Monthly Archives: February 2016

Just In: G20 Causes Wall St Hissy Fit

Thanks for the post. Excellent analysis. in peace

Wolfessblog -- Guillotine mediocrity in all its forms!

Wall Street’s Savage Reckoning: Clouds Gather Over G-20 Summit

Finance ministers and central bankers from the world’s biggest economies met in Shanghai, China over the weekend to discuss many of the problems for which they alone are responsible. Leading the list of issues, was the steady deceleration in global growth which, to great extent, is the result of experimental monetary policies central banks implemented following the recession in 2009. Surprisingly, the group admitted that their “easing strategies” had failed to produce the durable recovery that they sought, but at the same time,  they made virtually no effort to correct their mistake by making the changes necessary to shore up flagging global output. Here’s a brief recap from Bloomberg:

“Finance chiefs from the world’s top economies committed their governments to doing more to boost global growth amid mounting concerns over the potency of monetary…

View original post 1,048 more words

To Be or Not To Be a ‘Human Being’?

The following is yet again another example of semantic deceit by employment of a language called LEGALESE which is the jargon used by BAR members and LAW SOCIETY.

From Ballentine’s Law Dictionary, 1948 Edition. ‘Human Being’ is defined as follows: ‘See monster’ . From the same dictionary, ‘monster’ is defined: ‘A human-being by birth, but in some part resembling a lower animal.’
      This is an unusual definition, but like all Law Dictionaries on this subject, a non-definition. It only states that a ‘human being’ is a higher animal. It is not found anywhere in Scripture that a Christian Man or Woman is an animal or part of the animal kingdom. This being the case, then what exactly is a ‘human being.’
      From the Oxford New English Dictionary of 1901, ‘human’ is defined as, ‘3. Belonging or relative to man as distinguished from God or superhuman beings; pertaining to the sphere or faculties of man (with implication of limitation or inferiority); mundane; secular. (Often opposed to divine.)’
      ‘Secular’ being the important word here, we look to the multi-difinitions in the 1992 Random House Webster’s College Dictionary: “Secular’ adj. 1. of or pertaining to worldly things or to things not regarded as sacred: temporal. 2. not relating to or concerned with religion (opposed to sacred). 3. concerned with non-religious subjects. 4. not belonging to a religious order: not bound by monastic vows.”
      Could it be that ‘human’ means un-Godly. From the same dictionary, a look at a combination of the two: ‘Secular humanism’ n. any set of beliefs that promotes human values without specific allusion to religious doctrines.” And, “‘ secularism’ n. 1. secular spirit or tendency, esp. a system of political or social philosophy that rejects all forms of religious faith or worship. 2. the view that public education and other matters of civil policy should be conducted without the influence of religious beliefs.”
      In conjunction with this, from Collier’s New Dictionary of the *English Language, 1928. ‘humanitarian’ is defined: n. ‘a philanthropist: an anti Trinitarian who rejects the doctrine of Christ’s divinity; a perfectionist.: From the above Random House Dictionary, “humanitarianism’ is defined: n. ‘the doctrine that humankind may become perfect without divine aid.’
With no definition of ‘human being’ in Law, Mellinkoff’s Dictionary of American Legal Usage, 1992, defines ‘Person’ as, 1.”a human being–without regard to sex, legitimacy, or competence. This person is the central figure in law, as elsewhere, characterized by personal attributes of mind, intention, feelings, weaknesses, morality common to human beings; with rights and duties under the law. This is the person, sometimes called an individual, and often referred to in the law as a natural person, as distinguished from an artificial person (sense 3).”
      Of course, ‘morality common to human beings’ is not explained, because that would reveal to much. Again, in Shawmut Bank, N.A. vs. Valley Farms, (610A.2d652,654) it states, “For purpose of statute protecting certain property from post-judgment remedies, and therefore from prejudgment attachment, ‘natural person’ means ‘human being’, not artificial or juristic person”.
      So, if natural person and human being are considered the same in the law, let’s take a closer look at what a ‘natural person’ is. As you may know, all government codes, rules and regulations only attach to corporations, partnerships and natural persons. In American law, it seems that a definition of ‘natural person’ does not exist. To get any idea of what a natural person is, we have to go to English law. In the 17th Century, Lord Coke differentiated between ‘natural persons’ and ‘moral persons in a community’ in the following statement from his Institututes:… “we must observe, that estate is defined by the civilians, the capacity of moral persons; for, as natural persons have a certain space in which their natural existence is placed, and in which they perform their natural actions, so have persons in a community a certain state or capacity, in which they are supposed to exist, to perform their moral acts, and exercise all civil relations,”… (2 Inst. 669).
      With ‘natural man’ being the same as ‘natural person’, we find further evidence of exactly what a ‘human being’ is. From the above Random House Dictionary, page 901, ” ‘Natural’ adj. 17. natural man: unenlightened or unregenerate.” From the same Dictionary, page 1461, ” ‘unregenerate’ 1. not regenerate; unrepentant. 2. unconvinced by or unconverted to a particular religion, sect, or movement. 4. wicked; sinful; dissolute. 5. an unregenerate person.”
      In conjunction with this, from The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, 1933, ‘naturalism’ is defined as: ‘a system of morality or religion having a purely natural basis; a view of the world, and of man’s relationship to it, in which only the operation of natural, as opposed to supernatural or spiritual, laws and forces is assumed.’ and ‘naturalist’ is defined as: ‘One who follows the light of nature, as contrasted with revelation.’
      And, of course, the Scriptures being the final authority, confirms all of the above, at
1 Corinthians 3:14, “But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.”
      Therefore, when a Christian calls him or herself a ‘human being’, they are saying, “I’m an animal; I’m non-religious; I’m unrepentant: I’m wicked, sinful and dissolute; I’m able to do all things and be perfect without Jesus Christ; I’m subject to man’s law, rather than God’s Law.”


This is sufficient logical proof why ‘human rights’ are NOT enforceable. Think about it; your Constitution talks about ‘we, the people’ and NOT ‘we, the human beings’…

Therefore, it is ludicrous to fight for human rights. We may as well scrap or re-write ‘human rights’ charters and amend to people’s charters. In peace 


The erosion of human rights

Without prejudice and merely to educate: There is no such thing as ‘human rights’. We have once again been deluded by semantic deceit aka LEGALESE: the jargon used by lawmakers. We are people, not human beings; please make the distinction? Our constitutions state ‘we, the people’ and not ‘we the human beings’. The following is the best educational deconstruction of the word ‘human’
The 1893 Encyclopaedia Britannica defines the word LEGAL as: “THE UNDOING OF GOD’S LAW.” Now we know why. in peace

Satu Insan - Malaysia

New Mandala

Ritualism and the erosion of human rights

Just because states sign up to human rights conventions, it doesn’t mean they will follow them. Often it’s the exact opposite, writes Melanie O’Brien. 

While paying lip service to stopping human rights abuses, leaders in the Asia-Pacific are rejecting basic freedoms and reinforcing their own power, eroding human rights and flouting the very international agreements they are parties to.

Prosecutions for the crimes of lèse majesté and sedition have dramatically increased in the past two years in Southeast Asia. As a means of maintaining power, countries such as Thailand and Malaysia are clamping down on freedom of expression.

Since the May 2014 coup in Thailand, extraordinarily long sentences have been imposed on those convicted of lèse majesté, such as the 30-year sentence given to 48-year-old Pongsak Sriboonpeng in 2015. Accused are held in secret military detention. It was reported that…

View original post 947 more words

Britain’s Struggle to Abolish the Slave Trade

Us Africans are still slaves; we are still under a land claim; we are a conquered people under the Trading with the Enemy Act; we are still Homo animals under the papal bulls; African courts are still Admiralty courts oathed to HM THE QUEEN; a private slave company; RSA still follows Roman-Dutch law based on the Dutch East India Company; and pirates yes they rob I still; our pirated natural resources are swopped for fiat money, our lands and water destroyed. And, we still are bonded by the roman catholic slave birth certificate; in peace

The Most Revolutionary Act


Abolition: The Struggle to Abolish Slavery in the British Colonies

By Richard S Reddie

Lion Hudson (2007)

Book Review

Reddie devotes most of his book to debunking common myths Europeans perpetuate to justify chattel slavery and the current plight of the African diaspora. First and foremost is the prevailing myth that Africa was a savage and backwards continent prior to the arrival of the first Europeans.

Prior to reading this book, I had never heard of the Nubian, Great Zimbabwe, Ghana, Songhay or Mali civilizations. Archival records suggests that Africa, not the Middle East, was the cradle of civilization. The pioneering Greek scientists Archimedes and Pythagoras both spent their youth studying in Egypt. There’s also fairly strong evidence that East Africans began producing steel before Europeans did.

Of the millions of slaves forcibly transported to the Americas, 40% ended up in Brazil, 40% in the Caribbean, 15% in Spanish territories…

View original post 247 more words

Funding Fictions: Australia, China and the Defence White Paper

DEMOCRACY is the art and science of running the circus from the monkey cage. H.L. Mencken

Counter Information

Global Research, February 28, 2016

us-australia-china-620x349-400x225Political establishments are constantly in search of excuses for their existence. Since the tax payer is constantly asked to provide funding for them, one of the most pertinent questions tends to be what use a military-security establishment tends to have, apart from creating rivals of the same ilk. More weapons, more armaments, and a bloated defence security complex suggests an escapade rather than a sober assessment on self-interest and security.

The Cold War was one such example, a vicious confrontation masquerading as a morally clear conflict. The ones to profit enormously from it were, as ever, those working in defence and beavering away on the next murderous device for the next lethal, preferably bogged down conflict. It produced false enemies in search of a fiction, leading to bloody proxy wars, long-ended engagements with lasting consequences, and trillions of dollars in waste. That…

View original post 891 more words

BANKING CARTEL: For the Love of God…& Money, The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) – The Vatican’s Central Bank (Archive)

Thank you for the research; pity we cannot get any Rothschild proof such as agreements etc.; in peace


Source –

– The monster octopus has so many tentacles. But of all these sucking arms, nothing is more secretive than the Central Bank of all central banks, the BIS that is nestled in a country with a Red Cross flag to represent it.

The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) headquarter as shown above looks a lot like the Vatican Bank in Rome because it is a Vatican Bank.

Vatican Bank in Rome

 It is where the methods creating the most elaborate enslavement scheme are formulated. Done in utmost secrecy, all activities are beyond the reach and understanding even by Swiss law enforcement agencies and government. The elements of secrecy and diplomatic immunity characterize evil intent on the part of its real owners.

The Vatican’s ownership of the bank can be traced through the Rothschild’s $500 trillion dynasty.

For as long as the people keep kneeling on these self…

View original post 6,338 more words

From the Aegean to the English Channel – the refugees who shame Europe

And this kind of people’s violations still happens in the 21st century? The G20 must pay for harm and loss caused; in peace


syrian-refugees Refugees trapped Greek-Macedonia border

Today, hundreds of  thousands demonstrated in cities across Europe to demand #SafePassage for the hundreds of thousands of refugees from war zones still trying to cross Europe to safety. But in the last few days middle Europe closed its doors: Austria, Slovenia, Serbia, Croatia, Hungary and Macedonia each took measures to ensure these refuges are either turned back to Greece or remain trapped in Greece, a country that has been bankrupted by the Euro Group and is doing its best, despite its dire financial circumstances, to help how it can. Fortress Europe has returned.

According to a Guardian report

19 February: Austria imposes a daily limit of 3,200 people entering the country and restricts asylum applications to 80 a day.

21 February: Macedonia prevents Afghans from crossing from Greece.

22 February: Slovakia says it is prepared to fence off its borders with Austria and…

View original post 293 more words

Amnesty International: Britain downgrades human rights across globe

Luckily a “human being” is not a “people”; a human being is a legal fiction by definition as opposed to living people who have antecedent rights and superior rights to legal fictions; most people do not get this; we may as well ban the word “human-being” because it does NOT apply to anything living or relate to anything we know; the definition of a human is a monster by birth; the PTW use legalese to dumb is down and gain a semblance of jurisdiction under color of law. in peace

The Complete History of Monsanto, “The World’s Most Evil Corporation”

Pure evil. in peace

Counter Information

Global Research, February 27, 2016
Waking Times 22 June 2014

Monsanto-2.0-400x266First published by Waking Times in May 2014

Of all the mega-corps running amok, Monsanto has consistently outperformed its rivals, earning the crown as “most evil corporation on Earth!” Not content to simply rest upon its throne of destruction, it remains focused on newer, more scientifically innovative ways to harm the planet and its people.

1901: The company is founded by John Francis Queeny, a member of the Knights of Malta, a thirty year pharmaceutical veteran married to Olga Mendez Monsanto, for which Monsanto Chemical Works is named. The company’s first product is chemical saccharin, sold to Coca-Cola as an artificial sweetener.

Even then, the government knew saccharin was poisonous and sued to stop its manufacture but lost in court, thus opening the Monsanto Pandora’s Box to begin poisoning the world through the soft drink.

toxiclove1920s: Monsanto expands into…

View original post 3,657 more words

A Universal Basic Income Is Anti-Work

Absolute codswollop; the people have been beaten into a system of slavery and slaves have no incentive to ‘work’; in a society where creativity and vested interest is stimulated, the people sitting on the side will feel left out; the natural has now become un-natural and we are measuring or evaluating possible outcomes based on a system that no-one wants to play in; make it by the people, for the people, of the people and watch people get productive; with or without a basic income; in peace

BREAKING: US government releases its 2015 financial statements

At most, they can fake it for another year before the orange dayglo jumpsuits become fashionable. in peace



Hot off the presses, the US government just published its audited financial statements this morning, signed and sealed by Treasury Secretary Jack Lew.

These reports are intended provide an accurate accounting of government finances, just like any big corporation would do.

And once again, the US government’s financial condition has declined significantly from the previous year.

For 2015, the government reports $3.2 trillion in total assets.

This includes everything from financial assets like bank balances to physical assets like tanks, bullets, aircraft carriers, and the federal highway system.

Curiously, the single biggest line item amongst these listed assets is the $1.2 trillion in student loans that are owed to the government by the young people of America.

This is pretty extraordinary when you think about it.

37% of the government’s total reported assets are student loans, which is now considered one of the most precarious bubbles in finance.


View original post 745 more words