We the people are sovereign and not subject to the “laws” of “government UNLESS we consent. So, best you learn how “they” coerce, entrap, mischaracterize and pressgang you into foreign un-known jurisdictions using fear, force and fraud.
Maxim – The law does not protect he who slumbers on his rights.
“Sovereignty itself is… not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law… while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts.” (Justice Thomas Stanley Matthews in Yick Wo v. Hopkins [p. 370]);
Now, because South African people’s common law was first suppressed by the colonial global elites, followed by the Apartheid Regime and since 1994 by RSA INC. we have no common law rulings. The best we can do is cite American rulings who have common law.
Blackstone who is an “Old Authority” on the Laws of England states: “Common law is the embodiment of the moral sentiment of the community.”
Now, that can only be derived from the rulings of a jury or by referendum; hence, the actions of SA Jural Assembly in laying the foundations for the people’s courts.
Note, Roman Dutch and English “Common Law” is NOT common law, it is Admiralty, Mercantile, Corporate Sea Rules, NOT law.
Think of the Dutch East India Company – Roman Dutch “Law” is founded in the VOC Octrooi and Ordinances.
Now, ask yourself, are the rules for the employees of Macdonald’s “laws”? Heavens no.
Therefore, if you are not an employee of the VOC or RSA INC. then those rules do not apply to you AT ALL!!!
The Bill of Rights Section 39(1)(c) recognises our right to quote foreign laws.
.39. Interpretation of Bill of Rights
1. When interpreting the Bill of Rights, a court, tribunal or forum ¬
c. may consider foreign law.
Here are a few U.S. citations regarding acts, codes and statutes:
US. SUPREME COURT DECISION – “All codes, rules, and regulations are for government authorities only, not human/Creators in accordance with God’s laws. All codes, rules, and regulations are unconstitutional and lacking due process…” Rodriques v. Ray Donavan (U.S. Department of Labor) 769 F. 2d 1344, 1348 (1985).
“A “Statute” is not a Law,” (Flouraoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248)
“A “Code” or “Statute: is not Law,” (Flouraoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248)
“Statutes apply only to state created creatures known as corporations no matter whether [creatures of statute and offices of] state, local, or federal [government].” (Bolonial) Pipeline Co. v. Traigle, 421 US 100. (1975).
US. SUPREME COURT DECISION – “…every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowman without his consent.” Cruden v. Neale, 2 N.C. 338 (1796) 2 S.E.
US. SUPREME COURT DECISION – The common law is the real law, the Supreme Law of the land, the code, rules, regulations, policy and statutes are “not the law”, [Self v. Rhay, 61 Wn (2d) 261]
People v. Ortiz, (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 286. “A statute does not trump the
Bennett v. Boggs, 1 Baldw 60, “Statutes that violate the plain and obvious principles of common right and common reason are null and void.”
Supreme Court Ruling [Miller vs. U.S., 230 F. 486, 489] “The claim and exercise of a constitutional Right cannot be converted into a crime.”
Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, Alabama, 373 U.S. 262 (1963): “If the State converts a right (liberty) into a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right (liberty) with impunity.”
In Hertado v. California, 110 US 516, the U.S Supreme Court states very plainly: “The state cannot diminish rights of the people.”
Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1914, p. 2961: “Those who have the right to do something cannot be licensed for what they already have right to do as such license would be meaningless.”
To be convicted under a statute you must give your consent, and i do not give my consent.
City of Dallas v Mitchell, 245 S.W. 944 “To take away all remedy for the enforcement of a right is to take away the right itself. But that is not within the power of the State.”
In re McCowan (1917), 177 C. 93, 170 P. 1100 “Ignorance of the law does not excuse misconduct in anyone, least of all in a sworn officer of the law.”
Brookfield Const. Co. v. Stewart, 284 F. Supp. 94. “An officer who acts in violation of the Constitution ceases to represent the government.”
U.S. v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 614 (3d Cir. 1982) “There is no crueler tyranny than that which is exercised under cover of law, and with the colors of justice …” Griffin v. Maryland, 378 U.S. 130
10 Co. 77; Dig. 2. 1. 20; Story, Confl. Laws ‘ 539; Broom, Max. 100, 101: “One who exercises jurisdiction out of his territory cannot be obeyed with impunity.”
Feel free to find other citations to add to the list and forward it to us please.
2 thoughts on “ACTS, CODES and STATUTES are not “Laws””
Where do I find posts like this on your website or under what heading/tab/menu are they placed?
Do a word search in the search tab; it will show you where it is mentioned in posts or in the pages section; also do a word search at annavonreitz.com for further explanations.
try search using the term “what is law” or “common law” or “your rights”