Category Archives: Your Rights

Public Defender Letter for Municipal COURTS

By Anna Von Reitz

Many people have written or called me in recent days because they are being harassed by foreign quasi-military courts under a variety of false charges ranging from tax evasion to domestic abuse and so on.  I thought I would take a little time this morning to draft a representative template of a Letter which anyone might send to the Office of the Public Defender in their community as a query regarding any action appearing to be taken against them in a Municipal COURT or addressed to a Municipal PERSON at their mailing address or delivered by Process Server.  

The body of this Letter is provided in template form, ready for people to edit in their own specific information, and can be addressed to the Public Defender’s Office at any time after a case number has been assigned, whether or not you have already entered a plea, whether or not you have already unintentionally granted jurisdiction to the COURT, and whether or not you have accepted the services of a Public Defender. Simply read the text closely and edit it as necessary to fit your exact circumstance. 

Please note that this letter is only for Municipal COURTS that are addressing Municipal PERSONS and will not serve in cases where a British Territorial Person is being addressed by a Court appearing to be named in Upper and Lower Case and a Defendant named in Upper and Lower Case.  This circumstance will require a different Letter to the Public Defender addressing different issues. I shall hope to have a templated response letter prepared for that situation soon, but have started with a Letter regarding the Municipal COURTS first, as the vast majority of cases start in Municipal COURT and begin by addressing Municipal PERSONS. 

It is our objective to “fully inform” the Office of the Public Defender and put them on the spot for failure to make the appropriate inquiries and failure to take logical action. Although this is not framed for the purpose of establishing liability and is presented as a formal but friendly  “question and answer” session with the Public Defender, it will not be lost on them that if they fail to answer and fail to make proper efforts, they can later be held personally and commercially liable for any harm that comes to you. 

Also please note that there is a not-so veiled contractual aspect to this Letter, which presents a conditional offer to the Public Defender, leaving it to him or her to accept or counter-offer your proposal at the end of the Letter — in effect, if the Public Defender is competent and able to defend a member of the General Public, and if they guarantee to represent you with no conflict of interest as an Officer of the COURT, they may take the pre-accepted action to have the charges dropped, which is the only action you have offered.  

They may come back with “plea deals” attempting to force you to accept at least some kind of charge.  This serves two purposes— first, accepting any kind of plea deal allows them to charge the court’s fees and expenses for their time and effort seeking to entrap you, and second, it relieves them from any admission of wrong-doing.  

Your response to plea deal offers should again be short and simple: “Either I am the DEFENDANT or I am not. If I am the DEFENDANT, it’s up to those bringing the charges to prove it with proper evidence on the public record of the COURT. If I am not the DEFENDANT and these charges have been brought to me in error, it is the COURT’S responsibility  to self-correct.” 

Keep your communications business-like and in so far as possible, friendly. 

If upon your own volition you use this Letter, you assume responsibility for all editing and any additions or deletions and are responsible for closely and thoroughly reading the content so that you understand it and are competent to respond in a reasonable manner to any questions the Public Defender’s Office might have.  You are posing questions that the Public Defender is actually responsible for asking and investigating — basically, doing his job for him or her, and briefly running through the attendant issues.  

If the Public Defender responds by asking for more citations about anything in this letter, you can refer to abundant information available in the searchable database on my website, www.annavonreitz.com using search words like “Named Entities” and “Municipal PERSON” and “NAME”.

Some documents presented there, including the “Notice Regarding Named Entities/Notice of Liability” which might be adapted to your needs and sent to the Public Defender’s Office as a Next Step if they don’t reply and don’t take action— offer a compendium of appropriate citations of case law and court findings spanning jurisprudence for the last two hundred years on these subjects.  

Remember that the Public Defender’s Office is always underfunded and understaffed and usually populated by attorneys who have good hearts but are not the sharpest tools in the shed.  They may ask you for more information because they truly need more information. Don’t be afraid or take offense if they want more back-up information.  You are asking them to undertake a job that they don’t normally do — actually defending a member of the General Public. 

This one is editable if you have word or open office:  

https://annavonreitz.com/publicdefenderletter.docx

—————————-

http://www.paulstramer.net/2022/10/public-defender-letter-for-municipal.html

See this article and over 3800 others on Anna’s website here: www.annavonreitz.com

SA common law class Saturday

Dearest friends & fellow South Africans!

🕊

Hope everyone is doing well and feeling into the positive changes that are happening in so many ways!

We are delighted to announce that COMMON LAW CLASSES will begin this coming Saturday.

brother-thomas, founder of Gift of Truth, and Southern Africa’s Common Law expert, will be sharing his knowledge and teaching. 

This Saturday’s class will be a general overview of the various laws and their hierarchy, jurisdiction and your rights. 

DETAILS for the CLASS:

This Saturday 10th September at 11am to 12:30pm

Duration: 1 and a half hours

Subject: General overview various laws, hierarchy, jurisdiction, your rights

Gifting of: R 150 ea (one hundred and fifty Rand)

Booking is essential for these classes, and a R150 gift is requested per attendee.To confirm your space, please make an EFT of the R150 gift to the following account, and send through the email with gift confirmation and your name. The zoom link will be supplied shortly thereafter.*** please email info@sajuralassembly.co.za

Donations Account Details

Bank: Mercantile Bank

Account Name:           GLOBAL REBOOT NPC

Account Type:             Current

Account Number:       1051095603

Branch Name:             George

Branch Code:  450105

Reference: SAJurA classes

Please note that in the event of inclement weather, or there being less than 5 people attending, the class will be carried over to the following session. Thank you for your kindness in this regard!
In the meantime please read up on the following links below, for knowledge in advance of the class. 

We look forward to welcoming you to Common Law Classes!

With peace & gratitude!

we the people

🦋

Notice: Warning About Legalities — and “Human” Rights

By Anna Von Reitz

It’s unlawful and illegal to own living people as slaves, right?  Right. 

We gave that up ages ago, didn’t we?  Yes, we did.  

Amendment XIII “Abolished slavery” and by 1926, the League of Nations succeeded in banning both slavery and peonage worldwide.  

But look at how the Balrog’s tail snagged a new lease on life and allowed — indeed, institutionalized, slavery for “some” people…. the Fourteenth Amendment defined criminals as slaves and failed to define “criminals” except to inform us that “citizens of the United States” are criminals by definition.   

And, going into the Great Depression, men like Franklin Delano Roosevelt pulled another Fast One by selling all the Municipal “citizens of the United States” into slavery.  Read over FDR’s First Inaugural Address and his references to “consecration” and “clearinghouse certificates”.  

In order to do these evils, FDR and his Buddies had to relabel and redefine the victims as “humans” — that is, not really people, not men and women, but something “else” that the Perpetrators could pass off as something other-than-men-and-women with Natural and Unalienable Rights. 

Think of it this way: “man” versus “hue-man” or translate it another way, and you get “man” versus “color of man” or “colored man”.   Many of the victims of FDR’s slave sale were actually and factually colored people.  So then, we had the whole effort to dig out of the insanity of the Buck Act of 1940, and the Civil Rights Movement for Hue-Mans and The United Nations’ Hue-man Rights Declaration —- and all of this is very helpful and nice, but never addressed the actual issue —- which is slave ownership glossed over (literally) and peonage, too, which were outlawed in 1926. 

So, do you want to be classified, legally but not lawfully, as a “human”?  No, you definitely don’t. And you don’t want “Human Rights”, either, because whatever those rights may be, it’s still “legal” to kill humans, still “legal” to enslave humans, and still “legal” to steal from humans under force. 

It’s not lawful or legal to do any of these things to men and women.  

So you want to be a man or you want to be a woman and you want to be on your toes ready to disavow any claim that you are a thing, a Mister, a Missus, a Miss, or any other “Person” or “PERSON” that they can classify as a “Hue-man” and victimize using this pernicious fraud and evasion of the actual Public Law which has forbidden both slavery and peonage since 1926. 

Obviously, the cat is finally out of the bag and people are waking up to this maladept use of “legality” to evade the Public Law and abuse innocent people by mischaracterizing and impersonating them as things.  

So what do the criminal cretins do?  Well, they gin up another scheme, only worse, that allows them to do the same thing — use “legalities” to evade the Public Law.  

The U.S. Supreme Court made a bad error and allowed corporations involved in genetic engineering to patent bits and pieces of DNA and mRNA and inject these into plants and animals that they then classify — and own — as “Genetically Modified Organisms”.

Sound oddly familiar?  Redefining and relabeling?  Owning the newly redefined  “things” as slaves?  Being able to impose peonage?  Being able to kill and imprison and enslave, only this time based on patents?  

Are we to endure another round of this gratuitous fraud and crime against humanity —- which includes men and women and also “male” and “female” hue-mans?   Crowds of people marching around demanding “GMO Rights!”? 

I don’t think so.  

This time, it’s the turn of the screw in the opposite direction.  

Our country has already passed a Public Law forbidding all claims attempting to define living people as Genetically Modified Organisms, whether or not they have voluntarily accepted patented DNA or RNA altering vaccinations. 

And if the recipients of DNA or RNA altering vaccinations die, we recognize no claims of interest in their estates by any corporation whatsoever. 

We are going after the criminal masterminds behind all this crap.  We know what they did in the past and we know what they are trying to do right now and enough is enough.  Before we are done, we will have cleaned up every Board Room from here to Bangkok, and God enlighten anyone who stands in the way, because they will be defending the authors of their own demise.  

All you bankers, all you Party Boys, all you “governmental officials” — take heed.  The Herd isn’t the Herd anymore— and you are all at the end of your ropes.  

We outlawed slavery in 1865 and we outlawed it again, and peonage, too, in 1926, and with God as our Witness, enslavement by redefinition and relabeling of people as “humans” or “GMOs” or anything else —- and evasion of the Public Law via the use of such “legalities” —- is at an end in 2022.  

—————————-

See this article and over 3700 others on Anna’s website here: www.annavonreitz.com

SA People Sovereignty Explained

Do we, the people work for Government? OR Does Government work for US?

No, government works for us! They are our public servants, our hired help; we pay their salaries; not the UN, IMF or WHO. South Africa belongs to we the people. The 1955 Freedom Charter declares: “South Africa belongs to all who live in it…”

Now, our servants claim to own our cars, houses, public buildings, lands and everything. And, they think they can now do as they want in our house.

There is a well-established principle of law that says: Capture by pirates and robbers does not change title.

It’s time to wake up and remember who we are and restore the natural order of things. The Creator Created man and man created a fiction called government. And the only purpose for government is to protect our rights and provide us with services.

U.S. Justice Matthews in Yick Wo v. Hopkins clearly states: “Sovereignty itself is… not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law… while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts.”

The 1776 Declaration of Independence of the original 13 united States of America declares: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

The 1955 Freedom Charter declares: “No government can justly claim authority unless it is based on the will of the people.”

The Freedom Charter and the 1994 Reconstruction & Development Programme both declare: “The people shall govern” thereby affirming the sovereignty of the people.

Is the government of today based on the will of the people? No? Well then it is up to we the people to abolish and change it. No-one is going to do it for us.

“Sovereign individuals are subject only to a Common Law, whose primary purposes are to protect and defend individual rights and to prevent anyone, whether public official or private person, from violating the rights of other individuals. Within this scene, Sovereigns are never subject to their own creations, and the constitutional contract is such a creation.” To quote the Supreme Court, “No fiction can make a natural born subject.” [Milvaine v. Coxe’s Lessee, 8 U.S. 598 (1808)]. “That is to say, no fiction, be it a corporation, a statute law, or an administrative regulation, can mutate a natural born Sovereign into someone who is subject to his own creations.”

Now, the theory of government is that we have surrendered some of our rights so that government can protect the rights that we have not surrendered. The fiction is that we have consented to the surrender of our rights. The reality is that our rights have been stolen from us because the government monopolizes force; it’s a sad and terrible reality. Still, rights are yours, not the government’s to be taken away.

If, our rights belong to us then they cannot be taken away by majority vote; they cannot be taken away by legislation; they cannot be taken away by command of the executive; they cannot be taken away by the majority of the people; they can only be taken away IF I GIVE THEM UP MYSELF. We can voluntarily surrender our own natural rights but, one cannot surrender someone else’s rights because natural rights belong to each one of us. That is the theory of a republican form of government and we are a Republic not a democracy.

Question: Is there any legitimate activity a government has in a free society? Yes, to protect the natural rights of the people in that society; meaning, do not assault my freedom, my life, my liberty, my property! Protect it! That is what a government is for.

The Bill of Rights was supposed to be written to prevent government from doing that except by due process; due process means if they want to take away my rights, one has the right to a fair trial and the protections that come with it. However, the Constitution was a sellout and natural rights have been flipped.

Now, if the government recognised the concept of natural rights and people sovereignty, it would know that virtually everything it has done since 1995 has been unlawful. A government that believes in natural rights will limit itself to those behaviors. Do you know of any government today that limits itself to only the protection of natural rights? That is the ideal.

The problem is that the REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA is merely a foreign privately-owned corporation and a subsidiary of the UN, IMF, WHO controlled by the globalist elite’s and their New World Order.

This week, representatives of most nations will be surrendering our sovereignty to the New World Order with the Plandemic Treaty. We have already declared it null and void with the Minister of Health. Joe Phaala does not have our consent. He has no legal or lawful right to give up our rights for us.

We need to understand the force of darkness among us and that force of darkness is the very government we have elected and empowered to impose the darkness upon us. The better we understand it, the more we understand it, the sooner we can be free from its shackles.

It’s time to put South Africa back on track to where we were meant to go since 1995; to restore people sovereignty and a government by, for and of the people.; it’s time for a new 2022 Freedom Declaration, a new Reconstruction and Development Programme; people’s courts, referendums and share in the national wealth.

The people shall soon govern.

With the Autograph

From an excellent website to learn from called – Living in the Private

Only you can reserve your natural rights.

Your Living Jurisdiction is declared in your written and spoken words. If you fail to declare your private Living Jurisdiction in the Common Law – the National Law of the Land, the public “legal person actors” will invariably make the “presumption” that you are “acting” as an “accommodation party” in “joinder” to a dead artificial legal “person” NAME, in the Admiralty Maritime Jurisdiction – the International Law of the Sea.

Any registered NAME created by joining a Given appellation (“Given name”) and a Family name, often prefixed with a fictional title such as “Mr/Mrs/Miss” etc., always forms an artificial legal “person”, i.e. MR JOHN DOE, and John Doe, are both dead artificial legal “persons”

The NAME can be described as a “person”, “legal person”, “legal personality”, “artificial person”, “legal fiction”, “ens legis”, “company”, “trade-name”, “vessel in commerce”, “transmitting utility”, “creature of the law”, “Ward of the State”, “employee of the State”, “public servant”, “Estate trust”, “Foreign Situs Trust”, “Cestui Que Vie Estate Trust”, “deceased Estate”, “decedent”, “corporation”, “corpse”, “franchise”, “bankrupt”, “surety”, “accommodation party”, “debtor”, or “debt ledger”. All legally generated fictions are debtors by default, because they are created without any inherent productive capacity.

On any document, to avoid the presumption of “joinder” to one of those dead fictional things, it is at least necessary to use proper grammar, and ideally reserve all your rights. For example: By: John: of the family Doe. All Rights Reserved.

On commercial paper, to avoid the presumption of “joinder” to one of those dead fictional things, bearing liability, it is necessary to separate yourself from the fictional entity by making an unambiguous declaration of your living standing as, for example, the “authorised agent”. This invokes the Common Law of Agency, in which the general rule is that the agent is not liable for the fictional entity/principal, if he/she makes it clear that he/she is the agent. For example: By: John: of the family Doe. Authorised Agent for MR JOHN DOE.

Importantly, a living man or woman is not evidenced by a “signature”. Section 3-401 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), states that a signature can be made (i) manually or by means of a device or machine, and (ii) by the use of any name, including any trade or assumed name, or by any word, mark, or symbol executed or adopted by a “person”. Thus, it is any mark of a corporation.

A “signature” is a “sign” that merely suggests the existence of something else not actually there – it is not evidence of substance and living capacity. Someone who makes a “signature” is an “accommodation party” in “joinder” to an artificial legal “person” NAME, with Dead Status, serving as surety for the corporate national debt in the Admiralty Maritime Jurisdiction – the International Law of the Sea.

Whereas an “autograph” is a graphic from your living hand as a sentient, flesh and blood man or woman – it provides evidence of substance and living capacity, which is why a thumbprint is the ultimate “autograph” for a living man or woman. Someone who makes an “autograph” declares that they are a sovereign man or woman, with Living Standing, in the Common Law Jurisdiction – the National Law of the Land.

Since you are born a sovereign in your own right without a master, you decide how best to make your autograph in any given situation.

Autograph ink is red (life), blue (sea), or purple (royal). Black ink indicates debt and death. For handwritten autographs, the declaration of Living Standing is more important than the colour of the ink, however a thumbprint autograph is always in red ink denoting your lifeblood.

The declaration of Living Standing beneath an autograph can be handwritten, typed, or rubber stamped, and can refer to the Universal Commercial Code (UCC).

Including a reference to the UCC is important if you are autographing paperwork that may later go into a commercial court, because you are citing to the Judge the relevant UCC remedy/recourse for a man or woman in the court’s Admiralty Maritime Jurisdiction – the International Law of the Sea, whereas you wish to retain your standing as a living man or woman in the Common Law Jurisdiction – the National Law of the Land. (They will not admit the jurisdictional difference between an artificial “legal person” and a living “man” or “woman”, because that would disclose that they are deceptively administering the international bankruptcy of your YOURNATION.INC., for which the artificial “legal person” is “surety”.)

Write/print/stamp under your autograph: WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to UCC 1-308

When you use “Without Prejudice UCC 1-308” in connection with your autograph, you are saying: “I reserve my right not to be compelled to perform under any contract, commercial agreement or bankruptcy, that I did not enter knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally. And furthermore, I do not and will not accept the liability of the compelled benefit of any unrevealed contract or commercial agreement or bankruptcy.”

Universal Commercial Code, Article 1, Sub-Section 1-308:
1-308. Performance or Acceptance Under Reservation of Rights.
(a) A party that with explicit reservation of rights performs or promises performance or assents to performance in a manner demanded or offered by the other party does not thereby prejudice the rights reserved. Such words as “without prejudice,” “under protest,” or the like are sufficient.

UCC 1-308 (old 1-207) also states:
The making of a valid Reservation of Rights preserves whatever rights the person then possesses, and prevents the loss of such rights by application of concepts of waiver or estoppel. (UCC 1-308 (old 1-207).7)
When a waivable right or claim is involved, the failure to make a reservation thereof, causes a loss of the right, and bars its assertion at a later date . (UCC 1-308 (old 1-207).9)
The Sufficiency of the Reservation – Any expression indicating an intention to reserve rights, is sufficient, such as “WITHOUT PREJUDICE.” (UCC 1-308 (old 1-207).4)

It is always best to reserve your rights in advance.

“Actually, it is better to use a rubber stamp, because this demonstrates that you had previously reserved your rights. The simple fact that it takes several days or a week to order and get a stamp shows that you had reserved your rights before ‘autographing’ the document.” – The UCC Connection

See Jurisdiction Is The Key

Source: https://livingintheprivate.blogspot.com/p/with-autograph.html

Notice of Dismissal Magistrate’s Court Template

The following template is to defend yourself against pirates of the high seas on our lands attempting to arrest you so as to silence you or to enforce the Plandemic de-population jab narratives on you; carry these documents with you at all times;

In The Magistrates Court Of The District Of …………………..

(Held At ……………………)

                                                Case Number: …../………/…………/202…..

In the matter between:-

THE STATE                                                                                       

and

John Doe                                                                                                     

_________________________________________________________________

Notice to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction

_________________________________________________________________

Be Pleased To Take Judicial Cognizance and Notice That the “that without which not” (sine qua non) of any matter is to establish the truth:

Corinthians 13:8 For we can do nothing against the truth, but for the truth.

Firstly, I John Doe, of lawful age and of sound mind hereby expressly declare and say that I am a living soul, a sovereign people, a creditor with inherent, inalienable, non-derogable, pre-existing, natural God-given  rights to life, freedom and happiness, some of which are enshrined in, but not subject to, the Bill of Rights;

Corinthians 7:22 For he that is called in the Lord, being a servant, is the Lords free man: likewise also he that is called being free, is Christs servant. 23 You are bought with a price, be not you the servants of men.

Secondly, my inalienable rights can neither be taken away by any fiction “STATE” nor any fictions of law unless I expressly give them up myself and with informed consent:

“Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them.” (S.C.R. 1795, (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54))

I am a living people standing on the land jurisdiction and not a corporate artificial  “person” as defined by the Interpretation Acts of SOUTH AFRICA, REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA or any derivatives thereof, hereinafter “RSA Inc.”;

Therefore, I am only accountable to a jury/tribunal of my peers at common law/customary law in accordance with, but not subject to, the Bill of Rights Section 34. Access to courts – Everyone has the right to have any dispute that can be resolved by the application of law decided in a fair public hearing before a court or, where appropriate, another independent and impartial tribunal or forum.

And, Section 39.3 Interpretation of Bill of Rights – 3. The Bill of Rights does not deny the existence of any other rights or freedoms that are recognised or conferred by common law, customary law or legislation, to the extent that they are consistent with the Bill.

Furthermore, there is a mistake: the ALL CAPITALS person, namely, JOHN DOE is merely a STRAWMAN transmitting utility to facilitate commercial transaction and neither to be mischaracterized or misrepresented as me, John Doe, nor construed as a grant of jurisdiction;

Maxim – One who exercises jurisdiction out of his territory is not obeyed with impunity.

I expressly do not consent to these proceedings three times ( 3x) and as declared and established by the following documents in support of the herein-made claims:

(If, you have not emancipated yet then download and complete and file the following documents from: https://giftoftruth.wordpress.com/emancipation/

Remove this highlighted section when done;)

  • Mandamus to SA Courts
  • Notice of Understanding and Claim of Right & Intent
  • Recording Cover Sheet
  • Deed of Reconveyance
  • Certificate of Assumed Name
  • Act of Expatriation
  • Cancellation of POA
  • Claim of Life & Estate
  • Mandatory Notice
  • Baby Deed of Land Recording

Take Further Notice That truth is expressed in the form of a declaration, statement or communication (affidavit):

Matthew 5:33 Again, you have heard that it has been said by them of old time, you will not forswear yourself, but will perform to the Lord your oaths. 34 But I say to you, Swear not at all, neither by heaven, for it is Gods throne: 35 Nor by the earth, for it is his footstool: neither by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great king. 36 Neither will you swear by your head, because you cannot make one hair white or black. 37 But let your communication be Yes, yes: No, no: For whatsoever is more than these, comes of evil.

James 5:12 But above all things, my brethren, swear not, neither by heaven, neither by the earth, neither by any other: but let your yes, be yes, and your no, no: lest you fall into condemnation.

That an unrebutted declaration or statement (affidavit) stands as truth in trade (commerce):

Isaiah 43:9 Let all the nations be gathered together, and let the people be assembled: who among them can declare this, and show us former things? Let them bring forth their witnesses, that they may be justified: or let them hear, and say, It is truth.

Hebrews 6:16 For men verily swear by the greater, and an oath for confirmation is to them an end of all strife.

Maxim – He who does not deny, admits.

Maxim – He who is silent appears to consent.

That an unrebutted declaration or statement becomes the judgment in trade:

Hebrews 6:17 Wherein God willing more abundantly to show to the heirs of promise the immutability of his counsel, confirmed it by an oath: 18 That by two immutable things in which it was impossible for God to lie, we might have a strong consolation, who have fled for refuge to lay hold upon the hope set before us.

Maxim – Where truth is, fiction of law does not exist.

“Once jurisdiction is challenged, the court cannot proceed when it clearly appears that the court lacks jurisdiction, the court has no authority to reach merits, but, rather, should dismiss the action.” Melo v. US, 505 F2d 1026.

“The law requires proof of jurisdiction to appear on the record of the administrative agency and all administrative proceedings.” Hagans v Lavine, 415 U. S. 533.

Therefore, the above-named Court is hereby ordered to dismiss this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Maxim – The order of things is confounded if every one obeys not his jurisdiction.

Declared his ………. day of ………………………. in the year 2021 at

……………………………… (Place), land Southern Africa.

By:    ……………………….………………………………………………(Seal)

Physical location for service:           c/o (Full Names)

(Physical Address close to the court)

(postal code; leave brackets)

(email address)

To:              The Clerk of the Court

                   Magistrate Court

And:           …………………………….. Attorneys

Download Text Document: Notice of Dismissal Magistrate’s Court Template – 2022.02.06

UPF SA Meeting with AngloAmerican Vaccine Committee

Today at 3pm a zoom meeting was held between Kath for the Yes Movement, Advocate Sabelo Sibanda, brother-thomas for SA Jural Assembly together as the United People’s Front with a lawyer of the AngloAmerican Vaccine (gene therapy) Committee;

The meeting was an informal discussion to understand the people’s concerns and to advise on the process.

The lawyer stated that AngloAmerican has no mandatory vaccination (gene therapy) policy; that a consultation process is underway with all interested stakeholders and submissions close on the 11th of February; the outcome will be presented by the AngloAmerican Vaccine (gene therapy) Committee to all relevant government departments;

In fact, AngloAmerican have no records of which staff are vaccinated (gene therapied) or not;

Therefore, no AngloAmerican company or mine or staff may discriminate against any employees in the workplace whatsoever;

Kindly report any and all gene therapy discrimination by AngloAmerican officials to Kath at viljoen.kath@gmail.com

The people shall govern;

in peace, bt

Read more about the SA United People’s Front at:

Some of the United People’s Front Coalitions are:

https://zarboervolk.net/

https://nationalpeacecommission.org/christian-coalition/

Pro-choice supporters: https://theredlist.co.za/

UPF Bitchute Channel https://www.bitchute.com/channel/i3Onpp1qK5Q6/

Take Action – let your voice be heard; take part in the SA People’s National Referendum: https://yesmovement.org.za/referendum/

Feel free to invite your coalition to join the United People’s Front;

The people shall (soon) govern! The faster you take action, the faster it will happen;

JAIL THE BANKSTERS? Is True Justice Seeking Retribution? Really?…

We are beginning to see a time when some bankers will get thrown under the bus, so to speak, by their very own brothers-in-arms, the banking fraternity; while some may cheer, it is in fact a sad state of affairs;

Banksters gene pool

Now, we know that there is honour, even among thieves; and, scapegoats and fall guys will be chosen from within their ranks to fall on their swords so as to appease the pitchfork-wielding people; the ‘retributionists’ as we call them: the eye-for-an-eye folks; while the real masterminds will get away…. Yet, again while the people squabble between themselves on how the banksters should be punished; here are some recent reports:

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-07-07/ex-barclays-traders-jailed-more-than-6-years-over-libor-rigging

https://sentinelblog.com/2016/07/30/first-senior-bankers-on-the-planet-responsible-for-2008-economic-collapse-finally-jailed/

BAR: Maybe 3 years ago we would have cheered, but not today; not after comprehending what natural law and natural justice is; what the law truly is; and, how we are still blindly following a retributive colonial slave bar legal system; the same legal system that has its occult roots in the papacy: http://one-evil.org/content/texts_papal_bull.html

By now, we have all lost an eye [or two] in this retributive system; and, in the world of the blind the one-eyed is king, they say; and, it was Gandhi who is attributed with saying:

Ghandi an eye for an eye

After a number of years of research on the true nature and concepts of law; and, what the law really means; and is; we can tell you this:

It’s all about subject-matter-jurisdiction as well as jurisdiction; the BAR system is a foreign jurisdiction operating under law-of-the-sea jurisdiction; it is a LIMITED jurisdiction; inferior to and in a lower jurisdiction to the law-of-the-land; law-of-the-sea ONLY has jurisdictions over legal fictions written in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS such as your ‘PERSON’, COPORATIONS, HUMAN BEINGS, CITIZENS, INDUVIDUALS; these are only IMAGINARY AND HAVE NO PARITY WITH THE TANGIBLE; law-of-the-sea is merely for commercial transactions between legal fictions; in this system the ‘STATE’ [a legal fiction] is ‘sovereign;

SUPREME COURT RULING – NO CORPORATE JURISDICTION OVER THE NATURAL MAN: Supreme Court of the United States 1795,

“Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them.” S.C.R. 1795, (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54)

Government is  merely a legal fiction which was created solely to protect peoples’ antecedent rights, property and natural resources; and, to provide the people with services, not to lord over them. A piece of paper cannot rule over a people. It has no jurisdiction over the tangible as affirmed by the above ruling.

A ‘sovereign state’ is a cabalistic term and is contrary and opposed to ‘people sovereignty’:

“The words “sovereign state” are cabalistic words, not understood by the disciple of liberty, who has been instructed in our constitutional schools. It is our appropriate phrase when applied to an absolute despotism. The idea of sovereign power in the government of a republic is incompatible with the existence and foundation of civil liberty and the rights of property.” Gaines v. Buford, 31 Ky. (1 Dana) 481, 501.

The real problem is the legal system, the banking system and political system; in order to be truly free we, the people must create new and alternative models of law, banking and without politics; 

Law of the Land: The law-of-the-land is your Bill of Rights, your tangible property and natural resources; people are equal before the law and have the right to a fair trial by jury, in a TRC or public hearing or forum; and, sovereign states and peoples honour the “law of nations”; in this system the people are sovereign;

Law of Nations: Now, as no people or community will ever acknowledge the superiority of one people over another, the only law that binds us is the “law of nations” which depends entirely on the rules of natural law and to which each people is equally subject; on this subject Sir William Blackstone wrote the following:

“However, as it is impossible for the whole race of mankind to be united in one great society, they must necessarily divide into many, and form separate states, commonwealths, and nations, entirely independent of each other, and yet liable to a mutual intercourse. Hence arises a third kind of law to regulate this mutual intercourse, called “the law of nations,” which, as none of these states will acknowledge a superiority in the other, cannot be dictated by any, but depends entirely upon the rules of natural law, or upon mutual compacts, treaties, leagues, and agreements between these several communities: in the construction also of which compacts we have no other rule to resort to, but the law of nature; being the only one to which all the communities are equally subject; and therefore the civil law(c) very justly observes, that quod naturalis ratio inter omnes homines constituit, vocatur jus gentium.” [Sir William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Law of England in Four Books, Vol. 1[1753] INTRODUCTION: OF THE STUDY OF NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE LAWS OF ENGLAND, SECTION 1: ON THE STUDY OF THE LAW] [extract]

QUOD NATURALIS RATIO INTER OMNES HOMINES CONSTITUIT, VOCATUR JUS GENTIUM. That which natural reason has established among all men is called the “law of nations.” 1 Bl.Comm. 43; Dig. 1, 1, 9; Inst. 1, 2, 1.

The bar system uses semantic deceit [in a language called “legalese” which sounds like English, but is deceptively different]; and, used to garner semblances of consent under the colour of law; what passes for law is not law; these are rules that only apply to government employees and members of bar associations and law societies; admirals, esquires, bachelors, privateers, pirates etc. are all ranking knights of a secret Temple society collaborating with monarchies and oligarchies under foreign and secret jurisdictions; hidden behind smoke and mirrors… switch and bait… divide, conquer and rule…

The 1893 Dictionary of Arts and Sciences, and general literature / The R. S. Peale 9th Encyclopaedia Britannica defines the word “LEGAL” as: “THE UNDOING OF GOD’S LAW.”

In a more fair and just system wherein people are sovereign; and, the law-of-the-land prevails; and, the protection of people freedoms [such as the right to not go to jail] people rights, peoples property is paramount; and, wherein governments provide equitable services as public servants and ONLY concern themselves with these behaviours; and, wherein people can be lifted out from behind the corporate veil and be held accountable before the people as peers; and wherein the people are the judges such as trial by jury;

And, wherein every people [even a banker] has the right to a fair trial by the law-of-the-land; wherein the people hear facts; and, after diligent deliberation, judge with equity; and, ought to make unanimous rulings according to principles of natural law and natural justice and restorative justice; and, ought to be reconciliatory;

Bankers are people too and NOT ‘persons’; they have the right not to incriminate themselves; they have the right to the presumption of liberty; they have the right not to give up their natural right to liberty, too; if you want those rights you need to give them to banksters too; be aware to not become the tyrants that we are opposing in the first place;

Albie Sachs - True Justice

What passes for justice in the fraudulent bar legal system is not justice; it’s a system of barratry and piracy and racketeering;

Are you telling us that you would have acted honourably if you were a banker? That you would NOT have put your hand in the cookie jar? Codswollop, we say;

Bastiat stated in his writings The Law that: “The STATE is that great legal fiction where everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else”;

The fraudulent system thrived because we were all clamouring to engage in usury against each other; to compete in a winner-takes-all system instead of co-operation and equity and sharing, equally; the system only existed because we remained party to the fraud; we are all guilty; not even one people will be found to be honourable and pure enough to open the seals…

Judge not harshly, lest ye be judged harshly, we say; punishment and imprisonment is archaic and cabalistic, people; it does not rehabilitate; it breaks down and burdens society; come on!!! Let’s not blindly copy the very same obsolete system that we are building new models for so as to make this one obsolete; let’s truly build new models based on principles of restorative justice; if, you wish to know more feel free to read our Restorative Justice page;

Sadly, our focus is on jailing the bankers; instead, it should be to hold Truth & Reconciliation Commissions to ensure that the harm ceases on the victims; who are the victims? The people! And, to ensure that the rights of the victims namely we, the people are addressed; to place moratoriums on evictions and foreclosures and repossessions; so that the harm ceases; to give the bankers the opportunity to repent in TRCs AND THEN TO FORGIVE THEM!!! THAT IS THE GOLDEN RULE! LOVE THY NEIGHBOUR [even bankers!!!] AS YOU LOVE YOURSELF;

DO YOU WANT TO SIT IN A JAIL? NO!!! NO-ONE WANTS TO SIT IN A JAIL!!!

Let’s forgive, but NOT forget; so that this never happens again; In the words of the ONLY Great Dictator: “We all want to help one another. Human beings [people] are like that. We want to live by each other’s happiness-not by each other’s misery. We don’t want to hate and despise one another. In this world there is room for everyone. And the good earth is rich and can provide for everyone. The way of life can be free and beautiful, but we have lost the way. Greed has poisoned men’s souls-has barricaded the world with hate-has goose-stepped us into misery and bloodshed. We have developed speed, but we have shut ourselves in. Machinery that gives abundance has left us in want. Our knowledge has made us cynical. Our cleverness, hard and unkind. We think too much and feel too little. More than machinery we need humanity. More than cleverness we need kindness and gentleness. Without these qualities life will be violent and all will be lost. . . .”

Yet, let’s rather focus our energy on the remedies; such as DEBT JUBILEEs; the set-off and settlement of ALL fraudulent debts!!! Fraud vitiates everything; fraud nullifies contracts; restitution to those who were de-frauded; equity and true equality before real law and real people courts wherein the people are the judges; yet, judge according to principles of restorative justice;

Let’s rather build new models of banking; of people community courts wherein true justice is seeking reconciliation and not retribution; and, wherein people are truly sovereign and recognise that life is sacred; and, we are embodiment of the sacred and that the divine dwells within us all, equally; and, where your rights end, mine begins;

And, finally, let’s all remember what that Great Soul Mahatma said:

Gandhi Peace is the way

Sincerely, without prejudice, under onerous title, in peace, brother-thomas

 

To Be or Not To Be a ‘Human Being’?

The following is yet again another example of semantic deceit by employment of a language called LEGALESE which is the jargon used by BAR members and LAW SOCIETY.

From Ballentine’s Law Dictionary, 1948 Edition. ‘Human Being’ is defined as follows: ‘See monster’ . From the same dictionary, ‘monster’ is defined: ‘A human-being by birth, but in some part resembling a lower animal.’
      This is an unusual definition, but like all Law Dictionaries on this subject, a non-definition. It only states that a ‘human being’ is a higher animal. It is not found anywhere in Scripture that a Christian Man or Woman is an animal or part of the animal kingdom. This being the case, then what exactly is a ‘human being.’
      From the Oxford New English Dictionary of 1901, ‘human’ is defined as, ‘3. Belonging or relative to man as distinguished from God or superhuman beings; pertaining to the sphere or faculties of man (with implication of limitation or inferiority); mundane; secular. (Often opposed to divine.)’
      ‘Secular’ being the important word here, we look to the multi-difinitions in the 1992 Random House Webster’s College Dictionary: “Secular’ adj. 1. of or pertaining to worldly things or to things not regarded as sacred: temporal. 2. not relating to or concerned with religion (opposed to sacred). 3. concerned with non-religious subjects. 4. not belonging to a religious order: not bound by monastic vows.”
      Could it be that ‘human’ means un-Godly. From the same dictionary, a look at a combination of the two: ‘Secular humanism’ n. any set of beliefs that promotes human values without specific allusion to religious doctrines.” And, “‘ secularism’ n. 1. secular spirit or tendency, esp. a system of political or social philosophy that rejects all forms of religious faith or worship. 2. the view that public education and other matters of civil policy should be conducted without the influence of religious beliefs.”
      In conjunction with this, from Collier’s New Dictionary of the *English Language, 1928. ‘humanitarian’ is defined: n. ‘a philanthropist: an anti Trinitarian who rejects the doctrine of Christ’s divinity; a perfectionist.: From the above Random House Dictionary, “humanitarianism’ is defined: n. ‘the doctrine that humankind may become perfect without divine aid.’
With no definition of ‘human being’ in Law, Mellinkoff’s Dictionary of American Legal Usage, 1992, defines ‘Person’ as, 1.”a human being–without regard to sex, legitimacy, or competence. This person is the central figure in law, as elsewhere, characterized by personal attributes of mind, intention, feelings, weaknesses, morality common to human beings; with rights and duties under the law. This is the person, sometimes called an individual, and often referred to in the law as a natural person, as distinguished from an artificial person (sense 3).”
      Of course, ‘morality common to human beings’ is not explained, because that would reveal to much. Again, in Shawmut Bank, N.A. vs. Valley Farms, (610A.2d652,654) it states, “For purpose of statute protecting certain property from post-judgment remedies, and therefore from prejudgment attachment, ‘natural person’ means ‘human being’, not artificial or juristic person”.
      So, if natural person and human being are considered the same in the law, let’s take a closer look at what a ‘natural person’ is. As you may know, all government codes, rules and regulations only attach to corporations, partnerships and natural persons. In American law, it seems that a definition of ‘natural person’ does not exist. To get any idea of what a natural person is, we have to go to English law. In the 17th Century, Lord Coke differentiated between ‘natural persons’ and ‘moral persons in a community’ in the following statement from his Institututes:… “we must observe, that estate is defined by the civilians, the capacity of moral persons; for, as natural persons have a certain space in which their natural existence is placed, and in which they perform their natural actions, so have persons in a community a certain state or capacity, in which they are supposed to exist, to perform their moral acts, and exercise all civil relations,”… (2 Inst. 669).
      With ‘natural man’ being the same as ‘natural person’, we find further evidence of exactly what a ‘human being’ is. From the above Random House Dictionary, page 901, ” ‘Natural’ adj. 17. natural man: unenlightened or unregenerate.” From the same Dictionary, page 1461, ” ‘unregenerate’ 1. not regenerate; unrepentant. 2. unconvinced by or unconverted to a particular religion, sect, or movement. 4. wicked; sinful; dissolute. 5. an unregenerate person.”
      In conjunction with this, from The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, 1933, ‘naturalism’ is defined as: ‘a system of morality or religion having a purely natural basis; a view of the world, and of man’s relationship to it, in which only the operation of natural, as opposed to supernatural or spiritual, laws and forces is assumed.’ and ‘naturalist’ is defined as: ‘One who follows the light of nature, as contrasted with revelation.’
      And, of course, the Scriptures being the final authority, confirms all of the above, at
1 Corinthians 3:14, “But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.”
      Therefore, when a Christian calls him or herself a ‘human being’, they are saying, “I’m an animal; I’m non-religious; I’m unrepentant: I’m wicked, sinful and dissolute; I’m able to do all things and be perfect without Jesus Christ; I’m subject to man’s law, rather than God’s Law.”

Source: http://www.hisholychurch.net/sermon/human.htm

This is sufficient logical proof why ‘human rights’ are NOT enforceable. Think about it; your Constitution talks about ‘we, the people’ and NOT ‘we, the human beings’…

Therefore, it is ludicrous to fight for human rights. We may as well scrap or re-write ‘human rights’ charters and amend to people’s charters. In peace 

 

The first case before the International Tribunal for Natural Justice is “We, the People” v. REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA INC. – PART 2

The Mother of all African trials will commence in Johannesburg, South Africa on the 28th of January, 2016 because this is truly the first case “by the people, for the people, of the people” by the UN-ENACTED law of the land, natural law and universal jurisdiction; in the trial the OPPT foreclosures will be presented for verification; we will be inviting Caleb Skinner, Heather Tucci-Jarraf and Randall Hiller to testify; those who have been following SWISSINDO TRUST and global black screen off-ledger accounts will not be disappointed; the case will be livestreamed by New Earth Nation and ITNJ committee; other issues which will be raised is the Federal Reserve swindle: how RSA has been “federalized”, the role of the NWO in the history of RSA, the truth about central banking, revenue services fraud; corporate government franchise fraud, banking fraud, electoral fraud, the whole nine yards; we will have expert witnesses, central banking experts, community members with evidence of fraud on ALL levels; rest assured, there will not be a dull moment;

BUT MOST IMPORTANTLY, IF THE ITNJ RULE IN OUR FAVOUR THEN IT WILL SET PRECEDENT FOR MANY COUNTRIES!!!

UZA ITNJ Document banner

We will be flying the ITNJ Chief Justice Dr. John Walsh of Brannagh to Johannesburg, South Africa to arbitrate the trial; this will be the first trial by jury since it was abolished in 1969; however, in terms of jurisdiction, the first of its kind as ALL current COURTS are ADMIRALTY jurisdiction courts and this is one of the key issues in this very complex trial;

The case has been filed by Unified Common-law Grand Jury of Southern Africa (UZA) against Chief Justice Moegeng Moegeng and others of the Constitutional Court of South Africa by representative action of we, the people; we are holding them accountable for all our woes; after all, they are the “kingmakers” and, the only remedy is for them to re-oath themselves to we, the people to re-establish the proper hierarchy: we at the top; public servants below us; that is only if our case succeeds, of course;

28 JANUARY 2016 UDF

 UZA now represent a loose affiliation of about 6 million people on the land of Southern Africa who do not consent to the current anglo-saxon hegemony and who see no difference between the apartheid-era of the pre-1994 regime and the current economic apartheid enforced by an oligarchy ruled by a global minority elite; UZA is also now recognized as the Southern Africa Chapter of the committee in support of the International Tribunal for Natural Justice. There are many countries already affiliated; if this interests you or you have skills then do get involved; its open doors; the troublemakers work themselves out quickly as there are no ego trips; we are all awake and aware of what we are up against;

2015.10.12 ITNJ Press Release

The Tribunal will function similarly to the Nuremberg Tribunal, where government officials in Germany were tried for crimes against humanity. The primary difference is that the ITNJ is founded on principles of Natural Law, and has universal jurisdiction, recognizing no borders against justice. The ITNJ therefore stands positioned to set legal precedents that restore common dignity, truth, and reason to the delivery of justice in the world.

ITNJ is reaching out to planetary leaders whose works toward disclosure, natural justice and the elevation of consciousness impact our times. Please have a look at the Proclamation, Mission, and Treaty of the International Tribunal for Natural Justice (www.itnj.org) and consider aligning with this noble endeavor. We would be greatly honoured to count your name and voice among those people now advocating a planetary renewal in law and governance. The International Tribunal for Natural Justice was officially established on February 14th of this year – and the world is responding.

Thousands of constitutional scholars, law researchers, human rights groups and activists are joining hands across a wide spectrum of issues to support the ITNJ as a beacon of light to lead us out of the darkness of corruption. The Tribunal’s ceremonial seating was broadcast around the world via secure live-stream:

The establishment of the ITNJ means that it is no longer out of reach to bring to trial the decision-makers at the top of corporate and government structures such as the central banks, and even those working for corporations masquerading as our governments and our court systems. No longer will corporate agents be able to hide behind a corporate veil claiming immunity from prosecution. We sincerely hope you will join us as an esteemed member and supporter. This is truly for the People, by the People.

ARIKI TE WAIREMANA ZLAMALA:

 te wairemana 1

Our battles are not of the flesh and blood, it is of the “spirit”; the scales of justice are determined by the “Spirit of the Law” in the one scale and the “Letter of the Law” in the other; that’s why the scales of justice are currently all hanging skew; ours are level and we are changing “All shall be equal before the Law” to “All ARE NOW equal before the Law”;

Therefore, it is with humble gratitude that we announce that Ariki Te Wairemana Zlamala, Paramount Chief of Aotearoa (New Zealand) and, who’s people are also re-claiming their country from their colonial slave-masters’ tentacles; we feel Ariki Te represents the embodiment of the “Spirit of the Law”; he will be in Southern Africa for a month doing peace and healing ceremonies around the country;

Also, as part of the brand new World Hereditary Council, will be meeting with Hereditary Chiefs and Kings;

Also, will open the court ceremony on the 28th of January, 2016 on Constitutional Hill, Hillbrow, Johannesburg, South Africa; very historical in that the old fort prison is where both Mandela and Gandhi were jailed;

A Rangatira (chief) and Tohunga from New Zealand – Te Wairemana is a respected, Spiritual Leader and Healer. His noble whakapapa {lineage} stretches back to the time before Maori made New Zealand their new home Aotearoa, many centuries ago.

Te Wairemana was born gifted with the ability to communicate with the Wairua (Spirit World of both the old ways and the new) and the Ancient Ones. The Ancient Ones in Maoritanga are the Ancestors of Te Wairemana’s people, and the Spirits of the land (Papatuanuku) and the majestic mountain sacred to his iwi (tribe). Every iwi has their own mountain which they honor as a living being and part of their ancestry. Maoritanga holds that every mountain around the world can communicate with each other and that they carry the Spirit and Knowledge of the land to teach those who will listen.

Te Wairemana is a powerful healer. Listening to his own Wairua and those of the people who come to him, he works with the Ancient Ones and all elements of the Land and Life. He calls upon his Spiritual connections to guide people to their healing, opening doors to the path they are searching for.

Te Wairemana’s belief is in Oneness, the Oneness of All. His desire is to bring the Spirit and Being of all people regardless of race or religion, together in harmony with themselves, each other and the Earth we live upon. He works powerfully and with deep compassion for those who come to him for guidance, healing and his sacred teachings.

http://www.wairua.at/en/team/te-wairemana-english.html

http://wairua-te.com/

http://itnjcommittee.org/about-us/chapters/aotearoa/

Te Wairemana Zlamala: facebook

Te Wairemana Zlamala: Te Puna Wairua Healing Aotearoa Ltd

Te Wairemana Zlamala: closed group

Te Wairemana Zlamala: Te Puna Wairua Healing Retreat