According to the old idiom – “a fool and his money are soon parted“. But what is never asked of the fool is how did the money got to him/her in the first place? Regardless of by whatever means, what all the fools don’t know is the where, from and how the money derived.
Well…if you’re one of the fools like Rosmah, when “your” money (wealth) is questioned and threatened, you’d be jumping mad and barking the wrong tree. And that’s damned dangerous…soon you and your money are parted.
“Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain – and most fools do.” – Benjamin Franklin
Malaysian PM’s Wife Seeks Central Bank Governor’s Ouster
Two powerful women take center stage in spreading scandal as government clings to power
Prime Minister Najib Razak’s controversial wife, Rosmah Mansor, is trying to drive another powerful woman, internationally respected Bank Negara Governor…
View original post 613 more words
all these laws are only applicable to artificial persons;
there are currently ZERO laws written for the people, by the people;
Unless, you have a flag, constitution, charter or treaty, they will assume that you are travelling in commerce under theirs;
What’s the remedy? The International Tribunal for Natural Justice; http://www.itnj.org;
Have you signed the People’s Treaty, the ITNJ Treaty? well, then get on to it!
There is an established principle in common-law, which holds as much authority as ANY court decision:
“The decree of the sovereign makes the law”
Two weeks before he was taken by empire and their agents, Lovinsky Pierre Antoine personally sent to the Ezili Dantò Network/Free Haiti Movement his July 28, 2007 essay to mark the 92nd anniversary of the terrorizing US occupation of Haiti that lasted for 19 years from 1915 to 1934.
Lovinsky Pierre Antoine is amongst the few national treasures of Haiti. He used his life and professional skills to give voice and a space of validation to the victims, especially to Haitian women, of both the first (1991) and second (2004) Bush regime changes/foreign interventions against Haiti these last twenty-four years.
View original post 2,213 more words
By Armando Cruz
28 July 2015
The political crisis surrounding the investigation into the massive bribes-for-contracts scandal at the Brazilian state-owned oil giant Petrobras has intensified during the recent weeks with the arrest of the CEOs of two of the country’s biggest corporations.
At the same time, the Brazilian federal prosecutor has announced an official investigation of former president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva for supposed “influence peddling” on behalf of one of these corporations, the Odebrecht conglomerate, which includes both the largest construction and petrochemical firms in Latin America.
Marcelo Odebrecht, the CEO of the conglomerate, and Otávio Márques de Azevedo, who heads Andrade Gutiérrez, Brazil’s second-largest construction corporation, were detained and sent to Curitiba, the capital of the southern state of Paraná, to face trial before Sergio Moro, the federal judge and head of the Petrobras investigation, which is known as Operation Car Wash (Lava Jato) because of…
View original post 1,057 more words
Also the president of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Muhammadu Buhari, came to the United States the previous week and held high-level meetings with Obama along with other officials in the State Department and the Pentagon.
Obama’s term ends next year and many have criticized him for not visiting the country where his father was born since he was elected to office in 2008. Kenya has been a longtime ally of the U.S. since the early days of independence in 1963 under the leadership of Jomo Kenyatta, the first president of the East African state.
The president attended a business development conference in Kenya. He emphasized during his trip the much-touted phenomenal economic growth on the continent.
Although there has been the enhanced…
View original post 1,100 more words
Gabe Roth, Fix the Court, joins Thom. According to a new report from “Fix The Court” – three of the nine Supreme Court justices hold common stock in public companies. But the more alarming part of the report is the fact that those justices voted in the interests of their financial holdings a whopping 89 percent of the time in 2014.
Media for the people! Click here to help Rise Up Times continue to bring you essential news you won’t find in the mainstream corporate media. Subscribe or “Follow” us on RiseUpTimes.org. Rise Up Times is also on Facebook! Check the Rise Up Times page for posts from this blog and more! “Like” our page today. Rise Up Times is on Pinterest, Google+ and Tumblr. Find us on Twitter at Rise Up Times (@touchpeace).
“It’s About Time”
There’s a full moon over India and Gandhi lives again
Who’s to say, you have to lose for someone else to win?
In the eyes of all the people, the look is much the same
For the first is just the last one when you play a deadly game
It’s about time we realize it, we’re all in this together
It’s about time we find out, it’s all of us or none
It’s about time we recognize it, these changes in the weather
It’s about time, it’s about changes and it’s about time
There’s a light in the Vatican window for all the world to see
And a voice cries in the wilderness and sometimes he speaks for me
I suppose, I love him most of all when he kneels to kiss the land
With his lips upon our mother’s breast, he makes his strongest stand
It’s about time we start to see it, the earth is our only home
It’s about time we start to face it, we can’t make it here all alone
It’s about time we start to listen to the voices in the wind
It’s about time, it’s about changes and it’s about time
There’s a man who is my brother, I just don’t know his name
But I know his home and family because I know we feel the same
And it hurts me when he’s hungry and when his children cry
I too am a father and that little one is mine
It’s about time we begin it, to turn the world around
It’s about time we start to make it, the dream we’ve always known
It’s about time we start to live it, the family of man
It’s about time, it’s about changes and it’s about time
It’s about peace and it’s about plenty and it’s about time
It’s about you and me together and it’s about time
Songwriters – John Denver, Glen D. Hardin
“This truth is well known among our principal men now engaged in forming an imperialism of Capital to govern the world.
By dividing the voters through the political party system, we can get them to expend their energies in fighting over
questions of no importance. Thus by discreet action we can secure for ourselves what has been so well planned and so
successfully accomplished.” – Sir Denison Miller
By G. T. Maqhubela
27 July 2015
The tripartite alliance partners of the ruling African National Congress (ANC), the Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU) and the Stalinist South African Communist Party (SACP), held emergency national congresses this month in an attempt to overcome the social crisis which threatens to engulf them.
Among the usual blather and infighting, the key resolutions of the twin congresses was that neither COSATU nor the SACP would break out of the alliance and contest elections independently of the ANC.
At present, among others, SACP General-Secretary Blade Nzimande, his deputy Jeremy Cronin, Deputy Chairperson Thulas Nxesi and Central Committee members Rob Davies, Yunus Carrim and Buti Manamela serve as ministers or deputy ministers in the Cabinet of President Jacob Zuma. ANC Secretary-General Gwede Mantashe is also an SACP Central Committee member, while multimillionaire Deputy President Cyril Ramaphosa first came to prominence as a bureaucrat…
View original post 1,065 more words
Source – expandedconsciousness.com
– There are important changes happening on so many levels in our society. Collectively we are waking up, driven by the deep lack of satisfaction that we have for the way our social systems are designed and the destructive impacts that they’ve had both on humanity and the environment. Inspiringly, these changes are being led by many people who have devoted their lives to the cause.
View original post 1,110 more words
I love it; Judge Anna can say it in the way most people can get;
Regarding Francis; he has mostly made all the right moves so far …
we will know by October if this was a Jesuit coup and part of the NWO, or reformation in the interest of the people;
If not, we will take action …
On Jul 25, 2015, at 2:08 PM, Anna von Reitz <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
The corporations that the Global Estate Trust allowed to run wild have caused terrible problems for the environment— Fukashima, chem trails, “uranium enriched” artillery shells and radioactive dust pollution, pollution of major aquifers,etc.,etc., etc., and their meddling with the gas plasma of the upper atmosphere has additionally caused changes in the jet stream that are in turn causing MORE problems…..
Nobody has money to pay for cleaning this up, least of all the corporations that caused the problems— which have all conveniently gone bankrupt.
So, it comes back to you and I to fund the clean up, because we and our assets are the only sources of wealth that ever existed in the first place.
And we do have a stake in undertaking this work, because it is our world that is messed up—our earth, our air, our…
View original post 2,342 more words
Methinks that because they are speaking out against climate-change, We, the People should be there in September and at every occasion to remind them that it’s NOT ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE !!!
IT’S ABOUT REGIME CHANGE !!!;
Time to nip Pax Romana in the bud; we will be filing on the unholy sea with the ITNJ (www.itnj.org) by early 2016;
This brings to mind my favourite song by John Denver:
“It’s about time, it’s about changes, and it’s about time”
Very interesting, thanks; the missing word is ‘monster’ …
Why? you might ask; when I read your post, it raised the issue of human being and it’s definitions, so here is the answer 🙂 and my favourite piece of research:
To Be or Not To Be a Human Being?
(By Randy Lee in The Christian Jural Society News.)
From Ballentine’s Law Dictionary, 1948 Edition. ‘Human Being’ is defined as follows: ‘See monster’ . From the same dictionary, ‘monster’ is defined: ‘A human-being by birth, but in some part resembling a lower animal.’
This is an unusual definition, but like all Law Dictionaries on this subject, a non-definition. It only states that a ‘human being’ is a higher animal. It is not found anywhere in Scripture that a Christian Man or Woman is an animal or part of the animal kingdom. This being the case, then what exactly is a ‘human being.’
From the Oxford New English Dictionary of 1901, ‘human’ is defined as, ‘3. Belonging or relative to man as distinguished from God or superhuman beings; pertaining to the sphere or faculties of man (with implication of limitation or inferiority); mundane; secular. (Often opposed to divine.)’
‘Secular’ being the important word here, we look to the multi-definitions in the 1992 Random House Webster’s College Dictionary: “Secular’ adj. 1. of or pertaining to worldly things or to things not regarded as sacred: temporal. 2. not relating to or concerned with religion (opposed to sacred). 3. concerned with non-religious subjects. 4. not belonging to a religious order: not bound by monastic vows.”
Could it be that ‘human’ means un-Godly. From the same dictionary, a look at a combination of the two: ‘Secular humanism’ n. any set of beliefs that promotes human values without specific allusion to religious doctrines.” And, “‘ secularism’ n. 1. secular spirit or tendency, esp. a system of political or social philosophy that rejects all forms of religious faith or worship. 2. the view that public education and other matters of civil policy should be conducted without the influence of religious beliefs.”
In conjunction with this, from Collier’s New Dictionary of the *English Language, 1928. ‘humanitarian’ is defined: n. ‘a philanthropist: an anti Trinitarian who rejects the doctrine of Christ’s divinity; a perfectionist.: From the above Random House Dictionary, “humanitarianism’ is defined: n. ‘the doctrine that humankind may become perfect without divine aid.’
With no definition of ‘human being’ in Law, Mellinkoff’s Dictionary of American Legal Usage, 1992, defines ‘Person’ as, 1.”a human being–without regard to sex, legitimacy, or competence. This person is the central figure in law, as elsewhere, characterized by personal attributes of mind, intention, feelings, weaknesses, morality common to human beings; with rights and duties under the law. This is the person, sometimes called an individual, and often referred to in the law as a natural person, as distinguished from an artificial person (sense 3).”
Of course, ‘morality common to human beings’ is not explained, because that would reveal to much. Again, in Shawmut Bank, N.A. vs. Valley Farms, (610A.2d652,654) it states, “For purpose of statute protecting certain property from post-judgment remedies, and therefore from prejudgment attachment, ‘natural person’ means ‘human being’, not artificial or juristic person”.
So, if natural person and human being are considered the same in the law, let’s take a closer look at what a ‘natural person’ is. As you may know, all government codes, rules and regulations only attach to corporations, partnerships and natural persons. In American law, it seems that a definition of ‘natural person’ does not exist. To get any idea of what a natural person is, we have to go to English law. In the 17th Century, Lord Coke differentiated between ‘natural persons’ and ‘moral persons in a community’ in the following statement from his Institututes:… “we must observe, that estate is defined by the civilians, the capacity of moral persons; for, as natural persons have a certain space in which their natural existence is placed, and in which they perform their natural actions, so have persons in a community a certain state or capacity, in which they are supposed to exist, to perform their moral acts, and exercise all civil relations,”… (2 Inst. 669).
With ‘natural man’ being the same as ‘natural person’, we find further evidence of exactly what a ‘human being’ is. From the above Random House Dictionary, page 901, ” ‘Natural’ adj. 17. natural man: unenlightened or unregenerate.” From the same Dictionary, page 1461, ” ‘unregenerate’ 1. not regenerate; unrepentant. 2. unconvinced by or unconverted to a particular religion, sect, or movement. 4. wicked; sinful; dissolute. 5. an unregenerate person.”
In conjunction with this, from The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, 1933, ‘naturalism’ is defined as: ‘a system of morality or religion having a purely natural basis; a view of the world, and of man’s relationship to it, in which only the operation of natural, as opposed to supernatural or spiritual, laws and forces is assumed.’ and ‘naturalist’ is defined as: ‘One who follows the light of nature, as contrasted with revelation.’
And, of course, the Scriptures being the final authority, confirms all of the above, at
1 Corinthians 3:14, “But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.”
Therefore, when a Christian calls him or herself a ‘human being’, they are saying, “I’m an animal; I’m non-religious; I’m unrepentant: I’m wicked, sinful and dissolute; I’m able to do all things and be perfect without Jesus Christ; I’m subject to man’s law, rather than God’s Law.” Randy Lee
Now you can see how much fun the cabal have been having with us …
the intention was NOT to explain the process, but to get people to realize there are other forms of currency;
However, you have a VERY interesting scenario; If I was you, I would look at the following options:
1. In the absence of ANY documentation, we create and file a common-law express trust with the Master of the Supreme Court where YOU are now the trustee on the land, your strawman is the beneficiary in the sea and you are dealing at arm’s length;
In court, learn how to decree a common-law court (audio lectures http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org) if the judge refutes the express trust he/she MUST prove the contrary;
we have done an express trust manual with templates:
https://giftoftruth.wordpress.com/express-trusts/ which were adapted to South African law from US manuals such as Redemption manual which has US templates with USC. civil code references & Foreclosure Defence Handbook by Vince Kahn who is, in my opinion one of the leading experts in UCC; you may try get hold of him:
UCC: PART 4. REGISTRATION
§ 8-401. DUTY OF ISSUER TO REGISTER TRANSFER.
Now this part explains how an ISSUER transfers a Security Certificate;
An UN-ABRIDGED or VAULT birth certificate (the one that can be legalised or appostilled by your states laws) IS a security certificate;
If you endorse (read UCC on endorsements) the birth certificate and transfer it from home affairs to the secretary of the state (your banker/securities intermediary) with a security bond (in our templates) THEN YOU are now the ENTITLEMENT HOLDER and YOU are now the ISSUER (technically, your strawman is the issuer/beneficiary/secured party debtor and you are the agent/trustee/creditor); this is VERY simplified; and VERY tricky … if you are not confident in securities and securities trading then leave it alone! Just do a search on people such as Cody Banks and Tim Turner … 25 years is a long time … ;
ALTERNATELY: The safest route and the one I believe we should all follow and accept as done, is the filings of the now foreclosed One People’s Public Trust; they did a legal and lawful foreclosure on the ENTIRE system; all UCC filing documents are at http://www.i-uv.com;
Now there is a lot of controversy around this lot, but my research leads me to believe that Heather Tucci-Jarrief and the others who assisted her know their stuff; she also wrote the report that blew the whistle on global bankruptcy OPERATION PARADIGM BULLET REPORT;
We use those UCC filings in our court cases as legitimate proof of where our value lies upon which commercial claims are made; we used this process successfully in a deceased estate with a shortfall of half a million to the banks; we filed the express trust documents and a security bond for 100 million, backed by the security of UCC Doc # 2013031779 (the OPPT filing);
We never heard from the court or the banks again and the Master of the High Court refused to comment after our 3rd Notice of settlement;
On a private note, what you are doing is commendable; I, on the other hand un-plugged as my defiance to Babylon and the Beast, revoked my citizenship, cancelled all contracts, accounts everything; wrote to the pope and told him I am baptized outside ALL churches on God’s Creation and my only contract is between me and my Creator, the Great Mystery.
I am probably the first in the last century who has been acknowledged in a South African court as a man, on record, representing others in defence of their non-derogable rights and because of this precedent, others may now follow; One cannot serve two masters … I wish you success in your quest;
If you have no success, you may wish to file with the International Tribunal for Natural Justice (www.itnj.org)
Hope this helps; in peace, bt
On Jul 25, 2015, at 4:50 PM, HI&RH Prince William-Bullock III: Stewart <email@example.com> wrote:
To whomever posted the Hey Stupid you don’t know jack article,
I have given the article a quick review.
If I understand it correctly, the article presumes that individuals have not filed their UCC-1 to claim their birth certificate trust, and tells them to claim their trust.
I and others I know have done this, and given notice in the public record and by explicit notice to various government agencies and office holders.
The article mentioned above seems to claim that we will then get the trust, but fails to explicitly detail how to claim this cestique trust bond and other assets of the cestique trust.
We are sovereigns, and our status has been recognized in official acts by the STATE OF NEW YORK, pursuant to Fed. R. of Civ. Proc. rule 9(d), and Fed. R…
View original post 261 more words
It seems that we have reached the final stages of the Illuminati plan which includes the destruction of Israel:
On August 15, 1871, Pike told Mazzini that “after World War Three is ended, those was aspire to un-disputed world domination will provoke the greatest social cataclysm the world has ever known.”
Cuy Curr, W. (1958; Pawns in the Game.) indicates that Albert Pike (1809-1891) wrote in 1871 to Guisepe Mazzini (1805-1872); on p.xv:
“Pike’s plan was as simple as it has proved effective. He required that Communism, Naziism, Political Zionism, and other international movements be organized and used to foment the three global wars and the three major revolutions.
The First World War was to be fought so as to enable the Illuminati to over throw the powers of the Tzars in Russia and turn that country into the stronghold of Atheistic Communism. The differences stirred up by agentur of the Illuminati between the British and German Empires were to be used to foment the war. After the war ended, Communism was to be built up and used to destroy other governments and religions.
World War Two, was to be fomented by using the differences between Fascists and Political Zionists. This war was to be fought so that Naziism would be destroyed and the power of Political Zionism increased so that the sovereign state of Israel could be established in Palestine. During world war two, International Communism was to be built up until it equalled in strength to that united Christendom. At this point it was to be contained and kept in check until required for the final social cataclysm…..
World War Three is to be fomented by using the differences the agentur of the Illuminati stir up between Political Zionists and the leaders of the Moslem world. The war is to be directed in such a manner that Islam (the Arab World including Mohammedanism) and Political Zionism (including the State of Israel) will destroy themselves while at the same time the remaining nations, once more divided against each other on this issue, will be forced to fight themselves into a state of complete exhaustion physically, mentally, spiritually and economically….On August 15, 1871, Pike told Mazzini that after World War Three is ended, those was aspire to undisputed world domination will provoke the greatest social cataclysm the world has ever known.”
Seems right on cue …
The UN’s 54-nation Economic and Social Council adopted a resolution on Monday that names the world’s only – only – violator of economic and social rights in the world, UN Watch reports. Which country did a majority of 42 states including all EU members condemn? If you guessed Iran, Syria, Russia, Saudi Arabia, or any other likely candidate, then you haven’t been paying attention to world affairs or the United Nations since the establishment of the nation of Israel.
That’s right, Israel.
Only Australia and the U.S. opposed the resolution. Honduras and Panama abstained, and eight other countries were absent.
The resolution charges Israel with such crimes as “destruction of homes and properties, economic institutions and agricultural lands and orchards in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, as well as in the occupied Syrian Golan”; of the “exploitation of natural resources”; and of “the dumping of all kinds of…
View original post 152 more words
Yes, you are correct;
There is NO current lawful governance; elections are fraudulent because the people were not informed that they are in reality, voting for a corporate state;
Only a REFERENDUM is a lawful vote of the people; can you remember when last you had a referendum?
It’s simple really: we are doing the same in RSA; ask this question:
Is the current form of governance based on the Will of We, the People? Yes or No?
Here is your referendum; In USA 5000 signatures got your attention a few years ago; now, they have upped it to 100 000;
This is very achievable if one involves the common-law grand juries;
Have fun; in peace
THANK YOU FOR YOUR MESSAGE.
However I must ask a question?
If the government of the American people only exists as a corporate fiction and the corporation misrepresenting itself as the government of the American people is by the act of misrepresenting itself is clearly based on fraud, there is no lawful and legitimate government of the people.
That being the case, by what lawful authority do the states claim legitimacy? There is no lawful authority to issue the lawful state or even the impostor state a charter.
Since the current states are all misrepresenting themselves as the lawful state governments of the people, they too fail to be legitimate. Well if the state or the impostor itself is acting in fraud, then there is no legitimate authority to issue corporate charters in any state.
The conclusion to which I arrive?
There are no corporations in America lawfully chartered…
View original post 264 more words
“It’s about time, it’s about changes, and it’s about time.” – John Denver
We can forget about kicking the can down the road; take way people’s safety net and they will start creating their own as we are already doing; this beast is eating itself by the tale; time to get out of dodge; in peace