We must make it clear to you that the entire banking and money system is corrupt, deceitful and fraudulent; therefore, we cannot be a party to the fraud; this page is how to pass the fraudulent debt back to the treasury to sort out the mess; this is for conscientious objectors;
Sadly, way too many people are wasting 1 000s of precious hours trying to find loopholes in the money system or ways of making “easy money”; they are looking for BIG trouble:
Instead, we should rather be spending our time learning what law is, what rights are, what jurisdiction is; and, then develop and establish jural assemblies and community banks to find alternatives for the present bankruptcy-for-profit Ponzi scheme we wrongly call “banking”;
Introduction to “Current-sea”
What most people do not know is that there is different types of currency (which we incorrectly call “money”);
Most people only know about paper currency (which we incorrectly call “cash”) and money of account; however, there is also money of exchange; to know more read:
We also recommend you read the Banking page before continuing here;
So, now you know that we live in a pre-paid system; and, that we are being double-billed; and, that we have no lawful government – only privately-owned corporate franchises fronting as “government”; their job is to profit off of the people for private, mostly foreign shareholders and secret beneficiaries;
These franchises are merely money bill vendors – collecting and selling all your ORIGINAL bills, birth certificates, court orders, invoices, mortgages, notes, receipts, remittances, tax invoices, tax documents, tenders, title deeds through CLEARING HOUSES AT HUGE PROFITS; it’s B-I-L-l-I-O-N-S!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Way bigger than the banking foreclosure frauds;
Where is the proof? Just look at your rates and taxes invoice – it says “COPY”; ask yourself, where is the original? Why has it not been presented to you for payment according to the Bills of Exchange Act? Try find out where it is; try finding the clearing house that printed the ORIGINAL invoices…
Try find any ORIGINAL court order after the case; it’s “missing” and in it’s place is a certified COPY;
Maxim – He is guilty of barratry who for money sells justice.
Barratry is piracy; inland piracy; and, the courts are selling their rules as money; so, it is not law, but merely commerce; in the old days under draconian common law they would be swinging from a tree; however, true justice is seeking reconciliation and not retribution; we must apply principles of restorative justice;
So, after having sold your original bills at 9 times the total value on the bill, they have the cheek to demand further payment on the copy from your hard-earned sweat;
Can you now see how we are being double-billed? The banks, corporations, courts and governments are all in on this money bill fraud;
The double jeopardy is that it ALL is one huge giant global bankruptcy-for-profit scheme; they are not really making money, but debt; and, sadly countries and peoples with the fraudulent debt;
the more money created out of thin air, the bigger the national debt of every country grows; and, with the current system we can NEVER pay back the debt; think about that for a minute; and, with compound interest, it’s runaway debt; the bubble will pop, not if, when;
The other thing to know is that at the registration of birth the corporate franchise fronting as government creates a STRAWMAN TRUST ACCOUNT; look in your IDENTITY DOCUMENT; your name is written in CAPITAL LETTERS; when you see capital letters know that it is law of the sea; it is a trust; and, held in the National Re-venue Fund; and, the National Treasury (a federal institution) “administrates” your trust; and, the minister of finance is your “banker” (securities intermediary); instead, your trust is used as collateral for the dummy corporation – RSA Inc.; it is an “asset”; an “insolvent debtor” and, also traded on the stock markets;
A Worthy Question— A Name or a Name? – Anna von Reitz
Names in the form: John Mark Doe have to function both on the land and at sea.
On the land they are Trade Names. At sea they are Foreign Situs Trusts. You can’t tell the difference between land jurisdiction Trade Names and sea jurisdiction Foreign Situs Trusts just by looking at them. They appear to be identical.
That’s why FDR’s fraud scheme worked so very well.
So what the Certificate of Assumed Name does is establish the “permanent domicile” of the Name on the land and soil of whichever state, and then goes on to claim the Name in Maritime and Admiralty jurisdictions, too. In those jurisdictions the Name (Admiralty) and the NAME (Maritime) represent corporate and incorporated entities, respectively.
On the land the Name is unincorporated, in Admiralty it is corporate, and in Maritime it is incorporated.
This is the difference between Anna (unincorporated being/ “natural person”), The Anna Company (private company), and Anna, Inc. (corporation).
Visually it looks like this: Anna Maria Riezinger (Trade Name on the land), Anna Maria Riezinger (Foreign Situs Trust on the High Seas), and ANNA MARIA RIEZINGER (incorporated Cestui Que Vie Trust in commerce)…
It will be well-worth your while to study this little discussion and discern the necessity of figuring out the jurisdiction at any given time—and clearly stating the jurisdiction. It’s easy to tell the difference between “Anna Maria Riezinger” and “ANNA MARIA RIEZINGER” —- but you have to define whether that “Anna Maria Riezinger” is standing on the land or floating on the High Seas, because in that case, we could be referencing the Trade Name of a living woman standing on dry land, or we could be referencing a Foreign Situs Trust belonging to a private company operating on the High Seas.
In the Certificate of Assumed Name we are specifically and purposefully addressing the latter case—the Foreign Situs Trust(s) named after the original land jurisdiction Trade Name, and then we go on to address the derivative Municipal corporation franchises dba ANNA MARIA RIEZINGER, ANNA M. RIEZINGER, RIEZINGER, ANNA M. and so on. If you don’t put in your claim for “The Anna Company” version Name and claim the Foreign Situs Trust on the High Seas, you have no standing in their courts and they can “administer” your “Foreign Situs Trust” however they please. Preventing that and retaining control over your name and placing it in proper ownership and character as belonging to an American civilian is the whole reason behind the Certificate of Assumed Name.
Currency Continued – Southern Africa
Theoretically, we can settle any utility bill by Acceptance For Value; download and read: What does A4V mean
How to use money of exchange: How to use Money of Exchange Manual April 2014
The following is an example of an indorsement:
With it comes the Entitlement Order. 2014.02.01 Entitlement Order
Comprehend what you are doing. Take responsibility in your actions. In Peace.
More on BOE
Presentment of Bill: If you have listened to Robert-Arthur: Menard’s interview Bursting Bubbles, you will know all about the Bills of exchange act. By not accepting the original Bill of Exchange (the traffic fine/bank loan/court order) you go into dishonour and this is why they have power over you. Here is a piece about dishonour from the Bills of Exchange Act: Bill of Exchange Amendment Act 56 of 2000
Quote: 41 When bill is dishonoured by non-acceptance, and consequences thereof (1) A bill is dishonoured by non-acceptance if- (a) it is duly presented for acceptance, and such an acceptance as is prescribed by this Act is refused or cannot be obtained; or (b) presentment for acceptance is excused and the bill is not accepted. (2) Subject to the provisions of this Act, if a bill is dishonoured by non-acceptance, a right of recourse against the drawer and indorsers immediately accrues to the holder, and no presentment for payment is necessary. 42 Duties as to and consequences of qualified acceptance (1) The holder of a bill may refuse to take a qualified acceptance, and, if he does not obtain an unqualified acceptance, may treat the bill as dishonoured by non-acceptance. (2) If a qualified acceptance is taken and the drawer or an indorser has not expressly or impliedly authorized the holder to take a qualified acceptance, or does not subsequently assent thereto, the drawer or such indorser is discharged from his liability on the bill: Provided that the provisions of this subsection do not apply to a partial acceptance whereof due notice has been given. (3) If the drawer or an indorser of a bill receives notice of a qualified acceptance, and does not within a reasonable time express his dissent to the holder, he shall be deemed to have assented thereto. Read the stuff in bold: “If a bill is dishonoured by non-acceptance a right of recourse against the drawer and indorsers immediately accrues to the holder and no presentment of payment is necessary”. This is why you are truly double-crossed. You refused to accept the bill, now they gonna send you a notice in the post to pay or go to court. If you go to court you are in dishonour and at the courts mercy.. bad situation to be in. So what you need to do when a traffic fine/court order/warrant is presented to you is this: 1. Acknowledge that you know it is a bill of exchange 2. Offer to accept the presentment of the original bill i.e. “I am open to you presenting to me of the original”. 3. If they give the original then indorse it. If they don’t give you the original then make out a protest bill and thus you do not sign (I mean why go into dishonour??) It’s funny when you read the statutes you will always find remedy, even if it is on the last page. The following part of the Act deals with proper presentment of the bill. Quote: 91 Presentment of note for payment (1) (a) If a note is in the body of it made payable at a particular place, it must be presented for payment at that place to render the maker liable, unless the particular place mentioned is the place of business of the payee and the note remains in his hands. (b) In no other case is presentment for payment necessary in order to render the maker liable. (2) Presentment for payment is necessary to render the indorser of a note liable. (3) (a) If a note is in the body of it made payable at a particular place, presentment at that place is necessary to render an indorser liable. (b) If a place of payment is indicated by way of memorandum only, presentment at that place is necessary to render an indorser liable; provided that presentment to the maker elsewhere, if sufficient in other respects, shall be sufficient to render an indorser liable. I am interested in the bold part above; you must be presented with the bill properly in order to be made liable for it. If your signature is on the bill then that is proof that it has been properly presented to you and that fact that they STILL have the original is proof that you dishonoured the bill by not accepting it… tricky! Tricky! The thing is – with traffic fines you are never presented with the bill properly, if you are not properly presented with the bill then it stands you are not liable for it… In this case the liability of the bill falls on the traffic officer who issued it. Once the traffic officer has refused to give you the original, you then protest the fact by using a notary and sending the protest to the finance minister. Some suggestions from the act: Quote: 98 Protest when notary not accessible (1) If a dishonoured bill or note is authorized to be protested, and the services of a notary cannot be obtained at the place where the bill or note is dishonoured, any landowner or householder of the place may, in the presence of two witnesses, give a certificate, signed by them, attesting the dishonour of the bill and such certificate shall in all respects operate as if it were a formal protest of the bill. [Sub-s. (1) substituted by s. 46 of Act 56 of 2000.] 30 (2) The form set out in the First Schedule may be used with the necessary modifications for such certificate, and if so used, shall be sufficient.
Here is the form you can use: Quote:
FORM OF PROTEST WHICH MAY IN TERMS OF SECTION ninety-eight BE USED WHEN THE SERVICES OF A NOTARY CANNOT BE OBTAINED Know all men that I, A. B., landowner or householder of _______________________ In the district of __________________________________________________________ at the request of C.D., there being no notary available, did on the _________ day of ______________________ 20_____ at __________________________________________ demand payment or acceptance from E.F., of the bill of exchange which or a copy of which is hereto annexed, to which demand he answered (state answer, if any) wherefore I now in the presence of G.H., and J.K., do protest the said bill of exchange. A.B. ____________________________ Witnesses: G.H. ____________________________ J.K. ____________________________ N.B. – The bill ___________________________________________________________________________
Here our printable version of the protest of bill
No Disclaimer: There is no disclaimer on these pages because the reader will learn and know that each and every perception and interpretation of anything and everything we as People experience, is unique. The responsibility is our own on how we use what we are learning and becoming. Anyone reading these pages is wise enough to follow their own counsel and therefore acknowledges this by the act of reading further. The choice is yours and yours alone.