With SA Human Rights Day coming up bt has been asked to write on what “human rights” means to SA Jural Assembly; so here’s another ‘sermon on the mount’;
Now, most South Africans are Christians so our common law is founded in the Holy Bible (1611 King James Version), especially in the New Testament which is for us “gentiles” aka “goyim” aka “herd animals” aka “useless eaters”,
Firstly, we are NOT “human beings” we are “people” as in “we the people”; sovereign people to be specific; otherwise known as “man” not “hue-man” which is “colour of man” as in “colour of law”; and, we have inherent, natural, pre-existing, Creator-given, inalienable rights, each by their own private belief, some of which are supposedly “enshrined” in the Bill of Rights; and, this is why human rights are not enforceable;
And, if my inalienable rights belong to me as my fingers belong to me then they cannot be taken away by majority vote of the people; they cannot be taken away by legislation; they cannot be taken away by command of the executive; they can only be taken away if I give them up myself; watch: The Natural Law as a Restraint against Tyranny by Judge Andrew P. Napolitano: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4orlWZeF6sg
We are living souls: Genesis 2:7 And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, & breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
We are holy temples of our Creator: I Corinthians 3:16 Know you not that you are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwells in you? 17 If any man defiles the Temple of God, him will God destroy: for the Temple of God is holy, which Temple you are.
We are gods: John 10:34 Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, you are gods?
We are perfect: Matt. 5:48 Be you therefore perfect, even as your father, which is in heaven, is perfect.
We are temples of the Holy Ghost: I Corinthians 6:19 What, know you not that your body is the Temple of the holy Ghost which is in you, which you have of God, and you are not your own? 20 For you are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God’s.
We are sacred; and, it is a well-established principles of law (maxim) that:
A sacred thing does not admit of valuation.
The human body does not admit of valuation.
However, when a Christian calls him or herself a ‘human being’, they are in truth saying, “I’m a monster, an animal; I’m non-religious; I’m unrepentant; I’m wicked, sinful and un-sacred so I can be placed under bondage, taxed and levied, chipped tagged and bagged like a herd animal, made a modern day slave and turned into merchandise; corporate “property of ‘THE STATE’, therefore I’m subject to man’s law, rather than God’s Law.”
Background:
To understand the problems of today we need to understand how we got here in the first place; now, the oldest religion in the world is demon satanic luciferin worship of the “fallen ones” which goes all the way back to Ancient Babylon, Mesopotamia, Persia, Sumeria and the Garden of Eden;
In a nutshell, the Brotherhood of the Serpent and Reptilian Bloodlines, claiming to be directly descended from Sargon the Great and his Annunaki forefathers, infiltrated Israel and Judaism via the Canaanite Ashkenazi Khazarian Mafia aka “Synagogue of Satan”; they swore an oath to avenge Hiram Abiff and to corrupt and destroy the earth, the people and all that is sacred while using us as the tools of the destruction;
Revelation 2:9 I know your works, and tribulation, and poverty, but you are rich, and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews and are not, but are the Synagogue of Satan.
And, over the last 1000 years, Mystery Babylon took control of the Vatican, Monarchies, Merchants and Banksters; Rome, over London, Washington DC and New York; today known as the New World Order has corrupted and perverted every system of good governance: from banking, commerce, law and government;
And all this was achieved by employing what we jurists call “semantic deceit under colour of law”; in other words using false words in the legal system intended to deceive and defraud and enslave; and also using false measures and weights in the banking and law merchant system;
Levitus 19:35 You shall do no unrighteousness in judgment, in meteyard, in weight, or in measure. 36 Just balances, just weights, a just Ephah, and a just Hin shall you have: I am the Lord your God, which brought you out of the land of Egypt.
Legalese:
The true meaning of words is hidden in the definitions of words; so we turn to the Law Dictionaries;
Black’s Law Dictionary defines LEGALESE as:
“The jargon characteristically used by lawyers, esp. in legal documents <the partner chided the associate about the rampant legalese in the draft sublease>.
See PLAIN-LANGUAGE MOVEMENT. [Black’s Law 8th Edition]
PLAIN-LANGUAGE MOVEMENT. 1. The loosely organized campaign to encourage legal writers and business writers to write clearly and concisely — without legalese — while preserving accuracy and precision. 2. The body of persons involved in this campaign. [Black’s Law 8th Edition]
The 1893 Dictionary of Arts and Sciences, Encyclopedia Britannica, a Dictionary of Arts, Sciences, And General Literature / The R.S Peale 9th 1893 defines the word “LEGAL” in 5 words: “The undoing of God’s Law.” Need we say more…
II Peter 2:3 And through covetousness will they with feigned words, make merchandise of you, whose judgement now of a long time lingers not, and their damnation slumbers not.
Human Being Defined:
From Ballentine’s Law Dictionary, 1948 Edition. ‘Human Being’ is defined as follows: ‘See monster’. From the same dictionary, ‘monster’ is defined: ‘A human-being by birth, but in some part resembling a lower animal.’
It is not found anywhere in the Bible that a Christian Man or Woman is an animal or part of the animal kingdom. This being the case, then what exactly is a ‘human being.’
From the Oxford New English Dictionary of 1901, ‘human’ is defined as, ‘3. Belonging or relative to man as distinguished from God or superhuman beings; pertaining to the sphere or faculties of man (with implication of limitation or inferiority); mundane; secular. (Often opposed to divine.)
‘Secular’ being the important word here, we look to the multi-definitions in the 1992 Random House Webster’s College Dictionary: “Secular’ adj.
1. of or pertaining to worldly things or to things not regarded as sacred: temporal.
2. not relating to or concerned with religion (opposed to sacred).
3. concerned with non-religious subjects.
4. not belonging to a religious order: not bound by monastic vows.”
Therefore, ‘human’ means un-Godly. From the same dictionary, a look at a combination of the two: ‘Secular humanism’ n. any set of beliefs that promotes human values without specific allusion to religious doctrines.”
And, “‘secularism’ n.
1. secular spirit or tendency, esp. a system of political or social philosophy that rejects all forms of religious faith or worship.
2. the view that public education and other matters of civil policy should be conducted without the influence of religious beliefs.”
In conjunction with this, from Collier’s New Dictionary of the *English Language, 1928. ‘humanitarian’ is defined: n. ‘a philanthropist: an anti Trinitarian who rejects the doctrine of Christ’s divinity; a perfectionist.:
From the above Random House Dictionary, “humanitarianism’ is defined: n. ‘the doctrine that humankind may become perfect without divine aid.’
With no definition of ‘human being’ in Law, Mellinkoff’s Dictionary of American Legal Usage, 1992, defines ‘Person’ as, 1.”a human being–without regard to sex, legitimacy, or competence. This person is the central figure in law, as elsewhere, characterized by personal attributes of mind, intention, feelings, weaknesses, morality common to human beings; with rights and duties under the law. This is the person, sometimes called an individual, and often referred to in the law as a natural person, as distinguished from an artificial person (sense 3).”
Of course, ‘morality common to human beings’ is not explained, because that would reveal too much. Again, in Shawmut Bank, N.A. vs. Valley Farms, (610A.2d652,654) it states, “For purpose of statute protecting certain property from post-judgment remedies, and therefore from prejudgment attachment, ‘natural person’ means ‘human being’, not artificial or juristic person”.
So, if natural person and human being are considered the same in the law, let’s take a closer look at what a ‘natural person’ is. As you may know, all government codes, rules and regulations only attach to corporations, partnerships and persons.
In South African law, the Interpretation Act of 1957 and amendments defines ‘person’ as follows:
‘person’ includes-
(a) any divisional council, municipal council, village management board, or like authority;
(b) a company, close corporation or co-operative incorporated or registered in terms of legislation whether in the Republic or elsewhere;
(c) a body of persons corporate or unincorporated;
(d) an estate of a deceased or insolvent person; or
(e) a partnership, trust or trust fund,
but excludes an organ of state unless section 27 applies;
And the inclusion of the above means the exclusion of all else;
Note: nowhere does it mention that an ACT applies to people; a person is a legal fiction entity that exists only on paper;
Acts 10:34 Then Peter opened his mouth, and said: Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:
Romans 2:11 For, there is no respect of persons with God.
James 2:8 If you fulfil the royal Law, according to the Scripture, you will love your neighbour as yourself, you do well. 9 But if you have respect to persons, you commit sin, and are convinced of the Law, as transgressors.
Jude 1:16 These are murmurers and complainers, walking after their own lusts, and their mouth speaks great swelling words, having men’s persons in admiration because of advantage.
It is through false words used by Courts of SA known as semantic deceit under colour of law that we the people get converted from living creditors into legal fiction debtor “persons”, “chattel” (cattle), “property” and “deceased estates”…
read more at: https://giftoftruth.wordpress.com/what-is-law/
Luke: 11:45 Then answered one of the Lawyers, and said to him, Master, so saying, you reproach us also. 46 And he said, Woe to you also you lawyers: for you laid men with burdens grievous to be born, and you your selves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers.
In English Law in the 17th Century, Lord Coke differentiated between ‘natural persons’ and ‘moral persons in a community’ in the following statement from his Institutes… “we must observe, that estate is defined by the civilians, the capacity of moral persons; for, as natural persons have a certain space in which their natural existence is placed, and in which they perform their natural actions, so have persons in a community a certain state or capacity, in which they are supposed to exist, to perform their moral acts, and exercise all civil relations,”… (2 Inst. 669).
With ‘natural man’ being the same as ‘natural person’, we find further evidence of exactly what a ‘human being’ is. From the above Random House Dictionary, page 901, ” ‘Natural’ adj. 17. natural man: unenlightened or unregenerate.” From the same Dictionary, page 1461, ” ‘unregenerate’
1. not regenerate; unrepentant.
2. unconvinced by or unconverted to a particular religion, sect, or movement.
4. wicked; sinful; dissolute.
5. an unregenerate person.”
In conjunction with this, from The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, 1933, ‘naturalism’ is defined as: ‘a system of morality or religion having a purely natural basis; a view of the world, and of man’s relationship to it, in which only the operation of natural, as opposed to supernatural or spiritual, laws and forces is assumed.’ and ‘naturalist’ is defined as: ‘One who follows the light of nature, as contrasted with revelation.’
And, of course, the Scriptures being the final authority, confirms all of the above, at
1 Corinthians 3:14, “But the natural man receives not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness to him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.”
In closing, it is a well-established principle of law that: If ever the law of God and man are at variance, the former are to be obeyed in derogation of the later. [Acts 5:29]
Conclusion:
Therefore, we do not celebrate “Hue-man Wrongs” Day; monster rights are not enforceable so what’s the point?
Attorneys and Advocates cannot claim plausible deniability in this mass scale deception, entrapment, mis-characterization, personage, press-ganging, conversion of your status, to name but a few artifices of semantic deceit under colour of law;
It is only when the power of lawmaking is restored back to the people in common law or customary law courts, where it lawfully belongs, that these glaring legalese errors can be corrected; where plain language can be restored, where man, people and humans can mean the same thing; and, where human rights can finally be enforceable if a people’s court in the form of a jury of peers or tribal authority declares it to be so;
The decree of the sovereign makes law. Restore the power back to you where it belongs – the people shall govern! Let your voice be heard; take part in the SA People’s National Referendum: https://yesmovement.org.za/referendum/
In peace, bt
SA Jural Assembly – a people’s court of common opinion;
Maxim – Common opinion is good authority in law.
This is whFurther Reading from Anna Von Reitz:
http://annavonreitz.com/manvhuman.pdf
http://annavonreitz.com/entrapment.pdf
Giftoftruth Southern Africa 