Speak to us on Freedom

And an orator said, “Speak to us of Freedom.”

And he answered:

“At the city gate and by your fireside I have seen you prostrate yourself and worship your own freedom, Even as slaves humble themselves before a tyrant and praise him though he slays them.

Aye, in the grove of the temple and in the shadow of the citadel I have seen the freest among you wear their freedom as a yoke and a handcuff.

And my heart bled within me; for you can only be free when even the desire of seeking freedom becomes a harness to you, and when you cease to speak of freedom as a goal and a fulfillment.

You shall be free indeed when your days are not without a care or your nights without a want and a grief, But rather when these things girdle your life and yet you rise above them naked and unbound.

And how shall you rise beyond your days and nights unless you break the chains which you at the dawn of your understanding have fastened around your noon hour? In truth that which you call freedom is the strongest of these chains, though its links glitter in the sun and dazzle your eyes.

And what is it but fragments of your own self you would discard that you may become free? If it is an unjust law you would abolish, that law was written with your own hand upon your own forehead. You cannot erase it by burning your law books nor by washing the foreheads of your judges, though you pour the sea upon them.

And if it is a despot you would dethrone, see first that his throne erected within you is destroyed. For how can a tyrant rule the free and the proud, but for a tyranny in their own freedom and a shame in their own pride? And if it is a care you would cast off, that care has been chosen by you rather than imposed upon you.

And if it is a fear you would dispel, the seat of that fear is in your heart and not in the hand of the feared. Verily all things move within your being in constant half embrace, the desired and the dreaded, the repugnant and the cherished, the pursued and that which you would escape. These things move within you as lights and shadows in pairs that cling.

And when the shadow fades and is no more, the light that lingers becomes a shadow to another light. And thus your freedom when it loses its fetters becomes itself the fetter of a greater freedom.”

The Prophet – Kahlil Gibran

It’s our Time to Change the World

Premiered on 14 Jan 2022

Julian tried to help us Showed us how the powerful hide their crimes Shoot em up and cover up How they laughed and didn’t give a damn But it takes time It takes TIME To change the world Chelsea tried to help us A soldier without fortune she came clean Raised the veil on dirty wars Murder and the torture was obscene But it takes time It takes TIME To change the world TIME It takes time To change the world All the time we’ve sat right back Watching liars and killers rule our lives Round and round our treadmill Turned against each other and ourselves So now it’s time It sure is time To change the world Aaron tried to help us Weighed the right to share with right to gain Favoured education Gave us all the right to read the same So we’re on time Right on time To change the world TIME It’s our time To change the world

——————————–

“There is unity in the oppression. There must be absolute unity and determination, in the response.” Julian Assange Written and sung by Cathy Vogan 2022 Creative Commons Licence (copyright free)

Licence

Creative Commons Attribution licence (reuse allowed)

Imagine – John Lennon

Ode to a legend who “left us” on this day the 8th of December 1980.

John Lennon was right: “We’re being run by maniacs for maniacal ends.”

Read the full post here: http://annavonreitz.com/commonmistake.pdf

OUR RIGHTS ARE BEING ROBBED FROM US. IS FREEDOM OF SPEECH NEXT? | Gerald Celente & Judge Napolitano

Now, this might be American but it’s much the same NWO agenda everywhere; Judge Napolitano is one of the very few Judges speaking out.

$500 TRILLION LAWSUIT AGAINST THE FEDERAL GOVT AND OVER 140 MONOPOLISTS

John Pilger: How the People of South Africa Were Misled and Can Rise Again

By Eric Ortiz

https://player.vimeo.com/video/248221120

Journalist John Pilger traveled to South Africa in November and delivered a lecture in Cape Town in memory of anti-apartheid campaigner Abdulhay Ahmed Saloojee.

During his talk, Pilger asked why the struggle for freedom in South Africa has yet to be won, why a form of apartheid still rules and why this oppression has become a model for much of the world in the 21st century.

Watch the entire video above.

– See Also –

South African President resigns after his party pressured him to step down amid corruption allegations

South Africa’s ruling party finally turns against Zuma

John Pilger: South Africa: 20 years of apartheid by another name

 

https://counterinformation.wordpress.com/2018/02/14/john-pilger-how-the-people-of-south-africa-were-misled-and-can-rise-again/#comment-41205

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/48792.htm

 

Raging Fyah – Judgment Day

On Judgment Day I’ll be playing music for the rebels, yeah…

… and ye shall know the truth… on RSA INC.

 

https://abathembublog.wordpress.com/rsa-inc/

WE THE PEOPLE PARTY; time to vote for real change; time to vote for ourselves

There is much activity around elections and voting in many countries; the herein is an idea that can bring the much-needed change for we, the people of each and every country; we invite you as one of we, the people of your country to seriously consider taking action; we are inviting the people of Southern Africa to join us in our launch of the we, the people party;

Is the current system of governance based on the will of we, the people?

Is your answer “No!!!”? [we have not had a single “yes!!!”]

Then why are things only getting worse? Why does voting not change anything?

Now, ask yourself:

Does the political party system serve we, the people? The 99%? Or, only the 1%?

Does it serve religious people? Churches and religious communities? Or, even recognise divine law?

Does it promote placing the power of banking back into the hands of we, the people where it properly belongs? Such as community banks and alternative systems of barter, trade and exchange?

Does it serve first nations and indigenous peoples?

Does it serve communities that want to govern themselves?

Is the purpose of government not to serve we, the people? To protect our rights as enshrined in the Bill of Rights? The supreme law of the land? To protect our freedoms, our peace, our prosperity, our private property and our sovereignty? To provide us with services? Do they?

THEN WHAT GIVES? WHAT IS THE PROBLEM?

We spent years down this rabbit hole so you don’t have to; it would take you months to read all our research; every topic and page is briefly outlined at https://giftoftruth.wordpress.com/faqs/

The entire system is rigged; in almost every country; banks, courts and government are in collusion; and, they work for a global oligarchy; the 1%;

Paul Craig Roberts should know what he is talking about; see https://1earthunite.wordpress.com/2016/08/02/everything-is-rigged-medicine-science-elections-the-media-money-education-search-engines-social-media-you-are-living-in-a-fabricated-fairy-tale/

 

 

Every bar and law society member are in collusion with the same 1%; private corporations; a secret societies; elite families; the law and justice is now so far removed from its origins, it is now the undoing of natural law and natural justice;

We are in fact living in an occult society wherein everything is hidden; this is not a new world order, but an Old World Order; Vestus Ordo Seclorum…

 

The ancestors of the nations of the compass turned the world into ‘citizens’; their descendants are still in control; the 1% designed the political party system to divide, conquer and rule we, the people; the 99%; their sole aim is to steal our lands and natural resources; it is as simple as that;

We say “Power to the People;”

 

VOTING IS HOW WE GIVE OUR POWER AWAY!

How do they maintain power? And, where does the 1% get their authority from? FROM VOTING!!! Even if we only ‘register’ to vote, we have in fact waivered our natural rights; we have waivered our Bill of Rights, our benefits; and, instead taken on ‘duties’ and ‘obligations’; turned from living creditors into legal fiction debtors; we have granted sovereignty to corporations [which we mistakenly think is government]; ‘state sovereignty’ [a cabalistic term] as opposed to ‘people sovereignty’;

This is also known as ‘representative democracy’ when, in fact, only ‘direct democracy’ serves the people; word magick is used to keep fomenting this plot against we, the people;

Now, consider that in the words of Albert Einstein: “We can’t solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.”  

In the same fashion, we cannot keep using the same system of voting and expect change!!!

We have been educating the people of Southern Africa on VOTER DEREGISTRATION; see https://giftoftruth.wordpress.com/voter-deregistration/

 

The only way we can possibly use the voting system for change is to vote in a NEW SYSTEM; a system wherein people rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness trump supreme! A system of EQUITY! Wherein ALL PEOPLE ARE EQUAL BEFORE THE LAW; wherein governance ONLY concerns itself with those behaviours; a system that Bastiat, Locke, Jefferson and Napolitano would approve of;

A system wherein natural law and natural justice can be used as a restraint against tyranny:

 

A government of ALL the people, by ALL the people, for ALL the people;

 

 

Truth & Reconciliation Commissions: Investigation into the fraudulent financial system; people restored as creditors; nationalisation of corporations into lawful we, the people trust; anti-trust laws; overturn unjust laws; see https://giftoftruth.wordpress.com/banking/

Moratorium on evictions & foreclosures; repossessions restored; see https://giftoftruth.wordpress.com/foreclosures/

Debt jubilee; forgiveness and set-off of debts; return to prudent banking;

 

Community banks: the power of banking back in the hands of we, the people where it properly belongs; develop alternative models of barter, trade & exchange; https://giftoftruth.wordpress.com/community-banks/

 

Community Courts: scrap the divided bar; pierce the corporate veil; all are equal before the law; hold accountable those working for harmful corporations; trial by jury/forum/public hearing/; the people judge; revolving juries – all get a turn; true justice is seeking reconciliation and not retribution; see https://giftoftruth.wordpress.com/uza/

 

 

 

Self-determination: Local community municipal governance; revolving committees – all get a turn; direct access and admin over per capita share of national gdp;

 

Poverty: End man-made poverty; zero un-employment; basic income for all; un-employed work on social or environmental rehab projects;

 

Environment: Predatory capitalism is destroying ALL societies AND the earth; see https://giftoftruth.wordpress.com/capitalism/ Social & environmental rehab projects proposed by we, the people reviewed & implemented;

 

Natural Health: develop, educate, implement, promote, review natural health & projects

 

Tax: Zero tax on we, the people; only corporate tax; only customs & excise duty;

 

Development: No shortage of capital to develop the above; Tackling of illicit capital flows for development of the above; see https://giftoftruth.wordpress.com/reports/

Free: Free education on ALL levels; 30 minutes talktime & 25 SMS DAILY FREE;

 

 

Now, why would you want to vote for anyone else?

Vote for yourself as one of we, the people; see https://giftoftruth.wordpress.com/we-the-people-party/

JAIL THE BANKSTERS? Is True Justice Seeking Retribution? Really?…

We are beginning to see a time when some bankers will get thrown under the bus, so to speak, by their very own brothers-in-arms, the banking fraternity; while some may cheer, it is in fact a sad state of affairs;

Now, we know that there is honour, even among thieves; and, scapegoats and fall guys will be chosen from within their ranks to fall on their swords so as to appease the pitchfork-wielding people; the ‘retributionists’ as we call them: the eye-for-an-eye folks; while the real masterminds will get away…. Yet, again while the people squabble between themselves on how the banksters should be punished; here are some recent reports:

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-07-07/ex-barclays-traders-jailed-more-than-6-years-over-libor-rigging

https://sentinelblog.com/2016/07/30/first-senior-bankers-on-the-planet-responsible-for-2008-economic-collapse-finally-jailed/

BAR: Maybe 3 years ago we would have cheered, but not today; not after comprehending what natural law and natural justice is; what the law truly is; and, how we are still blindly following a retributive colonial slave bar legal system; the same legal system that has its occult roots in the papacy: http://one-evil.org/content/texts_papal_bull.html

By now, we have all lost an eye [or two] in this retributive system; and, in the world of the blind the one-eyed is king, they say; and, it was Gandhi who is attributed with saying:

After a number of years of research on the true nature and concepts of law; and, what the law really means; and is; we can tell you this:

It’s all about subject-matter-jurisdiction as well as jurisdiction; the BAR system is a foreign jurisdiction operating under law-of-the-sea jurisdiction; it is a LIMITED jurisdiction; inferior to and in a lower jurisdiction to the law-of-the-land; law-of-the-sea ONLY has jurisdictions over legal fictions written in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS such as your ‘PERSON’, COPORATIONS, HUMAN BEINGS, CITIZENS, INDUVIDUALS; these are only IMAGINARY AND HAVE NO PARITY WITH THE TANGIBLE; law-of-the-sea is merely for commercial transactions between legal fictions; in this system the ‘STATE’ [a legal fiction] is ‘sovereign;

SUPREME COURT RULING – NO CORPORATE JURISDICTION OVER THE NATURAL MAN: Supreme Court of the United States 1795,

“Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them.” S.C.R. 1795, (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54)

Government is  merely a legal fiction which was created solely to protect peoples’ antecedent rights, property and natural resources; and, to provide the people with services, not to lord over them. A piece of paper cannot rule over a people. It has no jurisdiction over the tangible as affirmed by the above ruling.

A ‘sovereign state’ is a cabalistic term and is contrary and opposed to ‘people sovereignty’:

“The words “sovereign state” are cabalistic words, not understood by the disciple of liberty, who has been instructed in our constitutional schools. It is our appropriate phrase when applied to an absolute despotism. The idea of sovereign power in the government of a republic is incompatible with the existence and foundation of civil liberty and the rights of property.” Gaines v. Buford, 31 Ky. (1 Dana) 481, 501.

The real problem is the legal system, the banking system and political system; in order to be truly free we, the people must create new and alternative models of law, banking and without politics; 

Law of the Land: The law-of-the-land is your Bill of Rights, your tangible property and natural resources; people are equal before the law and have the right to a fair trial by jury, in a TRC or public hearing or forum; and, sovereign states and peoples honour the “law of nations”; in this system the people are sovereign;

Law of Nations: Now, as no people or community will ever acknowledge the superiority of one people over another, the only law that binds us is the “law of nations” which depends entirely on the rules of natural law and to which each people is equally subject; on this subject Sir William Blackstone wrote the following:

“However, as it is impossible for the whole race of mankind to be united in one great society, they must necessarily divide into many, and form separate states, commonwealths, and nations, entirely independent of each other, and yet liable to a mutual intercourse. Hence arises a third kind of law to regulate this mutual intercourse, called “the law of nations,” which, as none of these states will acknowledge a superiority in the other, cannot be dictated by any, but depends entirely upon the rules of natural law, or upon mutual compacts, treaties, leagues, and agreements between these several communities: in the construction also of which compacts we have no other rule to resort to, but the law of nature; being the only one to which all the communities are equally subject; and therefore the civil law(c) very justly observes, that quod naturalis ratio inter omnes homines constituit, vocatur jus gentium.” [Sir William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Law of England in Four Books, Vol. 1[1753] INTRODUCTION: OF THE STUDY OF NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE LAWS OF ENGLAND, SECTION 1: ON THE STUDY OF THE LAW] [extract]

QUOD NATURALIS RATIO INTER OMNES HOMINES CONSTITUIT, VOCATUR JUS GENTIUM. That which natural reason has established among all men is called the “law of nations.” 1 Bl.Comm. 43; Dig. 1, 1, 9; Inst. 1, 2, 1.

The bar system uses semantic deceit [in a language called “legalese” which sounds like English, but is deceptively different]; and, used to garner semblances of consent under the colour of law; what passes for law is not law; these are rules that only apply to government employees and members of bar associations and law societies; admirals, esquires, bachelors, privateers, pirates etc. are all ranking knights of a secret Temple society collaborating with monarchies and oligarchies under foreign and secret jurisdictions; hidden behind smoke and mirrors… switch and bait… divide, conquer and rule…

The 1893 Dictionary of Arts and Sciences, and general literature / The R. S. Peale 9th Encyclopaedia Britannica defines the word “LEGAL” as: “THE UNDOING OF GOD’S LAW.”

In a more fair and just system wherein people are sovereign; and, the law-of-the-land prevails; and, the protection of people freedoms [such as the right to not go to jail] people rights, peoples property is paramount; and, wherein governments provide equitable services as public servants and ONLY concern themselves with these behaviours; and, wherein people can be lifted out from behind the corporate veil and be held accountable before the people as peers; and wherein the people are the judges such as trial by jury;

And, wherein every people [even a banker] has the right to a fair trial by the law-of-the-land; wherein the people hear facts; and, after diligent deliberation, judge with equity; and, ought to make unanimous rulings according to principles of natural law and natural justice and restorative justice; and, ought to be reconciliatory;

Bankers are people too and NOT ‘persons’; they have the right not to incriminate themselves; they have the right to the presumption of liberty; they have the right not to give up their natural right to liberty, too; if you want those rights you need to give them to banksters too; be aware to not become the tyrants that we are opposing in the first place;

What passes for justice in the fraudulent bar legal system is not justice; it’s a system of barratry and piracy and racketeering;

Are you telling us that you would have acted honourably if you were a banker? That you would NOT have put your hand in the cookie jar? Codswollop, we say;

Bastiat stated in his writings The Law that: “The STATE is that great legal fiction where everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else”;

The fraudulent system thrived because we were all clamouring to engage in usury against each other; to compete in a winner-takes-all system instead of co-operation and equity and sharing, equally; the system only existed because we remained party to the fraud; we are all guilty; not even one people will be found to be honourable and pure enough to open the seals…

Judge not harshly, lest ye be judged harshly, we say; punishment and imprisonment is archaic and cabalistic, people; it does not rehabilitate; it breaks down and burdens society; come on!!! Let’s not blindly copy the very same obsolete system that we are building new models for so as to make this one obsolete; let’s truly build new models based on principles of restorative justice; if, you wish to know more feel free to read our Restorative Justice page;

Sadly, our focus is on jailing the bankers; instead, it should be to hold Truth & Reconciliation Commissions to ensure that the harm ceases on the victims; who are the victims? The people! And, to ensure that the rights of the victims namely we, the people are addressed; to place moratoriums on evictions and foreclosures and repossessions; so that the harm ceases; to give the bankers the opportunity to repent in TRCs AND THEN TO FORGIVE THEM!!! THAT IS THE GOLDEN RULE! LOVE THY NEIGHBOUR [even bankers!!!] AS YOU LOVE YOURSELF;

DO YOU WANT TO SIT IN A JAIL? NO!!! NO-ONE WANTS TO SIT IN A JAIL!!!

Let’s forgive, but NOT forget; so that this never happens again; In the words of the ONLY Great Dictator: “We all want to help one another. Human beings [people] are like that. We want to live by each other’s happiness-not by each other’s misery. We don’t want to hate and despise one another. In this world there is room for everyone. And the good earth is rich and can provide for everyone. The way of life can be free and beautiful, but we have lost the way. Greed has poisoned men’s souls-has barricaded the world with hate-has goose-stepped us into misery and bloodshed. We have developed speed, but we have shut ourselves in. Machinery that gives abundance has left us in want. Our knowledge has made us cynical. Our cleverness, hard and unkind. We think too much and feel too little. More than machinery we need humanity. More than cleverness we need kindness and gentleness. Without these qualities life will be violent and all will be lost. . . .”

Yet, let’s rather focus our energy on the remedies; such as DEBT JUBILEEs; the set-off and settlement of ALL fraudulent debts!!! Fraud vitiates everything; fraud nullifies contracts; restitution to those who were de-frauded; equity and true equality before real law and real people courts wherein the people are the judges; yet, judge according to principles of restorative justice;

Let’s rather build new models of banking; of people community courts wherein true justice is seeking reconciliation and not retribution; and, wherein people are truly sovereign and recognise that life is sacred; and, we are embodiment of the sacred and that the divine dwells within us all, equally; and, where your rights end, mine begins;

And, finally, let’s all remember what that Great Soul Mahatma said:

Sincerely, without prejudice, under onerous title, in peace, brother-thomas

 

The Nazarenes and Apostles were an unruly bunch of free men and judicial activists that challenged the courts, judges, lawyers, government, mosaic laws and the hierarchal system as a whole… not much different to the free-wo/men-on-the-land of today…

Generations later and only now are judicial activists beginning to re-discover The Bible from a lawful perspective; as well as realise that the legal problems of society were not much different than as they are now.

The highest law is divine being a rule given by divine instruction as nothing may contradict such a rule. The second highest law be the reason of mind, being an edict given by a great council of wise elders or jurists, as nothing absurd and without good reason may be considered law. The third highest law be the law of the people, as the consent and will of the people is the source of true authority. Every law has it’s boundaries called jurisdiction.

Even today, for the believers in the teachings of Iesus (there was no ‘J’, only ‘I’, in English during the time the 1611 King James Version was written) the Nazarene and the Apostles The Bible is a source of divine law. Much to the concern of the Jewish and Roman scribes of that hierarchical era, the revolutionary teachings of the Nazarenes of the New Testament brought redemption to humanity and created a new natural law which literally superseded the old hierarchical mosaic laws. To many the Nazarenes were regarded as apostate and most of the Apostles met a tragic end. Gnostic Christians went into hiding or continued in other countries. Today the law of liberty is being revived as it was then.

The Nazarenes were well schooled and versed in different aspects of law:

The Gospel according to Matthew, Chapter IX,

Verse 9 And as Iesus passed forth from thence, he saw a man named Matthew, sitting at the receipt of custom: and he said unto him, Follow me. And he arose and followed him.  

This begs the question: What did Iesus and Matthew (a tax official) talk about which convinced Matthew to leave his job? Was it maybe in connection with the herein verses? Here is Levi, another tax official…

To Mark, Chapter II,

Verse 13 and he went forth again by the sea side, and all the multitude resorted unto him, and he taught them. 14 And as he passed by, he saw Levi the son of Alpheus sitting at the receipt of Custom, and said unto him, Follow me. And he arose, and followed him.

Remember, the Levites became the treasurers and the bankers; some even today…

The Gospel according to the Apostle Luke, Chapter V,

Verse 27 And after these things he went forth, and saw a Publican, named Levi, sitting at the receipt of custom: and he said unto him, Follow me. 28 And he left all, rose up, and followed him.

Sounds like the makings of a conspiracy already…

The Acts of the Apostles, Chapter VI,

Verse 9 Then there arose certaine of the Synagogue, which is called the Synagogue of the Libertines, and Cyrenians, and Alexandrians, and of them of Cilicia, and of Asia, disputing with Steven. 10 And they were not able to resist the wisdom and the spirit by which he spoke. 11 Then they suborned men which said, We have heard him speak blasphemous words against Moses, and against God. 12 And they stirred up the people, and the Elders, and the Scribes, and came upon him, and caught him, and brought him to the Council, 13 and set up false witnesses, which said, This man ceases not to speak blasphemous words against this holy place, and the Law. 14 For we have heard him say, that this Iesus of Nazareth shall destroy this place, & shall change the Customs which Moses delivered us. 15 And all that sate in the Council, looking steadfastly on him, saw his face as it had bene the face of an Angel. 

Is this not what judicial activists of today are doing? Speaking blasphemy against the law of the sea? Seeking to change the status quo/customs? Are the courts not using false witness against you? The opposing attorney is not a witness, they are a representative… where is the witness? The corpus delict? Absent a body there can be no dispute… the truth is, in a corporation versus a ‘citizen’ there is never a witness…

The Gospel according to the Apostle Matthew, Chapter XVII,

Verse 24 And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money, came to Peter, and said, Does not your master pay tribute? 25 He said, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Iesus prevented him, saying, What thinks thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? Of their own children, or of strangers? 26 Peter said unto him, Of strangers. Iesus said unto him, Then are the children free. 27 Notwithstanding, least we should offend them, go thou to the Sea, and cast a hook, and take up the fish that first comes up: and when thou hast opened his mouth, thou shalt find a piece of money: that take, and give unto them for me, and thee. 

A very telling verse showing Iesus’ disdain for authority and for money as when he overturned the tables of the moneylenders…

The Gospel according to John, Chapter VIII,

Verse 32 And you shall know the Truth, and the Truth shall make you free. 36 If the Son therefore shall make you free, you shall be free indeed. 

Very telling words… The mission of the Nazarenes was to set humanity free. There are only two places where the words ‘free man’ is used:

The First Epistle of the Apostle Paul to the Corinthians, Chapter VII,

Verse 22 For he that is called in the Lord, being a servant is the Lord’s free man: likewise also he that is called being free, is Christ’s servant. 23 You are bought with a price, be not you the servants of men.

Revelations, Chapter VI,

Verse 15 And the kings of the earth, and the great men, and the rich men, and the chief captains, and the mighty men, and every bondman, and every free man, hid themselves in the dens, and in the rocks of the mountains,

The Bible, 1611 King James Version 1611 as a source of divine law for Christians has the following to say on the jurisdiction of your body and spirit:

The First Epistle of Paul the Apostle to the Corinthians, Chapter III

Verse 16 Know you not that you are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwells in you? 17 If any man defiles the Temple of God, him shall God destroy: for the Temple of God is holy, which Temple ye are. 18 Let no man deceive himself: If any man among you seems to be wise in this world, let him become a fool, that he may be wise. 19 For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God: for it is written, He takes the wise in their own craftiness 20 and again, The Lord knows the thoughts of the wise, that they are vain. 21 Therefore let no man glory in men, for all things are yours.

This begs the question as to how courts of today then gain jurisdiction over our body.

Chapter VI Verse 19: “What, know you not that your body is the Temple of the holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own? 20 For you are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are Gods.

Our bodies cannot be lawfully incarcerated by the state or anyone else. It belongs to your Creator and is under divine jurisdiction. And, we were redeemed with a price long time ago and which also means that under divine law we cannot be debtors.

The Second Epistle of Paul the Apostle to the Çorinthians, Chapter VI,

Verse 16 and what agreement hath the Temple of God with idols? For ye are the Temple of the living God, as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in [them], and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.

Here again, the divine law dwells within us. Then how can for example THE STATE or any agency for that matter have jurisdiction over the people? 

The Epistle of Paul the Apostle to the Ephesians, Chapter II,

Verse 18 for through him we both have access by one Spirit unto the Father. 19 Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners; but fellow citizens with the Saints, and of the household of God, 20 And are built upon the foundation of the Apostles and Prophets, le-sus Christ himself being the chief corner stone, 21 In whom all the building fitly framed together, grows unto a holy Temple in the Lord: 22 In whom you also are built together for an habitation of God through the Spirit.

Here we find that our lawful citizenship of body and spirit is with the saints while today our ‘legal person’ aka strawman is REGISTERED as a ‘citizen’ of THE STATE which are all legal fiction terms as substantiated by the following Supreme Court ruling – No corporate jurisdiction over the natural man: Supreme Court of the United States 1795, “Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them.” S.C.R. 1795, (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54)

The key is in the word ‘person’. The remedy lies in what is called the subject-matter-jurisdiction or jurisdiction. The ‘artificial person’ aka THE STATE or any other man-made legal fiction agency clothed as an ‘artificial person’ only have jurisdiction over the legal fiction aka ‘natural person’ which is a cabalistic term; Black’s Law 4^th Edition, 1968 defines ‘natural’ as follows:

NATURAL. The juristic meaning of this term does not differ from the vernacular, except in the cases where it is used in opposition to the term “legal;” and then it means proceeding from or determined by physical causes or conditions, as distinguished from positive enactments of law, or attributable to the nature of man rather than to the commands of law, or based upon moral rather than legal considerations or sanctions.

The above describes the contra-distinct jurisdictions between ‘natural’ (also similar to ‘lawful’) and ‘legal’ and like oil and water the two cannot mix. A ‘natural person’ is a legal term even though it is not lawful.

The Bible is full of verses written by the Apostles regarding the word ‘person’… “…let those who have ears hear…and those who have eyes see…”

Regarding the ‘person’: 

The First Epistle of Paul the Apostle to Timothy, Chapter I,

5 Now the end of the commandment is charity, out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned. 6 From which some having swerved, have turned aside unto vain jangling, 7 desiring to be teachers of the Law, understanding neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm.  

Do today’s law-givers know what they are saying with all these man-made rules they use in today’s courts?

8 But we know that the Law is good, if a man use it lawfully. 9 Knowing this, that the Law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly, and for sinners, for unholy, and profane, for murderers of fathers, and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, 10 For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for men-stealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine,

The key word is ‘lawful’ as opposed to ‘legal’; lawful refers to the un-enacted divine law, natural law or law of the land; and, today in contradistinction ‘legal’ is the commercial enacted law of the sea.

The General Epistle of the Apostle James, Chapter II,

Verse 1 My brothers, have not the faith our Lord Iesus Christ the Lord of glory, with respect of persons. 2 For if there come unto your assembly a man with a gold-ring, in goodly apparel, and there come in also a poor man, in vile raiment: 3 And ye have respect to him that wears the gay clothing, and say unto him, Sit thou here in a good place: and say to the poor. Stand thou there, or sit here under my footstool: 4 Are ye not then partial in yourselves, and are become judges of evil thoughts?

From the above we can deduct that a ‘person’ is someone who masks themselves with a certain status.

The Gospel according to the Apostle Matthew, Chapter XXII,

Verse 15 then went the Pharisees, and took counsel, how they might entangle him in his talk. 16 And they sent out unto him their disciples, with the Herodians, saying, Master, we know that thou art true, and teaches the way of God in trueth, neither cares thou for any man; for thou regards not the person of men. 

Here the Pharisees and Herodians were schooled in Roman legalese, trying to trap Iesus by the law regarding the ‘person’.

The Gospel according to the Apostle Luke, Chapter XV,

1 Then drew near unto him all the Publicans and sinners, for to hear him. 2 And the Pharisees and Scribes murmured, murmured, saying, This man receives sinners, and eats with them. 3 And he spoke this parable unto them, saying, 4 What man of you having a hundred sheep, if he loose one of them, does not leave the ninety and nine in the wilderness, and goes after that which is lost, until he find it? 5 And when he has found it, he lays it on his shoulders, rejoicing. 6 And when he comes home, he calls together his friends, and neighbours, saying unto them, Rejoice with me, for I have found my sheep which was lost. 7 I say unto you, that likewise joy shall be in heaven over one sinner that repents, more than over ninety and nine just persons, which need no repentance.

He has a great comeback for them in the form of a parable.

The Gospel according to the Apostle Luke, Chapter XX,

Verse 20 and they watched him, and sent forth spies, who should feign themselves just men that they might take hold of his words, that so they might deliver him unto the power and authority of the governor. 21 And they asked him, saying, Master, we know that thou says and teaches rightly, neither accepts thou the person of any, but teaches the way of God truly.

What is being implied here again is that the lawyers of that time tried to gain jurisdiction over Iesus by employing semantic deceit nowadays called LEGALESE, not much different to what the courts are doing today…

The Gospel According to Matthew Chapter XXVII,

Verse 23 And the Governor said, Why, what evil has he done? But they cried out, yes more, saying, Let him be crucified. 24 When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but that rather a tumult was made, he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent of the blood of this just person: see you to it.

Even Pilatus used semantic deceit by referring to the ‘person’ of Iesus because in truth he had no divine jurisdiction over the natural man, only his ‘person’ and this was his ‘legal’, but not lawful, justification for plausible deniability.

The Acts of the Apostles, Chapter X,

Verse 34 Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a trueth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons: 35 But in every nation, he that fears him, and works righteousness, is accepted with him.

Paul was highly schooled in Roman law as Saul before his conversion, but when he realised the nature of divine law, he could probably see the jurisdictional shortcomings of the Roman ‘legal’ hierarchal man-made laws. 

The Epistle of the Apostle Paul to the Romans, Chapter II,

Verse 11 for there is no respect of persons with God. 12 For as many as have sinned without Law, shall also perish without Law: and as many as have sinned in the Law, shall be judged by the Law. 13 ( For not the hearers of the Law are just before God, but the doers of the Law shall be justified; 14 For when the Gentiles which have not the Law, do by nature the things contained in the Law: these having not the Law , are a Law unto themselves, 15 Which show the work of the Law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the meanwhile accusing, or else excusing one another: 16 In the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by le-sus Christ, according to my Gospel.

Natural law is written in our hearts. It is our moral and ethical compass. We call it our ‘heart’, or ‘conscience’, or ‘gut feeling’.

The Epistle of Paul to the Galatians, Chapter II,

Verse 4 And that because of false brothers unawares brought in, who came in privily to spy out our liberty, which we have in Christ Iesus that they might bring us into bondage. 5 To whom we gave place by subjection, no not for an hour, that the truth of the Gospel might continue with you. 6 But of these, who seemed to be somewhat, (whatsoever they were, it makes no matter to me, God accepts no man’s person,) for they who seemed to be somewhat, in conference added nothing to me. 

The Creator accepts no man’s ‘person’ or status. We are all equal under divine law.

The Epistle of Paul the Apostle to the Colossians, Chapter III,

24 Knowing, that of the Lord ye shall receive the reward of the inheritance: for ye serve the Lord Christ. 25 But he that does wrong shall receive for the wrong which he has done: and there is no respect of persons.

Again no respect for ‘persons’…

5 Hearken, my beloved brothers, has God not chosen the poor of this world, rich in faith, and heirs of the kingdom, which he has promised to them that love him? 6 But you have despised the poor. Do not rich men oppress you, and draw you before the Judgement seats? 7 Do they not blaspheme that worthy Name, by that which you are called? 8 If you fulfil the royal Law, according to the Scripture, you shall love your neighbour as yourself, you do well. 9 But if you have respect to persons, you commit sin, and are convinced of the Law, as transgressors. 10 For whosoever shall keep the whole Law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all. 11 For he that said, do not commit adultery; said also, do not kill. Now if you commit no adultery, yet if you kill, you have become a transgressor of the Law. 12 So speak you, and so do, as they that shall be judged by the Law of liberty. 13 For he shall have judgement without mercy, that has shown no mercy, & mercy rejoices against Judgement.

Are the courts and judges of today showing the people mercy?

The Fist Epistle of the Apostle Peter, Chapter I,

Verse 16 Because it is written, “Be ye holy, for I am holy”. 17 And if you call on the Father, without respect of persons judges according to every man’s work, pass the time of your sojourning here in fear: 18 For as much as you know that you are not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold, from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers; 19 But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a Lamb without blemish and without spot, 20 who verily was fore-ordained before the foundation of the world, but is manifest in these last times for you: 21 Who by him do believe in God that raised him up from the dead, and gave him glory, that your faith and hope might be in God.

We were redeemed!!!

The Second General Epistle of Peter, Chapter II,

Verse 2 And many shall follow their pernicious ways, by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of: 3 And through covetousness shall they with feigned words, make merchandise of you, whose judgement now of a long time lingers not , and their damnation slumbers not

Does this not sound like what lawgivers today are doing to the people?

 The General Epistle of Jude,

Verse 16 these are murmurers and complainers, walking after their own lusts, and their mouth speaks great swelling words, having men’s persons in admiration because of advantage.

 The following verses we believe allude to this ‘advantage’ mentioned:

The Gospel according to the Apostle Matthew, Chapter XXIII,

Verse 12 And whosoever shall exalt himself, shall be abased: and he that shall humble himself, shall be exalted. 13 But wo unto you, Scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites; for you shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: For you neither go in your selves, neither suffer you them that are entering, to go in. 14 Woe unto you Scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites; for you devour widows houses, and for a pretence make long prayer; therefore you shall receive the greater damnation.

Sound like today’s global foreclosure pandemic? The rebuke continues…

15 Woe unto you Scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites; for you compass Sea and land to make one Proselyte, and when he is made, you make him two fold more the child of hell than yourselves.

The judicial activists will recognise that commercial law is the law of the sea and is swallowing up the law of the land by greying areas of jurisdiction; for example, how did the law of the sea such as admiralty law get onto the land?

16 Woe unto you, you blind guides, which say, Whosoever shall swear by the Temple, it is nothing: but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the Temple, he is a debtor.

Today all BAR members belong to a secret society known as The Temple in the City of London… they still make long ‘prayers’ in court documents… and they make one swear by the gold of baal’s unholy temple… hence the Jewish people traditionally only traded silver amongst themselves…

To add to this regarding oaths and solemn affirmations in a court:

Verse 34 But I say unto you, Swear not at all, neither by heaven, for it is Gods throne: 35 Nor by the earth, for it is his footstool: neither by Hierusalem, for it is the city of the great king. 36 Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou cannot make one hair white or black. 37 But let your communication be Yes, yes: No, No: For whatsoever is more than these, comes of evil.

The rebuke continues… 

Verse 23 Woe unto you Scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites; for you pay tithe of mint, and aniseed, and cumin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the Law, judgement, mercy and faith: these ought you to have done, and not to leave the other undone. 24 You blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel. 

You blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel. Imagine saying the above in a court of today? He, he;

Verse 27 Woe unto you Scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites, for you are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness. 28 Even so, you also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within you are full of hypocrisy and iniquity.

Sounds like even then they powdered their faces into a mask? Does this bring to mind what judges or lawyers still do today with their wigs and bat-capes?

The Book of the Prophet Isaiah, Chapter III,

Verse 8 Woe unto them that join house to house, that lay field to field, till there be no place, that they may be placed alone in the midst of the earth.

Sound like any corporation or oligarch you may know of in today’s world?

Chapter X,

Verse 1 Woe unto them that decree unrighteous decrees, and that write grievousness which they have prescribed: 2 to turn aside the needy from judgement, and to take away the right from the poor of my people, that widows may be their pray, and that they may rob the fatherless.

Sound like a social welfare court near you? Or, much the same as courts of today are doing?

To conclude, this brings to mind the following enigmatic verse:

Ecclesiastes, Chapter I,

Verse 8 the thing that has been, it is that which shall be: and that which is done, is that which shall be done; and there is no new thing under the sun. 9 Is there anything, whereof it may be said, See, this is new? It has been already of old time, which was before us. 10 There is no remembrance of former things; neither shall there be any remembrance of things that are to come, with those that shall come after.

Strategy for Revolution in the 21st Century – Winning Conflicts by Non-Violence

Nonviolence is a strategy to win in conflict. It was invented by Gandhi during the struggle of independence of the people of India against British imperialism. It was so successful as a strategy that it produced the most decisive of all victories to bring down the British empire.

For the basic principles of nonviolence, see the clear exposition by Martin Luther King, Jr in his book Stride Toward Freedom.

A key to nonviolence is that there should be no enemies. The struggle is against ideas and institutions but not individual persons. As Gandhi put it, “Hate the sin and not the sinner” History shows that people change and today’s enemy can become tomorrow’s ally. Perhaps the most extraordinary example is that of Saul of Tarsus who was the persecutor of the Christians until he was converted to Christianity and became St. Paul.

As we leave the 20th Century behind, nonviolence has yet to reach its full potential. Both Gandhi and King were assassinated. In India independence was marred by a bloodbath between Hindus and Muslims and the splitting off of Pakistan. The movement begun by King has yet to reach its goals of racial equality in America. Enemy images continue to be used by those seeking dominance in the world today, including the anti-Islamic language of American militarism and the anti-American language of Islamist sects.

We have a long way to go in the 21st Century to put nonviolence on the agenda and to replace enemy images by the tactics of Gandhi that the opponent must be “weaned from error by patience and sympathy.”

There are important lessons to be learned from the practical experiences of nonviolent revolutionaries in the 21st Century. One of the most important is the “Peace Process” that was at the center of the successful struggle to overthrow apartheid and establish a multi-racial democracy in South Africa. It directly engaged people in conflict management on a grass roots level throughout the country. At their peak, there were 11 regional committees and over one hundred local peace committees,

Another important side of the South African struggle was the international movement in solidarity with the struggle against Apartheid. The movement forced major imperialist countries and institutions to withdraw financial investment from companies doing business with the South African apartheid government.

The success of the nonviolent struggles led by Gandhi in India and by the ANC in South Africa, as well as more recent nonviolent struggles in the Philippines, Czechoslovakia and Venezuela, has depended on the mobilization of large numbers of people to come onto the streets where they have overwhelmed military power by their sheer numbers. Success, however, did not come as a result of spontaneous action. Instead, many of the people were prepared by training and discipline in nonviolent resistance.

As Gandhi has stressed, nonviolence requires at least as much training as that of a traditional soldier. “It takes a fairly strenuous course of training to attain to a mental state of non-violence … The perfect state is reached only when mind and body and speech are in proper co-ordination. But it is always a case of intense mental struggle … Non-violence is a weapon of the strong.”

An important part of training for revolutionaries in the 21st Century will be the study of nonviolent resistance movements and training and experience in the disciplined methods that prove to be successful in these movements. No doubt, there will be more and more such movements in the coming years – and more lessons to be learned and applied.

For nonviolence to succeed there must be training of thousands of activists, mastering the discipline of nonviolence and the principles and practices of revolutionary leadership.

Source: http://sfr-21.org/winning-conflict.html

To Be or Not To Be a ‘Human Being’?

The following is yet again another example of semantic deceit by employment of a language called LEGALESE which is the jargon used by BAR members and LAW SOCIETY.

From Ballentine’s Law Dictionary, 1948 Edition. ‘Human Being’ is defined as follows: ‘See monster’ . From the same dictionary, ‘monster’ is defined: ‘A human-being by birth, but in some part resembling a lower animal.’
      This is an unusual definition, but like all Law Dictionaries on this subject, a non-definition. It only states that a ‘human being’ is a higher animal. It is not found anywhere in Scripture that a Christian Man or Woman is an animal or part of the animal kingdom. This being the case, then what exactly is a ‘human being.’
      From the Oxford New English Dictionary of 1901, ‘human’ is defined as, ‘3. Belonging or relative to man as distinguished from God or superhuman beings; pertaining to the sphere or faculties of man (with implication of limitation or inferiority); mundane; secular. (Often opposed to divine.)’
      ‘Secular’ being the important word here, we look to the multi-difinitions in the 1992 Random House Webster’s College Dictionary: “Secular’ adj. 1. of or pertaining to worldly things or to things not regarded as sacred: temporal. 2. not relating to or concerned with religion (opposed to sacred). 3. concerned with non-religious subjects. 4. not belonging to a religious order: not bound by monastic vows.”
      Could it be that ‘human’ means un-Godly. From the same dictionary, a look at a combination of the two: ‘Secular humanism’ n. any set of beliefs that promotes human values without specific allusion to religious doctrines.” And, “‘ secularism’ n. 1. secular spirit or tendency, esp. a system of political or social philosophy that rejects all forms of religious faith or worship. 2. the view that public education and other matters of civil policy should be conducted without the influence of religious beliefs.”
      In conjunction with this, from Collier’s New Dictionary of the *English Language, 1928. ‘humanitarian’ is defined: n. ‘a philanthropist: an anti Trinitarian who rejects the doctrine of Christ’s divinity; a perfectionist.: From the above Random House Dictionary, “humanitarianism’ is defined: n. ‘the doctrine that humankind may become perfect without divine aid.’
With no definition of ‘human being’ in Law, Mellinkoff’s Dictionary of American Legal Usage, 1992, defines ‘Person’ as, 1.”a human being–without regard to sex, legitimacy, or competence. This person is the central figure in law, as elsewhere, characterized by personal attributes of mind, intention, feelings, weaknesses, morality common to human beings; with rights and duties under the law. This is the person, sometimes called an individual, and often referred to in the law as a natural person, as distinguished from an artificial person (sense 3).”
      Of course, ‘morality common to human beings’ is not explained, because that would reveal to much. Again, in Shawmut Bank, N.A. vs. Valley Farms, (610A.2d652,654) it states, “For purpose of statute protecting certain property from post-judgment remedies, and therefore from prejudgment attachment, ‘natural person’ means ‘human being’, not artificial or juristic person”.
      So, if natural person and human being are considered the same in the law, let’s take a closer look at what a ‘natural person’ is. As you may know, all government codes, rules and regulations only attach to corporations, partnerships and natural persons. In American law, it seems that a definition of ‘natural person’ does not exist. To get any idea of what a natural person is, we have to go to English law. In the 17th Century, Lord Coke differentiated between ‘natural persons’ and ‘moral persons in a community’ in the following statement from his Institututes:… “we must observe, that estate is defined by the civilians, the capacity of moral persons; for, as natural persons have a certain space in which their natural existence is placed, and in which they perform their natural actions, so have persons in a community a certain state or capacity, in which they are supposed to exist, to perform their moral acts, and exercise all civil relations,”… (2 Inst. 669).
      With ‘natural man’ being the same as ‘natural person’, we find further evidence of exactly what a ‘human being’ is. From the above Random House Dictionary, page 901, ” ‘Natural’ adj. 17. natural man: unenlightened or unregenerate.” From the same Dictionary, page 1461, ” ‘unregenerate’ 1. not regenerate; unrepentant. 2. unconvinced by or unconverted to a particular religion, sect, or movement. 4. wicked; sinful; dissolute. 5. an unregenerate person.”
      In conjunction with this, from The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, 1933, ‘naturalism’ is defined as: ‘a system of morality or religion having a purely natural basis; a view of the world, and of man’s relationship to it, in which only the operation of natural, as opposed to supernatural or spiritual, laws and forces is assumed.’ and ‘naturalist’ is defined as: ‘One who follows the light of nature, as contrasted with revelation.’
      And, of course, the Scriptures being the final authority, confirms all of the above, at
1 Corinthians 3:14, “But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.”
      Therefore, when a Christian calls him or herself a ‘human being’, they are saying, “I’m an animal; I’m non-religious; I’m unrepentant: I’m wicked, sinful and dissolute; I’m able to do all things and be perfect without Jesus Christ; I’m subject to man’s law, rather than God’s Law.”

Source: http://www.hisholychurch.net/sermon/human.htm

This is sufficient logical proof why ‘human rights’ are NOT enforceable. Think about it; your Constitution talks about ‘we, the people’ and NOT ‘we, the human beings’…

Therefore, it is ludicrous to fight for human rights. We may as well scrap or re-write ‘human rights’ charters and amend to people’s charters. In peace 

 

Notice to Banki Moon and Kerry in regard to continuing Abuses

February 23, 2016Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon       via Certified Mail #7006 0810 0003 3541 5717 United Nations Secretariat New York, New York  10017John Forbes Kerry                         via Certified Mail # 7006 0810 0003 3541 5724 2201 C Street NW Washington, DC 20520

Notice in Regard to Continuing Abuses

Dear Sirs:

This business concerns both of you, so both are being addressed.

Mr. Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon: It is our understanding that the UNITED STATES CONGRESS named the United Nations the Trustee of our states and the laws thereof beginning in 1976 and there has been no other appointment since.   This was caused by the wholesale incorporation of former State and County government operations on the land jurisdiction of the United States, which left the land jurisdiction Public Offices (which are still owed to us) vacated though we were not informed at the time.

It is our further understanding that the service contract of the IMF sponsored UNITED STATES (INC) was defaulted in March of 2015 when that entity –together with its numerous franchises— was declared insolvent and entered receivership.   This circumstance left the federal services contract portion of The Constitution for the united States of America vacated, too.

We became aware shortly afterward that unscrupulous persons have self-interestedly claimed that we were operating as franchises of the insolvent UNITED STATES and that vessels in commerce including STATES and ESTATE trusts named after the States of America and the living American Nationals were to be considered sureties and franchises of the UNITED STATES and sold as abandoned properties to pay the debts of the insolvent governmental services corporation.

As our Trustee in this matter, we protest to you in your office as Secretary General of the United Nations and also wish you to make our objections known to the General Secretary of the United Nations that none of these arrangements supposedly made in our behalf are true or equitable.  We have repudiated the so-called National Debt of the UNITED STATES (INC) as odious debt that is not owed by the people of the (Continental) United States, testified that the people of the (Continental) United States are not sureties for the debts of the UNITED STATES and that our public and private property interests have not been abandoned.

We have refused offers by both the World Bank and FEDERAL RESERVE dba THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (INC) to act as successors to contract.  This is the result of the obvious wrong-doing of these organizations in the past documented by the wet-ink, autographed, and sealed affidavit of probable cause which we have delivered to your offices in New York.  We have issued new Sovereign Letters Patent and have Declared Joint Sovereignty and established arrangements for the co-signing Native American Nations to act as our new federal service providers.  It should be apparent that we are of age, competent, acting with complete commercial liability, are birthright people of the (Continental) United States and hereditary beneficiaries of the unincorporated united States of America.

While this no doubt comes as a surprise to you, it is our wish and Will in this matter acting as the entitlement holders, beneficiaries, and sovereigns of the land jurisdiction of the United States.  We object to the continuing criminality of the international banks and governmental services corporations involved in this ongoing attempted institutionalized theft of our identities, mischaracterization of our political status, and securities fraud upon the probate courts and the bankruptcy courts throughout America.

We hold you and the United Nations fully accountable for the safety, support, welfare, and security of the living people of the (Continental) United States, the prosecution of the criminal elements in the international banking community and governmental services industry responsible for these outrages, and the return of our unencumbered property interests which have been falsely indebted under conditions of fraud and inland piracy.

Mr. Secretary Kerry:  We have ourselves fully and freely declared our disenfranchisement and revoked our election to pay federal income taxes since 1998.  We are what you call exempt non-resident aliens and American Nationals.  All reversionary interest in our estates returns to the united States of America on the land and United States of America on the sea.

These are Matters of Fact well-demonstrated in the public record, and they should be well-understood by those administering the Seattle Passport Office. We have been informed of stubborn refusals of service from passport agents and decided to check it out for ourselves. Accordingly, I, my husband, and grown son made request for new passports in August of 2015.

It is now approaching the end of February 2016 and despite copious correspondence and the plain Matter of Fact that we do not live in any Federal Enclave, do not reside in any municipal nexus, and are in fact Zip Code exempt —the passport agents have failed to perform and deliver the red jacket and properly styled passports we are owed, have objected to our use of the actual physical location of our home on the land as established by GPS as the basis of our land domicile, and refuse to understand  Title 39 U.S.C. Section 3003, 1341, 1342, which is punishable by up to 15 years imprisonment and $1,000,000.00 fine. Use of ZIP CODE is voluntary. (Domestic Mail Services Regulation Section 122.32 Nondiscrimination for NON-USE of ) and ZIP CODE per Public Law 91-325, section 403.

The Seattle Passport Agency has been offering to obstruct our ability to travel freely for six months over these petty obstructions and refusals to provide services owed and failure to obey the Public Law.  This is in itself a crime against humanity and an insufferable mis-administration of essential governmental services which are owed to us and to all American Nationals.

It is just one more example of the way in which governmental services corporations in this country have put self-interest ahead of service commitment and perpetuated commercial fraud against their employers and benefactors via obstruction, monopoly inducement, and disregard of Public Law.

We wish to see a prompt correction leading to the immediate issuance of passports bearing the proper color, proper style of name, proper mailing address (Rural Route Number), proper seal, stamp, and date. To that end I am returning the incorrect version of both the Passport and the Passport Card that were issued to me directly to your attention, Mr. Kerry, and requesting expedited service and issuance of the proper passport documents for me, Anna Maria Riezinger, my husband James Clinton Belcher and our son Eric Jon Belcher who still haven’t received anything at all from the Seattle Passport Agency, all non-combatant American Nationals, all living peacefully in Big Lake, Alaska.

Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon and Secretary of State John Forbes Kerry:  As we write this letter yet another governmental services corporation doing business as GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES, DUNS Number 16-190-6193, is terrorizing other innocent non-combatant Americans throughout the Western States.  This referenced corporate entity is the parent corporation of the FBI and BLM, both of which are operating on our soil as commercial mercenary forces under color of law.

This constructive fraud and deceit is brought about by the misuse and abuse of old trademarks and copyrighted names that were obtained as the result of corporate takeovers and mergers among governmental services corporations in the past and it has served to promote the impersonation of peacekeeping officers and other public officials by private, mostly foreign corporations having no more granted authority to “serve us” in this manner than employees of Target have authority to rob their customers.

This blatant lawlessness on the part of this foreign corporation run amok on our shores has resulted in the premeditated murder of an innocent American on our soil, and the false arrest of at least fifty other non-combatant American State Citizens who are being purposefully mischaracterized as “Enemies of the State” when they are in no way associated with any such “State” referenced in the entirety of Title 50. As the Trustee of our state offices and laws, Mr. Secretary General, this situation should be of vital concern to you, along with the continued purposeful and self-interested mischaracterization of the political status of the victims.

The American Nationals being mischaracterized by these vermin on our shores are innocent Third Parties and Priority Creditors of these same corporations, which are intent upon acts of inland piracy, armed international racketeering, and murderous insurance fraud against their employers.

We call upon you, Mr. Secretary General, to engage the necessary diplomatic process to free those Americans being held under false arrest and we call upon you, Secretary of State Kerry, to bring charges against these criminal entities masquerading as our lawful government.

The arrest and punishment of the bankers, attorneys, and administrators responsible is eminently more sensible in all respects than allowing these same criminals to continue to mis-characterize, murder and rob their Priority Creditors in an effort to avoid paying them.  This lawlessness must be brought to a swift end and the perpetrators must be recognized as the criminals they are with no more scape-goating of the innocent victims of these crimes.   They have already paid all the costs with their labor and natural resources; it is completely insane to expect them to pay again with their blood.

A policy of silence and failure to take action is not an acceptable response.  Both of you, Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon and Secretary of State Kerry, are responsible in different ways for controlling the GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES (INC.) and both will be accountable if you do not take prompt and effective action to correct the operations of this erring corporation.

Continuing to allow the GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES (INC.) to operate commercial mercenary armies under conditions of fraud and color of law on our shores will result in violent Breach of Trust and the lasting destruction of all respect for civil law and government.

Please note that the Federal Government has at most a proprietary interest as a caretaker of the property assets of the Western States.  That role does not include any authority to act against the actual owners and beneficiaries of the land assets nor allow any failure to recognize them as American State Citizens owed all the guarantees of their Statehood Compacts.

Our repudiation of the actions which have been taken in our names without our knowledge or consent by men and institutions merely pretending to represent us and which have been used as a means to establish institutionalized fraud and to hypothecate debt against our names and property assets is complete, final, and firmly established on the public records of all nations.

Although these crimes do involve mischaracterization of our political status, the entire scam is nothing more or less than garden variety bunko practiced on a vast scale, a matter of national identity theft and credit fraud engineered by international banks, attorneys, and politicians who have served themselves at the expense of those they are bound by treaty, trust indenture, commercial contract, and all forms of moral conscience to serve.

Correction must be viewed as a criminal matter, not misrepresented as a political one.

Sincerely,

Anna Maria Riezinger For the Alaska Civil Judge Advocates Council c/o Box 520994 Big Lake, Alaska RR 99652 (907) 250-5087

cc:

General Joseph F. Dunford, Jr.          via Certified Mail 7006 0810 0003 3541 5731

c/o Joint Chiefs of Staff

9999 Joint Staff Pentagon

Washington, DC 20318-9999

—————————————

See this article and over 100 others on Anna’s website here:www.annavonreitz.com

Posted by: http://www.paulstramer.net/2016/02/notice-in-regard-to-continuing-abuses.html

 

 

For the King

Do you realise that to be considered an upstanding citizen you have to obey the law of the sea, the Holy See? All laws, statutes and regulations are based on maritime law.

You are required to register, from the root; Regis, for the king, all births (berths) property; including home and car, which makes it all the property of the king. This is why your property can be seized and you pushed into a warehouse, until ‘they’ decide what to do with you.

Your country is also registered with the SEC and is a corporation, which explains how countries are invaded all the time. http://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/registration.asp Maritime law has invaded the land. Here is South Africa http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?company=south+africa&owner=exclude&action=getcompany

The president of your country is a corporate CEO, who’s only work is to keep you unaware and in line. The laws are given to the CEO of your corporate country by the ‘church’ who has owned everything on, under and above the earth since 1302, by holy decree. http://one-evil.org/content/symbols_papal_bull.html The bull is Ba’al by the way. These documents are only genuine when written on the skin of sacrificed children or ‘kids’.

Presidents are selected by shareholders, not voted for by you.

All these statutes are designed to force you to agree to them, whether you are aware or not. Without an identity card you cannot have access to a home, car, bank account, a cellular phone or a passport. You repeatedly sign away your wealth during your lifetime of working to survive and it all is given to the king. This article explains who the king is. https://giftoftruth.wordpress.com/2015/12/20/sleeping-with-the-enemy-a-four-part-article/

You can apply for benefits, every application you make is an offer to contract, if your application is approved you are locked into a contract, according to the terms and conditions that are imposed on you. A licence is a special permission given to you to do something that is otherwise illegal. You only should need a licence to drive if you travel for fair or charter, even by their laws.

These contracts are not simply between you and a partner (ship) there is a three way or tripartite agreement between you and the state. When you marry you are granted a licence and have to seek the judgement of the third party; the state; to dissolve it when things go wrong.

What I am trying to explain to you is that you are a slave, a chattel, property by consent. The state can seize your home, firearm, car, and children and lock you up, all because they own you and your property, they represent the church. See here for a list of bulls http://one-evil.org/content/texts_papal_bull.html including ownership of the whole planet.

You can go to an attorney and moan about justice and he will take your case to get paid, not to help you. The court will hear your case for profit not to give you justice. You will not be permitted to speak in court, if you employ a lawyer, because you are incompetent and a ward of the court.

So from birth, when you are weighed and measured and entered into the stock market for trade, given a certificate of berth; or a bill of lading; to when you die and are taken off the books as an asset, you are a chattel, a means of producing wealth for the king.

Can we do anything about this?

Absolutely yes!

Stop giving your life away, stop voting. A CEO is appointed by the shareholders, not voted for by the people. When you register to vote you are saying that you consent to be governed, controlled, and that the corporation represents you…. they don’t.

I can hear you thinking that this is the system that we have and that we are stuck with.

We are not stuck with this broken thing this robber baron corruption, this corporate piracy.

Soon your bank account will be seized; you get a receipt when you make a deposit, so it isn’t your money. The water and electricity will be turned off and the supermarkets will be out of stock. The troops will move in to keep you in line and then it will be too late.

Oh but that won’t happen here. That is what they said in Europe and America. It is happening everywhere, undeclared war on the people. Your government is a rogue state an enemy agent, and sees you as an enemy combatant.

So… if you want a future with happy children, clean rivers and birds and animals running free in fields where genetically modified crops never grow, where you can travel anywhere without let or hindrance, it is essential that you follow the next few steps to give your children the right to self determination and future that they deserve, free of corporate tyranny.

There is help at hand; no this is not an advertisement. A movement has developed to help you today. All your rights are explained and there is remedy.

The International Tribunal for Natural Justice (ITNJ) is fighting for the people to regain independence from a corrupt cartel, which includes the banks, church, government, science and education…. all these bodies are corporations that control us all. You will find truth and instant solutions for your immediate problems.

This movement is taking on the governments and banks for you. The courts have no power over you; the police are corporate policy enforcers and have no power over you. The only power that another has is the power that you give to them. Power that they have stolen using lies and sorcery http://one-evil.org/content/symbols_triple_crown.html Definition of the word human is monster https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tk7mEoOAcCY

The only law is to do no harm, and not impede the freedom of others. Should you break this law, you should have a fair trial based on the judgement of your peers, not corporate greed.

You have become accustomed to life as a slave. You do not have to ask permission to live on the land of your ancestors, or to pay to do so.

Please also consider making a donation to the cause, even the price of a toxic hamburger would go a long way to making sure that your children have the future that you yourself would want.

The government has been telling you lies about who the enemy is, open your eyes and see for yourself.

Bobby

 

http://itnjcommittee.org/contribute/southern-africa/

http://itnjcommittee.org/about-us/chapters/southern-africa/

https://giftoftruth.wordpress.com/annexures/

http://peoplevsrsa.com/

http://giftoftruth.info/

http://www.knysnakeep.org/the-brave-we-the-people-vs-rsa-inc/

 

 

Robert Emmet, the 1803 Irish Proclamation of Independence and his defiant speech prior to his death sentence.

Robert Emmet, architect of the 1803 rebellion. In 1803 in Dublin, Robert Emmet and a small band of republican revolutionaries proclaimed the independence of Ireland. After a haphazard rebellion, that turned out to be little more than a calamitous, bloody riot on Dublin’s Thomas Street, his hopes lay in ruins. Emmet, after fleeing to a safe house in the Wicklow mountains, was subsequently arrested, tried for treason and put to death along with 15 of his followers.

The Speech from the Dock
Robert Emmet’s speech on the eve of his execution.

My Lords:

What have I to say why sentence of death should not be pronounced on me according to law?  I have nothing to say that can alter your predetermination, nor that it will become me to say with any view to the mitigation of that sentence which you are here to pronounce, and I must abide by.  But I have that to say which interests me more than life, and which you have labored (as was necessarily your office in the present circumstances of this oppressed country) to destroy.  I have much to say why my reputation should be rescued from the load of false accusation and calumny which has been heaped upon it.  I do not imagine that, seated where you are, your minds can be so free from impurity as to receive the least impression from what I am going to utter–I have no hopes that I can anchor my character in the breast of a court constituted and trammeled as this is–I only wish, and it is the utmost I expect, that your lordships may suffer it to float down your memories untainted by the foul breath of prejudice, until it finds some more hospitable harbor to shelter it from the storm by which it is at present buffeted.

coat of arms of Ireland 13th century

Was I only to suffer death after being adjudged guilty by your tribunal, I should bow in silence and meet the fate that awaits me without a murmur; but the sentence of law which delivers my body to the executioner will, through the ministry of that law, labor in its own vindication to consign my character to obloquy–for there must be guilt somewhere: whether in the sentence of the court in the catastrophe, posterity must determine. A man in my situation, my lords, has not only to encounter the difficulties of fortune. and the force of power over minds which it has corrupted or subjugated. but the difficulties of established prejudice: the man dies, but his memory lives. That mine may not perish, that it may live in the respect of my countrymen, I seize upon this opportunity to vindicate myself from some of the charges alleged against me. When my spirit shall be wafted to a more friendly port; when my shade shall have joined the bands of those martyred heroes who have shed their blood on the scaffold and in the field, in defense of their country and of virtue. this is my hope: I wish that my memory and name may animate those who survive me, while I look down with complacency on the destruction of that perfidious government which upholds its domination by blasphemy of the Most High-which displays its power over man as over the beasts of the forest-which sets man upon his brother, and lifts his hand in the name of God against the throat of his fellow who believes or doubts a little more or a little less than the government standard–a government which is steeled to barbarity by the cries of the orphans and the tears of the widows which it has made.

un-official green ensign of Ireland

[Interruption by the court.]

I appeal to the immaculate God–I swear by the throne of heaven, before which I must shortly appear–by the blood of the murdered patriots who have gone before me that my conduct has been through all this peril and all my purposes governed only by the convictions which I have uttered, and by no other view than that of their cure, and the emancipation of my country from the superinhuman oppression under which she has so long and too patiently travailed; and that I confidently and assuredly hope that, wild and chimerical as it may appear, there is still union and strength in Ireland to accomplish this noble enterprise. of this I speak with the confidence of intimate knowledge, and with the consolation that appertains to that confidence. Think not, my lords, I say this for the petty gratification of giving you a transitory uneasiness; a man who never yet raised his voice to assert a lie will not hazard his character with posterity by asserting a falsehood on a subject so important to his country, and on an occasion like this. Yes. my lords. a man who does not wish to have his epitaph written until his country is liberated will not leave a weapon in the power of envy, nor a pretense to impeach the probity which he means to preserve even in the grave to which tyranny consigns him.

[Interruption by the court.]

Again I say, that what I have spoken was not intended for your lordship, whose situation I commiserate rather than envy-my expressions were for my countrymen; if there is a true Irishman present. let my last words cheer him in the hour of his affliction.

[Interruption by the court.]

I have always understood it to be the duty of a judge. when a prisoner has been convicted, to pronounce the sentence of the law; I have also understood that judges sometimes think it their duty to hear with patience and to speak with humanity. to exhort the victim of the laws. and to offer with tender benignity his opinions of the motives by which he was actuated in the crime, of which he had been adjudged guilty: that a judge has thought it his duty so to have done. I have no doubt–but where is the boasted freedom of your institutions. where is the vaunted impartiality, clemency. and mildness of your courts of justice, if an unfortunate prisoner, whom your policy, and not pure justice. is about to deliver into the hands of the executioner. is not suffered to explain his motives sincerely and truly. and to vindicate the principles by which he was actuated?

My lords, it may be a part of the system of angry justice, to bow a man’s mind by humiliation to the purposed ignominy of the scaffold; but worse to me than the purposed shame, or the scaffold’s terrors, would be the shame of such unfounded imputations as have been laid against me in this court: you, my lord [Lord Norbury], are a judge.

I am the supposed culprit; I am a man, you are a man also; by a revolution of power, we might change places, though we never could change characters; if I stand at the bar of this court and dare not vindicate my character, what a farce is your justice? If I stand at this bar and dare not vindicate my character. flow dare you calumniate it? Does the sentence of death which your unhallowed policy inflicts on my body also condemn my tongue to silence and my reputation to reproach? Your executioner may abridge the period of my existence. but while I exist I shall not forbear to vindicate my character and motives from your aspersions: and as a man to whom fame is dearer than life, I will make the last use of that life in doing justice to that reputation which is to live after me, and which is the only legacy I can leave to those I honor and love, and for whom I am proud to perish. As men, my lord, we must appear at the great day at one common tribunal. and it will then remain for the searcher of all hearts to show a collective universe who was engaged in the most virtuous actions. or actuated by the purest motives-my country’s oppressors or–

[Interruption by the court.]

My lord, will a dying man be denied the legal privilege of exculpating himself, in the eyes of the community, of an undeserved reproach thrown upon him during his trial, by charging him with ambition and attempting to cast away, for a paltry consideration. the liberties of his country? Why did your lordship insult me? or rather why insult justice. in demanding of me why sentence of death should not be pronounced? I know, my lord, that form prescribes that you should ask the question; the form also presumes a right of answering. This no doubt may be dispensed with–and so might the whole ceremony of trial, since sentence was already pronounced at the castle, before your jury was impaneled; your lordships are but the priests of the oracle, and I submit; but I insist on the whole of the forms.

I am charged with being an emissary of France An emissary of France? And for what end? It is alleged that I wished to sell the independence of my country? And for what end? Was this the object of my ambition? And is this the mode by which a tribunal of justice reconciles contradictions? No, I am no emissary; and my ambition was to hold a place among the deliverers of my country–not in power, nor in profit, but in the glory of the achievement!…

Connection with Prance was indeed intended, but only as far as mutual interest would sanction or require. Were they to assume any authority inconsistent with the purest independence. it would be the signal for their destruction: we sought aid, and we sought it, as we had assurances we should obtain it–as auxiliaries in war and allies in peace…

I wished to procure for my country the guarantee which Washington procured for America. To procure an aid, which, by its example, would be as important as its valor, disciplined. gallant, pregnant with science and experience; which would perceive the good and polish the rough points of our character. They would come to us as strangers and leave us as friends, after sharing in our perils and elevating our destiny. These were my objects–not to receive new taskmasters hilt to expel old tyrants: these were my views. and these only became Irishmen. It was for these ends I sought aid from France; because France, even as an enemy. could not he more implacable than the enemy already in the bosom of my country.

[Interruption by the court.]

I have been charged with that importance in the efforts to emancipate my country. as to be considered the keystone of the combination of Irishmen; or, as Your Lordship expressed it, “the life and blood of conspiracy.” You do me honor overmuch. You have given to the subaltern all the credit of a superior. There are men engaged in this conspiracy, who are not only superior to me but even to your own conceptions of yourself, my lord; men, before the splendor of whose genius and virtues, I should bow with respectful deference, and who would think themselves dishonored to be called your friend–who would not disgrace themselves by shaking your bloodstained hand–

[Interruption by the court]

What, my lord, shall you tell me, on the passage to that scaffold. Which that tyranny. of which you are only the intermediary executioner. Has erected for my murder. that I am accountable for all the blood that has and will be shed in this struggle of the oppressed against the oppressor?–shall you tell me this–and must I be so very a slave as not to repel it?

I do not fear to approach the omnipotent Judge, to answer for the conduct of my whole life; and am I to be appalled and falsified by a mere remnant of mortality here? By you. too. who, if it were possible to collect all the innocent blood that you have shed in your unhallowed ministry, in one great reservoir. Your Lordship might swim in it.

[Interruption by the court.]

Let no man dare, when I am dead. to charge me with dishonor; let no man attaint my memory by believing that I could have engaged in any cause but that of my country’s liberty and independence, or that I could have become the pliant minion of power in the oppression or the miseries of my countrymen. The proclamation of the provisional government speaks for our views; no inference can he tortured from it to countenance barbarity or debasement at home, or subjection. humiliation. or treachery from abroad; I would not have submitted to a foreign oppressor for the same reason that I would resist the foreign and domestic oppressor: in the dignity of freedom I would have fought upon the threshold of my country, and its enemy should enter only by passing over my lifeless corpse. Am I, who lived but for my country, and who have subjected myself to the dangers of the jealous and watchful oppressor, and the bondage of the grave, only to give my countrymen their rights, and my country her independence, and am I to be loaded with calumny and not suffered to resent or repel it–no, God forbid!

If the spirits of the illustrious dead participate in the concerns and cares of those who are dear to them in this transitory life–oh, ever dear and venerated shade of my departed father. look down with scrutiny upon the conduct of your suffering son; and see if I have even for a moment deviated from those principles of morality and patriotism which it was your care to instill into my youthful mind, and for which I am now to offer up my life!

My lords, you are impatient for the sacrifice-the blood which you seek is not congealed by the artificial terrors which surround your victim; it circulates warmly and unruffled, through the channels which God created for noble purposes. but which you are bent to destroy. for purposes so grievous. that they cry to heaven. Be yet patient! I have but a few words more to say. I am going to my cold and silent grave: my lamp of life is nearly e4inguished: my race is run: the grave opens to receive me, and I sink into its bosom! I have but one request to ask at my departure from this world–it is the charity of its silence! Let no man write my epitaph: for as no man who knows my motives dare now vindicate them. let not prejudice or ignorance asperse them. Let them and me repose in obscurity and peace, and my tomb remain uninscribed, until other times, and other men, can do justice to my character; when my country takes her place among the nations of the earth, then, and not till then, let my epitaph be written. I have done.

coat of arms of Ireland 17th century

http://www.robertemmet.org/speech.htm

Everyone is crying out for peace, yes… none is crying out for justice…

South Africa – Learning Man Festival – New Year

Confrontation…

Mr. president, distinguished delegates,

Since the beginning of modern civilization
Generations have witnessed and inherited the only conflicts of world wars
But behold the marriage supper of the lamb and the bridegroom onto his bride
Then shall the earth’s children know the true expression of one love
Then mother earth shall honeymoon in peace.
Forever eliminating the aspirations, lust and anguish of wars and rumors of wars, Selah!

See it deh know the innocent going up in vapors
And propaganda spreading inna the Sunday papers
not even superman coulda save you with him cape cause
Red-a judgement a blaze, blaze ya
And Babylon a gamble the youth dem life like racehorse
And gi dem a uniform and a shave dem head with razors
And now the clock a strike war, don’t be amazed ’cause
Inna dem churches tryin’ to save, saviors

Can we do it? we can do it, we shall do it!

Boom! Tell dem fe uh draw mi out when the world government inna falling out
Only few men survive crawling out
Run left him colleagues dem sprawling out, nearly dead!
Medic haffi haul him out
And give him two tranquilizer fi stall him out, deh pon base!
Can’t get no calling out when him hear from the shout last week
Him mistress find a new shoes
Wife can’t get no news and lately she starting to doubt, she still searching!
And the youth dem bawling out
Working hard not to let it all come out
Well it’s not safe to go walk about
A slaughterhouse from Baghdad to water house
She start to arouse sometime she want a spouse
She start go out, start beat a darker stout, guns come out!
Working people funds run out
Keep a show last week and no one come out, bombs come out!
Mi gas tank just run out, bombo clatt!
The scotch tape just run out, weed run out!
Yuh senses must dumb out, mi have a pound round a back deh a gwan sun out
Nah come out! ‘Til the chalice bun out,
Nah come out! ‘Til the malice bun out, a war!

Zimbabwe to berlin wall
Blazin’ like a burnin’ ball, loose ball, dat no work, in war
Sleeping, dat no work..in war
Can’t wear jheri curl, in war
No diamond and pearl, in war
Can’t drink weh a serve, in bar
Gas wi fuck up yuh nerves, in war
Shot wi blood up yuh shirt, in war
Can’t go lift up no skirt, in war
Now disease and germs, in war
Can’t go release your sperms, in war
Stamina must preserve, in war
Fire constantly burn, in war
Red, it red, it red, it red, it red!

If you cannot do it, if you are not prepared to do it, then you will die.
You race of cowards, you race of imbeciles, you race of good for nothings
If you cannot do what other men have done
What other nations have done, what other races have done
Then you yourself shall die.

See it deh know the innocent going up in vapors
And propaganda spreading inna the Sunday papers
not even superman coulda save you with him cape cause
Red-a judgement a blaze, blaze ya
And Babylon a gamble the youth dem life like racehorse
And gi dem a uniform and a shave dem head with razors
And now the clock a strike war, don’t be amazed ’cause
Inna dem churches tryin’ to save, saviors

Hey, now wi fore parents sacrifice enough
Dem blood sweat and tears run like syrup
Any day a revolution might erupt, and the sky’s over Kingston lighting up
For the new generation rising up, of youths now a days weh dem sighting up
And through reasoning dem biding up,
Searching for the sign and the sign is us,
Searching for the truth all you find is us,
Searching for the troops still behind is us,
The almighty we recruit and we come from the root
We build like roach building boot
Weh just can’t done, Rastafari’ design me tuff
If a the fight for freedom sign me up
Cause you tell-lie-vision can’t blind me up
Soldiers and police dem wising up, realizing they’re no more right than us
Realizing there’s no use fighting us
Realizing their opening their eyes to see the same demoralizing life as us
So we nah tek talk nor smiling up
Cause the word temper tantrum boiling up,
And who alling the shots and nah bust none
Controlling the mind of the young, bring down

Bear famine, no rain nah fall from London to Dadeland mall
All the son of the virgin bawl, institute of the church in war
Preaching and researching war
Practice and rehearsing war
Teaching and dem learning war
Instigating and urging war
Always keep alert in war
Cause man will jump out a swerving car
Now bees and birds in war
And the freaks and nerds in war
And the straight and curves in war
Forward and reverse in war
Red, it red, it red, it red, it red

If you cannot do it, if you are not prepared to do it, then you will die.
You race of cowards, you race of imbeciles, you race of good for nothings
If you cannot do what other men have done
What other nations have done, what other races have done
Then you yourself shall die.

Songwriters: Stephen Marley, Damian Marley, Robert Nesta, P. Levy

A revolution is coming… and Babylon shall not rise again

“A revolution is coming – a revolution which will be peaceful if we are wise enough; compassionate if we care enough; successful if we are fortunate enough – but a revolution which is coming whether we will it or not. We can affect its character; we cannot alter its inevitability” – Robert F. Kennedy: