In Part I we explained exactly what CONSTITUTION OF RSA INC. is; in Part II we discussed the company registered as RSA INC. and its relationship to the U.S. In Part III we followed the road leading to Rome; in Part IV we show sufficient reason that the 99% are still being sold down the river; in Part V we took a look into the mind of the occultists; in Part VI we discover the truth regarding money; in Part VII we cover the beginning and end of Babylonian commerce;
Knowledge is Power dear people, there is only one remedy in the law and that is knowledge of the concepts of law and knowledge of the truth of law; it has taken some people a lifetime to study all manner of laws to arrive at the same or similar simple truths;
So, we learnt from the long and hard studies of ‘old authorities’, philosophers, lawmakers and modern judicial activists and sovereigns; because we no longer have the luxury of time, we have had to learn on the run; so, we went down the rabbit holes so that you no longer have to go there; and, that future generations do not have to go there, either;
There is only ONE LAW: “Do no harm, cause, no loss, let freedom rein.”
And, to apply 5 basic ethics: truth, integrity, accountability, responsibility and transparency at all times;
And, if anyone is accused of doing harm or causing loss, as sovereigns they have the right to a fair trial; and, that means in a community court, free from legal fiction, before a hearing or jury of their peers; and, wherein disputes are heard based on facts not law-of-the-sea rules; therefore, without attorners, lawyers or BAR members;
Maxim – Judges do not answer questions of fact; juries do not answer questions of law. 8 Coke, 308; Co.Litt. 295.
In community courts, the hearing or jury of people are the judges ; while, the judge is merely a wise elder or arbitrator; and, NOT a BAR member; the arbitrator merely ensures proceedings are fair and impartial; and, both disputants represent themselves, so there is no need for lawyers; and, a unanimous decision is binding and enforceable;
In community courts, even a Justice or a President can be held accountable as a public servant to the people for their actions or non-actions; in this way can we pierce the corporate veil and lift those out from behind the legal fictions they hide behind; especially, for causing harm or loss to the 99%, the people, their health, their property, their rights, the environment and or the earth; with community courts will the corrupt and greedy and power hungry quickly be de-throned and brought down to an equal footing; and, no longer do we have to say “All SHALL BE equal before the law”, but “All ARE equal before the law!”
Every Bill of Rights declares the right to a fair trial; it is an unalienable antecedent right; the SA Bill of Rights states in Section 34. Access to courts – Everyone has the right to have any dispute that can be resolved by the application of law decided in a fair public hearing before a court or, where appropriate, another independent and impartial tribunal or forum.
And, for members of the juries or hearings to apply principles of Restorative Justice, meaning that the harm or loss must cease against the victim;
The Retributive Justice of the Sea Lords and their system of imprisonment is archaic and a violation of natural law, itself; nowhere in nature do we see one creature holding another captive; captivity and punishment is what a feudal system metes to its captives and slaves; this is not what reasonable people, equals and peers do to their neighbour; because this is not what we would want someone else do to us;
“True justice is seeking reconciliation and not retribution.” Albie Sachs
To uphold The Golden Rule: to love your neighbour as you love yourself;
So too, judge them as you would judge yourself; but, remember that we are all sinners and therefore no-one is really in any position to judge anyone else;
Judge not, lest ye be judged.
Where your rights end, mine begins.
And, the law-of-peace is supreme;
Brief History the Laws of England
Now, it was the Norman invasion of William “The Conqueror” that destroyed the customary laws and oral traditions of the indigenous peoples of the British Isles, forever; no different to what was done throughout the “age of discovery”, even to this day;
The Normans justified their invasions with Merchant Pirate Law and Admiralty Law, the law-of-the-sea, the law-of-war; of taking prize, sharing the spoils and levying duties, fees, tribute and taxes on “conquered peoples”; and, along with them came the papal artificers with their Necromancer Law, the [un]’civil’ Law; employing their crafty and deceitful spell-ings and spell-bindings upon the ignorant; and, by employing the written word do they entrap a man’s life and very soul into pieces of paper; in this way did they turn English into “Dog-Latin”;, today known as Legalese; they brought the legal fiction, CORP[S]orations and created the ‘cult of personality’ we live in today; first, they perverted the good laws of England then they perverted the good laws of commerce; interestingly, 3 letters were added to the English alphabet: J, U, W… this is the Zionists trying to give Judaism a bad name;
So, with the smoke and mirrors of great pomp and ceremony do these Sea Lords and BAR members ply their trade of ‘piracy on the high seas’, way beyond their sea jurisdiction, which is 200 nautical miles from the shore of sovereign states; and, across the lands of sovereign peoples and their sovereign states;
WITH NO APPARENT AUTHORITY OR JURISDICTION!!!
THEIR AUTHORITY IS ALL ASSUMED AND PRESUMED!!!
Ask any BAR member under what authority or jurisdiction are they operating?
Now, Sea Courts give your “person” a choice to plead innocence, guilt or remain silent; however, by their own rules, if one challenges their jurisdiction they may not proceed; however, sovereigns know these pirates barge ahead, notwithstanding;
You as a living, breathing soul have antecedent natural Creator-given rights that existed long before pirate laws invaded our lands; the sea court may have jurisdiction over your “person”, but not over you, the natural man or woman;
These sea courts only have jurisdiction, IF you consent to their ACTings; but, if you challenge their jurisdiction they may not proceed; however, with crafty and deceitful spell-ing and spell-binding in their Temple Courts do these whited sepulchres entrap and “press-gang” the innocent; and, employ semantic deceit under colour of law to garner a semblance of consent; thereby giving agents “licence” to seize and pirate away your freedoms, your peace, your life, your property, your rights…
The merchant money-changers have perverted the good laws of commerce; and, perverted law-of-the-land with the twisted reasoning of the law-of-the-sea, a piratical feudal system, to justify their plunder; and, to indoctrinate the ignorant public into believing that the law-of-the-sea has jurisdiction on the land and over the tangible; when, in truth, what pirates call “law” is merely the rules of business and commerce of and between pirates; and, it only applies to pirates: those ACTing as BAR members, corporations, agents and employees; that is why you cannot represent your “person” in their courts; and, if you listen carefully to their words, they can only argue about their silly rules, nothing else; if, one takes away their rules one will find no substance to their argument at all; to them it is all just one big act and all the world’s a stage, but they fail to look at the millions of un-dignified, artificial man-made asset forfeitures, bankruptcies, evictions, poverty, un-employment and such like; causing untold indignities, stress and trauma to more than half the peoples of earth;
And, these pirates wrote millions of rules to make it look even more imposing and impossible to make head or tail of it; but, we do not need to know it all, dear people; we only need to know, the boundaries and limits of the different laws; it is known as jurisdiction; the truth is that with every new definition and rule made, the boundaries and limits are being greyed beyond recognition; it is time to re-draw the lines of jurisdiction;
Maxim – The order of things is confounded if every one preserve not his jurisdiction. 4 Inst. Proem.
In this Part you will find more knowledge of law than in any BAR legal course or seminar;
Law of Nations
The people of earth are tired of war; they are tired of being ruled by tyrants; and, no self-identifying community wants to be ruled by another; more and more people are realising that autonomy, direct democracy, self-governance and self-determination is the solution for each and every sovereign community; and, this also applies to republican forms of government and to direct democracy the people shall govern;
Sir William Blackstone, an ‘old authority’ of England proclaimed”
“However, as it is impossible for the whole race of mankind to be united in one great society, they must necessarily divide into many; and form separate states, commonwealths, and nations, entirely independent of each other, and yet liable to a mutual intercourse. Hence arises a third kind of law to regulate this mutual intercourse, called ” the law of nations:” which, as none of these states will acknowledge a superiority in the other, cannot be dictated by any ; but depends entirely upon the rules of natural law, or upon mutual compacts, treaties, leagues, and agreements between these several communities : in the construction also of which compacts, we have no other rule to resort to, but the law of nature ; being the only one to which all the communities are equally subject : and, therefore, the civil law very justly observes, that quod naturalis ratio inter omnes homines constituity vacatur Jus gentium.”
Commentaries on the Laws of England Volume I; ON THE NATURE OF LAWS IN GENERAL; page 44
QUOD NATURALIS RATIO INTER OMNES HOMINES CONSTITUIT, VOCATUR JUS GENTIUM. That which natural reason has established among all men is called the “law of nations.” 1 Bl.Comm. 43; Dig. 1, 1, 9; Inst. 1, 2, 1.
Therefore, the following is written with people sovereignty in mind; as well as peoples’ common laws, customary laws and oral traditions in mind, simply put, the law-of-the-land; and, not to be confused with the feudal law-of-the-sea the BAR legal system punts; because, although legal by law-of-the-sea feudal and pirate standards, it is odious, illegitimate and unlawful according to sovereign peoples and peoples law-of-the-land; and, is as a result null and void; back to its beginnings; fraud vitiates everything;
Hierarchy of Law
The highest law is the unseen Divine law; from the unseen laws of the universe flow the physical Natural laws;
From Divine and Natural laws flow reason of Mind; being an edict given by a council of wise elders or jurists; and, nothing absurd and without good reason may be considered law; The third highest law is the law of the people as the consent and will of the people is the source of true authority;
When mankind started bartering and trading Commercial law was born; we then invented many creative and innovative ways of commerce; and, communities started making rules based on experiences from disputes with bad people; thus, the common law and, customary law was born;
Then mankind created pieces of paper and called it “government”; and, these fictions were meant to only protect the peoples’ property and their rights and to provide them with services; but, the rules of these pieces of paper were perverted to a point where the paper fiction now claims to rule over the living; the “created” now claims to be the “creator”… so too, have faceless harmful “corporations” plundered the earth and its peoples un-abated; it is time to unbind the incantations of the artificers of law; it is time to sift through the ashes of law; and, gather all the good and just maxims, parables, principles, proverbs and stories; and, return back to ME [morals and ethics] because we are all lost at sea…
Rule of Law
Honour and respect every sovereign community’s rule of law; and,
Allow each community the unalienable right of, and to, self-determination; and,
Allow each self-determining community, hereinafter ‘state’, the unalienable right to govern themselves by their own customs and rules, without interference; and,
Allow each and every state to freely choose and make use of their own divine laws; and, by their own private beliefs; and,
For every state to uphold equality, fairness, freedom, justice and the One Law; and, Allow each community to keep and use the good and just teachings and wisdoms of the ancient laws, wise ancestors and founders they so freely choose; and, Restore the states’ customary rule of law where it has been taken from them; and,
Revolving local committees and local juries wherein everyone gets a fair and equal turn to make decisions on behalf of their own local community; and,
Each to serve their local community and its needs with accountability, integrity, responsibility, transparency and truth at all times; and, To hear all who seek to transact with or bring issue against another people; To peacefully resolve and settle any and all controversies and disputes; and,
And, failing in peace between states, the lawful right of self-defence of one state against harm or invasion from another country or state; and,
The law-of-peace is supreme in all cases and must be abided by and be enforceable against those who live by and profit from law-of-war; and,
War must never be condoned; and,
All weapons of mass destruction be abolished and de-commissioned;
There was, there is, there will be only One Law; simply put:
“Do no harm, cause no loss, let freedom reign.”
All law is equal that no one is above it; All law is measured that all may learn and know it; All law is a standard that it may always be applied the same; A law is a precedent that was set by the unanimous decisions and rulings of community courts, juries, hearings, tribunals and Truth & Reconciliation Commissions by, for and of the people; and,
The laws of autonomous, sovereign, self-determining communities and or peoples prohibits or permits things; A rule is a bar, custom, maxim, measure or standard; A rule may be derived by consent, custom, discovery or instruction; The weakest rule is that of tyranny, an absolute despotism, as any rule without authority or right but merely by force cannot be sustained; and, which the people shall eventually overcome; and, render such unjust rules as dust; This has been the law of all great civilizations and no king or assembly or city has lived in ignorance of these foundations of Rule of Law:
All law be spoken as it is the spirit of the word that carries the authority; therefore, all action under law be by word of mouth; and, writing be only for memory and trade and never be the law; All are equal before the law; All are accountable and answerable to their peers; All are without blemish until proven culpable; Where there is a law there must be a cause; Where there is a law there must be restoral or restitution; Where there is a law there must be a remedy; An action in law cannot proceed without first a cause; Restoral or restitution is not granted to one who has not suffered harm or loss; The action of a valid law can do no harm and cause no loss; An action decided in law must reflect cause of such action; No injury to the law means no valid cause for action by law; No action through law can arise from a fraud; No action through law can arise in bad faith or prejudice; An action does not make one accountable unless there be harm or loss;
No one may suffer loss by valid law for mere intent; No one is punished for the transgression of an ancestor or another; No one can derive an advantage in law from his own wrong; What is invalid from the beginning does not become valid over time; No one is accused of the same exact cause twice; No one be a judge over his own matter; No one possess the authority to be both judge and executioner; No penalty may exist without a valid law; The immediate cause and not the remote cause be the subject of law; These be the foundations of Rule of Law.
As to justice it be the maxim that Justice never contradicts the rule of law;
Justice be the lawful right of use of all that has been defined by law; and, Justice be the rights of all people as equals and peers to adjudicate the law; and, Justice be an independent and impartial tribunal, hearing or jury of peers wherein all solemnly agree that their ‘yes’ is their ‘yes’; and, their ‘no’ is ‘no’; and,
True Justice is seeking Reconciliation and not retribution; therefore the Principles of Restorative Justice be applied at all times and in all cases;
Most countries are following the accusatorial, punitive and retributive system of justice of the feudal system since it set foot on our shores; and,
Retributive Justice is foreign to most peoples that followed Restorative Justice Philosophies and principles;
Restorative Justice identifies the victim; and
Restorative Justice seeks to ensure that harm and loss on the victim ceases; and,
Restorative justice seeks restoral and restitution of what was taken without consent;
Divine Law is the law that defines the Divine and all creation; and, Through Life and Living expresses the soul and mind and instruction of the Divine; and,
The operation of the will of the Divine Creator through existence; and, All valid rights and Justice is derived from Divine Law and Natural Law;
Natural Law is the law that defines the operation of the will of the Divine through the existence of form and sky and earth and physical rules; therefore, Natural Law governs the operation of what we can see and name;
Natural Law is based on universal principles which agree with the nature and state of people without which the peace and happiness of society can never be preserved; Knowledge of natural laws may be attained merely by reason and from facts that agree with human nature;
Natural Law exists regardless of whether it is enacted as statutory law; Two of the most basic tenets of Natural Law are:
- That it is unlawful to harm others; and
- That it is lawful to prevent deliberate harm from occurring or continuing if one has reasonable ability to do so.
The Golden Rule compels us to intervene when basic rights violations take place; Natural Law provides people with the right to sanctuary, the right to contract voluntarily provided that we are trustworthy, and the right to obtain all knowledge necessary for a truly viable future, amongst other rights;
These rights are to be enjoyed by all men and women, and never be the monopolized “property” of any group that isolates itself from the whole;
“Sovereignty itself is… not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law… while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts.” Justice Thomas Stanley Matthews in Yick Wo v. Hopkins [p. 370]:
The 1776 Declaration of Independence of the 13 united States of America declares: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”
“The words “sovereign state” are cabalistic words, not understood by the disciple of liberty, who has been instructed in our constitutional schools. It is our appropriate phrase when applied to an absolute despotism. The idea of sovereign power in the government of a republic is incompatible with the existence and foundation of civil liberty and the rights of property.” Gaines v. Buford, 31 Ky. (1 Dana) 481, 501.
The people have no accountability to their creation, the state, save before a hearing of peers; and,
The laws of the people are the precedents set by the unanimous rulings of juries or peers in community courts, public hearings, tribunals or Truth & Reconciliation Commissions by, for and of the people; and,
Wherein disputes are heard according to the facts and not BAR rules; and,
Recognised as being lawful in the eyes of the local community; and,
Wherein disputes affecting the local community, be with the full consent and participation of the local community; For the good governance of a society under the Rule of Law the laws of People are always inherited from Natural Law; A man-made rule cannot abrogate or usurp a Natural Law; Nor, is it possible for a Natural Law to usurp Divine Law; These then be the foundations of Justice;
All possess the Right: to be heard even if such speech be controversial; of free will and choice to choose their actions and destiny; of reason that distinguishes them from lesser animals; to informed consent or to withdraw their consent; over their body that none may claim their flesh; of their divine self that none may claim their soul; not to foreswear or make oath, but for their ‘yes’ to be ‘yes’ and their ‘no’ to be ‘no’; to not claim servitude or obligation of suretyship and or usury such an abomination, For such Rights are granted solely by the Creator, to each people as they believe; And no man or body of jurists have the authority to usurp one’s Creator;
All true authority and power to rule is inherited from one’s Creator and only to those men of good faith and good character and good conscience; who then make a solemn affirmation in trust and form an office into which such Divine Rights are conveyed for only so long as they honour their word and duties to serve the people; for, whenever a man gives his word to form a sacred trust of office, then breaks such an oath through prejudice or unclean hands or bad faith, then all such authority and power ceases from them and the trust dissolved;
Verily, no man may serve the people unless his word and honour is sacred; therefore guard your behaviour and actions of office; Though the heavens appear to fall, let justice always be done. These be the foundations of Justice.
As to the administration of Justice these be the foundations of Due Process: No valid action in law proceeds without first a valid cause; And no valid cause exists until such claim is first tested; Thus the birth of all action in law must begin with the claim; If a claim be not proven as a valid cause then the accused has nothing to answer; Yet, if the claim be proved to have merit as a cause, then all valid causes in law must be resolved; Thus, he who first brings the claim must first prove its merit, as the burden of the proof lies upon him who accuses not he who denies. A heavy obligation rests on one who first brings the controversy, for one who brings false accusation is the gravest of transgressors, in that it injures not only one law, but all law; Thus a valid claim in part is one in which an accuser makes a complaint, bringing two witnesses as proof and petitions a forum of law for remedy;
If merit of a cause be proved, the one accused must appear to answer; The one accused and any witnesses appear by summons; When anyone be summonsed, they must appear without hesitation; If, one is summonsed and does not appear or refuses to appear to answer, then let him be forced to appear; When anyone who has been summonsed seeks to evade, or attempts to flee, let the one who summons lay hands on them to prevent their escape; One who flees fair judgment confesses his guilt;
If illness or old age hinder the appearance of the one summonsed, let the one who made the summons provide a basic means of transport;
When men wish to settle their dispute among themselves then they shall have the right to make peace; If a dispute cannot be settled before seeking a judge then both the accused and the accuser must be granted equal hearing;
The accused cannot be judged until after the accusations be spoken; And, then after the accused exercises or declines their three rights to defence; The first being Prolocution and the right to speak as a matter of law; And, why the complaint and investigation should not continue; The second being Collocution as to why the complaint and accusation is false; And, upon such proof why the burden should now be placed on the accuser; And, the third being Adlocution being a final speech in defence against a complaint or accusation having been heard; An accused cannot be found guilty unless three pieces of evidence or facts be attributed;
Judges are bound to explain the reason of their judgment; The setting of the sun shall be the extreme limit of time within which a judge must render their decision; These be the foundations of Due Process, Rule of Law and Justice; Any law that is against such truth, cannot be law.
CANONS OF JUDICIAL ETHICS
– Ancient Precedents
And I charged your judges at that time, saying Hear the causes between your brethren, and judge righteously between every man and his brother, and the stranger that is with him. Ye shall not respect persons in judgment; but ye shall hear the small as well as the great; ye shall not be afraid of the face of man; for the judgment is God’s; and the cause that is too hard for you, bring it unto me, and I will hear it. – Deuteronomy, I, 16-17.
Thou shalt not wrest judgment; thou shat not respect persons, neither take a gift; for a gift doth blind the eyes of the wise, and pervert the words of the righteous. – Deuteronomy, XVI, 19.
We will not make any justiciaries, constables, sheriffs or bailiffs, but from those who understand the law of the realm and are well disposed to observe it. – Magna Charta, XLV.
Judges ought to remember that their office is jus dicere not jus dare; to interpret law, and not to make law, or give law.
Judges ought to be more learned than witty; more reverend than plausible; and more advised than confident. Above all things, integrity is their portion and proper virtue.
Patience and gravity of hearing is an essential part of justice; and an over speaking judge is no well-tuned cymbal. It is no grace to a judge first to find that which he might have heard in due time from the Bar, or to show quickness of conceit in cutting off evidence or counsel too short; or to prevent information by questions though pertinent.
The place of justice is a hallowed place; and therefore not only the Bench, but the foot pare and precincts and purprise thereof ought to be preserved without scandal and corruption. – Bacon’s “Essay Of Judicature.”
It is the duty of a good judge to prevent litigations, that suit may not grow out of suit, and it concerns the welfare of a state that an end be put to litigation. 4 Coke, 15b; 5 Coke, 31a.
A Judge should have two salts: the salt of wisdom lest he be insipid; and the salt of conscience, lest he be devilish.
Look out for Part IX coming up soon;
Sincerely, administrator UZA