause on How Southern Africa, instead of marching straight on to Freedom, made a short left towards the Washington Consensus; and, what we, the people can do to fix it; and, in so doing, finally finish the “long walk to freedom” once and for all…
It is a few years old and needs to be updated but mostly relevant.
In Part I we explained exactly what CONSTITUTION OF RSA INC. is;
In Part II we discussed the company registered as RSA INC. and its relationship to the U.S.A.;
In Part III we followed the road leading to Rome and Vatican;
In Part IV we expose the folk treason and that since 1994, the 99% are still being sold down the river;
In Part V we took a look into the occult system and the mind of the occultists;
In Part VI we discover the truth regarding money;
In Part VII we cover the beginning and end of Babylonian commerce;
In Part VIII we lay down the basics of what law is;
In Part IX we highlight what has not been fulfilled in the RDP since 1994;
In Part X we discuss the two outcomes: the new world order that the elite want; and, the new earth that the people want; what will it be?
Facing Eviction, Foreclosure or Repossession?