In Part I we started un-packing the closet of the CONSTITUTION of REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA; we strongly recommend one reads Part I of this story first;
We will return to the CON-stitution, but before we do that, we are going to take a sneak peak at some of the dirty laundry of RSA INC. first; so, here goes:
RSA INC. Truth
The real truth is that we no longer have a lawful “government”; REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA is a privately-owned, foreign corporation FRONTING as “government”; the same applies to almost every country that is part of the Federal Reserve Ponzi scheme;
In fact, Southern Africa has NEVER had a lawful government; this is now the fourth attempt and they have all failed dismally because all governments were imposed on the 99% without their consent; the Boer Afrikaners came close, but they made the same mistake the imperial colonials did: exclude the Indigenous Peoples; and, imposing the Dutch Reformed Church as the only lawful religion; today, less than 2% of the SA population are members thereof;
We believe that it is very easy to put S.A. on the track it was meant to be on; more on that later;
Back to the U.S. of S.A….
On doing a company search for RSA on the U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION webpage http://www.sec.gov/ we find REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA is listed as a company:
RSA Company number: 0000932419
And, the “managers” are named as Barclays Capital, Citigroup, Nedbank Capital, Rand Merchant Bank and Citigroup; and, the governing law is ‘New York’; jurisdiction Delaware; this means RSA INC. is governed by federal laws.
Ask yourself, does this not place our country at the mercy of foreign banks with foreign interests?
Now, here is the crux of the matter; according to legal definition a corporation can be classified as an “inhabitant”; HOWEVER,
A corporation can be an inhabitant only in the state of its incorporation. Sperry Products v. Association of American Railroads, C.C.A.N.Y., 132 F.2d 408, 411; Vogel v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., D.C.Md., 36 F.Supp. 74, 75; International Union of Mine, Mill and Smelter Workers v. Tennessee Copper Co., D.C.Tenn., 31 F.Supp. 1015, 1017; Deutsch v. Times Pub. Corporation, D.C.N.Y., 33 F.Supp. 957, 958.
Therefore, by legal definition is RSA INC. NOT an inhabitant of continental Southern Africa, BUT THE U.S.; this then also means that RSA INC. is a “foreigner”;
Ask yourself, how can a “foreigner” then be ruling over us?
BUT, MOSTLY IMPORTANTLY: WHO ARE RSA OFFICIALS REALLY WORKING FOR?
THE POPE? THE CROWN? WASHINGTON D.C.? THE U.N.? THE ROTHSCHILDS AND ROCEKEFELLERS? ALL OF THE ABOVE?
Definitely not for the Real Re-public, the 99%
RSA INSOLVENCY ACTS
But, that’s not all; since the 1910 Union of South Africa was it then fraudulently placed under insolvency as a means to steal our gold and valuable resources; starting with Insolvency Act, 1916; we will discuss the culprits later on;
And, after 45 years in 1961 were we “re-venued” into another insolvent entity, namely Republic of South Africa; the purpose was to avoid the foreclosure of this Ponzi scheme;
And, after 43 years were we again “re-venued” into another insolvent, this time REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA INC. so as to again avoid another foreclosure;
Since the 1910 Union of South Africa, we have no less than 17 insolvency related acts; and, for the first 7 years the Union was administrated by the Crown; and, the laws of the Union are still held in the British archives; a clue that we are still under “administration”; in fact, the 1993 interim constitution carries all laws of the colonies over into the post ‘94 CON-situational era;
Did you notice that both name changes were under 50 years? Well, it is because the Holy Bible and the Laws of Moses are the common law of western nations; and, according to the Laws of Moses:
Leviticus 25:10 And you shall hallow the fiftieth year, and proclaim liberty throughout all the land, unto al the inhabitants thereof: It shall be a Jubilee unto you, and you shall return every man unto his possession, and you shall return every man unto his family.
If, they allow the Ponzi to continue for longer than 50 years then they will have to declare a debt jubilee; to bypass Mosaic Laws they simply change the name…
THEREFORE – IF, THIS PONZI CONTINUES [WHICH IT WON’T] THEN WE CAN EXPECT ANOTHER NAME CHANGE BEFORE 2044;
Is it not time to investigate these insolvent entities? For restoral and restitution of what was fraudulently taken? And, start afresh?
RSA listed in the U.S.
Manta.com – On doing a company search using the word ‘parliament’ at http://www.manta.com/ one will discover no less than 5 privately-owned companies are trading as “Parliament of South Africa” in the U.S.
Download text: parliament-of-sa-manta-com
Ask yourself, where are parliamentary decisions then being made? In the U.S.? Or, in Cape Town?
Is this perhaps why parliament is nothing more than a circus? A theatre? Is it not time to abolish parliament? Were we not supposed to abolish parliament in 1994?
After all, the 1993 Interim Constitution does state, enigmatically: Schedule 4 – XXXIII
The Constitution shall provide that, unless Parliament is dissolved on account of its passing a vote of no-confidence in the Cabinet, no national election shall be held before 30 April 1999.
Also notice that Schedule 4 ends with XXXIII – 33, the 33rd Degree of freemasonry; everywhere we look we find the mark of the beast; “X” marks the spot…
Rhodes, Milner, Oppenheimer were all Freemasons, but let’s leave this rabbit hole for later;
Will access to information such as tax record history not indicate that there is business being conducted for private gain that was meant for the Republic? For we, the people?
Next, we go to another company search website;
Dunn & Bradstreet.com – On doing a company search using the words “REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA” at http://creditreports.dnb.com/
Under USA in the COUNTRY listing; And, then under NEW YORK in the CITY listing; one finds ‘REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA’;
As well as ‘PARLIAMENT OF SOUTH AFRICA’ which is also traded as PERMANENT MISSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA [TO THE UN].
It clearly states that each entity is a “private company”;
Download text: parliament-of-sa-dnb
Notice it is PARLIAMENT OF ‘SOUTH AFRICA’, and not PARLIAMENT OF REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA;
Not only us, but other researchers have also noticed that since before the 2008 crisis, the first part of every entity name is dropped; for example, STATE OF OHIO instead of OHIO;
Was this done to save the U.S. “assets” in case it went belly up? It surely was;
NYS DEPARTMENT OF STATE – On doing a company search using the words “REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA” at NYS DEPARTMENT OF STATE, DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS, STATE RECORDS AND UCC; 18 entities are listed;
It states: county – New York; jurisdiction – DELAWARE; this is where virtually all corporations are registered; under the CORPORATION TRUST COMPANY OF AMERICA 1907 in Delaware;
Download text: corporation-trust-company-of-america-1907
There is most likely a corporation for every entity we can think of; we even find CONSTITUTION OF SOUTH AFRICA listed as “The Constitution”;
Ask yourself, if RSA INC. and its CON-stitution is privately-owned and you are not an employee then are you liable to its rules? Of course not;
Definition of MAXIM. An established principle or proposition. A principle of law universally admitted, as being just and consonant. They are principles and authorities, and part of the general customs or common law of the land; and are of the same strength as acts of parliament. Maxims of the law are holden for law, and all other cases that may be applied to them shall be taken for granted. The alterations of any of the maxims of the common law are dangerous.
Coke defines a maxim to be “conclusion of reason” Co.Litt. 11a.
He says elsewhere:
“A maxime is a proposition to be of all men confessed and granted without proofe, argument, or discourse.” Id. 67a.
Maxims on Deceit
A deceiver deals in generals.
A concealed fault is equal to a deceit.
Deceit is an artifice, since it pretends one thing and does another. Lane, 47.
It is safer to be deceived than to deceive.
Let him who wishes to be deceived, be deceived.
Look out for Part III coming up soon;
Sincerely, administrator UZA
17 thoughts on “UNITED STATES OF SOUTH AFRICA – Part II – RSA INC.”
Absolute thought something like this are happening. Nothing made sense in the last decade?
Thanks Christian, we will be doing weekly topic specific educational talks on zoom and record it for social media; stay tuned; you will know the truth and the truth will set you free; blessings, brother-thomas.