Category Archives: RSA INC.

Notice & Demand Regarding the Proposed Expropriation Bill to RSA INC. from we the people

On behalf of all South Africans the following Notice & Demand is being served on the Land Claims Court, Constitutional Court, CEO (“President”) of RSA INC. and Minister of Justice by SA Jural Committee and SA Jural Assembly as to why the proposed Expropriation Bill is both illegal (according to their rules) and unlawful at common law and customary law.

This will also be published in 2 national newspapers in the legal notices section.

Note that the Committee is laying the foundations for an alternative people’s government and the Assembly for the people’s courts; in accordance with the 1955 Freedom Charter and 1990-94 Reconstruction & Development Policy Framework – both declared – The People Shall Govern!!! Not just a few but EVERYONE!!!

Any counterclaims can be made below this post or to SA Jural Assembly at

Notice & Demand

Regarding the Proposed Expropriation Bill

Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents.

Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals.

Kindly Take Notice That the sine qua non (“that without which not”) of any matter is to establish the truth. And, the truth is that the expropriation of public and private land and property by agents of SOUTH AFRICA, GOVERNMENT OF SOUTH AFRICA, COURTS OF SOUTH AFRICA and all derivatives and franchises thereof, hereinafter ‘RSA INC’, is both unlawful and illegal for the reasons set out herein:

Regarding we the people

That, sovereignty is vested in we the people and not in some corporate legal fiction “STATE”:

“Sovereignty itself is… not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law… while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts.” (Justice Thomas Stanley Matthews in Yick Wo v. Hopkins [p. 370]);

That, the Preamble of the CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA, ACT 108 OF 1996 declares South Africa to be a “Sovereign State”. However, “The words “sovereign state” are cabalistic words, not understood by the disciple of liberty, who has been instructed in our constitutional schools. It is our appropriate phrase when applied to an absolute despotism. The idea of sovereign power in the government of a republic is incompatible with the existence and foundation of civil liberty and the rights of property.” Gaines v. Buford, 31 Ky. (1 Dana) 481, 501.

That, we the people are endowed by our Creator with inherent, pre-existing, antecedent, natural, unalienable, inalienable rights such as Life, Freedom, Land and Property which existed long before the fiction called “government”.

There are areas in human behaviour for which we do not need a government slip. The quintessential right is the Creator-given right to dominion over land and the earth. (Genesis 1:28).

Now, some of our rights are enshrined within but, not subject to, the Bill of Rights; such as:

Section 25(1) –  Property

No one may be deprived of property except in terms of law of general application, and no law may permit arbitrary deprivation of property.

However, ACTS, CODES and STATUTES Are Not Laws but rules that only apply to RSA INC. agents, employees and corporations as established further on under the same title. And, the source of law our rights cannot be limited by the Bill of Rights.

Maxim – Fraud lies hid in general expressions.

The concept of limited government

Take Further Notice That government officials are administrators – our hired help. We the people pay your salaries to serve we the people and administrate our public property – namely South Africa – the land and everything on, above and below it as well as the coastal waters.

South Africa is a Trust and we the people are the rightful and lawful creators, beneficiaries, shareholders, owners and priority claimants of everything tangible, on, above and below the soil.

The following is from a speech of the well-known U.S. Law Professor and Judge –  Andrew P. Napolitano – titled The Natural Law as a Restraint Against Tyranny:

“The government derives its powers from the consent of the governed;

The fiction is that we have consented to the surrender of our rights; the reality is that our rights have been stolen from us because the government monopolises force; it’s a sad and terrible reality;

Sadly, today the government, to which none of us has consented which claims it has authority by majority vote to trample our natural rights and assault on those liberties that make up our humanity;

And, just because we have given some powers to the federal government, it does not mean we have kept the rest for ourselves, we have;

That’s the concept of limited government; the government must stop when it wants to touch our natural rights, whatever we think our natural rights are;

Because these are the things that we all yearn as human-beings to do; free from interference by the government;

If they belong to me as my fingers belong to me then they cannot be taken away by majority vote; they cannot be taken away by legislation; they cannot be taken away by command of the executive; (they cannot be taken away by the majority of the people); they can only be taken away if I give them up myself;

So, we can voluntarily surrender our own natural rights but, one cannot surrender someone else’s rights because natural rights are owned by each one.

That is the theory of the founding fathers of a republican form of government.”

Note that South Africa is a Republic which is a Trust of which our forefathers are the Donors, adult South Africans are Trustees, and all their offspring are beneficiaries.

Therefore, we the people are the rightful and lawful owners, shareholders, priority claimants and creditors for the original organic un-incorporated South African Republic, hereinafter ‘SAR’ as well as all accounts, credit and assets of all corporate RSA INC. entities derived from SAR.

The debts owed to the FED, UN/IMF, ENGLISH CROWN, DUTCH CROWN, VATICAN et al is not the liability of we the people but the liability of those acting as agents and fiduciaries and principals of RSA INC.

Maxim – The partner of my partner is not my partner.

Natural rights have been flipped

Judge Napolitano continues: The presumption of liberty says that the rights that we did not surrender to the government, we retained for our self; and, they can never be taken away by popular vote or majority vote or command by a governor or a president.

Now, if the government recognised the concept of natural rights, it would know that virtually everything it has done since the last century other than to protect of natural rights;

Question: Is there any legitimate activity a government has in a free society? Yes, to protect the natural rights of the people in that society; meaning, do not assault my freedom, my life, my liberty, my property! Protect it! That is what we have a government for.

And, a government that believes in natural rights will limit itself to those behaviours;

Do you know of any government today that limits itself to only the protection of natural rights? That is the ideal.

We need to understand the force of darkness among us and that force of darkness is the very government we have elected and empowered to impose the darkness upon us. The better we understand it, the more we understand it, the sooner we can be free from its shackles.”


The fiction of government

Take Further Notice That: “Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them.” (S.C.R. 1795, (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54))

Therefore, no COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA OR GOVERNMENT OF SOUTH AFRICA has ANY jurisdiction over anything tangible; not we the people and certainly not over our land, air, water, coastal waters and natural resources, be it private or public.

And, therefore statutory law is not law per se but, merely the rules relating to contracts between corporate artificial persons and neither applies to real living people nor has any jurisdiction over we the sovereign people or our land, air, water, coastal waters and natural resources, be it private or public. In fact only common law people’s courts and or customary law courts and tribal authorities have jurisdiction to decide on matters regarding tangible reality – people, land, minerals, natural resources, water, air and so forth.

The truth is that COURTS OF SA employ DOG-LATIN legalese which is merely semantic deceit under colour of law and fictions of law  to subvert our status and thereby falsely “re-venue” we the living people, the lawful creditors, owners, and priority claimants of all South Africa, into bankrupt legal fiction CORPORATE STRAWMAN “DEBTORS’ with no rights into their watery sea venues and into CROWN “property” via actionable fraud, bad faith, bad motive, barratry (piracy), breach of contract and treaty, cheat, colourable transactions, concealment, conversion, false pretences, fraud, graft, gross misconduct, misdescription, misrepresentation, mischaracterization, law of war, personation, pressganging, racketeering, trespass with force and fraud, quasi trusts, unconscionable contracts and bargain, usury to name but a few.

A full investigation into all commercial paper issued by RSA INC. agencies and the chain of title and tax filings will confirm our claims. Clear proof is the mysterious “disappearance” of most original bills, birth certificates, court orders, mortgage bonds, municipal bills, tax invoices, tenders,  title deeds, vehicle registration papers, warrants and other commercial paper issued by RSA INC. corporate service providers.

Maxim – He who sells justice for money is guilty of barratry (piracy).


Take Further Notice That SOUTH AFRICA, REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA, GOVERNMENT OF SOUTH AFRICA and all derivatives and franchises thereof, hereinafter RSA INC., is not a lawful not-for-profit de jure government by, for and of the people but, merely foreign, privately-owned, de facto. corporate services providers operating under law merchant in the international sea jurisdiction and is not the lawful government as was intended to be, since the 1994 Reconstruction.

And, the CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA ACT No. 108 1996 is merely a creature of Statute – a corporate charter and corporate rules for how these foreign corporate service providers and their franchises, agencies and agents must behave when providing services to we the people on our lands. And, your services are appalling and overpriced. We can do it ourselves and for way cheaper. We therefore no longer require your services. You are fired as of immediate effect.

That when we do a search on company listings such as or we find many RSA INC. franchises listed as private companies.

Now, there is a big difference between a lawful government and private company. A lawful government is a not-for-profit Public Trust of which we the people are the rightful and lawful owners, shareholders and priority claimants. The Freedom Charter affirms that: “South Africa belongs to all who live in it, black and white, and that no government can justly claim authority unless it is based on the will of the People;”

Whereas, a private company is in the business of profiting off of we the people for the benefit of a small group of private shareholders as is the case with.

And, RSA INC. is managed by the major banks for the benefit of their, mostly foreign, shareholders – the global elites which is a recipe for disaster. Refer to:

According to the 2013 edition of the Corpus Jurus Secundrum, CORPORATIONS Section, and Subsection 38 – 41 – the U.S. Supreme Court states that whenever the United States (a body public corporate) engages in commercial business it abandons its sovereign capacity and is to be treated as any other corporation. The same applies to every other country registered in the US/UN/IMF such as RSA INC.

Therefore, RSA INC. Agencies, Agents and Employees cannot engage in commercial private-for-profit business and still claim to be a lawful public “government”. The entire tax history of RSA Departments will document that they are private, for-profit, corporations. And, if they are not government then it means that the actual lawful government offices are vacant and then it is the duty of we, the people to fill those offices and to govern ourselves so as to review and complete the “Reconstruction” of South Africa as set out in the 1994 Reconstruction & Development Policy Framework.

RSA INC. Bankruptcy

Take Further Notice That RSA INC. is in fact operating under revolving, rehabilitation bankruptcy since the 1933 Bretton Woods Agreement and Emergency Currency Acts and the Federal Reserve Act. And, the Federal Reserve System is in fact a non-permanent non-banking debt based fiat currency system which was supposedly introduced to try and “rehabilitate” the “bankruptcy” of nations but instead was a ploy by the Merchant Bankster Mafia in a debt-for-gold swop scam and the ultimate confiscation thereof due to the resulting runaway inflation caused by unsustainable interest equations and hyperinflation which we can all now see with the dramatic escalating increase in prices of goods.

“By this means government may secretly and unobserved, confiscate the wealth of the people, and not one man in a million will detect the theft.” – British Lord John Maynard Keynes

And, it gave central banks the licence to create and print fiat currency out of thin air.

“Banks lend by creating credit. (ledger-entry credit, monetized debt) They create the means of payment out of nothing.” — Ralph M. Hawtrey, Secretary of the British Treasury

Since, Federal Reserve currency such as the South African Rand, is not backed by anything of value, it is merely IOUs – promises to pay sometime in the future.

And, since the Federal Reserve System is way past its 75 year statute of limitations and cannot be rehabilitated, it is time to End the Fed. Refer to

And, as Thomas Jefferson rightly said: “The issuing power of money should be taken away from the banks and be restored to the people to whom it properly belongs.”

This is why BRICS was established: to develop an alternative system to the Fed with value-backed lawful money and a value-for-value system of trade and thereby end U.S. and fiat U.S. Dollar hegemony. .

Therefore, Take Further Notice That there is no lawful value-for-value exchange or just compensation if land was to be appropriated for fiat currency in Rands. Refer to

And, that it is both illegal and unlawful for a bankrupt entity to engage in commerce beyond the statute of limitations.

“We are completely dependent on the commercial banks. Someone has to borrow every dollar we have in circulation, cash or credit. If the banks create ample synthetic money we are prosperous; if not, we starve. We are absolutely without a permanent money system…. It is the most important subject intelligent persons can investigate and reflect upon. It is so important that our present civilization may collapse unless it becomes widely understood and the defects remedied very soon.” – Robert H. Hemphill, Credit Manager, Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank, in the Foreword to a book titled “100% Money” by Irving Fisher 1936.

Un-incorporated South African Republic

Take Further Notice That RSA derived from the original organic un-incorporated land jurisdiction South Africa, South African Republic and SA Trusts, hereinafter ‘SAR’, of which we the people are the rightful and lawful creditors, heirs, owners and priority claimants.

And, that all gold, silver, diamonds and all other natural resources that have been confiscated in the Federal Reserve Swindle are due and owing back to the people. .

All debts need to be contracted, the books balanced and all accounts closed in accordance with the Bills of Exchange Acts both national and international.

And, the only legal and lawful way to settle the debts of the bankrupt RSA INC. is by the proper application of the Bills of Exchange Amendment ACT 56 of 2000.

ACTS, CODES and STATUTES are not “Laws”

Take Further Notice That ACTS, CODES and STATUTES are not “laws” but merely rules that apply to RSA INC. employees, not their employers, namely we the people.

“US. SUPREME COURT DECISION – “All codes, rules, and regulations are for government authorities only, not human/Creators in accordance with God’s laws. All codes, rules, and regulations are unconstitutional and lacking due process…” Rodriques v. Ray Donavan (U.S. Department of Labor) 769 F. 2d 1344, 1348 (1985).

“A “Statute” is not a Law,” (Flouraoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248)

“A “Code” or “Statute: is not Law,” (Flouraoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248)

“Statutes apply only to state created creatures known as corporations no matter whether [creatures of statute and offices of] state, local, or federal [government].” (Bolonial) Pipeline Co. v. Traigle, 421 US 100. (1975).

US. SUPREME COURT DECISION – “…every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowman without his consent.” Cruden v. Neale, 2 N.C. 338 (1796) 2 S.E.

US. SUPREME COURT DECISION – The common law is the real law, the Supreme Law of the land, the code, rules, regulations, policy and statutes are “not the law”, [Self v. Rhay, 61 Wn (2d) 261]

People v. Ortiz, (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 286. “A statute does not trump the Constitution.”

Bennett v. Boggs, 1 Baldw 60, “Statutes that violate the plain and obvious principles of common right and common reason are null and void.”

Supreme Court Ruling [Miller vs. U.S., 230 F. 486, 489] “The claim and exercise of a constitutional Right cannot be converted into a crime.”

Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, Alabama, 373 U.S. 262 (1963): “If the State converts a right (liberty) into a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right (liberty) with impunity.”

In Hertado v. California, 110 US 516, the U.S Supreme Court states very plainly: “The state cannot diminish rights of the people.”  

Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1914, p. 2961: “Those who have the right to do something cannot be licensed for what they already have right to do as such license would be meaningless.”

City of Dallas v Mitchell, 245 S.W. 944 “To take away all remedy for the enforcement of a right is to take away the right itself. But that is not within the power of the State.”

In re McCowan (1917), 177 C. 93, 170 P. 1100 “Ignorance of the law does not excuse misconduct in anyone, least of all in a sworn officer of the law.”

Brookfield Const. Co. v. Stewart, 284 F. Supp. 94. “An officer who acts in violation of the Constitution ceases to represent the government.”

U.S. v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 614 (3d Cir. 1982) “There is no crueler tyranny than that which is exercised under cover of law, and with the colors of justice …”  
Griffin v. Maryland, 378 U.S. 130

10 Co. 77; Dig. 2. 1. 20; Story, Confl. Laws ‘ 539; Broom, Max. 100, 101: “One who exercises jurisdiction out of his territory cannot be obeyed with impunity.”

Therefore, we do not recognise any ACT, BILL, CODE, STATUTE or other legislation of RSA INC. as being lawful or having any authority over we the people; especially not an  Expropriation Bill.

Maxim – One who exercises jurisdiction out of his territory is not obeyed with impunity.


Take Further Notice That COURTS OF SOUTH AFRICA are not “judicial courts”; they are merely administrative tribunals;

“There are no Judicial courts in America and there has not been since 1789, Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statues and Codes. There have not been any Judges in America since 1789. There have just been Administrators.” FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1 Stat. 138-178

The same applies to South Africa and every other western commonwealth country part of the International BAR Association and BAR legal system.

“Courts are Administrative Tribunals” Clearfield Trust, et al v. United States 318 U.S. 363 (1943)

That, COURTS OF SOUTH AFRICA are in fact British and Dutch TEMPLE CROWN COURTS and Roman VATICAN COURTS under the STATUTES OF ROME still administrating “Crown Property” on our lands. We are still under the yoke of Roman Slavery Law even though it has been dead for over 1000 years.

Even the Chief Justice of the CONSTITUTIONAL COURT has SOVEREIGN LETTERS PATENT from the CROWN. Therefore, they work for the CROWN as “Admiralty Officers” and not for we the people.

And, they are in fact “sea courts” only having jurisdiction over commerce in the sea jurisdiction and not on the land. The HIGH COURT is in fact the “HIGH SEAS” COURT.

Now, the marine league, marking the limit of national jurisdiction on the high seas, is equal to three geographical (or marine) miles of 6,075 feet each so they are way beyond the limited bounds of their watery jurisdiction.

Customary Law Courts

Take Further Notice That the sovereignty of South African tribes was already established during the early 1800s in Treaties made with the BRITISH CROWN recognising the supremacy of customary courts and tribal authorities on their land.

And, as customary law is a living law it is alive and well amongst the various peoples.

Therefore, COURTS OF SOUTH AFRICA have no jurisdiction over any Southern African tribal lands as well as the neighbouring States.

In fact, RSA INC. is supposed to assist and fund tribes in their mission towards self-governance and self-determination in accordance with the U.N. Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Refer to:

Common Law Courts

Furthermore, leading up to 1994, we the people wished for people’s courts and to develop the common law and customary law and people’s courts. The 1990-1994 Reconstruction and Development Policy Framework clearly states in Section 5.7:


5.7.1 The system of justice should be made accessible and affordable to all people. It must be credible and legitimate. The legal processes and institutions should be reformed by simplifying the language and procedures used in the court, recognising and regulating community and customary courts, and professionalising the Attorney-General’s office. The public defence system must be promoted and the prosecution system reformed. The pool of judicial officers should be increased through the promotion of lay officials, scrapping the divided bar and giving the right of appearance to paralegals.

And, the 1955 Freedom Charter declares: “ALL SHALL BE EQUAL BEFORE THE LAW! …The courts shall be representative of all the people;”

And, Mulligan Ex Parte very clearly states that wherever American (and South African) Common Law Courts are up and operating, the admiralty courts must cease operating as military tribunals and revert to their proper place as courts merely concerned with actual maritime contracts and other admiralty issues.

To this end Southern Africa Jural Assembly, hereinafter ‘SAJurA’, was established in 2020, laying the foundations for the people’s courts with rules and procedures, principles of common law, keeping record and protecting the rights of the people; especially, from corporate raiders engaged in inland piracy from the high seas. Refer to

Common Law Judge Anna von Reitz for the Alaska Supreme Court affirms that: “These foreign international courts which are doing so much damage to our property and our people are merely opportunists filling a gap that we left open through ignorance. When our courts stand on the land, their courts cannot usurp— but when we allow our Common Law Court System to stand vacant, the cat is away and the rats can play.”


Now, according to the English “Old Authority, Sir William Blackstone, the common law simply means “the embodiment of the  moral sentiment of the community”

And, it is mostly oral and un-written and expressed from time to time by a jury of peers or similar forum; or, by referendum.

South African Common Law, which only applies to we the people, is not to be confused with colonial Roman Dutch or English Common Law which is merely Admiralty law of the sea, grafted with the Law Merchant, and relating only to sea commerce and the contracts between corporate legal fiction entities.

Furthermore, the Bill of Rights makes provision for the people’s courts:

Section 34. Access to courts

Everyone has the right to have any dispute that can be resolved by the application of law decided in a fair public hearing before a court or, where appropriate, another independent and impartial tribunal or forum.

And, Section 39(3) of the Bill of Rights recognises that we the people have other rights and implies that common law and customary are in separate jurisdictions:

39. Interpretation of Bill of Rights

3. The Bill of Rights does not deny the existence of any other rights or freedoms that are recognised or conferred by common law, customary law or legislation, to the extent that they are consistent with the Bill.


Take Further Notice That jurisdiction is the authority, capacity, power or right to of a particular court to act and decide in a dispute; and, when jurisdiction is challenged It cannot be assumed, it must be proven.

It was Thomas Jefferson who said: “The germ of destruction of our nation is in the power of the judiciary, an irresponsible body — working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall render powerless the checks of one branch over the other and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated.”

Furthermore, there are two main jurisdictions: land and sea. The international sea jurisdiction relates to commerce between corporate legal fictions and the contracts between them; whereas, we the people occupy the land and the land jurisdiction.

And, the law of the land is natural law, common law, customary law and law of nations; and deals with reality and facts.

Maxim – Juries must answer to questions of fact and judges to questions of (commercial) law. Ex parte United States, C.C.A. Wis., 101 F.2d 870, 874.

Land and sea are two separate and contradistinct jurisdictions and like land and sea, oil and water separated by a beach or sand bar, do not mix.

Maxim – Every jurisdiction has its own bounds.

Furthermore, regarding jurisdiction over land, COURTS OF SA and SA GOVERNMENT are way in overreach of their limited fiction sea jurisdiction. And, we hereby openly challenge your jurisdiction to expropriate land, amongst other things:

Maxim – One who exercises jurisdiction out of his territory is not obeyed with impunity.

Now, ss. 39(1)(c) of the Bill of Rights recognizes our right to quote foreign law:

39. Interpretation of Bill of Rights

When interpreting the Bill of Rights, a court, tribunal or forum ¬

c. may consider foreign law.

Therefore, we are quoting the following U.S. rulings regarding jurisdiction in the absence of equivalent South African Common Law case law.

“A court may not render a judgment which transcends the limits of its authority, and a judgment is void if it is beyond the powers granted to the court by the law of its organization, even where the court has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter. Thus, if a court is authorized by statute to entertain jurisdiction in a particular case only, and undertakes to exercise the jurisdiction conferred in a case to which the statute has no application, the judgment rendered is void.” 46 Am. Jur. 2d, Judgments § 25, pp. 388-89.

“A court cannot confer jurisdiction where none existed and cannot make a void proceeding valid. It is clear and well established law that a void order can be challenged in any court.” Old Wayne Mut. L. Assoc. v. Mcdonough, 204 U.S. 8, 27 S.Ct. 236 (1907).

“Once jurisdiction is challenged, the court cannot proceed when it clearly appears that the court lacks jurisdiction, the court has no authority to reach merits, but rather should dismiss the action.” Melo v. U.S., 505 F.2d 1026.

“There is no discretion to ignore lack of jurisdiction.” Joyce v. U.S., 474 2D 215.

“The burden shifts to the court to prove jurisdiction.” Rosemond v. Lambert, 469 F.2d 416.

“Court must prove on the record, all jurisdiction facts related to the jurisdiction asserted.” Latana v. Hopper, 102 F. 2d 188; Chicago v. New York, 37 F.Supp. 150.

“The law provides that, once State and Federal Jurisdiction has been challenged, it must be proven.” Main v. Thiboutot, 100 S.Ct. 2502 (1980).

“Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time.” Basso v. Utah Power & Light Co., 495 F.2d 906, 910.

“Defense of lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter may be raised at any time, even on appeal.” Hill Top Developers v. Holiday Pines Service Corp., 478 So.2d. 368 (Fla.2nd DCA 1985).

“Once challenged, jurisdiction cannot be assumed, it must be proved to exist.” Stuck v. Medical Examiners, 94 Ca.2d 751. 211 P.2d 389.

“Jurisdiction, once challenged, cannot be assumed and must be decided.” Main v. Thiboutot, 100 S.Ct. 2502 (1980).

“The law requires proof of jurisdiction to appear on the record of the administrative agency and all administrative proceedings.” Hagans v Lavine, 415 U.S. 533.

“Since jurisdiction is fundamental, and it is jurisdiction alone that gives a court power to hear, determine, and pronounce judgment on the issues before it, jurisdiction must be continuing in the court throughout the proceedings.” Re. Cavitt, 254, P.599

“Since jurisdiction is fundamental to any valid judicial proceeding, the first question that must be determined by a trial court in any case is that of jurisdiction.” Dillon v. Dillon, 187, P.27.

Therefore, we hereby expressly challenge the jurisdiction of RSA INC. And, when jurisdiction is challenged, courts may not proceed until they have proven up their claim. The herein-addressed must first prove up their jurisdiction over the land or cease and desist under colour of law.

Maxim – The order of things is confounded if every one preserves not his jurisdiction.

“Old Authorities”

Take Further Notice that the “Old Authorities” are deemed an authoritive source of South African Law and Sir William Blackstone is regarded as the English Common Law “Old Authority” by the BAR legal system..

Blackstone clearly states the following: “So great moreover is the regard of the law for private property, that it will not authorize the least violation; no, not even for the general good of the whole community.” – (Sir William Blackstone; Commentaries on the Laws of England; Vol I [Page 139])

“And these (rights) may be reduced to three principal or primary articles; the right of personal security, the right of personal liberty, and the right of private property: because, as there is no other known method of compulsion, or abridging man’s natural free will, but by an infringement or diminution of one or other of these important rights, the preservation of these, inviolate, may justly be said to include the preservation of our civil immunities in their largest and most extensive sense.” – (Sir William Blackstone; Commentaries on the Laws of England; Vol I [Page 129])

The people shall govern

Take further Notice That both the Freedom Charter and the RDP Policy Framework expressly declared: “THE PEOPLE SHALL GOVERN!!!”

However, as some people such as Ronnie Kasrils revealed in his book titled “Armed and Dangerous”, leading up 1994 “our people were sold down the river” in favour of the global elites who are still in control and ruling from behind the corporate veil.

The RDP Policy Framework clearly declares the following:

“1.1 The RDP is an integrated, coherent socio-economic policy framework. It seeks to mobilise all our people…

…Only an all-round effort to harness the life experience, skills, energies and aspirations of the people can lay the basis for a new South Africa.

… The RDP is an expression of confidence in the wisdom, organisational abilities and determination of our people.

            This programme is essentially centred on: 1.3.3 A people-driven process.

Peace and security for all. Promoting peace and security must involve all people and must build on and expand the National Peace Initiative.

1.3.7 The RDP requires fundamental changes in the way that policy is made and programmes are implemented. Above all, the people affected must participate in decision-making. Democratisation must begin to transform both the state and civil society.

Democracy is not confined to periodic elections. It is, rather, an active process enabling everyone to contribute to reconstruction and development.

1.3.8 An integrated programme, based on the people,…

1.4.2 Meeting Basic Needs. The first priority is to begin to meet the basic needs of people

1.4.3 Our people should be involved in these programmes by being made part of the decision-making…

1.4.4 Developing Our Human Resources. The RDP is a people centred programme – our people must be involved in the decision-making process, in implementation, in new job opportunities requiring new skills, and in managing and governing our society.

1.4.12 Building the Economy. …A process of reconstruction is proposed to ensure that these strengths now benefit all our people.

1.4.22 …The RDP can only be people-centred if the planning and coordinating processes allow the active involvement of democratic structures.

1.5.2 The RDP attempts to provide achievable, realistic and clear programmes to answer these questions. But it goes further than this and encourages people and their organisations to participate in the process. In the conclusion we outline proposed concrete steps to make such participation possible.

2.1.1 Poverty is the single greatest burden of South Africa’s people, and is the direct result of the apartheid system and the grossly skewed nature of business and industrial development which accompanied it.

2.3.6 A further component of the public works programme must be provision of education and training and the involvement of communities in the process so that they are empowered to contribute to their own governance. (Emphasis added] ensure accountability so that the people have control over what is provided;

3.2.1 Human resources, unlike other resources, think for themselves! People are, and must remain, the architects of the RDP as it unfolds in the years to come…

3.6.2 Youth development more generally must focus on education and training, job creation, and enabling young people to realise their full potential and participate fully in the society and their future. It must restore the hope of our youth in the future, and in their capacity to channel their resourcefulness and energy into reconstruction and development.

4.2.6 The RDP will foster a new and constructive relationship between the people, their organisations in civil society, key constituencies such as the trade unions and organised business, the democratic government, and the workings of the market. Our principal objective is to transform mining and mineral-processing industries to serve all of our people. The government must consider ways and means to encourage small-scale mining and enhance opportunities for participation by our people through support, including financial and technical aid and access to mineral rights. However, standards in respect of the environment, health and safety and other working conditions must be maintained.

4.7.5 Community banking. Community banks of various types have proven able to finance informal entrepreneurs, especially women. The democratic government must encourage community banking. It must reform regulations to foster the development of community banks while protecting customers. Where possible, government structures at all levels should conduct business with these institutions. The government must encourage the established banks and other financial institutions to help fund the community banks.

4.7.7 The Reserve Bank. The Interim Constitution contains several mechanisms which ensure that the Reserve Bank is both insulated from partisan interference and accountable to the broader goals of development and maintenance of the currency.

In addition, the law must change the Act governing the Reserve Bank to ensure a board of directors that can better serve society as a whole. The board must include representatives from the trade unions and civil society. In future, a stronger board of governors should emerge through the appointment of better qualified individuals. The new constitutional requirement that the board of governors record its decisions, publicise them when feasible, and account to parliament should help in developing a more professional and credible executive, with greater ability to exercise its mandate than the present board of governors.

4.7.8 The democratic government should immediately increase the resources available in the Reserve Bank and other appropriate agencies for combating illegal capital flight.

Furthermore, the democratic government must enter into discussions with holders of wealth in an effort to persuade them of the harmful effects their actions are having on our economy.


5.2.1 The People shall govern. The RDP vision is one of democratising power. Democracy is intimately linked to reconstruction and development. We will not be able to unleash the resources, neglected skills and stunted potential of our country and its people while minority domination of state and civil institutions persists. [Emphasis added] Without thoroughgoing democratisation, the whole effort to reconstruct and develop will lose momentum.

Reconstruction and development require a population that is empowered through expanded rights, meaningful information and education, and an institutional network fostering representative, participatory and direct democracy.

5.2.2 Democracy requires that all South Africans have access to power and the right to exercise their power. This will ensure that all people will be able to participate in the process of reconstructing our country.

5.2.6 Democracy for ordinary citizens must not end with formal rights and periodic one-person, one-vote elections. Without undermining the authority and responsibilities of elected representative bodies (the national assembly, provincial legislatures, local government), the democratic order we envisage must foster a wide range of institutions of participatory democracy in partnership with civil society on the basis of informed and empowered citizens (e.g. the various sectoral forums like the National Economic Forum) and facilitate direct democracy (people’s forums, referenda where appropriate, and other consultation processes). [Emphasis added]


5.7.1 The system of justice should be made accessible and affordable to all people. It must be credible and legitimate. The legal processes and institutions should be reformed by simplifying the language and procedures used in the court, recognising and regulating community and customary courts, and professionalising the Attorney-General’s office. The public defence system must be promoted and the prosecution system reformed.

The pool of judicial officers should be increased through the promotion of lay officials, scrapping the divided bar and giving the right of appearance to paralegals.

5.10.1 The Public Service – … the public service must internalise the concept of ‘serving the people’.

6.3.2 …The national RDP structure should also have oversight of inter-governmental financial transfers (national to provincial, provincial to local, etc.) to ensure that these are in conformity with the overall national objectives of the RDP.

6.5.8 The democratic government must end unnecessary secrecy in the formulation of the budget. To that end, it must change the relevant regulations. We must establish a Parliamentary Budget Office with sufficient resources and personnel to ensure efficient democratic oversight of the budget. Transformation of the parastatals and cooperation with forums will also help ensure more efficient and open budgeting processes.”

And, finally, the ANC agreed to the following:

7. Conclusion

7.1 Throughout this document, we have stressed that the RDP is a people-driven programme. People have been part of drawing up the RDP and they must now take the process forward. How can this be done in concrete ways? A number of processes must now begin.

7.2 The RDP will now be used to consult widely, in order to get comment and further input. Any organisation that wishes to make such a contribution can do so in writing, or contact the ANC to arrange a meeting. Any organisation that feels that it can make a specific contribution to the implementation of the RDP should do likewise.”

To this end the Southern Africa Jural Committee has been established and is laying the foundations and developing the South African people’s government: people’s courts; people’s banks; oversight committees; a committee for every aspect of society.

And, to establish people’s Land Oversight Committees to ensure the people’s right to land is protected; and, to identify lawful ways to distribute unused public lands for local community use,

And, to hold referendums by, for and of the people in accordance with 5.2.6: “…and facilitate direct democracy (people’s forums, referenda where appropriate, and other consultation processes).”

And, 5.3.2 “…Consideration should be given to the implementation of a constitutional provision for *by, for and of the people) the calling of a referendum in order to overturn unpopular laws, and to ensure that certain laws get passed.”

However, the people’s right to referendum has not been recognised by the Bill of Rights but that does not mean we have not retained that right. We have.

And, any and all referendums held by, for and of the people that are deemed lawful by any and all people’s courts or forums recognised by the people will be deemed lawful and binding on all organs of State and STATE.

In Closing

Take Final Notice That: we do not recognise any RSA INC. agency or franchise as “lawful government.” Not until the Freedom Charter and RDP Policy Framework is fulfilled.

Either, you must prove up your claim or cease and desist under colour of law.

Maxim – That which was originally void, does not by lapse of time become valid.

That no RSA INC. BANKS, COURTS, “GOVERNMENT” AGENCY or franchises thereof have neither any lawful claim or standing or jurisdiction over any land nor to expropriate any land or anything else tangible above, below or on it.

Your duty and obligations are to provide services. And your services are not required in any matter related to land.

We, the people have the lawful right as owners to refuse the expropriation of land, albeit private or public land.

And, if we do we have the right to informed consent and access to information and just compensation in lawful money, meaning payment in gold or silver; not fiat currency.

That any and all land expropriated becomes public land owned by we the people.

Maxim – Capture by pirates and robbers does not change title.

And, if we do not consent then we have the right to defend our land from invasion by the law of necessity.

Maxim – Necessity overrules the law.

Maxim – Necessity makes that lawful which otherwise is not lawful.

Furthermore, if you refuse to come to the table and continue with this unlawful action, you give us the right to lien you in your personal and private capacity and seize your accounts, assets and property for causing harm and loss to the people and Republic.

In commerce truth is sovereign.

In commerce for any matter to be resolved it must be expressed.

Truth is expressed in the form of an affidavit.

An un-rebutted affidavit stands as truth in commerce.

An un-rebutted affidavit becomes the judgement in commerce.

Therefore, we demand that you contact us via the email below to enter into peaceful negotiations.

“Aluta continuua!” – the struggle continues ‘These freedoms we will fight for, side by side, throughout our lives, until we have won our liberty.’


Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their own counter-claims must respond within twenty one (21) days excluding the day of original service of this Notice & Demand Regarding the Expropriation Bill. Responses must be written under affirmation and upon the pains and penalty of perjury; and is subject to the de jure jurisdiction of SA Jural Assembly and or other recognised people’s courts.

Failure to record a de jure dispute against the claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgment securing forevermore all rights herein claimed and barring the bringing of charges under statutory rules against any SAR nationals for exercising their sovereignty, freedoms, natural unalienable rights and duties.

Note: A Non-Response to this Notice expresses non-objection and tacit agreement to the claims made herein. Silence is consent; By Order.

Govern yourselves accordingly; In peace.

Declared and recorded on the land commonly known as South Africa, un-incorporated.

By:     SA Jural Committee and SA Jural Assembly

Re: Will UK-led private investigation on insider trading citing Old Mutual and the PIC bankrupt GEPF, and will Ramaphosa be cited in imminent Glencore litigation? – Africa News Global

Usually, we are too busy laying the foundations for the alternative to bother with what “they” are doing which takes us away from what we are doing about it. However, we were cc’ed into this email from Shamila Panter (who gave me permission) to the CEO of RSA INC. so duty and conscience compelled me to speak.

From Shamila:

Good day Mr Ramaphosa,

I refer to the article below.  There has been numerous accusations and allegations against yourself especially regarding money laundering and corruption.  This is now in the International arena as well as this article states that you have been/will be?? cited as a respondent in Glencore claims in which Phoenix Group/Standard life/HSBC Bank/Norges Bank/Abron/Kuwait Investment office/Aabar Investment/Reassure/Mubadala Investment/Sheik Mansour and others are said to be filing in the London High Court.

The whistleblower known as Justin Lewis, has made incredible claims that portray you as a corrupt money launderer and also offers you the opportunity to save yourself from all implications if you appointed an independent commission to investigate the misselling of the GEPF. This offer has been made clear in communications between Justin Lewis and your personal attorney Mr Harris.

As you can understand as a Citizen, it is very concerning that such remarks are made against a sitting president, and at the same time recommendations on who to appoint in this “Independent” commission is coming from the whistleblower himself.  Its all very confusing to me and I’m sure to many others.

The minutes of the meeting that took place in Ten Bompas on the 12th March 2015 with Johan Rupert, Ivan Glassenberg, Trevor Manuel and others is also very concerning as this would lead one to believe that this is actually how State Capturers operate and brings us the the very situation every South African is suffering through which is the current  loadshedding, and State of Disaster that you have placed the country in.

I humbly ask that you address the Nation as soon as possible to clear up any misunderstandings regarding this article and the risk of the GEPF going bankrupt.  My concern is that should the risks be a false claim by Mr Lewis and majority of government pension holders believe it to be true, there could be a huge exodus of cash from the Fund causing it to collapse anyway.  It is yours and governments responsibility to clear these allegations.  

I also believe that Justin Lewis who seems to hold the misselling of the GEPF in his hands be called to account for all the claims he has made in this article. Denial or refusal to do so may lead to a major economic crisis that can be avoided.

Yours sincerely

Shamilla Pather

From: SA Jural Assembly:

To Cyril Ramaphosa,

Kindly Take Further Notice of the following:

That “An officer who acts in violation of the Constitution ceases to represent the government.”Brookfield Const. Co. v. Stewart, 284 F. Supp. 94.

The question is did you as President make an oath of office in accordance with Schedule 2 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa? Or, to some other entity perhaps?


[Schedule 2 amended by s. 2 of Act No. 35 of 1997 (Eng text only) and substituted by s. 18 of Act
No. 34 of 2001 .]
Oath or solemn affirmation of President and Acing President
1. The President or Acting President, before the Chief Justice, or another judge designated by the Chief Justice, must swear/affirm as follows:
In the presence of everyone assembled here, and in full realization of the high calling I assume as President/
Acting President of the Republic of South Africa, I, A.B., swear/ solemnly affirm that 1 will be faithful to the
Republic of South Africa, and will obey, observe, uphold and maintain the Constitution and all other law of the Republic; and I solemnly and sincerely promise that 1 will always-
* promote all that will advance the Republic, and oppose all that may harm it;
* protect and promote the rights of all South Africans;
* discharge my duties with all my strength and talents to the best of my knowledge and ability and me to the dictates of my conscience;
* do justice to all; and devote myself to the well-being of the Republic a d all of its people.
(In the case of an oath So help me God.)

If not, you can be tried just as any other common man with sufficient evidence.

And, with sufficient evidence, even by a common law court by, for and of the people in accordance with Section 34 of the Bill of Rights:

34. Access to courts

Everyone has the right to have any dispute that can be resolved by the application of law decided in a fair public hearing before a court or, where appropriate, another independent and impartial tribunal or forum.

Note that SA Jural Assembly is “another independent and impartial tribunal or forum.”

Take further Notice That as a public servant of we the people you are obligated to provide information in accordance with ss. 32.1:

32. Access to information

  1. Everyone has the right of access to ­
    1. any information held by the state; and
    2. any information that is held by another person and that is required for the exercise or protection of any rights.

And, we have the right to just administrative action in accordance with ss.33(2) and ss.33(2):

33. Just administrative action

  1. Everyone has the right to administrative action that is lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair.
  2. Everyone whose rights have been adversely affected by administrative action has the right to be given written reasons.

Take Final Notice That an email is legally binding in accordance with the Electronic Communications Amendment Act of 2007.

Kindly respond.

sincerely, without prejudice,



SA Jural Assembly

a people’s court of conscience


Dear Sir or Madam

This is an automated reply to acknowledge receipt of your correspondence by the Office of the Deputy President of the Republic of South Africa, Mr David D Mabuza, MP.

Please note that all Complaints and Service Delivery Matters will be forwarded to: The Presidential Hotline (Email: who will respond to the issues. 

Should you wish to follow-up on your matter please contact the Presidential Hotline on 17737.

All other matters referred to including invitations and requests for meetings will receive the required attention and a response will be communicated.

Kind Regards

Office of the Deputy President

The Presidency

The Union Buildings

Government Avenue


Private Bag X1000, Pretoria, 0001


Regarding the Alleged Suspension of the RSA INC. CONSTITUTION

There are rumors circulating on social media that the ANC is to suspend the SA CONSTITUTION. This cannot happen for a number of legal as well as common law reasons.

To put things into context:

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA is merely a CORPORATION that provides services to we the people; therefore, it is a corporate services provider. And, as a corporation it operates in the corporate international sea jurisdiction it is a FOREIGN entity in relation to the un-incorporated South African Republic (SAR) which is a Trust operating on the land jurisdiction.

These are two separate and contradistinct jurisdictions and like land and sea, they cannot mix. However, the waters have been muddied to confuse the unwary traveler.

And, the CONSTITUTION is merely a contract as to how RSA INC. service providers must act when providing we the people with services. It is a contract between we the people and the corporate services providers that we incorrectly call “government”.

They are merely administrators, clerks; they are our hired help; we pay their salaries; so we are the owners and shareholders and priority claimants of South Africa and all public assets and accounts and the land, above and below. But, secretly they are acting as foreign agents for the global elite via Rome, London, New York and Washington D.C.

We are the un-incorporated Church (Ecclessia) and State (not “STATE”; when you see CAPITAL LETTERS it refers to a CORPORATION). Without we the people there is no State and no government. It all only exists and acts because of us. It has all been flipped and we have been dumbed down.

And, the CONSTITUTION applies only to the RSA INC. corporate services providers whereas only the Bill of Rights applies to we the people. The sole purpose of a lawful government is to protect our rights, not to trample them. And certainly not to profit from we the beneficiaries.

And their highest official is the CHIEF JUSTICE of CONCOURT. He appoints the President who is merely the CEO but they are the ACTing Trustees; the board of directors; the “kingmakers” in their limited venue. So, not even the President has the power to suspend the CON.

And IF, the Justices try and suspend the CON then they effectively fire themselves; then they have no jobs, eish; not even SASSA.

And, even IF (BIG IF) the CONSTITUTION is suspended the Bill of Rights still stands. Only we the people have the power to amend it. We have natural inalienable rights which existed loooong before “government” and our rights stand above and separate to the Constitution and even to the Bill of Rights. Read Section 39.2 and 29.3.  

HOWEVER, some rights are enshrined within the BOR. There are others too; as many as you can think of. And, natural rights cannot be taken away by ANYONE unless you give them up yourself; such as when infringing on someone else’s rights when stealing; as our hired help are doing.

And, if the CON is suspended then the entire RSA INC. fails because there is no more CONTRACT, No contract, no law! Period. Thus, all acts and statutes will fall away and everything else. Then it is up to us to write a new contract and contract new service providers or provide the services ourselves. We will be way better off without them.

So let them suspend the CONSTITUTION then they are FIRED!!! By themselves he he… but we must be ready with our alternative vision, not theirs.

Further, IF the 1996 CON falls away, legally it all reverts back to the 1993 Interim CON – specifically Schedule 4 and we begin the Reconstruction of South Africa again. The interim con is the legal failsafe.

But, because we were asleep at the wheel since 1994 and did not organize our oversight committees and people’s courts and people’s banks and referendums in accordance with the 1994 RDP Policy Framework, the pirates have been corporatizing our public departments to plunder and profit off we the people for the benefit of a handful of shareholders instead of doing their jobs that WE pay for.

Now, lawfully only we the people can suspend the CONSTITUTION. If they suspend it then there is no more Trust, no Constitutional Court, no government except us. And, we don’t have to pay their salaries anymore…

Even legally the South African Trust has already failed because of the privatization of ALL our public departments since 1994 by the “acting trustees” causing harm and loss to we the beneficiaries which gives us ample right to take action as the beneficiaries for the South African Trust.

Thankfully for us, there is a well-established Principle of Law that says:

Capture by pirates and robbers does not change title.

Finally, South Africa has been firmly in the hands of the global elite since Rhodes. It’s only now that people are investigating that it’s going mainstream. So the hijacking of Escom is nothing new.

But, you can see how ludicrous it is to entertain the idea that the ANC is suspending the CON. So, don’t lend your ears out to hearsay and use your noodle.

Nevertheless, to us in the know it does not matter what they do to the CON. It does not apply to us at all.

While most are sitting on the sidelines as spectators in life, endlessly watching what “they” are doing, should you not be asking yourself: What am I doing about it? Peacefully and lawfully.

Therefore, take notice that some of we the people are reclaiming all SA public trust assets and accounts this year on behalf of you the people. And you will be notified every step of the way.

We are taking lawful action, not fighting the old, but building the new; thereby making the old model redundant.

Amongst other things, we are busy training oversight committees to step in when the time is right so as to “trimtab” this sea ship back to the land.

This is by, for and of the people. We need all hands on deck.

Feel free to join our weekly zoom meetings and or volunteer and let us know what skills you have that may be useful.

Lead, don’t be led. Lead, follow or get out of the way. The people shall govern.

In peace, brother-thomas

SA Jural Assembly

Educate and inform yourself:




Updating The Informer….

By Anna Von Reitz

A little knowledge is dangerous, this “Oldie But Goodie” for example:

It was compiled by The Informer back in the day, probably twenty years ago, before he or anyone else had completely untangled the maze of similar names being used for dissimilar entities.

Throughout this referenced expose he leaves it to the reader to discern that “the United States” and “the US” he is talking about is a corporation eligible to receive bankruptcy protection, not our country, The United States.

Countries have sovereign immunity and are not eligible to go bankrupt. Bankruptcy is a privilege extended to corporations chartered by a sovereign government. The expense of their bankruptcy is then paid off by the people of that country.

When citing “the US” and “the United States” he is referring throughout to the Municipal Theocracy being run as a corporation. THAT is the entity that has been bankrupted, together with other similar entities, which have been bankrupted repeatedly by the Municipal Government as part of the Great Fraud Scheme.

This ongoing cycle of bankruptcies is how they safely unloaded all of their debts on the unsuspecting Americans. Technically, the only ones responsible for paying these debts are the actual Municipal citizens, what the Territorial Fourteenth Amendment calls “citizens of the United States”, but by coercion and “legal supposition” the rats contrived to redefine all of us as “citizens of the United States” so that we would be responsible for their spending.

This “supposition” or “presumption” that we were stateless because our American Government wasn’t in Session, is what allowed them to make these outrageous claims of control over us and our property assets; as we have stood up our American Government again, via the assembling of our State Assemblies, they— and the rest of the world — are faced with their criminal Breach of Trust, Fraud, and Usurpation against their Treaty Partners and Allies.

They also have to face the literal mountains of Odious Debt that they have amassed as a result of these criminal activities on our shores.

Also, The Informer in the referenced article, is supposing that the Reader knows the difference between “US” and “U.S.” Most people still don’t know that “US” means Municipal Government while “U.S.” indicates the British Territorial Government—- two completely separate forms of government (Theocracy v. Democracy, both of which are different from our American Government) and completely different entities.

Wherever The Informer is talking about the CFR, that is, Council on Foreign Relations, he is talking about the Municipal Government and in particular the Municipal Corporation. The CFR is how they administered the Municipal Corporation as they were preparing to go Full Monty and try to mount a Municipal World Government under the auspices of the United Nations.

The United Nations is being used as another storefront for the UN CORP, which proposes to use the United Nations Organization as a storefront for its activities in exactly the same way that the Roman Catholic Church has been used as a storefront for the Roman Pontificate.

The United Nations is actually functioning as another “independent international city-state” — a Municipal Government — which has been given safe harbor by the City of New York, which also allows “NYC” another Municipal Government to exist within its confines.

If you are paying attention, you will see that they are setting up exactly the same situation that they had with the District Governments, with the British Territorial Government being housed in the District of Columbia, and the Municipal Government being housed within the confines of the Municipality of Washington, DC—- only instead of it being set up as an obviously separate entity, they are hiding it behind the facade of New York City which already had a separate identity as a City prior to al the Municipal double-speak and chicanery.

Now we have New York City and within New York City (like a set of Nesting Dolls) we have NYC and within NYC we have the UN Corporation ensconced in its separate independent international city-state, operating under its own sovereign immunity on our shores —- and all without the permission or knowledge of the actual State, New York, and its People.

Wherever The Informer is talking about “Executive Orders” know that these are administrative directives to the Territorial U.S. Government officers and their U.S. Citizens, and have no authority with respect to the General Public.

The General Public of this country desperately needs to know what does and does not apply to them in terms of law and in terms of obligations. For example, in this expose, The Informer says that we “must” have a Social Security Number —- but this only applies to Municipal citizens of the United States, not members of the General Public. He says that the Pope can alter any “law” of “the United States” — but again, he is talking about the Municipal Corporation and the Municipal Theocracy, not our country, not The United States.

He says we are slaves and don’t own anything —- but that’s only true if we are actually Municipal citizens of the United States, the Municipal Theocracy.

There are laws and there are Laws and there are LAWS and all of us need to be much better informed and aware of which laws apply to which population, and also aware of which population we ourselves belong to.

Because our own American Government didn’t immediately come back into Session after the Civil War, the rest of the world “presumed” that it “disappeared” in the wreckage caused by the Mercenary Conflict engendered on our shores by the British Monarch, the Lord Mayor of the Inner City of London, and the then-Pope. They put it out to the rest of the world that we were “in Interregnum” because the Congress running the Federal Republic adjourned “sine die” and did not reappear five years later.

But that Congress was only running the Federal Republic, and the Federal Republic was only the American Subcontractor “created and hired” under the provisions of the original 1787 Federal Constitution.

The “missing Congress” wasn’t our Federation Congress in charge of our actual Federation of States — our so-called “Ship of State”. And this just underlines — again, the self-interested deceit of the British Government and its claim to “salvage rights” related to our “Ship of State”.

What they “salvaged” was a Subcontractor of our actual Government, which they illegally latched upon and hypothecated debt against for no justifiable reason.

The Popes, the Lord Mayors, and the British Monarchs all have cause to know that our actual Federation (not “Federal”) Congress never moved from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. So how could they mistake the Federal Subcontractor operating the Federal Republic in Washington, DC, a foreign territory, for our actual American Government?

They couldn’t. They knew better. They didn’t care and they didn’t honor their contractual and moral obligations to their Employers, the States and People of this country. Instead, they unleashed gangs of thugs to terrorize, murder, and pillage the members of the actual American Congress, like my husband’s Great-Grand Uncle, Clintwood Belcher, who was set upon by a gang of Union thugs while carrying home the Great Seals from Washington, DC, branded a horse thief, forced to flee to the Frontier, and spent the rest of his life looking over his shoulder.

The actual members of the American Congress told their children and their families what went on between the Government in Pennsylvania and the insurrectionists in charge of the U.S. Army and the foreign politicians operating out of Washington, DC. It’s because of that that we were able to Summon the Federation of States back into Session even 160 years after these events.

The Pope, the Lord Mayor, and the King, were all betting that they had successfully dismembered the actual American Government and that we would never be able to summon our States of the Union back into Session, and if we did, they would merely pretend that we were “citizens” obligated to them, and therefore, lacking the necessary “standing” to take such an action.

All that began to fall apart back in 1998 when we woke up and started the earnest process of unraveling their pernicious little word games and peeling back the layers of actual Government versus Governmental Service Providers and their Agencies.

One of the unambiguous bits of information that The Informer brought forward is that all these “Agencies” — the FBI, FEMA, BATF, IRS, etc., — are not even part of the Federal Government. They are Subcontractors of our Subcontractors and have no authority related to the General Public and the property of the General Public, at all. They have no authority over you or your property assets.

U.S. v Strang, 254 US491 Lewis v. US, 680 F.2nd, 1239, are the two court cases that prove that the Agencies are not part of the Federal Government.

U.S. v Strang proves this with respect to the Territorial Government.

Lewis v. US proves this with respect to the Municipal Government.

In addition, the U.S. Supreme Court recently reaffirmed the ruling of the Tennessee Supreme Court in Norton v Shelby County almost a century ago in West Virginia v EPA handed down a few weeks ago— finding that a Congress has no ability to further delegate its legislative authorities to Administrative Agencies. This means that all the Administrative Codes and Statutes cannot be applied to members of the General Public — only to U.S. Citizens and Municipal citizens of the United States.

This throws the Motor Vehicle Code, the Internal Revenue Code, and all similar codes out the window with respect to Joe Public.

The question is — are you volunteering to serve as a U.S. Citizen or Municipal citizen of the United States? Or, are you a member of the General Public?

Most Americans have been snookered into obeying “laws” that don’t apply to them, and under conditions of non-disclosure have done things that allow these foreign Subcontractors to suppose that you are one of them— so you have to reassert your standing as a simple member of the General Public.

We do this by declaring, recording, and publishing our chosen political status as Americans, and by notifying the Bureau of Consular Affairs in the United States Department of State of our political status choice, and by claiming our reversionary trust interest and exemptions provided as remedy to legalize these otherwise illegal activities on our shores.

Go to: to get started.


See this article and over 3700 others on Anna’s website here:

Comment: What was done to America was also done to South Africa and to every other country part of the central banking system; even on similar timelines; and, it’s all thanks to the Law Merchant which was grafted into the BAR legal system via the Inns of Staples and Westminster…

Read the Bills of Exchange page for further info;

Criminal Notice to RSA Inc. – Cease and Desist

Hat tip to Edgar Adams for taking on the corrupt and fraudulent RSA Inc.:


Mr. Edgar of the family Adams (1st applicant)
UCC 1-207 & UCC 1-308 & UCC 3-402
Private Attorney General
Court case: 10599/2020 Gauteng South High Court


And From:

2nd Applicants of court case 10599/2020
Sovereign Aboriginal National Living Freeman (+-25 million Aboriginal descendants in South Africa)
The Aboriginal / Autonomous Indigenous Khoe and San peoples of South Africa and Southern Africa (called “Coloured Derogatory” people)
Court case: 10599/2020 Gauteng South High Court


Lt Gen Khehla John Sithole
SAPS National Commissioner

And To:

Lt Gen Francina Ntombenhle Vuma
SAPS Deputy National Commissioner: Asset & Legal Management:

And To:
Station Commander, Colonel Bezuidenhout
SAPS Mondeor Police Station

And To:

1.) The President of South Africa, Cyril Rampahosa (Republic of South Africa known as South African Government);

2.) National Treasury, Tito Mboweni;

3.) South African Revenue Services (SARS) Mr,Edward Kieswetter;

4.) South African Reserve Bank, (SARB), Mr. Lesetja Kganyago;

5.) Minister of Finance, Mr. Tito Mboweni;

6.) Standard Bank of South Africa;

7.) Nedbank of South Africa;

8.) Investec bank of South Africa;

9.) First National Bank (FNB) of South africa

10.) ABSA of South Africa

11.) British High Commissioner in SA to British Queen Elizabeth II;

12.) Archbishop of the Catholic Church, Buti Tlhagale representing the Pope Vatican

13.) Taxpaying Master – Gauteng South High Court;

14.) All judges from all sectors of courts;

15.) All advocates, attorneys and lawyers of the S.A. Judicial system;

16.) All Sheriff’s of the court of S.A.

17.) The 13 Bloodlines running the world including the Cabal;

18.) The Rothschild, Ruperts, Rockerfellers and all elite groups of the illuminati;

19.) Pope Vatican;

20.) British Queen Elizabeth II;

21.) United Nations, BIS, CCP, CFR, CIA, ICC, ICJ, IMF, LONDON, US, ROME, WHO
et al;

22.) SANDF;

23.) SADC;

24.) World Bank;

25.) All Central Banks and All Banks;

26.) All Presidents

27.) Parliament of SA;

28.) All Corporations & All Foreign Companies;

29.) All Corporate States;

30.) All Companies within South Africa & Southern Africa & in the world;

31.) All Nation States;

32.) All Political Parties;

33.) All Elites;

34.) All Courts;

35.) The SA Corporation (CIK #: 000932419) / Republic of SA Inc / SA Inc;

36.) Internal Revenue Services (IRS);

37.) All SAPS / All SADF

38.) All Municipalities / Provincial Government / National Government;



Princess Sabina Valerie Clarisse nee van Wyk
Royal Empire of King Moshesh 1 and direct linage of Letsie 1
Court case: D3053/2022 Kwazulu- Natal Division High court

Notice to Agent is notice to Principal and Notice to Principal is notice to Agent


DATE: 10 AUGUST 2022






Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal, Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent

Attached herewith please find Criminal Notice to All – Cease and Desist dated 10 August 2022.

I also include all correspondence in relation to court case 10599/2020 on the reopening of court case together With the letter to Judge President dated 23 March 2022 in terms of terms of rule 60(b)(1) to (4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure – Civil Class Action and Counterclaim to uphold 11 claims court case 10599/2020 (stamped by Gauteng South High Court Johannesburg) in notice of motion filed by Johannesburg High Court – Judge Vally loaded onto Caselines file Registry on 11 March 2022.

Failure to adhere to this Criminal Notice – Cease and Desist shall result in the Sovereign Aboriginal National Living Freeman charging each and every one (guilty party) for Gross Dishonesty, Fraud, Gross Genocide and Crimes against Humanity by us in your courts and our Aboriginal Courts from the 11 August 2022.








Given that All her Majesty (British Monarch) proclamations, treaties, contracts and engagements were a sham and delusion, and the territory was never annexed at all (HANSARD UK Parliamentary document – Orange River Free State – source: HC Deb 09 May 1854 vol 133 cc49-8849), it therefore implies that the SA Government, SA Inc, SA Corporation or any Corporation including all SA Constitution, Acts, Laws, Legislation, Resolutions, Joint Resolutions, Codes, Proclamations, Rules, Orders etc. are a sham and delusion against the Sovereign Aboriginal National Living Freeman including our territories and Aboriginal title.

The SA Corporation, SA Government and any Corporation can only exist through the powers of the British Monarch (Her Majesty) which according to HANSARD UK Parliamentary documents (in your own words) are thus null and void, fraudulent and has no legitimacy and no effect on the Sovereign Aboriginal National Living Freeman forever.

You have been served and warned by the Sovereign Aboriginal National Living Freeman!!!.

Trusting that the above is in order.

Kind regards

Edgar of the family Adams
UCC 1-207 & UCC 1-308 & UCC 3-402b
Private Attorney General
Court case: 10599/2020 Gauteng South High Court

The Cabal Ruling the World : South Africa Plays a Major Role

Thanks to Evan for sending all the links on this massive dump which are now also posted on the RSA Inc. page;

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4

Part 5

Part 6

Part 7

Part 8

Part 9

Part 10

Part 11

Part 12

Part 13

Part 14

Part 15

Part 16

Part 17

Part 18

Part 19

Part 20

Part 21

Part 22

Part 23

Part 24

Part 25

‘No fear, no favour’: City of Tshwane disconnects SARS and SAPS HQ

The City of Tshwane continued its aggressive debt collection campaign on Tuesday, 15 February. The City previously said it was owed R17 billion by businesses, government departments and residents.

 The biggest scalps of the day included the South African Revenue Service (SARS), the South African Police Service (SAPS) and the local Gautrain station.

Read more at:

SAJurA Comment: This is all visible signs of the bankrupt RSA Inc. crumbling… building an alternative is a matter of urgency:

SA Notice of Non Consent for Traveling

To:                  …………………………………



From:             …………………………………


Date:              …………………………………

Dear Madame/Sir,

Without prejudice or malice aforethought and in peace,

Notice of Non-consent

Kindly Take Notice That I do not consent to any form of forced vaccination over me, my family or my biological offspring – which is my private property, in accordance with my inherent, natural, unalienable, God-given rights and some of which are enshrined in the Bill of Rights namely, the following Sections:

9. Equality

  1. Everyone is equal before the law and has the right to equal protection and benefit of the law.
  2. Equality includes the full and equal enjoyment of all rights and freedoms. To promote the achievement of equality, legislative and other measures designed to protect or advance persons, or categories of persons, disadvantaged by unfair discrimination may be taken.
  3. The state may not unfairly discriminate directly or indirectly against anyone on one or more grounds, including race, gender, sex, pregnancy, marital status, ethnic or social origin, colour, sexual orientation, age, disability, religion, conscience, belief, culture, language and birth.
  4. *1No person may unfairly discriminate directly or indirectly against anyone on one or more grounds in terms of subsection (3). National legislation must be enacted to prevent or prohibit unfair discrimination.
  5. Discrimination on one or more of the grounds listed in subsection (3) is unfair unless it is established that the discrimination is fair.

10. Human dignity

Everyone has inherent dignity and the right to have their dignity respected and protected.

11. Life

Everyone has the right to life.

12. Freedom and security of the person

  1. Everyone has the right to bodily and psychological integrity, which includes the right ­
    1. to make decisions concerning reproduction;
    2. to security in and control over their body; and
    3. not to be subjected to medical or scientific experiments without their informed consent.

Furthermore, section 9, 10, 11 and 12.2(c) are all non-derogable rights and cannot be taken away by any agency of state without my express and informed and written consent:

Table of Non-Derogable Rights

Section #Section TitleExtent to which the right is protected
9EqualityWith respect to unfair discrimination solely on the grounds of race, colour, ethnic or social origin, sex religion or language
10Human DignityEntirely
12Freedom and Security of the personWith respect to subsections (1)(d) and (e) and (2)(c).

Kindly Take Further Notice That the Bill of Rights is the supreme law of the land anything contrary to the Bill of Rights is un-constitutional, illegal, unlawful and therefore null and void.

Furthermore, you are acting under limited commercial liability in the public venue without any legal information, contract or insurance bond.

Maxim – An outlaw is, as it were, put out of the protection of the law.

You are hereby ordered to immediately cease and desist in any further illegal and unlawful activity and grant me my mutual dignity, equality, bodily integrity, life, love, respect and freedom of movement as I grant you yours.

Matthew 7:12Therefore all things whatsoever you would that men should do to you, do you even so to them: for this is the Law and the Prophets.

Kindly Take Final Notice That if you do enforce a vaccination on me, my family or offspring against my will and without my consent then you also agree to take private liability in the matter and thereby grant me the right to hold you privately liable in full for any and all damages, harm and or loss that I, my family or offspring may suffer past, present or future as a result of the experimental vaccination enforced by you, be they temporary or permanent.

Without prejudice or malice aforethought; in peace; all rights reserved. 

By:                   …………………………………

Signed:           …………………………………       

Dated:                        …………………………………

Served and notified this ………. Day of the Month of …………………………. 2021.

At:                   …………………………………   (Place)

Accepted by: …………………………………

Signed:           …………………………………       


  1. ………………………………………………           ………………………………………….

                        (Full Names)                                                                         signature

  • ………………………………………………           ………………………………………….

                        (Full Names)                                                                          signature

Download and print word doc:

The SA Defiance Campaign is BACK – Boycott the Unions

Here is a list of Trade Unions working with Ramaphosa and Thulas Nxesi to pass mandatory vaccines, all Union members are requested to deactivate their memberships in solidarity against the New World Order in our Anti-Globalist Defiance Campaign; the Unions have become NWO sock puppets:

Agricultural Food and Allied Democratic Workers UnionChemical, Energy, Paper, Printing, Wood and Allied Workers’ UnionCommunication Workers UnionCreative Workers Union of South AfricaDemocratic Nursing Organisation of South AfricaLiberated Metalworkers’ Union of South AfricaNational Education, Health and Allied Workers’ UnionNational Union of MineworkersPolice and Prisons Civil Rights UnionPublic and Allied Workers Union of South AfricaSouth African Commercial, Catering and Allied Workers UnionSouthern African Clothing and Textile Workers UnionSouth African Democratic Nurses’ UnionSouth African Democratic Teachers UnionSouth African Emergency Personnel’s UnionSouth African Medical AssociationSouth African Municipal Workers’ UnionSASBO – The Finance UnionSouth African Security Forces UnionSouth African Transport and Allied Workers Union

Courtesy of the Yes Movement:

Notice and Order to the SANDF Generals

To: SANDF Generals

From: SA Jural Assembly

Kindly Take Notice That sovereignty is vested in we the people for whom the government exists and acts. “Sovereignty itself is… not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law… while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts.” Justice Thomas Stanley Matthews in Yick Wo v. Hopkins [p. 370]:

That the blood of our martyrs have paved a highway of freedom for we the people since the 1950s Defiance Campaign and the actions of the United Democratic Front and the will of the people was established in the 1955 Freedom Charter and RDP Policy Framework; and both declared: The people shall govern!!!

However, in 1994 instead of a lawful South African Real Public Trust, of which we the people are the shareholders and beneficiaries, our people were sold down the river in favour of a foreign corporation registered as REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA INC., hereinafter RSA INC. for the benefit of a few elite shareholders to exploit and pirate and profit off of the people and South Africa.

And, instead of a lawful governor or statesman elected by the people a C.E.O of RSA INC. called a “President” was elected by a foreign private board of trustees.

Maxim – Capture by pirates and robbers does not change title.

Now, you are caught between a rock and a hard place because SANDF members are in fact employees and the hired help of we the people. We pay your salaries and you swore an oath to protect we the people and the Republic and NOT the elite shareholders of RSA INC. Instead, you are being used at our expense as mercenaries for a private foreign corporation.

And, to make things worse these pirates have now bankrupted RSA INC. without our prior and informed consent and for which we the people are not responsible. And now the UN Nations want to fraudulently claim South African assets and land and resources under the guise of a Plandemic.

Furthermore, it is common opinion amongst the millions of informed people that the Covid Plandemic is a UN New World Order de-population and One World Government Agenda. This is an all-out war on mankind – and the jab is the bullet!!! There are already millions of casualties in this war!!! And, the NWO wants we the people to get angry and to then burn and loot so that they can foment Martial Law and a permanent indefinite lockdown planned for the 1st of February 2022.

Common opinion is good authority in law.

And, it is only a few global elites controlling a few people in every government to foment the end of a natural society  for greed and a fiction called money.

There is already a case underway against world leaders for crimes against humanity:

Reiner Fuellmich: Nuremberg trials 2.0 has begun – For English go to minute 2.10

And: Nuremberg 2 Trial against World Leaders for Crimes Against Humanity finally Kicks Off in Poland

Even the NDF General has stood up against the New World Order de-population agenda and has declared to protect the Namibian people and soldiers against the “government”. Listen to his voice note at:

Now, we are doing our best to avoid this holocaust by ordering RSA INC. agents to come to the table to end this madness but, all are sticking to the NWO narrative.

Our question is where do you stand? Are you standing with we the people or with RSA INC. and the NWO? This is the line in the sand; enough is enough now.


Take Further Notice That on the 23rd of November 2021 the SA Jural Assembly, a people’s court, sent the UN a Cease & Desist Order giving them 90 days to enter into peaceful negotiations and resolution to discuss their withdrawal from South Africa. They are in fact private corporations fomenting mercenary activity on our land in the guise of “International Peace”; this is in fact an attempted hostile takeover; a coup and they are threatening the peace and security of Southern Africa and interfering with our independence and national sovereignty contrary to the original Law of Nations.

The Law of Peace is superior to the Law of War in any and ALL cases. HOWEVER IF, an acceptable resolution is not found then, as a last resort, we have the inherent right to lawful self-defence according to the law of necessity for self-preservation.

It is a well-established principle of law that: – Necessity overrules the law.

And: – Necessity makes that lawful which otherwise is not lawful.

Then, on the 22nd of February we will assemble a national people’s assembly  and table a People’s State Of Emergency Plan and Self-Defence Plan before as many informed people as possible so as to agree with one voice as a matter of urgency – to activate all commanders of all SA people’s Neighbourhood Watches, Civil Defence Units, Militias, ex-Liberation Armies, ex-SADF, Peace Officers, Peacekeepers, Patriots and UDF Internal Forces to defend our South African people and our Republic and to restore the peace.

We wish to deputize you and for you to affirm your loyalty to we the people and not to the corporate RSA INC. And, failing in which it will be simple proof that either your hands are tied or you regard us as the enemy.

Maxim – He who is silent appears to consent.

Maxim – Enemies are those with whom we declare war, or who declare it against us; all others are traitors or pirates.

Refer to the attached SA Cease & Desist Order to the UN, Mandamus to Courts of SA, Notice to the President of RSA Inc., Public Notice & Order to the IEC in support of this Notice & Order to the SANDF.

Kindly contact us to meet and discuss a way forward.

Govern yourselves accordingly;

By Order; without prejudice; all natural rights reserved naturally.

Commanded, Declared, Ordered, Proclaimed, Wished and Recorded this 7thth Day of December 2021, Land Southern Africa; South African Republic.

In peace, by brother-thomas – peacemaker

SA Jural Assembly

Kim Iversen: Omicron PANIC Overblown? South Africa Treated As A PARIAH In Wake Of New Variant

Kim Ivsersen gives her take on the emerging Omicron variant.

About Rising:
Rising is a weekday morning show with bipartisan hosts that breaks the mold of morning TV by taking viewers inside the halls of Washington power like never before. The show leans into the day’s political cycle with cutting edge analysis from DC insiders who can predict what is going to happen. It also sets the day’s political agenda by breaking exclusive news with a team of scoop-driven reporters and demanding answers during interviews with the country’s most important political newsmakers.

Follow Rising on social media:

Website: Hill.TV


Instagram: @HillTVLive

Twitter: @HillTVLive

Urgent Call To SA Parents – ACDP Free The Children Case

Duan Coetzee is asking for a group of 1,000 parents to join the ACDP/Free the children/CHC/CCA in a court case to stop Child Vaccinations.Please, if anyone feels strongly opposed to children receiving the vaccine, and want to show your support for those who are opposing this in court, send your full names and ID numbers to Duan Coetzee @ 083 709 6688. He is one of the representatives in this case. The courts need to see there are many parents expressing concern and raising their voices. 🙏🏼❤️🙏🏼[Do Not have to be present]. We just need your full names and ID numbers of everyone as respondents.

Die is vir die ACDP/Free the children/CHC/CCA hofsaak om die uitrol van inentings vir kinders stop te sit. Kontak Duan Coetzee @ 083 709 6688

Kindly note that Duan is not affiliated with the ACDP but with one of the attorneys working on the current court case.There are more than 1 applicant in this case, and more than 1 attorney involved. ACDP being the 1st applicant.
Although not coming from the ACDP, they are aware of the message.
Kindly send your name & ID to Duan if you strongly oppose the child vaccinations.
Note that all names and ID no’s will become public knowledge once these documents are included in the court case.
The time to be brave and stand up for what we speak and believe is here.

COVID-19 in SA | Fourth wave expected in December

The fourth wave is expected to hit in December. The Omicron variant has already made its landing in the country. Wastewater surveillance and analysis say that all the signs are clear that South Africa is heading for the fourth wave of COVID-19 in December 2021. The National Water Research Commission’s Jay Bhagwan discusses this with eNCA’s Mfundo Mabalane. Courtesy #DStv403#eNCA

Our comment: 70% are not buying your narrative anymore so you may as well give it up eNCA; not only are we going to defy you but in 2022 we are taking South Africa back and holding the criminals accountable; best you stock up on your feel-good meds; the people are already awake; next they are standing up and taking action…


The WHO, UN and RSA INC. are NEW WORLD ORDER fronts and faking a “Vaccination Variant” this time (Omnicron) to try and scare South Africans to take the de-population jab; expect a lockdown this December; they do not want us to go back to normal because then we will not take the jabs again;

The truth is God made us perfect; we have 100% natural immunity; and, we naturally get “herd immunity”; this is all a NWO theatre production to kill off we the creditors while they try to claim and control our country because RSA INC. is bankrupt and so is the UN INC.

70% of South Africans are not buying into their lies and agendas;

70% of South Africans do not trust politicians or “government” and did not vote;

Again we find ourselves under a corrupt and oppressive system of APARTHEID:

Economic apartheid; Freedom Apartheid; Health Apartheid; Justice Apartheid; Rights Apartheid; New World Order Apartheid; Down with all forms of Apartheid!!!

Remember the 1950s Defiance Campaign against an oppressive regime!!!

Remember the 1955 Freedom Charter!!!

Remember the United Democratic Front!!!

Remember the 1994 Reconstruction & Development Policy Framework!!!

We the people declared: The People Shall Govern!!!

These freedoms we will fight for side by side until our liberties are won!!!

The Struggle Continues!!!

History repeats itself;

From December 2021 we the people are embarking on a MASS DEFIANCE CAMPAIGN until the 1994 Reconstruction and Development of Southern Africa begins properly!!! Direct self-governance!!! The people shall govern!!!

2022 begins with:



Foreclosing the bankrupt RSA INC. and reclaiming all assets into the South African Republic TrustÓ; restoring the people as the first claimants, creditors, shareholders, trustees and beneficiaries in this bankruptcy back to 1898;

Later a Truth & Restoral Commission into all the RSA INC. fraud and theft; and much more;

Maxim – Capture by pirates and robbers does not change title.


You have God-given inalienable rights which no agency or regulation can restrict without your permission; some of them are listed in the Bill of Rights; and, the Bill of Rights is the supreme law of the land and any regulation that tries to restrict your rights is unlawful, illegal and null and void.

So, defy the December lockdowns; get arrested if you must; drown them in paperwork; fill up the cells; tire the SAPS out; overload the system;


Be peaceful while doing it; use it as an opportunity to educate and inform officials; get them on our side;

When in court tell the judge that unless the STATE comes with a Constitutional Court Order what they are doing is unlawful, illegal and null and void therefore they are obligated to let you go or take the case to the Constitutional Court; until then you are innocent; you are exercising your rights and the SAPS and COURTS OF SA are obligated to protect you in the exercising of your rights!!!

You can read the following in court:

7. Rights

  1. This Bill of Rights is a cornerstone of democracy in South Africa. It enshrines the rights of all people in our country and affirms the democratic values of human dignity, equality and freedom.
  2. The state must respect, protect, promote and fulfil the rights in the Bill of Rights.

8. Application

  1. The Bill of Rights applies to all law, and bindsthe legislature, the executive, the judiciary and all organs of state.

9. Equality

  1. Everyone is equal before the law and has the right to equal protection and benefit of the law.

And the “law” is the Bill of Rights in your case.

10. Human dignity

Everyone has inherent dignity and the right to have their dignity respected and protected.

11. Life

Everyone has the right to life.

12. Freedom and security of the person

  1. Everyone has the right to freedom and security of the person, which includes the right ­
    1. not to be deprived of freedom arbitrarily or without just cause;
    2. not to be detained without trial;
    3. to be free from all forms of violence from either public or private sources;
    4. not to be tortured in any way; and
    5. not to be treated or punished in a cruel, inhuman or degrading way.
  2. Everyone has the right to bodily and psychological integrity, which includes the right ­
    1. to make decisions concerning reproduction;
    2. to security in and control over their body; and
    3. not to be subjected to medical or scientific experiments without their informed consent.

13. Slavery, servitude and forced labour

No one may be subjected to slavery, servitude or forced labour.

14. Privacy

Everyone has the right to privacy, which includes the right not to have ­

  1. their person or home searched;
  2. their property searched;
  3. their possessions seized; or
  4. the privacy of their communications infringed.

15. Freedom of religion, belief and opinion

  1. Everyone has the right to freedom of conscience, religion, thought, belief and opinion.

17. Assembly, demonstration, picket and petition

Everyone has the right, peacefully and unarmed, to assemble, to demonstrate, to picket and to present petitions.

21. Freedom of movement and residence

  1. Everyone has the right to freedom of movement.

34. Access to courts

Everyone has the right to have any dispute that can be resolved by the application of law decided in a fair public hearing before a court or, where appropriate, another independent and impartial tribunal or forum.

35. Arrested, detained and accused persons

  1. Everyone who is arrested for allegedly committing an offence has the right ­
    1. to remain silent;
    2. to be informed promptly ­
      1. of the right to remain silent; and
      2. of the consequences of not remaining silent;
    3. not to be compelled to make any confession or admission that could be used in evidence against that person;
    4. to be brought before a court as soon as reasonably possible, but not later than ­
      1. 48 hours after the arrest; or
      2. the end of the first court day after the expiry of the 48 hours, if the 48 hours expire outside ordinary court hours or on a day which is not an ordinary court day;
    5. at the first court appearance after being arrested, to be charged or to be informed of the reason for the detention to continue, or to be released; and
    6. to be released from detention if the interests of justice permit, subject to reasonable conditions.
  2. Everyone who is detained, including every sentenced prisoner, has the right ­
    1. to be informed promptly of the reason for being detained;
    2. to choose, and to consult with, a legal practitioner, and to be informed of this right promptly;
    3. to have a legal practitioner assigned to the detained person by the state and at state expense, if substantial injustice would otherwise result, and to be informed of this right promptly;
    4. to challenge the lawfulness of the detention in person before a court and, if the detention is unlawful, to be released;
    5. to conditions of detention that are consistent with human dignity, including at least exercise and the provision, at state expense, of adequate accommodation, nutrition, reading material and medical treatment; and
    6. to communicate with, and be visited by, that person’s ­
      1. spouse or partner;
      2. next of kin;
      3. chosen religious counsellor; and
      4. chosen medical practitioner.
  3. Every accused person has a right to a fair trial, which includes the right ­
    1. to be informed of the charge with sufficient detail to answer it;
    2. to have adequate time and facilities to prepare a defence;
    3. to a public trial before an ordinary court;
    4. to have their trial begin and conclude without unreasonable delay;
    5. to be present when being tried;
    6. to choose, and be represented by, a legal practitioner, and to be informed of this right promptly;
    7. to have a legal practitioner assigned to the accused person by the state and at state expense, if substantial injustice would otherwise result, and to be informed of this right promptly;
    8. to be presumed innocent, to remain silent, and not to testify during the proceedings;
    9. to adduce and challenge evidence;
    10. not to be compelled to give self-incriminating evidence;
    11. to be tried in a language that the accused person understands or, if that is not practicable, to have the proceedings interpreted in that language;
    12. not to be convicted for an act or omission that was not an offence under either national or international law at the time it was committed or omitted;
    13. not to be tried for an offence in respect of an act or omission for which that person has previously been either acquitted or convicted;
    14. to the benefit of the least severe of the prescribed punishments if the prescribed punishment for the offence has been changed between the time that the offence was committed and the time of sentencing; and
    15. of appeal to, or review by, a higher court.
  4. Whenever this section requires information to be given to a person, that information must be given in a language that the person understands.
  5. Evidence obtained in a manner that violates any right in the Bill of Rights must be excluded if the admission of that evidence would render the trial unfair or otherwise be detrimental to the administration of justice.

Furthermore, a state of emergency can only last for 21 days so the lockdown is unlawful, illegal and null and void.

37. States of emergency

  1. A state of emergency may be declared only in terms of an Act of Parliament, and only when ­
    1. the life of the nation is threatened by war, invasion, general insurrection, disorder, natural disaster or other public emergency; and
    2. the declaration is necessary to restore peace and order.
  2. A declaration of a state of emergency, and any legislation enacted or other action taken in consequence of that declaration, may be effective only ­
    1. prospectively; and
    2. for no more than 21 days from the date of the declaration,

Download and print a copy of the SOUTH AFRICAN BILL OF RIGHTS

Aluta continua the struggle continues were the first words uttered by 52-year-old black consciousness exponent Simon Nkosi when he was freed after 13 years in jail.

A luta continua vitória é certa meaning The struggle continues victory is certain.