Category Archives: end the fed

Colossal Financial Pyramid: BlackRock and The WEF “Great Reset”

By F. William Engdahl

Global Research, October 09, 2022

The firm, BlackRock Inc., the world’s largest asset manager, invests a staggering $9 trillion in client funds worldwide, a sum more than double the annual GDP of the Federal Republic of Germany.

This colossus sits atop the pyramid of world corporate ownership, including in China most recently. Since 1988 the company has put itself in a position to de facto control the Federal Reserve, most Wall Street mega-banks, including Goldman Sachs, the Davos World Economic Forum Great Reset, the Biden Administration and, if left unchecked, the economic future of our world. BlackRock is the epitome of what Mussolini called Corporatism, where an unelected corporate elite dictates top down to the population.

How the world’s largest “shadow bank” exercises this enormous power over the world ought to concern us. BlackRock since Larry Fink founded it in 1988 has managed to assemble unique financial software and assets that no other entity has. BlackRock’s Aladdin risk-management system, a software tool that can track and analyze trading, monitors more than $18 trillion in assets for 200 financial firms including the Federal Reserve and European central banks. He who “monitors” also knows, we can imagine. BlackRock has been called a financial “Swiss Army Knife — institutional investor, money manager, private equity firm, and global government partner rolled into one.” Yet mainstream media treats the company as just another Wall Street financial firm.

There is a seamless interface that ties the UN Agenda 2030 with the Davos World Economic Forum Great Reset and the nascent economic policies of the Biden Administration. That interface is BlackRock.

Read further at: https://www.globalresearch.ca/more-blackrock-than-you-might-imagine/5748159

Bail In, Bail Out, Good Cop, Bad Cop

By Anna Von Reitz

First, the Gubmint steals your credit to bail out banks and insurance corporations. 

Second, the banks and insurance companies steal your bank deposits to pay back the Gubmint. 

Third, it all comes down to crooks bilking you in your own name.  Crooks who are pretending to “represent” you.

Crooks who are impersonating you. 

Brace for losing every cent you have deposited in commercial banks and in “equitable” consideration, you will be given shares in the bankrupt bank that stole your deposits. 

How’s that for compensation? 

You will get more shares based on the size of the deposits you lose.  And this has been advertised since 2010.

Did you know you were buying shares in a bankrupt bank? 

Did you know your deposits became bank property the moment you walked away with a receipt in your hand? 

Did you know you were loaning the bank your home when they offered you a home loan? 

All those IRS garnishments were the obligations of the bank? Not yours? 

And what about all the investments made in your name?  What became of them? 

Your “shares” again? 

Naught into naught is naught.  Naught divided by naught is naught. 

Every positive number is greater than every negative number. 

Every debt creates an equal credit. 

Fraud vitiates everything. 

Don’t take any wooden nickels and I would not accept any bank shares, either, because the shareholders become responsible for the debts  of the bank. 

Ever heard of the Trojan Horse?  Gifts that kill are all too common to this day. 

—————————-

http://www.paulstramer.net/2022/09/bail-in-bail-out-good-cop-bad-cop.html

See this article and over 3800 others on Anna’s website here: www.annavonreitz.com

The Anti-Dollar is Coming – USA Watchdog

By Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com

Renowned geopolitical and financial cycle expert Charles Nenner says his analysis shows there is big trouble coming for the U.S. dollar. The dollar’s reserve currency status is on its way to being a thing of the past. Nenner explains, “The dollar is still up. We have a target on the dollar of 113 (on the USDX). It’s now around 110, but it’s not going to be surviving as the major currency. People don’t trust what is going on in the United States. . . . We have seen this happen to other countries. We saw this happen to the British.

They are going to go to another major currency. The BRIC countries and China are preparing to have an anti-dollar. I have told you for years that the dollar is not going to crash, but now it is time. In a year or so, they will really be getting into trouble with the dollar. If the dollar goes down, of course, the inflation goes even higher. So, actually, there is no way out anymore.

Every Federal Reserve President has said let’s keep it going. The dollar is going to collapse, but not in my lifetime, and now there is almost nothing left to do anymore. . . . If you forgive the student loans, you will have a big problem. First of all, it’s impossible. They pretend nothing will come out of it, but it will destroy the economy. When they get out of college, students make 4 or 5 times what other people earn, and it is being paid by the simple people. You are going to have more social unrest than you have ever seen.”

Nenner says a big crash is inevitable. Nenner says, “Soon the pensions are going to be in trouble. The buying power is going to be in trouble. This is simply a situation that has been crated for . . . many years. There is simply no way out. We have to crash. We have to get a depression. The whole economy will have to start all over again.”

Nenner predicted in May that a “Third of the global population will be killed in next war cycle.” The only good news is that it has been pushed back a little and will not start at the beginning of 2023. Nenner says, “We are going to continue on this pace for war, and it is going to explode in the second half of 2023.”

Nenner says you have seen the lows in interest rates, and the long-term trend is up. Nenner has been out of the bond market for close to a year.

Nenner has never been more bullish on gold and silver. He says because of the massive money printing, there will be massive inflation. Nenner says, “This happened to the Dutch economy. It happened to the British Empire. That’s how it goes. At the end they always print money, and they don’t deserve it. It’s hard to say, but this usually ends in a war. . . . You have to buy gold and silver. . . . Gold will be up strong up until 2027, but you have to have a strong stomach to take the ups and downs.”

There is much more in the 42 min. interview.
Join Greg Hunter of USAWatchdog.com as he goes One-on-One with renowned cycle analyst and financial expert Charles Nenner. (9.6.22)

Comment: The Fed and SARB are joined at the hip; and there are too many cabal elements in South Africa to unplug from the FED and join the alternative systems such as BRICS; there is no “BRICS” only “BRIC” – the other bricks were sold off to third parties long ago; as a result we will tank along with the US because only Pravin and Trevor know how the federal ponzi scheme and bills of exchange fraud works and they do the cabal’s bidding…

More Shoes Dropping

By Anna Von Reitz

The Illuminati who were smart enough to figure out that money was a scam (and they wanted in on it) and smart enough to figure out that conventional religion was another control racket, and also smart enough to realize that governments were just another “concession”— somehow failed to pass the final test.  

The Illuminati — the Illuminated Ones — insofar as the institutional fraud games were concerned, just went on to create more of the same themselves.  Oh, they called their indoctrination centers by other names, and they set up brotherhoods by other names, too, based on other premises, but it was still the same-old-same-old — baffle ’em with BS and “initiation” rites and compartmentalize knowledge so that nobody knows what the other hand is doing, except the men at the top.  

If they all knew what they were doing, they’d stop.  

The excuse that the conventional religions and institutions give for their predatory and dishonest behavior is the same excuse given by the Illuminati who are trying to destroy conventional governments and religions: without us, they all say, there would be chaos, there would be no organization to society, anarchy would reign supreme. 

In full view of the selfish, ugly, violent, egotistical world they have all created, what’s so bad about the Wild West?  Our ancestors survived it.  

A long rifle, six gun, pick, and shovel, carried by a faithful mule, got many a pilgrim through the worst of it.  As recently as 1911 when the Great Flood hit Black River Falls, Wisconsin, I have proof that people could survive; my Grandmother spent the whole winter in a horse barn with four small children, two horses, and a cat who caught her own suppers.  

It wasn’t pretty, and they nearly starved in the spring when their supplies ran out and the roads were still impassable —- but God sent an early crop of dandelions and Grandma made dandelion fritters with the last of the bacon grease and flour.  They were all still eating when the rescue party arrived in March.  

We can and we did survive without the government, without church services, and without money.  In our own lifetimes, the Federal Government has been shut down repeatedly for as long as 120 days at a stretch, and nobody but the government workers noticed.  

There is, as FDR, that old devil, noted —- nothing to fear but fear itself.  Pack your buckboard with a little common sense and get ready.  

Those who have been reading my articles for a long time know that I have repeatedly told everyone that the Plan was to move the base of Deep State Operations to China — the parasites knew it was getting too hot for comfort in “the US” and they needed a new base of operations for their criminal empire.  

Beginning with Ronald Reagan’s outreach to China and Nixon’s full blown cooperation, the move began.  The Petrodollar which benefited the crude oil producers in the Mideast, and the crude oil refineries in the US, placed the US as the pivot point of the new world economy that Ronnie and Tricky Dick created.  China needed oil and oil products — refined oil products. 

 All the while that the mainstream media was whining endlessly about oil shortages and excusing the skyrocketing prices, they neglected to mention that it was crude oil that was hard to find, because “the US” was producing and shipping out all the refined oil products it could make as fast as it could ship them.  

During the same exact years we were suffering oil embargos and paying $5 per gallon at the pump back when $5 still bought something, we were in fact exporting refined oil products to China and Europe at utterly unprecedented rates. 

We were among the Top Three oil exporting nations in the world for decades.  Who knew?  

To hear the mainstream media spin it, you’d think we were poor little old helpless America, horribly oil dependent, hardly able to buy a quart of oil.  And don’t throw me in that Briar Patch, yes, Boss, anything but that…. while we’ve been sitting on crude oil resources of our own that would make Midas blush. 

Mr. Trump’s “miracle” of oil independence was no miracle.  It was just common sense. 

Anyway, China was groomed like a prospective child bride dondled on Uncle Ernie’s knee, and the Chinese Communist Party went right along with the CIA sponsored scheme.  The CCP sold them the Chinese Central Bank, and then, they used that to buy the Central Bank of the Philippines.  Imagine that? 

And they used phony money to do it, too. 

Remember the Riyadi Scandal back in 2012?  

https://www.tweaktown.com/news/22774/15_000_000_000_000_15_trillion_in_fraud_exposed_in_uk_house_of_lords/index.html

Well, THEY gave the banks a license to create money out of thin air.  How long do you think it took them to employ that license to do things like buy out the Central Bank of China?  

It’s not a coincidence that Mr. Riyadi “only” had 700 tons of gold on reserve in Indonesia and claimed to have 750,000 tons.  That’s a reflection of his prospective gain based on fractional reserve banking and trading platform contracts, plus interest, generated from “blocking” those 700 tons of gold for ten years.  

Bless Lord James; he knew something horribly fishy was going on and he brought it forward — he just couldn’t put his finger on it as exactly as I have.  And Riyadi wasn’t exactly lying, either, which is why he didn’t wind up in jail.  He was only banking on a completely predictable outcome.  Anyone with 700 tons of gold they could afford to lay idle for ten years was guaranteed that outcome by Lloyds of London.  Riyadi knew it. 

How could Lord James not know it?  For the same reason that Pope Benedict XVI stared at us wide-eyed and said, “Nobody told me!” 

The CIA by various means, “one thing and another”, bought the Central Bank of China and then the Central Bank of the Philippines; when things got “difficult” in the late 1990s and early 2000’s,  they used False Flags and the U.S. Military to straighten things out — mainly, access to Iraqi oil, gold, and artifacts.  

They also obtained and began trading on our SKRs —- Safekeeping Receipts.  These are receipts that verify the existence of gold deposits in various banks around the world.  These particular deposits actually belong to The D’avila Family Trust and to The United States of America — our Federation of unincorporated States, but the CIA had a co-depositor in the woodpile. 

The Roman Catholic Church apparatus had the gold deposited by Severino Sta. Romano, a defrocked Roman Catholic Friar with a taste for booze and intrigue, but there was another hand in the mix — a CIA Handler named Giovanni Baptista (sometimes Babtista) Richello, and it was through Richello’s part as a Witness to the deposits, that the CIA gained access to the SKR’s. 

Just like Mr. Riyadi, they have been trading on our gold deposits and keeping the cream ever since, using the wealth to pay off other governments, fund Black Ops, and provide absolutely amazing retirement programs for themselves —- and it’s all been done “legally” —- if you buy into their legal presumptions, which we don’t. 

This past week, I have received word that Interpol and various other police and law enforcement organizations around the world have been sicced on the CIA and its clandestine commandeering of what they call “the Legacy Trust” or “Historic Trust” assets, and also on those bankers who collaborated with this scheme.  

All I can say is that it has been seventeen years since the CIA went totally rogue, and it’s about time for a worldwide Come to Jesus meeting.  Having foreign interests secretively buying out the Central Banks of entire countries (and using our money to do it, without our permission) undermines all forms of national sovereignty, and all forms of trade agreements, which of course, is what the Illuminati have been pushing since 1772.  No wonder they are coming out of the woodwork like carpenter ants on a holiday. 

—————————-

See this article and over 3700 others on Anna’s website here: www.annavonreitz.com

Discovering The Money Tree  – Money grows on (trees) “promises to pay”

By Monique Terrazas

May 2013 – SA Real Estate Investor – Money grows on trees

(This post is old but just as valid today until we End the Fed, which is a non-permanent non-banking debt system, and move to an alternative permanent value-backed real money and real banking system.)

The banking and Financial system globally is under scrutiny as scandal after scandal rocks what we had always assumed was a trustworthy industry, solid as rock. But things have changed. There is little doubt that the irresponsible practice of securitization and inter-bank lending brought about the global credit crunch. After setting in motion the subprime crisis that dumped the global economy into the worst recession in living memory, banks were exposed for manipulating the Libor and Euribor interbank interest rates- providing false figures on key interest rates upon which mortgages and loans are priced – affecting millions of families and hundreds of thousands of companies, large and small, across the globe. As one commentator noted: “This dwarfs by orders of magnitude any financials cam in the history of the markets. In addition, the information age has brought to the man in the street the knowledge that “money” is no longer backed by gold reserves, but fabricated through the fractional reserve banking system. Given how pervasive the financial system is – affecting every aspect of our lives – it has become critical that we move out of our comfort zone where ignorance was bliss. We need to become far more proactive and involved, understanding thoroughly how the system works. This is the only way in which we can shift from being victims of a system we have helped to create through ignorance, complacency and greed, to becoming empowered consumers and users of these systems, understanding the rules so we can play the game or step outside the game for our own collective best interests, and the interests of generations to come.

Understanding the rules

We cannot play on an equal footing in the global financial system if we don’t understand the rules. While learning the rules requires time, effort and dedication, it is absolutely necessary if we are to become empowered players, instead of victims. It is not possible to explain the intricacies of the entire global financial system in one article, but there are a few concepts that, once understood, will help us to understand the basic tenets of the system, notably the fractional reserve banking system and securitization.

The fractional reserve system

In previous articles in REIM, we revealed that banks do not actually lend out money they already possess, but rather “create” the money loaned to borrowers, using the “promise to pay” signed by the borrower. In other words, “money” is created through debt. This is called a ‘fractional reserve’ banking system, and it is used by governments, central banks and financial institutions across the globe. On a national scale, central banks print money that has no intrinsic value, based on a “promise to pay” issued by a government. Because this new “money” has no intrinsic value, it derives its value by literally taking value from the money already in circulation, and this is what is called “inflation”. The money already in circulation is worth ever less to give value to new money that is printed. This practice was taken to extreme in Zimbabwe not so long ago, when the government’s practice of simply printing more money at a rate well in excess of economic growth, sent inflation to levels above 1 000%,  rendering the money already in circulation worthless. Of course, today, they do not really actually “print” more money, but simply “create” the money through a “deposit entry”, even though no deposit was made by anyone! The same happens when a borrower approaches a bank for a loan. The bank does not actually have the money it “loans” to the borrower. They simply “create” money, through similar electronic “deposit entries” or “book entries”, simply based on a borrower’s “promise to pay”, with no actual deposit being made by anyone, anywhere. This raises a number of issues, including the legal validity of a “loan” and the legality and the morality of charging interest on such a “loan”. It has been contested in a number of court cases that a “loan” agreement cannot exist legally under these circumstances, because the bank did not “lend” something they had prior title, ownership and rights to. The “money” lent to the borrower did not exist before the borrower signed the all-important “promise to pay”, but was “created” based on the borrower’s “promise to pay”. How can a loan agreement exist when nothing was loaned? This, furthermore, raises issues around the charging of interest. How can the bank charge interest on a “loan” that is not legally valid? If the “money” loaned is “created” out of nothing more than a “promise to pay” – which belongs to the borrower – and the bank does not loan its own money to the borrower, why is interest charged by the bank? “A management fee payable to the bank for managing the system seems more appropriate,” comments Robert Vivian, Professor of Finance and Insurance at the School of Economic and Business Sciences at the University of the Witwatersrand.

Securitization

Another hot topic over the last few years is the practice of securitization. Banks securitize loans by bundling them together, using a special purpose vehicle (SPV), and selling them to third party investors, who trade them on the capital markets. For example, in the home loan market, the borrowers’ promissory notes are backed by collateral through the mortgage contraction the property. As such, these become “mortgage-backed securities”. The bank approaches another institution that buys and sells mortgage-backed securities. It “sells” the buyer’s mortgage-backed security to this institution for the full amount – the principal and interest – payable by the buyer over the period of the mortgage loan. This is up to three times the amount of the principal debt. Since the bank is paid in advance, it makes a tidy profit without using or risking its own money. However, legally, once a bank securitizes a loan, it loses all rights to it – i.e. the bank is no longer the owner of the debt. Should the borrowers default on their loans, the debt to the SPV and its investors are covered by insurance policies, called “credit default swaps” in the US and other countries. While the use of this insurance has not been confirmed in South Africa, it stands to reason, according to legal experts, that an SPV trading on a stock exchange would be required to have this insurance in place. The South African Securitization Forum has confirmed that the implication of this is that the bank cannot, for example, repossess

the property if the borrower defaults on repayments, because the bank no longer has any rights to the property that is the collateral for a “loan” which has been securitized and now belongs to another entity. Quite simply, there can be no legal case against the defaulting borrower, because all parties have been settled. The bank was settled when the mortgage-backed security was sold, and the investors were settled through an insurance policy. Several recent court rulings in a number of states in the US have, essentially, declared the practice of securitizing home loans illegal, and as a result numerous banks have stopped foreclosure procedures on home-owners who have defaulted on their mortgage repayments. The implications are staggering: four million people in the US have had their homes repossessed illegally and the banks have been forced to pay out $8.5 billion in settlements.

“How can a loan agreement exist when nothing was loaned? And how can the bank charge interest on a “loan” that is not legally valid? ”

The situation in South Africa

How do these practices in the global financial system impact South Africa? South Africa has one of the most advanced financial systems in the world, which is why we survived the global economic crisis better than most developed countries. But this does not mean there is nothing to be concerned about. The fractional reserve system is used extensively in South Africa.

According to Russell Lamberti, writing on Mises.co.za/blog, the blog of the Mises Institute South Africa (www.mises.co.za): “Since 2000 the SARB [South African Reserve Bank] probably printed about R100 billion out of thin air. This allowed the commercial banks to use about R40 billion to fractionally leverage at about 40:1 and create about R1.6trillion in additional money out of thin air (that’s R1,600,000,000,000).” This means that South Africa has quadrupled its money supply in the last decade and, of course, the value of this new money must be derived from the money in circulation, creating inflation.

He adds that: “Since 2000, the US Fed balance sheet grew 370%. Over the same time the SARB balance sheet increased from R76bn to R440bn, about 480%. In other words, since 2000 the SARB balance sheet has grown 1.3 times more than the Fed balance sheet.” The fractional reserve system is also used by our banks to “create” money based on the borrowers’ “promises to pay”, which raises the issues of the legal validity of the loans and legality and morality of charging interest when “nothing” was loaned, because the money “loaned” did not belong to the bank, but was “created” ex nihilo (out of nothing) based solely the borrower’s “promise to pay”.

The Banks Act states that a bank cannot act as an agent or intermediary for a third party, such as a securitization SPV, without the express written consent of the customer. However, according to the South African Banking Association’s website, local banks securitize loans worth about R30 billion a month. The issue here is that is a bank securitizes a loan, it loses all rights to the asset. Tis means the bank cannot, for example, repossess property put up as collateral on a loan which has been securitized, because the bank no longer has any rights to the debt. It could well mean that thousands of homes may have been illegally repossessed by banks in South Africa too. The issue has already been tested in court, and on a number of occasions, it has resulted in a bank abandoning the foreclosure proceedings, because it was no longer the lawful owner of the debt. These practices are also being challenged in the High Court by New ERA (New Economic Rights Alliance), a non-profit organization supported by 150 000 people, which argues that if a loan has been securitized, not only has the borrower’s legal status with the bank changed, but the debt with the bank no longer exists. Their case is supported by extensive evidence and research with specific reference to South African economics and South African law and presented by lawyers acting pro-bono. The banks have emphatically argued that they cannot understand New ERA’s papers and the court ruled that New ERA must amend its papers, “removing all the evidence”. New ERA has said it will file amended documents with renewed ferocity, “to protect millions of South Africans from what we believe are blatant and unscrupulous actions of the banks.”

Follow the case on http://www.newera.org.za. REIM asked the banks and the major role players the following questions about securitization.

1. Can you provide us with an indication of the value of loans securitized and what percentage of these loans are home loans?

2. Does a consumer have the right to know if their loan has been securitized? Or is there a clause in the credit agreement that the client signs that provides the bank with the rights to securitize the loan? If so, can you provide a sample of the wording used? If not, how is the client informed?

3. Can a consumer choose not to have their loan securitized?

4. How can a consumer trace the securitization of his/her loan?

5. How do the banks ensure compliance with the legislation that credit agreements that have been sold or traded are registered with the NCR?

6. How is the legal standing of a South African citizen’s loan affected if the loan has been securitized?

7. How would the debt counseling process be affected by securitization?

The Banking Association of South Africa did not bother to acknowledge or respond to numerous emailed requests for information. The National Credit Regulator (NCR) –legally mandated to protect the interests of South African credit consumers – replied: “The NCR views this matter in an extremely serious light and is giving it the requisite attention. For fear of compromising the project the NCR is not at liberty to discuss any details at this stage”. Frightening. Especially given the fact that the National Credit Act, Sec 69(4) requires that all credit agreements that have been sold or traded(i.e. securitized) are to be registered with the National Credit Regulator.

“If the ownership of the debt shifts, it could mean the banks have no legal status over the debt, because they do not own the debt.”

Humbulani Salani, spokesperson for FNB Legal, simply responded: “We can confirm that currently FNB does not have any home loan securitization outstanding in the market. When securitization transactions were entered into by FNB in the past, it did not breach any law. Securitization is an industry matter. Steven Barker, Standard Bank’s Head of Home Loans, replied: “Only a small portion of Standard Bank’s Home Loans form part of a securitization arrangement. The customer agrees up front that the bank may cede its rights and delegate its obligations under any loan agreement to a third party. Where a loan is securitized there is generally a cession of the rights under the mortgage bond registered at the Deeds Office. The terms and conditions of the loan agreement are not affected by the securitization and a customer is required to repay the loan as set out in the loan agreement. The debt counseling process and any rights under the National Credit Act is not impacted. Further, Standard Bank complies with its reporting requirements under the Act.”

Absa noted that, currently, their total residential mortgage book amounts to approximately R233bn and only about 2% of this has been securitized. “Worth mentioning is that the performance of South African residential mortgaged backed securitization transactions have been superior to those in the US over the last 10 years. This is primarily due to South Africa’s very well-regulated securitization market where transactions are monitored by the SARB, the JSE, international rating agencies and the NCR. Fitch Ratings recently released a report confirming that EMEA (Europe, the Middle East and Africa) residential mortgaged backed securitization transactions (from 2000to 2011) had significantly lower losses than their US counterparts.” With regard to the questions about the consumer’s rights, Absa stated the following: “The customer will receive a letter from Absa to advise the customer [in the event] of the securitization of the loan and thereafter the credit provider’s details are reflected in all communications to the customer. Usually there is an express provision for a credit provider to transfer its rights and obligations. It should be noted that a credit provider has a common law right to transfer rights without consent. The NCA did not remove this right.”

Furthermore, Absa notes that “The consumer remains indebted under the loan, albeit to a different creditor and, save for this the terms and conditions of the loan do not change. The debt counseling process is not affected by securitization and the consumer is still entitled to exercise the rights he/she has in terms of the National Credit Act. ”Deborah Solomon, founder of the DCI, the debt counseling industry portal that has become the springboard to better debt management for thousands of overly indebted consumers, offered a different view. “The NCR is aware of the process called ‘securitization’ and have stated that they are investigating how this fits into the National Credit Act.

We have also brought the matter of securitization to Minister Rob Davies’ attention and will hopefully get some answers from the Minister’s office. We have also requested further information from the NCR regarding the compliance of the banks in terms of registering credit agreements that have been sold or traded with the NCR, but nothing has been forthcoming as yet. In terms of the NCA, the banks must give the debt counselors information as per their request. But the banks all have one ‘template answer’ and obviously feel that they do not have to answer these types of questions. It is another point which we have raised both with the NCR and with the Minister,” says Solomon.

She notes that from a debt counselor’s perspective, securitization has huge implications, as the counselor needs to know who the debt belongs to, to ensure negotiations and payments. “If we do not know who the real owner of the debt is, how can we make a judgment call on the outstanding ownership of the debt?” In terms of the effect of securitization on the debt counseling process, Solomon says that it could mean that a credit agreement is illegal. “If the ownership of the debt shifts, it could mean the banks have no legal status over the debt, because they do not own the debt.

The new holder or owner of the debt would also need to be a registered credit provider in terms of the NCA. Of course, a debt counselor would look at the debt differently if they knew it was securitized and would question the legality of the action on behalf of the consumer.” Solomon further notes that consumers absolutely have the right to know if their loan has been securitized. “If the bank has securitized a debt, made money from your signature without your consent or knowledge, and then try to take legal action against you should you default on the loan, it is 100% your right as a consumer to know this. Maybe this could be the reason why the banks have not embraced the NCA or tried to window dress the debt counseling process, because they know that should the truth be revealed, they could stand to lose more than what they are currently worth.”

Bank Loan Validity.doc – The Banker And The Attorney (Promissory Notes)

Anyone who has ever had a Bank loan or, is about to apply for one, really must read “The Banker And The Attorney” story…

The banker was placed on the witness stand and sworn in. The plaintiff’s (borrower’s) attorney asked the banker the routine questions concerning the banker’s education and background.

The attorney asked the banker, “What is court exhibit A?”

The banker responded by saying, “This is a promissory note.”

The attorney then asked, “Is there an agreement between Mr. Smith (borrower) and the defendant?”

The banker said, “Yes.”

The attorney asked, “Do you believe the agreement includes a lender and a borrower?”

The banker responded by saying, “Yes, I am the lender and Mr. Smith is the borrower.

The attorney asked, “What do you believe the agreement is?”

The banker quickly responded, saying, “We have the borrower sign the note and we give the borrower a check.”

The attorney asked, “Does this agreement show the words borrower, lender, loan, interest, credit, or money within the agreement?”

The banker responded by saying, “Sure it does.”

The attorney asked, `”According to your knowledge, who was to loan what to whom according to the written agreement?”

The banker responded by saying, “The lender loaned the borrower a $200,000 check. The borrower got the money and the house and has not repaid the money.

The attorney noted that the banker never said that the bank received the promissory note as a loan from the borrower to the bank. She asked, “Do you believe an ordinary person can use ordinary terms and understand this written agreement?”

The banker said, “Yes.”

The attorney asked, “Do you believe you or your company legally own the promissory note and have the right to enforce payment from the borrower?”

The banker said, “Absolutely we own it and legally have the right to collect the money.”

The attorney asked, “Does the $200,000 note have actual cash value of $200,000? Actual cash value means the promissory note can be sold for $200,000 cash in the ordinary course of business.”

The banker said, “Yes.”

The attorney asked, “According to your understanding of the alleged agreement, how much actual cash value must the bank loan to the borrower in order for the bank to legally fulfil the agreement and legally own the promissory note?”

The banker said, “$200,000.

The attorney asked, “According to your belief, if the borrower signs the promissory note and the bank refuses to loan the borrower $200,000 actual cash value, would the bank or borrower own the promissory note?”

The banker said, “The borrower would own it if the bank did not loan the money. The bank gave the borrower a check and that is how the borrower financed the purchase of the house.

The attorney asked, “Do you believe that the borrower agreed to provide the bank with $200,000 of actual cash value which was used to fund the $200,000 bank loan check back to the same borrower, and then agreed to pay the bank back $200,000 plus interest?”

The banker said, “No. If the borrower provided the $200,000 to fund the check, there was no money loaned by the bank so the bank could not charge interest on money it never loaned.”

The attorney asked, “If this happened, in your opinion would the bank legally own the promissory note and be able to force Mr. Smith to pay the bank interest and principal payments?”

The banker said, “I am not a lawyer so I cannot answer legal questions.”

The attorney asked, ” Is it bank policy that when a borrower receives a $200,000 bank loan, the bank receives $200,000 actual cash value from the borrower, that this gives value to a $200,000 bank loan check, and this check is returned to the borrower as a bank loan which the borrower must repay?”

The banker said, “I do not know the bookkeeping entries.”
|
The attorney said, “I am asking you if this is the policy.”

The banker responded, “I do not recall.”

The attorney again asked, “Do you believe the agreement between Mr. Smith and the bank is that Mr. Smith provides the bank with actual cash value of $200,000 which is used to fund a $200,000 bank loan check back to himself which he is then required to repay plus interest back to the same bank?”

The banker said, “I am not a lawyer.”

The attorney said, “Did you not say earlier that an ordinary person can use ordinary terms and understand this written agreement?

The banker said, “Yes.”

The attorney handed the bank loan agreement marked “Exhibit B” to the banker. He said, “Is there anything in this agreement showing the borrower had knowledge or showing where the borrower gave the bank authorisation or permission for the bank to receive $200,000 actual cash value from him and to use this to fund the $200,000 bank loan check which obligates him to give the bank back $200,000 plus interest?”

The banker said, “No.”

The lawyer asked, “If the borrower provided the bank with actual cash value of $200,000 which the bank used to fund the $200,000 check and returned the check back to the alleged borrower as a bank loan check, in your opinion, did the bank loan $200,000 to the borrower?”

The banker said, “No.”

The attorney asked, “If a bank customer provides actual cash value of $200,000 to the bank and the bank returns $200,000 actual cash value back to the same customer, is this a swap or exchange of $200,000 for $200,000.”

The banker replied, “Yes.”

The attorney asked, “Did the agreement call for an exchange of

$200,000 swapped for $200,000, or did it call for a $200,000 loan?”

The banker said, “A $200,000 loan.”

The attorney asked, “Is the bank to follow the Federal Reserve Bank policies and procedures when banks grant loans.”

The banker said, “Yes.”

The attorney asked, “What are the standard bank bookkeeping entries for granting loans according to the Federal Reserve Bank policies and procedures?” The attorney handed the banker FED publication Modern Money Mechanics, marked “Exhibit C”.

The banker said, “The promissory note is recorded as a bank asset and a new matching deposit (liability) is created. Then we issue a check from the new deposit back to the borrower.”

The attorney asked, “Is this not a swap or exchange of $200,000

for $200,000?”

The banker said, “This is the standard way to do it.”

The attorney said, “Answer the question. Is it a swap or exchange of $200,000 actual cash value for $200,000 actual cash value? If the note funded the check, must they not both have equal value?”

The banker then pleaded the Fifth Amendment.

[The Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides, “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” tinyurl.com/ntusype]

The attorney asked, “If the bank’s deposits (liabilities) increase, do the bank’s assets increase by an asset that has actual cash value?”

The banker said, “Yes.”

The attorney asked, “Is there any exception?”

The banker said, “Not that I know of.”

The attorney asked, “If the bank records a new deposit and records an asset on the bank’s books having actual cash value, would the actual cash value always come from a customer of the bank or an investor or a lender to the bank?”

The banker thought for a moment and said, “Yes.”

The attorney asked, “Is it the bank policy to record the promissory note as a bank asset offset by a new liability?”

The banker said, “Yes.”

The attorney said, “Does the promissory note have actual cash value equal to the amount of the bank loan check?”

The banker said “Yes.”

The attorney asked, “Does this bookkeeping entry prove that the borrower provided actual cash value to fund the bank loan check?”

The banker said, “Yes, the bank president told us to do it this way.”

The attorney asked, “How much actual cash value did the bank loan to obtain the promissory note?”

The banker said, “Nothing.”

The attorney asked, “How much actual cash value did the bank receive from the borrower?”

The banker said, “$200,000.

The attorney said, “Is it true you received $200,000 actual cash value from the borrower, plus monthly payments and then you foreclosed and never invested one cent of legal tender or other depositors’ money to obtain the promissory note in the first place? Is it true that the borrower financed the whole transaction?”

The banker said, “Yes.”

The attorney asked, “Are you telling me the borrower agreed to give the bank $200,000 actual cash value for free and that the banker returned the actual cash value back to the same person as a bank loan?”

The banker said, “I was not there when the borrower agreed to the loan.”

The attorney asked, “Do the standard FED publications show the bank receives actual cash value from the borrower for free and that the bank returns it back to the borrower as a bank loan?”

The banker said, “Yes.”

The attorney said, “Do you believe the bank does this without the borrower’s knowledge or written permission or authorisation?”

The banker said, “No.”

The attorney asked, “To the best of your knowledge, is there written permission or authorisation for the bank to transfer $200,000 of actual cash value from the borrower to the bank and for the bank to keep it for free?

The banker said, “No.”

The attorney said, “Does this allow the bank to use this $200,000 actual cash value to fund the $200,000 bank loan check back to the same borrower, forcing the borrower to pay the bank $200,000 plus interest?”

The banker said, “Yes.”

The attorney said, “If the bank transferred $200,000 actual cash value from the borrower to the bank, in this part of the transaction, did the bank loan anything of value to the borrower?”

The banker said, “No.” He knew that one must first deposit something having actual cash value (cash, check, or promissory note) to fund a check.

The attorney asked, “Is it the bank policy to first transfer the actual cash value from the alleged borrower to the lender for the amount of the alleged loan?”

The banker said, “Yes.”

The attorney asked, “Does the bank pay IRS tax on the actual cash value transferred from the alleged borrower to the bank?”

The banker answered, “No, because the actual cash value transferred shows up like a loan from the borrower to the bank, or a deposit which is the same thing, so it is not taxable.”

The attorney asked, “If a loan is forgiven, is it taxable?”

The banker agreed by saying, “Yes.”

The attorney asked, “Is it the bank policy to not return the actual cash value that they received from the alleged borrower unless it is returned as a loan from the bank to the alleged borrower?”

The banker replied “Yes“.

The attorney said, “You never pay taxes on the actual cash value you receive from the alleged borrower and keep as the bank’s property?”

No. No tax is paid.”, said the crying banker.

The attorney asked, “When the lender receives the actual cash value from the alleged borrower, does the bank claim that it then owns it and that it is the property of the lender, without the bank loaning or risking one cent of legal tender or other depositors’ money?”

The banker said, “Yes.”

The attorney asked, “Are you telling me the bank policy is that the bank owns the promissory note (actual cash value) without loaning one cent of other depositors’ money or legal tender, that the alleged borrower is the one who provided the funds deposited to fund the bank loan check, and that the bank gets funds from the alleged borrower for free? Is the money then returned back to the same person as a loan which the alleged borrower repays when the bank never gave up any money to obtain the promissory note? Am I hearing this right? I give you the equivalent of $200,000, you return the funds back to me, and I have to repay you $200,000 plus interest? Do you think I am stupid?”

The banker, In a shaking voice the banker cried, saying, “All the banks are doing this. Congress allows this.”

The attorney quickly responded, “Does Congress allow the banks

to breach written agreements, use false and misleading advertising, act without written permission, authorisation, and without the alleged borrower’s knowledge to transfer actual cash value from the alleged borrower to the bank and then return it back as a loan?”

The banker said, “But the borrower got a check and the house.”

The attorney said, “Is it true that the actual cash value that was used to fund the bank loan check came directly from the borrower and that the bank received the funds from the alleged borrower

for free?”

The banker, “It is true“, said the banker.

The attorney asked, “Is it the bank’s policy to transfer actual cash value from the alleged borrower to the bank and then to keep the funds as the bank’s property, which they loan out as bank loans?”

The banker, showing a wince of regret that he had been caught, confessed, “Yes.

The attorney asked, “Do you believe that it was the borrower’s intent to fund his own bank loan check?”

The banker answered, “I was not there at the time and I cannot know what went through the borrower’s mind.”

The attorney asked, “If a lender loaned a borrower $10,000 and the borrower refused to repay the money, do you believe the lender is damaged?”

The banker thought. If he said no, it would imply that the borrower does not have to repay. If he said yes, it would imply that the borrower is damaged for the loan to the bank of which the bank never repaid. The banker answered, “If a loan is not repaid, the lender is damaged.”

The attorney asked, “Is it the bank policy to take actual cash value from the borrower, use it to fund the bank loan check, and never return the actual cash value to the borrower?”

The banker said, “The bank returns the funds.”

The attorney asked, “Was the actual cash value the bank received from the alleged borrower returned as a return of the money the bank took or was it returned as a bank loan to the borrower?”

The banker said, “As a loan.

The attorney asked, “How did the bank get the borrower’s money for free?”

The banker said, “That is how it works.

. . . And so it is!

CONCLUSION: See Drop-box: tinyurl.com/k2ta9fp

LC

ps; YouTube www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_If31KLDKA#t=257

https://seekingalpha.com/instablog/36191-lookingconfident/3896636-bank-loan-validity-doc-the-banker-and-the-attorney-promissory-notes

Global Planned Financial Tsunami Has Just Begun

By F. William Engdahl

Global Research, July 08, 2022

***

Since the creation of the US Federal Reserve over a century ago, every major financial market collapse has been deliberately triggered for political motives by the central bank. The situation is no different today, as clearly the US Fed is acting with its interest rate weapon to crash what is the greatest speculative financial bubble in human history, a bubble it created. Global crash events always begin on the periphery, such as with the 1931 Austrian Creditanstalt or the Lehman Bros. failure in September 2008. The June 15 decision by the Fed to impose the largest single rate hike in almost 30 years as financial markets are already in a meltdown, now guarantees a global depression and worse.

The extent of the “cheap credit” bubble that the Fed, the ECB and Bank of Japan have engineered with buying up of bonds and maintaining unprecedented near-zero or even negative interest rates for now 14 years, is beyond imagination. Financial media cover it over with daily nonsense reporting , while the world economy is being readied, not for so-called “stagflation” or recession. What is coming now in the coming months, barring a dramatic policy reversal, is the worst economic depression in history to date. Thank you, globalization and Davos.

Read further at: https://www.globalresearch.ca/global-planned-financial-tsunami-has-just-begun/5784217

Making history canceling two 1934 Gold Bearer Bonds

This is our Fiduciary for The United States of America [Unincorporated], Anna Maria Riezinger, making history cancelling two 1934 Gold Bonds with the assistance of the Financial Director of The Global Family International Trade Bank. We are privileged to witness and to have video of this historic event. As we witness history being made, it is now time to Intend, Create, and Manifest our future.

The Fed Reserve, Shelf Corporations, and You

By Anna Von Reitz

A “shelf corporation” is slang for a corporation that exists only on paper.  It has a name, an address (usually in an otherwise vacant house or office), a Registered Agent, a President, a Secretary, a Treasurer, a stated line of business — and nothing else.  These are also called “dummy corporations”.  

Also in slang, these are used as “storefronts” for all sorts of purposes.  To protect assets.  To hide actual ownership interests.  To launder money.  To act as asset holders during bankruptcy proceedings to hide assets that would otherwise be subject to the bankruptcy.  To “represent” other similarly-named businesses and organizations for purposes of deceit or substitution. Most recently, shelf corporations have made the news as mortgage holders and mortgage servicing companies and have been used as illegal transfer agents in equally illegal mortgage title foreclosures. 

Shelf corporations create a “Business Person” that can be used to do dirty work under cover of the “corporate veil” and then, when the heat is on, they can close up shop, go bankrupt, or simply “sunset” by failure to re-register and pay the fees. 

The Scottish Interloper doing business as “The United States of America — Incorporated” from 1868 to 1907 was a Shelf Corporation.  The name was deceitfully similar to the name of our unincorporated Federation of States, which allowed them to access our credit and steal our identity like any other Credit Card Hacker.  

Eventually, this dummy corporation from Scotland substituting itself for our actual government acquired so much debt that it was bankrupted by the banks that were extending credit to it “in our names” and those private banks operating under the deceitful name of the “Federal Reserve” took over the Scottish Interloper together with all the business names and assets it had acquired via fraud from us during Woodrow Wilson’s Administration. 

In this way, the “Federal Reserve” which was really just a private consortium of banks, took over what appeared to be the government, and the criminality that has infested Washington, DC, ever since the end of the Civil War began in earnest. 

The banks wasted no time in consolidating their hold on the politicians and members of the military brass, both by carrots and sticks, and settled in to loot the country and the people via a “legal tender laws” and “progressive taxation” and “controlled inflation of the currency”.  They also broadly practiced “unlawful conversion” whenever possible. 

This is the underlying crime used to kidnap land and soil assets via a process of incorporation and traffick them out into the international jurisdiction of the sea, where they can more readily be seized upon and plundered “legally”.  

Given this history, it should be no surprise that the same charlatans have used incorporation and shelf corporations to steal your identity and credit and to enslave you with their debts. 

Here is a famous transcription of comments made by Colonel Mandell House, one of the chief conspirators during a meeting with then-President Woodrow Wilson.  This came across my desk again this morning and prompted me to bring your attention to this key time and the issues it generated: 

“…Birth Certificates will be delivered to us…to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges…..They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit  and they will be none the wiser…Afterall this is the only logical way to fund government by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges….This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and  leave every American a contributor to this fund which we will call ‘Social Insurance.’… Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur

in this manner; every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly…The people will become helpless and without any hope for their

redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.”

So what was the “dummy corporation” he referred to?  

A new version of the Scottish Interloper calling itself “the” United States of America, Incorporated.  The only difference was dropping “The” as part of the name of the offending shelf corporation.  Within twenty years, it would be bankrupted for profit, too, as part of the Great Depression engineered by the Federal Reserve Banks.  

Yes, the member banks of the “Federal Reserve” created the Great Depression, and then stepped forward as the solution to the problem they created.  They created the bank runs prior to The Crash in 1929 to spook the herd and scare the politicians.  Then they created The Crash by selling out of the stock market en masse and by prior agreement.  In this way, they reduced stock prices to pennies on a dollar, destroyed all the smaller investors, and left themselves in position to come back in and buy up everything for nothing. 

They are all poised and ready to do it again.  

But, fool me once, shame on you…. fool me twice, shame on me.  

When they pull the plug this time, they are all going down for it — and somewhere in the back of their brains there is an alarm bell ringing, a prickle up the back of their necks, something telling them that despite their nearly infinite arrogance — the ax is going to fall.  

On them. 

Couldn’t happen to nicer people. 

But I digress…. it’s the rest of the Colonel’s comments that are the centerpiece to think about. Just as the Conspirators used Shelf Corporations to steal the identity and credit of our Federation of States immediately after the Civil War — and more to the point — our foreign Federal Government Subcontractors ever since, they also used shelf corporations to steal your identity, too. 

By a secretive and undisclosed process of “registration” which gives up your ownership interest in whatever is “registered”, the members of the military and the Federal Reserve Banks planned —with malice aforethought— to pull off the biggest asset heist in history.  They planned the “legal” enslavement of this entire country, and using that as a fulcrum, they then used the same simple diabolical fraud scheme to enslave most of the known world. 

Soon after you were born, and without any disclosure to your parents, you were “registered” as a British Territorial Person — a Foreign Situs Trust, which is a form of corporation — a shelf corporation — owned by the British Territorial State-of-State organization operating in your State of the Union.  

You were born, for example, as a Texan — but registered as a British Territorial  Person operated under the same name.  

The American named Albert Francis Smith looks and sounds identical to the British Territorial Person — a shelf corporation created by the State of Texas — also called “Albert Francis Smith”.  

The only difference is that the American is a living baby with a Proper Name and a birthday, while the British Territorial Person — a shelf corporation — has a birthdate — when the file and the “Birth Certificate” were created a few days or weeks later. 

This British doppelganger is presumed to be the inheritor of your name and estate. After seven years, the State-of-State franchise declares him “missing, lost at sea” and an entity with your name which has died intestate as a child, leaves behind an “infant decedent estate” to be administered by the members of the Bar Associations as they see fit. 

Now, it’s a dead shelf corporation with your name attached to it and the probate judges dressed in black can do whatever they like with it and its assets —if it has any. 

Of course, they self-interestedly presume that all your assets including your body were donated to the British Territorial doppelganger when they administer his estate in their foreign courts.  He was a British Subject.  He was a ward of their State of State organization.  He’s their Cash Cow.  And he’s “presumed” to be both dead and intestate, so he can’t possibly show up and protest what they are doing, can he?  

And neither can the American he was named after, because the American was just a baby when all this happened.  

This is identity theft and human trafficking, unlawful conversion, fraud, inland piracy and so much more.  

This scheme was brought to our shores by the U.S. Military and the Federal Reserve Banks as a plan to use shelf corporations as a means to defraud us individually in the same manner that they used shelf corporations to steal the identity and credit of our lawful unincorporated government.  It was primarily advanced by our British Territorial Subcontractors operating as “the” United States of America.  

Later, 1937, the Pope’s Municipal Government got into the same scheme and set up its own set of shelf corporation doppelgangers operating under names like MELINDA ANNE PIKE. 

Today, the Municipal Federal Reserve Corporation has been bankrupted in turn, and as a result, Chase Manhattan Bank owns the name “FEDERAL RESERVE” and JP Morgan owns the name “FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD OF GOVERNORS”.  

What a tangled web we weave, when first we practice…. to deceive…. 

Deliberate self-interested deceit leading to False Claims in Commerce, Identity Theft, Fraud, Unlawful Conversion and Inland Piracy is the essential problem for all these shelf corporations from 1850 to today.  The Federal Reserve, past and present, is responsible for this.  The other Principals — foreign Governments relied upon to honor our Constitutional Agreements and Treaties with them — are responsible for this. 

And at the end of the day, fraud vitiates everything they have done, nullifies everything they’ve said, demands the return of every penny they’ve stolen and coerced under false pretenses for 160 years.  

Possession by pirates does not change ownership.  

The foreign shelf corporations are recognized for what they are.  The incorporated foreign Federal Subcontractors are recognized for what they are.  And the role of the Federal Reserve in this entire nasty enslavement-by-registration scheme is laid bare for what it is. 

This international criminal cartel that operated under the corporate veil to impersonate and steal the credit and identity and resources of this country and its people is no longer protected by any secrecy. 

Anyone “registering” any babies in this country is likely to be shot in the coming days and those using the “name of” the Federal Reserve and those manipulating the stock markets and those manipulating the currency and counterfeiting “US DOLLARS” and those thinking that they will gain an ownership interest in living people by shooting them up with genetically engineered bits of DNA or RNA, had better think again.  

Go to: www.TheAmericanStatesAssembly.net and bring your mops and buckets.  

—————————-

See this article and over 3700 others on Anna’s website here: www.annavonreitz.com

The Old Lady Explains

By Anna Von Reitz

Government Central Banks were created to control the flow of commodities— and money and credit currencies , like wheat and sow bellies, are commodities.   This is state-sanctioned crime, because commodity rigging is a crime—- if Joe Blow does it.  

This is why commodity brokers and stock brokers are licensed, too.   This is why Central Banks and Stock Exchanges are (supposed to be) regulated. 

Merchant banks are created to engage in international trade, which is what we think of as  private business between unincorporated entities, using asset-backed money to trade goods and services.  It is called “trade” because actual physical assets are being exchanged.  My bag of peanuts for your apple is barter; my apple for your silver dime is trade. 

Commercial banks deal in various kinds of “commercial paper”—- stocks, bonds, certificates, insurance, debentures, promissory notes and credit instruments such as Letters of Credit, for example.  These banks serve incorporated entities since commerce itself is defined as business between two incorporated entities. 

Now that you can observe this for yourselves you will better understand it when I say all the commercial banks worldwide are bankrupt and all the central banks are guilty of mammoth crimes beyond the state sanctioned variety crimes they are allowed to indulge in. 

As a result, the International Trade Banks are the only ones still standing and capable of translating values.  The form this takes does not matter so long as people still have access to abundant cash assets —- without which everyone would be enslaved. 

Read that — digital currency is okay so far as it goes— your funds are routinely translated into digits as it is, so it isn’t that digital currency is bad—- it’s that banks controlling the flow of digital currency, banks with the ability to shut down your accounts without agreement, banks that can arbitrarily turn your credit cards on and off, would have complete coercive economic power if we do not immediately and with prejudice insist on maintaining a cash economy wherein people have physical control over defined asset-backed cash currency. 

And all this, plus the biggest bust in commodity rigging history and crimes beyond the scope of this quick summation — is what the PTW are arguing and struggling over. 

Meantime, note that Goldman-Sachs, the IRS, and the Territorial (British) Federal Reserve have so far moved to China—- obviously planning to set up shop there and do the same things to Chinese workers that they have done here.  

Really?  Will China be foolish enough to eat the Tapeworms?   Stay tuned.  We fully intend to take up the criminal nature of these entities with the Chinese Government. 

—————————-

See this article and over 3600 others on Anna’s website here: www.annavonreitz.com

http://www.paulstramer.net/2022/05/the-old-lady-explains.html

The Marshall Plan – Part Two — Who Is Owed the Return

By Anna Von Reitz

Attention: Prosecutor Karim A.A. Kahn,QC; H.E. Joan E. Donoughue, H.E. Kiril Gevgorian, H.E. Cardinal Dominique Mamberti, Lord High Steward Ivan Talbot, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Antonio Guterres Secretary General of the United Nations, Bank of International Settlements, Lord Mayor of Inner City of London, and other Interested Parties: 

Consider this lesson in Black Magic to be a necessary part of educating oneself to face off the powers of evil in the modern world.  

It’s the end of World War II.  Seventeen countries in western and southern Europe teetered on the edge of an Abyss.  General George Marshall came up with a Plan to rebuild those countries and their economies and here is how it worked.

A very large amount of privately held gold belonging to the D’Avila Family Trust was “blocked” for fifty (50) years — meaning that the Depositors were denied access to or any ability to move their gold held by banks for a period of fifty years from the date of deposit.  

The banks, thus assured of having that gold underwriting their extension of credit promptly issued ten times the value of the gold deposits as credit available to the ravaged countries and their governments under the theory of Fractional Reserve Banking. 

Fractional Reserve Banking says, well, on any given day, only about 1/10th of the people will want to take cash out of their accounts, so, we can safely loan out 90% of our “reserves” as credit at interest.  

So, in this crazy (and technically illegal) system, the bank gets to create 10X as much credit as the value of the assets that underwrite the bank and keep only the 100% of the gold or other commodity asset, plus 11% of the credit amount as “cash”, to pay off those depositors who at random ask for cash back from their deposits. 

The banks are “betting on the margin” in other words and reaping large returns on the interest being paid on these “loans” of credit that is, technically, owed to the heirs of the D’Avila Family Trust and their beneficiaries and not to the banks at all.  The banks have nothing at risk and no actual ownership interest in anything.

In 1851 the Spanish Courts ruled that the D’Avila assets came from non-criminal origin and the administrator of the Trust was allowed to deposit these assets in the global banking system.  The original agreement for this privilege was for 50 years from the last deposit that happened on October 7th, 1941, so the heir could not remove these assets until October 7th, 1991. The outbreak of World War II changed everything, the United States of America, the Allied Nations, and Non-Allied Nations were seeking a way to rebuild the world after two world wars, the solution was the D’Avila assets.  These Assets were transferred to Severino Garcia STA Romana as the asset owner so these assets could be traded for 50 years to fund a global project to rebuild the world. It took some time to plan and position these assets due to World War II and the recovery of assets from Germany and Japan that belonged to the D’Avila Trust. The 50-year agreement was extended to 2005 as the trading of these assets likely did not start until 1955.

All the D’Avila Family Trust assets were placed on deposit as of 1941, so the heirs went hungry to bed for sixty-four years, waiting for 2005 to roll around, and the promised end to the “block” on their funds.  They also held the reasonable expectation that at least some of the interest that was collected by the banks would be returned to the Trust, and that they would: (1) be able to enjoy a reasonable standard of living for themselves, and (2) would be able to fulfill the Trust Indenture, which requires the funds to be used to “uplift” humanity. 

2005 came and went.  More excuses and more shuffling took place. The “arrangement” provided a 5-year window period that extended another five years to 2010, with the understanding that the deposits would finally be released to the control of the heirs and beneficiaries.  2010 came and went.  More shuffling.  More excuses.  

The fact is that the World Bank and IBRD and BIS and all these other banks had grown used to having control of the D’Avila Trust assets secured in their vaults and they had found ways to benefit themselves by manipulating markets and seizing actual physical assets in exchange for loans of “credit” that never even belonged to these banks.  All that credit is owed to the Trust, minus reasonable and customary bank and brokerage fees. 

By 2005 and 2010, however, it was apparent that the banks couldn’t possibly pay back the D’Avila Trust both the gold and the credit owed from all the interest collected on all those loans, plus keep on glutting themselves, so negotiations came to a standstill.  In 2005, the so-called “Off Ledger” — blocked asset accounts, were left in Limbo Land, all the banks and all the governments without a contract to use the gold any longer continued as if they had a contract in place.  

What has ensued ever since has been a Bank Club Fest of criminality, greed, unaccountability, lies, and excuses.  They all know where the gold that underwrites their banks came from.  They all know that the gold assets must be freed up and that the profits from the interest must be shared with the Trust. Most of all, they all know that the accounting is due. 

And they are all sitting there, including Karen Hudes, shrugging like so many monkeys, trying to pretend, “Well, hey, this depository account hasn’t been touched in fifty years…. must be “abandoned”….” 

That’s their favorite excuse for stealing money, especially money held in Escrow accounts and Slush Funds that the Depositors of the actual assets are never told about.

When you have more than one person, one bank, one agency, one government acting together to prevent the asset owner and/or Heirs from recovering their assets, it is called a conspiracy, a criminal act that has no statute of limitations.  Because these assets were placed under Severino Garcia STA Romana as the asset owner and he died in 1974, the assets are protected under an estate with a court appointed Attorney in Fact that has been ordered by the Federal Court of the United States of America to Discover, Collect and Settle the Estate of Severino Garcia STA. Romana. The Claimant against this Estate is the D’Avila Family Trust –the source of the assets deposited by Severino Garcia STA. Romana in the first place.

The actual heir of the D’Avila Family Trust who has the General Power of Attorney for the Trust (there are other heirs, but he holds the GPA) went to Federal Court and to International Courts, and he won his cases to recover these assets from the agencies and banks holding these assets. 

The banks are still trying to avoid the judgment in favor of the heirs (STA Romana Family), and claimants (Avila Family) and the actual Beneficiaries — that is, all the people of the Earth. 

So, that makes the Banks and everyone protecting the Banks in this matter criminals– unless they immediately Cease and Desist their obstructionist activities and release the D’Avila Depository Accounts and make available the pre-paid credit owed back to the Trust, in recompense for blocking these accounts and extending credit at interest based on these assets since 1941. 

How would you feel if you deposited your money in a bank, and that bank arbitrarily blocked your access to your money for eighty years?  And then lied about it and said that they don’t know who the Depositor is?  That the funds are “abandoned”? 

I am the Assign of the D’Avila Trust in my capacity as the Fiduciary for The United States of America, speaking on behalf of the Heirs and Beneficiaries, all living people of this country and ultimately, the planet: it’s time for this criminal nonsense to end, and literally everyone in the world has a stake in helping me to end it.   

There are more than 5,000 Family and Institutional Trusts which the banks are attempting to commandeer in this way.

Money is a symbol. Life is the only value. And the debt owed back to the living people is long past due. 

The actual ownership interest is known. It has been adjudicated. There is no confusion about it.  Not one peso has been “abandoned”.  Each bank and each government is responsible and liable.  

On the back side of the overall transaction, the interest and return has been paid by living people who didn’t owe the governments that have benefited from the Marshall Plan and the European Economic Recovery Plan a single penny.  All that debt was foisted off on individual living people by means of legal chicanery and commercial deceit.  

The actual physical assets belonging to families have been seized under conditions of fraud and deceit by banks trading on the assets of the D’Avila Family Trust, in direct violation of the Trust Indenture, which directs this money to be used to uplift humanity and to break the chains of ignorance and poverty. 

The banks had the use of the credit generated from the D’Avila Trust assets to use and invest for free, yet they charged rates in usury above 500% on many mortgages that the living people never owed.

These banks have been protected in these outrageous crimes by the members of the Bar Associations, by military contractors, and by politicians who have benefited themselves at the cost of millions of lives, homes, and families. 

As I speak, thousands of Americans are being physically evicted from their homes for not paying mortgages that those Americans never owed.  Armed thugs acting under color of law have trespassed on private property at the behest of these banks, which are benefiting from the assets of the D’Avila Family Trust and inflicting this crime on the living people that the Trust assets are supposed to help and uplift. 

Shame on the Generals who have participated in and allowed this for a cut of the action.  

Shame on the Roman Catholic Church and its Collection Agency known as the Internal Revenue Service and the IRS, both, and its venal abusive claim to own the names of living people and to use those names and the assets attached to them as collateral and as the basis of labor contracts without disclosure and without permission.  

Shame on the banks and the bankers who have taken such a gross advantage of the D’Avila Family Trust and the Heirs and the intended Beneficiaries of the Trust, with the help of corrupt and incorporated British Crown Corporations that have engineered much of this Crime Against Humanity. 

Shame on everyone who has attempted to further block the Heir’s access to their own deposits and to claim that any of these funds are abandoned.  

Shame on those who have whipped and beaten and harassed and evicted and stolen the physical assets of the living people using credit and collecting usury based on the use of assets that never belonged to them.  

The return on these assets from 153 countries is owed the D’Avila Family Trust and is owed to the intended Beneficiaries of the Trust – which includes all of humanity.  Full recompense is due to all the people who have been the victims of the selfishness, trickery, and False Claims in Commerce promoted by these banks.

The Federal Court Order discovery so far has uncovered (below) the banks holding assets covered by the Estate of Severino Garcia STA. Romana.  There are still many more banks and accounts holding assets that will be discovered as we continue the discovery as ordered by the Federal Courts:

1. ABN- Amro Bank NV Netherlands (Netherlands, Amsterdam)

2. ABN- Amro Bank Netherlands (Netherlands, Bussum Branch)

3, ABN- Amro Bank Netherlands (Singapore Branch)

4. Agricultural Bank of China (Singapore)

5. Alliance Bank Malaysia Berhad (Kuala Lumpur)

6. Allgemeine Privatkunden Bank (Berlin, Charlottenburg)

7. ANZ Bank Malaysia Berhad (Kuala Lumpur Branch)

8. Arab Bank of Italy (Rome, Italy)

9. Arab Bank of New York (New York) 

10. Arab Malaysia Berhad (Kuala Lumpur Branch)

11. Arab Bank PLC (Singapore Branch)

12. Banco Espirito Santo (Lisboa Branch)

13. Banco Central De Resarva De EI Salvador (El Salvador Branch)

14. Bangkok Bank (Kuala Lumpur Branch)

15. Bangkok Bank (Thailand, Bangkok Branch)

16. Bangkok Bank (Hongkong, Main Office)

17. Bangkok Bank Public Company Limited (Singapore Branch)

18. Bank of America National Association (Singapore Branch)

19. Bank of Ayudhya Public Company Limited (Phongpheng Ayudhya Thailand)

20. Bank of Baroda (Bangkok, Thailand)

21. Bank of Canada (Ontario, Canada)

22. Bank of China (Beijing, China Branch)

23. Bank of China (Beijing, main office)

24. Bank of China (Seoul Branch)

25. Bank of China (Shanghai, China)

26. Bank of China (Onsan Branch, Korea)

27 Bank of China (Shanghai & Shenzhen China)

28. Bank of China (Guangdong Branch China)

29. Bank of China (Jakarta Branch Indonesia)

30. Bank of China (Hongkong Branch)

31. Bank of China (Vietnam Branch)

32. Bank of China (Tokyo Branch)

33. Bank of China (Minato, Japan)

34. Bank of China (Singapore Branch)

35. Bank of China (Bangkok, Thailand)

36. Bank of China & Bank of Communication (Guldin Branch, China)

37. Bank of Communications (Singapore Branch)

38. Bank of East Asia Limited (Shenzhen Branch, China)

39. Bank of Estonia (Eesti Pank, Estonia)

40. Bank of Indonesia (Indonesia)

41. Bank of Israel (Israel)

42. Bank of Mongolia (London England Branch)

43. Bank of Japan (Tokyo Head Office)

44. Bank of Negara Malaysia (Kuala Lumpur)

45. Bank of Negara Malaysia (Sarawak Branch, Malaysia)

46. Bank of the Sierra (Porterville, California USA)

47. Bank of Taiwan (Singapore Branch)

48. Bank of Tokyo – Mitsubishi (Hongkong Branch)

49.Bank of Tokyo – Mitsubishi (Tokyo, Japan)

50. Bank of Walnut Creek (Dorville, California USA)

51. Bank of the West (San Francisco, California USA)

52. Bank of, the West (Beverly Hills, California USA)

53.Bank of Yokohama (Hongkong Branch)

54. Bank of Thai Public Company Limited (Bangkok Thailand)

55. Bank of Sierra Leone (Sierra Leone)

56. HypoVereinsbank (Germany)

57. Banco Intesa (Milan, Italy Branch)

58. Barclays Bank (Amsterdam Netherlands)

59. Barclays Bank (Bangkok Thailand)

60. Barclays Banks (Beijing, China)

61. Barclays Bank (Birmingham, U.K)

62. Barclays Bank (Doha, Qatar)

63. Barclays Bank (Dubai, UAE)

64. Barclays Bank (Dublin Ireland)

65. Barclays Bank (Frankfurt, Germany)

66. Barclays Bank (Geneva, Switzerland)

67. Barclays Bank (Hongkong)

68. Barclays Bank (Jakarta, Indonesia)

69. Barclays Bank (Johannesburg South Africa)

70. Barclays Bank (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia)

71. Barclays Bank (Labuan Malaysia)

72. Barclays Bank (Greater London, England)

73. Barclays Bank (London, England)

74. Barclays Bank (Lausanne, Switzerland)

75. Barclays Bank (Luxemburg)

76. Barclays Bank (Madrid, Spain)

77. Barclays Bank (UK)

78. Barleys Bank (Milan, Italy)

79. Barclays Bank (Moscow, Russia)

80. Barclays Bank (Mumbai, India)

81. Barclays Bank (Paris, France)

82. Barclays Bank (Seoul, Korea)

83. Barclays Bank (Shanghai, China)

84. Barclays Bank (People’s Republic of China)

85. Barclays Bank (Singapore)

86. Barclays Bank PLC (Singapore)

87 Barleys Bank (Sydney, Australia)

88. Barclays Bank (Taipei, Taiwan)

89. Barclays Bank (Tel Aviv, Israel)

90. Barclays Bank (Tokyo, Japan)

91. Barclays Bank (Zurich, Switzerland)

92. BMO Bank of Montreal (Alberta, Calgary, Canada)

93, BMO Bank of Montreal (British Colombia, Canada)

94. BMO Bank of Financial Group. (Toronto, Ontario Canada)

95. BMO Bank of Montreal (Waterloo, Ontario Canada)

96. BMO Bank of Montreal (Quebec, Canada)

97. BMO Bank of Montreal (Nova Scotia, Canada)

98. BNP Paribas (Bahrain Branch)

99. BNP Paribas (Hongkong Branch, Takoo Place Office)

100. BNP Paribas (King Fahd Rd, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia)

101. BNP Paribas (Milano Branch, Italy)

102. BNP Paribas (Rome, Italy Head Office)

103. BNP Paribas Asset Management (Madrid, Spain)

104. BNP Paribas (Singapore)

105. Bulgaria National Bank (Bulgaria)

106. Cassa Di Risparmio Di Ferrara (DI Ferrara, Head Office Italy)

107. Cambodian Commercial Bank (Cambodia Head office)

108. Cambodian Asia Bank (Phnom Penh, Kingdom of Cambodia)

109. Cambodia Asia Bank (Battambang Branch, Cambodia)

110. Cambodia Asia Bank (Siem Reap Branch, Cambodia)

111. CIBC Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (Canada)

112. Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (Grand Cayman)

113. Cayman Islands – Cayman Islands international Banking Centre (Cayman Islands)

114. Central Bank of the Bahamas (Nassau, Bahamas)

115. Central Bank of Barbados (Barbados, West Indies)

116. Central Bank of China. (Taipei, Taiwan)

117. Central Bank of Egypt (Cairo Egypt)

118. Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran (Iran)

119. Central Bank of India (New Delhi, India)

120. Central Bank of India (Ahmadabad, India)

121. Central Bank of India (Agra, India)

122. Central Bank of India (Mumbai, India)

123. Central Bank of Ireland (Dublin, Ireland)

124. Central Bank of Kuwait (Hawally, Kuwait)

125. Central Bank of Nigeria (Nigeria)

126. Central Bank of Jordan (Amman, Jordan)

127. Central Bank of Papua New Guinea (Papua New Guinea)

128. Central Bank of Republic of Turkey (Turkey)

129. Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Russia)

130. Central Bank of Malta (Valletta, Malta)

131. Central Bank of Libya (Al Bayda, Libya)

132. Central Bank of Libya (Jumhouria Gharyan, Libya)

133. Central Bank of Libya (Tripoli Libya)

134. Central Bank of Sri Lanka (Colombo, Sri Lanka)

135. China Construction Bank (Beijing, China)

136. China Construction Bank (Gansu Branch, Lanzhou China)

137. China Construction Bank (Shenzhen Head Office, China)

138. China Construction Bank (Guanxi China)

139, China Construction Bank (Seoul Branch Korea)

140. China Construction Bank (Shanghai China)

141. China Construction Bank (Jung-gu, Seoul Korea)

142. Citibank (Milan Italy)

143. Citibank (Osaka Japan)

144. Citibank (Sydney, Australia)

145. Citibank (Seoul, Korea)

146. Citibank (Toronto, Ontario Canada)

147. Citibank (United Kingdom)

148. Citibank (Laban, Korea)

149. Citibank Berhad (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia)

150. Citibank (Shinagawa, Japan)

151. Credit Suisse (Tokyo, Japan)

152. Credit Suisse (Zurich, Switzerland)

153. Credit Suisse (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia)

154. Credit Suisse (Rathenau plats # 1 (Deutschland)

155. Credit Suisse (Kurfürstendamm, Berlin (Germany)

156. Credit Suisse (Taipei, Taiwan)

157. Credit Suisse (Seoul, Korea)

158. Credit Suisse (Singapore)

159. Credit Suisse (Switzerland)

160. Credit Suisse (Luxemburg)

161. Credit Suisse (Parade plats, Zurich Switzerland)

162. Credit Suisse (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia)

163. Credit Suisse (Bienne, Switzerland)

164. CHB-Chang Hwa Commercial Bank (Taipei, Taiwan)

165. Commercial Bank of Ceylon (Bangladesh)

166. Commerzbank AG (Germany)

167. Commerzbank (Bremen-Waltrershaursen, Germany)

168. Commerzbank (Bremen Schwachhauser, Germany)

169. Commerzbank (Osterholz – Scharmbeck, Germany)

170. Commerzbank (Frankfurt Main, Germany)

171. Commerzbank (Mainzer Landstrasse, Germany)

172. Commerzbank (Aktiengesenschaft ­ Singapore)

173. Daiichi Kangyo Bank Limited (Japan)

174. Daichi Kangyo Limited (Chiyoda, Tokyo

175. Denmark National Bank (Denmark)

176. Development Bank of Japan. (Tokyo, Japan)

177. Deutsche Bank – (Germany)

178. DBS (Shanghai Branch China)

179. Dresdner Bank (Germany)

180. Dresdner Bank (Belgium)

181 Dresdner Bank (UAE)

182. Dresdner Bank (Monaco)

183. Dresdner Bank (Austria)

184. European Central Bank (Germany)

185. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Illinois (USA)

186. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (USA)  

187. Grupo Banco Popular (Russia)

188. Grupo Banco Popular (Lisboa, Portugal)

189. Grupo Banco Popular (Milano Italy)

190. Grupo Banco Popular (London, England) 

191. Grupo Banco Popular (United Kingdom)

192. FIM Bank PLC (Malta)

193. Goldman Sachs (Beijing China)

194. Hana Bank Limited (Seoul, South Korea)

195. Hang Seng Bank (Hongkong)

196. HSBC – Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corporation (London, England)

197. HSBC (Japan)

198. HSBC (Hongkong, SARR)

199. HSBC (South Africa)

200. HSBC (Dubai UA.E.)

201. HSBC (South Africa)

202. HSBC (Japan)

203. HSBC (Dubai)

204. HSBC (Dublin 2 Ireland)

205. HSBC- Kakugo Bank Limited (Japan)

206. International Moscow Bank (Moscow Russia)

207. International Banks -1 (France, Hongkong, Nanyang- China)

208. International Banks -2 (Hongkong Central, Korea, Singapore)

209. international Banks -3 (Taiwan, Bangkok, USA, New York)

210. International Banks -4 (Penn Plaza New York USA, New Jersey, California)

2I1 International Banks -5 (Vietnam, Shanghai, Menara)

2I2. Islamic Development Bank (Algeria. Africa)

213. Islamic Development Bank (Afghanistan)

214. Islamic Development Bank (Darussalam, Brunei)

215. Islamic Development Bank (Brunei, Main Office)

216. Islamic Development Bank (Kazakhstan)

217. Islamic Development Bank (Dakar, Africa)

218. Islamic Development Bank (Egypt)

219. Islamic Development Bank. (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia)  

220. Islamic Development Bank (Kuwait)

221. Islamic Development Bank (Menara, Kuala Lumpur Malaysia)

222. Islamic Development Bank (Jamahiriya Libya, Africa)

223. Islamic Development Bank (Tripoli, Libya Africa)

224. Islamic Development Bank (Saudi Arabia)

225. Islamic Development Bank (Jeddah, Saudi Arabia)

226. Islamic Development Bank (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia)

227. Islamic Development Bank (Iran)

228. Islamic Development Bank (Iraq)

229. Islamic Development Bank (Abu Dhabi, UAE)

230. Islamic Development Bank U. A. E.

231. Islamic Development Bank (Tajikistan)

232. Islamic Development Bank (Turkey)

233. Islamic Development Bank (Pakistan)

234. Islamic Development Bank (Qatar)

235. Janata Bank. (Rome, Italy)

236. JPMorgan, Chase Manhattan Bank (New York, USA)

237. KBC Bank (Bremen, Germany)

238. Koram Bank (Seoul, Korea)

239. Korea Development Bank (Shanghai, China Branch)

240, Korea Development bank (Uzbekistan)

241 Korea Development Bank (Singapore Branch)

242. Korea Development Bank (Tokyo Branch)

243. Korea Development Bank (Guangzhou branch, China)

244. Korea Development Bank (Seoul, Korea)

245. Korea Development Bank (Hongkong Central)

246. Korea Development Bank (Shenyang Branch)

247. Korea Development Bank. (Beijing, China)

248. KB Kookmin Finance Asia Limited (Hongkong Central)

249. KB Kookmin Finance Asia Limited (South Korea)

250. KB Kookmin Finance Asian Limited.

251. Lloyds Banking Group (London, England)

252. Maybank Berhad (Johor, Malaysia)

253. Maybank (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia)

254. National Australia Bank – Melbourne. Vitoria

255. National Bank of Malawi (Malawi)

256. National Bank of Oman (Oman)

257 National Bank of Pakistan (Pakistan)

258. National Bank of Dubai (Dubai)

259. National Bank of Fujairah (Fujairah, Saudi Arabia)

260. National Bank of United Arabia Emirates (UAE)

261. National Commercial Bank (Jeddah, Saudi Arabia)

261. National Commercial Bank (Kingstown & Grenville Streets)

262. Ngan Hang Dong A (Hanoi Branch, Vietnam)

263. NB Norges Bank (Norway)

264. Nordea Bank (Denmark)

265. 0CBC Bank (Singapore)

266. 0CBC Bank (Xiamen Branch, China)

267. 00BC Bank (Shanghai, China)

268. Posang Bank (Central Hongkong)

269. Royal Bank of Canada Europe Limited (London, England)

270. Royal Bank of Canada Europe Limited (England)

271. Royal Bank of Canada (Tokyo Branch)

272. Royal Bank of Scotland (lisle of Man)

273. Sanwa Bank Limited. (Higashi, Japan)

274. Standard Chartered Bank (Manama, Bahrain)

275. Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore)

276. Standard Chartered Bank (Frankfurt, Germany)

277. Standard Chartered Bank (Hongkong)

278. Standard Hellier Bank (Koror, Palau)

279. Standard Chartered Bank (Cambodia Bank)

280. Standard Chartered (United Arabia Emirates)

281. Standard chartered Bank (Vientiane Laos)

282. Scotiabank (Guadalajara, Mexico)

283. Scotiabank (Mexico branch)

284. Scotiabank (Dublin Ireland)

285. Scotiabank (London, United Kingdom)

286. Scotiabank (San Paulo, Brazil)

287. Scotiabank (New York, USA)

288. Scotiabank (Canada, Toronto)

289. Scotia Bank (People’ Republic of China, Hongkong)

290. SMFG Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group (New York, USA)

291. SMFG Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group (Queen Victoria, London)

292. SMFG Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group (Hongkong)

293. SFG. Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group (Japan)

294, SMFG Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group (Harbour View St, Hongkong)

295. SURSS National Bank (Zurich, Switzerland)

296. UFJ Bank Sanwa Bank Limited (Japan)

297. UFJ Bank Sanwa Bank Limited (Higashi, Japan)

298. UFJ Bank (Hong Kong)

299. UFJ Bank Fairmont House, Cotton Tree Drive (Hongkong)

300. The Peoples Bank of China (Beijing China)

301. The Bank of China (Seoul, Korea)

302. The Bank of New York Melon (Aventura)

303. The Bank of New York Mellon (Bangkok, Thailand)

304. The Bank of New York Mellon (Being China)

305. The Bank of New York Mellon (India)

306. The Bank of New York Mellon (Jakarta)

307. The Bank of New York Mellon (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia)

308. The Bank of New York Mellon (New York, USA)

309. The Bank of New York Mellon (Maryland, Bethesda USA)

310. The Bank of New York Mellon (Mumbai, India)

311. The Bank of New York Mellon (Taipei, Taiwan)

312. The Bank of New York Mellon (Seoul Branch, Korea)

313. The Bank of New York Mellon (Shanghai, China)

314. The Bank of New York Mellon (Tokyo, Japan)

315. UBS (Madrid, Spain)

316. UBS (Dublin, Ireland)

317. UBS (Zurich, Switzerland)

318. UBS (West Madison)

319. Union bank of Switzerland (Tokyo Branch)

320. Union bank (San Francisco, California USA)

321. Wells Fargo Bank (San Francisco, California)

322. West Pacific Banking Corporation (Melbourne, Australia)

323. Wing Lung Bank (Hongkong Central)

324. Wood Financial Group (Seoul, Korea)

325. Federal Reserve Banks (United States of America)

326. United States Treasury (United States of America)

327. World Bank (Washington, USA)

328. IMF (International Monetary Fund)

329. European Central Bank.

330. Bank of England (London, England)

331. Central Bank of Russia (Moscow, Russia)

332. Bank of Mongolia (London, England)

333. Bank of Copenhagen (Copenhagen, Denmark)

334. Bank of Singapore Limited (Singapore)

335. Bank of Thailand (Bangkok, Thailand)

336. Bank of Tokyo (Tokyo, Japan)

337. Mitsubishi Bank (Tokyo, Japan)

338. Sumitomo Bank (Kaobe, Osaka Japan)

339. Central bank of Estonia (Estonia)

340. BNI Bank Negra Indonesia (Jakarta, Indonesia)

341. Federal Bank of Indonesia (Jakarta, Indonesia)

342. Ireland and Swiss Cork Bank (Cork, Ireland)

343. Reserve Bank of India (New Delhi, India)

345. International Hungary Bank (Hungary)

346. Central Bank of Iran (Iran)

347. Central Bank of Jordan (Jordan)

348. National Bank of Korea (Korea)

350. Hanil Bank of South Korea (Seoul, South Korea)

351. Kukmin Bank of South Korea (Seoul, South Korea)

352. Mateo Investments Limited Offshore Corporation (Liberia/ABN-Amro-Singapore)

353. Central Bank of Kuwait (Kuwait)

354. central bank of Libya (Libya)

355. Central Bank of Malaysia (Malaysia)

356. Central Bank of Malta (Malta)

357. Central Bank of Mexico (Mexico City, Mexico)

358. Central Bank of Nigeria (Nigeria)

359. Central Bank of Norway (Norway)

360. Central Bank of Papua New Guinea

361. Central Bank of Portugal (Portugal)

362. Central Bank of Spain (Spain)

363. Central bank of Sri Lanka (Sri Lanka)

364. Central Bank of Taiwan (Taiwan)

365. Central Bank of Thailand (Thailand)

366. Central Bank of the Bahamas (Bahamas)

367. Central bank of Turkey (Turkey)

368. Citi Bank (USA)

369. JPMorgan Chase Manhattan Bank (USA)

370. Bank of America (USA)

371. Wells Fargo Bank (USA)

372. HSBC Bank (London, England)

373. HSBC Bank (Hongkong)

374. Goldman Sachs (USA)

375. First Caribbean International Bank (Cayman Islands)

376. First National City Bank (USA)

377. Lloyds Banking Group Plc. (London, England)

378. Merrill Lynch – Bank of America (USA)

379. Morgan Guaranty Trust Company (USA)

380. N.M. Rothchild & Sons Bank Ltd. (Zurich, Switzerland)

381. Union Bank of Switzerland (Switzerland)

382. National Bank of Australia (Melbourne, Australia)

383. Sanwa Bank Limited (Japan)

384. Narita Savings & Trust Corporation (Narita, Japan)

385. Saitama Banking Corporation (Saitama Ken, Japan)

386. Tokyo Trust and Savings (Tokyo, Japan)

387. Daichi – Kangko Bank (Osaka, Japan)

388. Standard Chartered Bank (London, England)

389. Barclays Bank (London, England)

390. Royal Bank of Scotland (Isle of Man)

391. Peoples Bank of China (Beijing, China)

392. Wing Lung Bank (Hong Kong)

393. Overseas Bank & Trust Company (Hong Kong)

394. Indosuez Bank (Hong Kong)

395. Woori Bank (Seoul Korea)

396. United Overseas Bank Limited (Singapore)

397. Korea Exchange Bank (Seoul, Korea)

398. National Bank of Oman (Oman)

399. National Bank of Munich (Munich, Switzerland)

400. Credit Suisse Bank (Basle, Switzerland)

401. National Bank of Malawi (Malawi)

402. National Bank of Uzbekistan

403. ING (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

404. Indosuez Bank (Central Hong Kong)

405. Hyakugo Bank (Japan)

406. Deutsche Bank (Germany)

407. FIM Bank Plc. (Malta)

408. Ngan Hang Dong A Eastern Asia Commercial Bank (Hanoi, Vietnam)

409. Vietnam International Bank (Hanoi, Vietnam)

410. Honk Kong Bank (Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)

411. Dominion Charter Merchant Ltd. (London, England)

412. Development bank of Japan (Tokyo, Japan)

413. Development Bank of Singapore (Singapore)

414. Daichi Kangyo Bank Limited (Tokyo, Japan)

415. Copenhagen Industrial Bank (Denmark)

416. Central Bank of Argentina

417. Central Bank of Austria

418. Central bank of Brazil

419. Banquo De France (Paris, France)

420. Bank of Israel (Jerusalem, Israel)

421. Bank of Foreign Trade of Vietnam (Ho Chi Mihn City, Vietnam)

422. ANZ Bank (Shanghai, China)

423. ANZ Bank (Seoul, Korea)

424. American Express Bank (Central Hong Kong)

425. Alliance Bank Malaysia Berad (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia)

426. Agricultural Bank of China (Singapore)

More banks and institutions will be added to this list as the recoupment and discovery progresses.  Meantime don’t buy any wooden nickels.   There may be Filipinos who are D’Avila family members, and if so, that will be established by blood tests and DNA — not through any claims based on Ferdinand Marcos’ position as a family attorney.   

Please bear in mind that although the D’Avila Family Trust is very large, there are other trusts that are also very large that have been arbitrarily encumbered by these miscreants.  The V.K. Durham Trust is an American Silver Trust that has been similarly held captive, cheated, and plundered by these criminals.  The Guadalupe Hidalgo Treaty Trust Assets have been illegally cashiered by the Bank of England, and the list goes on.

These issues are not unique to America. An estimated ten billion metric tons of gold are owed to the people of Germany and Russia, last seen disappearing into the vaults of the Bank of England.

It is to everyone’s advantage to spread this information far and wide and to bring pressure to bear upon the militaries and the politicians and the banks responsible for this continuing criminality and failure to perform according to our law and custom. Depositors are owed the return of their deposits, otherwise, they would have no reason to deposit any assets with banks in the first place. 

Like the institution of government — if a government does not protect you and your assets, it has no valid purpose. A bank that exists to control, encumber, and steal depositor’s money, whether those deposits are small or large, has no valid purpose.

Please join our effort to end this grotesque corruption, end all false claims that the Second World War is in any way unsettled, and demand restoration of private assets to the lawful owners. 

You can help me in my role as Fiduciary and Assign overseeing this mess by sharing this information and by properly informing law enforcement and miliary and political leaders as well as bank officers. This has, thus far, been a tremendous effort as the heirs and actual trustees have been left without the means to fight this gigantic theft and fraud.

Put yourselves in their shoes.  You are fabulously wealthy, but you live like a serf, and have no money to fight the banks.  You want to fund humanitarian projects all over the world and fulfill your ancestors’ dream of “breaking the bonds of poverty and ignorance” but you are prevented from doing this by white collar criminals who use your own assets to pay off other criminals to persecute and intimidate you. 

Despite all this, the Heir of the D’Avila Family Trust has won his cases and deserves our support, both in enforcing the law, and on a one-to-one level.  It costs money and takes skill and time to prosecute these banks, and at the end of the day, we are left with a piece of paper looking for the enforcement of the court’s orders.  We are left to enforce it ourselves, which costs more time, more skills, more money.

Banks need to be regulated.  They cannot otherwise be trusted.  If the D’Avila Family Trust assets can be stolen by the Bank Mob, why couldn’t yours be stolen, too?  Quite aside from the humanitarian and development support that the trust can and will provide each one of us, we all have a vested interest in honest banks and honest business practices. The world cannot long survive or be at peace without these basics in place.

I personally believe that much of the corruption and the violence of the past two hundred years lays at the feet of corrupt banks, corrupt militaries, and corrupt politicians who have undermined proper accounting standards, deregulated the banks and the securities exchanges, and promoted a lawless business environment.

If you are sick and tired of being the goat in this situation, join us.  Send your thoughts, your prayers, and any reasonable donation you can make toward ending this to:

Anna Maria Riezinger, In care of: Box 520994, Big Lake, Alaska 99652.

http://www.paulstramer.net/2022/04/the-marshall-plan-part-two-who-is-owed.html

A Couple of Thoughts on Big Numbers

By Charles Hugh Smith

April 18, 2022

Let’s ask “cui bono” of the $33 trillion in added debt and the $9 trillion added to GDP: to whose benefit?

I’ve been thinking about how hard it is to get our heads around big numbers. Technical analyst Sven Henrich (@NorthmanTrader) recently provided one method to grasp the immense wealth of Elon Musk: How to become as wealthy as Elon Musk? Easy. Get paid $1 Million every single day. For 750 years in a row and you’re there.

How can we get a handle on the $33 trillion we’ve added in total debt since 2010? We can start by noting that’s a 60% increase in debt in about a decade, while the population of the U.S. rose by 7%.

Are we 60% better off than we were 12 years ago? How do we measure “better off”? GDP went up by 60% as well, but are we 60% more efficient or 60% more productive? Has the purchasing power of our wages gone up 60%? Can we buy 60% more with a day’s earnings?

I think it’s fair to say “no” to all these questions. We’ve added $33 trillion in debt to more or less tread water.

Does it illuminate the $33 trillion to say that’s $100,000 of debt for every one of the 330 million Americans? Are we each $100,000 better off for borrowing $33 trillion? Well, a few folks have benefited. The top 400 wealthiest folks have seen their wealth skyrocket by trillions of dollars, from roughly 8% of GDP in 2010–way up from a paltry 2.5% in 1985–to about 18% of GDP, which is now $24 trillion. That works out to $4.3 trillion.

I think it’s fair to say that hyper-globalization and hyper-financialization has generated hyper-wealth and hyper-inequality.

Read more at: https://www.oftwominds.com/blogapr22/big-numbers4-22.html

A Public International Demand for Action

 By Anna Von Reitz

How can we, the living people, tear apart the corporations that are feasting on our bodies, minds, and material assets —-and making a bid to reduce living men and women to the status of animals?

Interestingly, the Pope and the Roman Curia are responsible for defining and regulating all corporations on Earth. That’s why they get a cut of the taxes paid by corporations. Obviously, they are falling down on the job, or they are directly responsible for this latest Tidal Wave of Corporate Criminality, in which case…. holding all those gentlemen accountable would be highly desirable.

You may also remember that the United Nations has historically taken a dim view of Colonialism, but nearly all its member nations have fallen victim to Colonialism’s incorporated Cousin, Territorialism. And they are facing yet another even more oppressive form of the same disease: Regionalism.

Corporatism, or as I call it, “Corporate Feudalism” is the belief that the world would be better off if it were completely controlled by mindless, faceless, unaccountable, and uncontrolled corporations which are single-mindedly motivated by only one goal: profit.

You may have noticed that a basic principle has been breached and that the world of corporations, which is fictional, is somehow bleeding over into the actual world where people live, breathe, and eat and love and fornicate and die. Who is responsible for that breach?

The Pope and his Cardinals and members of the Curia have already been identified and mentioned as part of the problem, but who else?

The Lord Mayor of London, who is in charge of the Magicians known as “twisters” or “attorneys”—- or as our ancestors called them, “Masters of Deceit”. They are the ones who are supposed to be maintaining “the Bar” between fact and fiction, life and corporation.

They are doing a very poor job at the same time that the Pope and the Curia are on strike. In fact, in courts around the world, they are deliberately impersonating living people as CORPORATIONS.

That is, the attorneys are committing crimes of personage, and they are getting away with it.

And who is responsible for that?

Ah, the military and the police and the politicians. The three monkeys and their football.

So what we really need is a “DEFUND” button on the bottom of our computer console, we grab the purse strings back from the politicians, and all this nastiness is over.

But who is giving the politicians access to our money and credit to use against our best interests without our consent in the first place?

The banks.

It all comes down to —- and on —- the banks, because the banks are enabling all this crime.

The Bankers are the Enablers, the Politicians are the Corporate Mouthpieces misdirecting the police and military to take orders from the Attorneys, who are committing crimes of personage against the living people, to enrich the Pope and his pals, the Roman Curia, and all their cronies.

There the condition of the world is, all neatly summarized. We know what’s wrong. We know who is at the bottom of it. Now, what are we going to do about it?

—————————-

See this article and over 3600 others on Anna’s website here: www.annavonreitz.com

http://www.paulstramer.net/2022/04/a-public-international-demand-for-action.html

‘Recession shock’: Bank of America is the latest major institution to deliver a grim warning for the future

Tristan Bove

Fri, April 8, 2022, 9:18 PM·2 min read

Pablo Monsalve—VIEWPress/Getty Images

Talk of a looming recession is rampant around the globe, and now a major U.S. bank has issued its own dire forecast for the global economy.

It’s been over a month since Russia invaded Ukraine, leading to an unforeseen and prolonged fallout for the global economy. Combined with an inflation problem that was already spiking the prices of virtually every commodity, global institutions have begun ringing the alarm bells that we are on the brink of a long-anticipated recession.

In an investment strategy report sent to clients on Thursday, Bank of America analysts warned that “inflation always precedes recessions” and that tighter monetary policies being put in place to control surging prices make a “recession shock” very likely.

Read more at: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/recession-shock-bank-america-latest-191853835.html

SA Jural Assembly Comment: This is more lamestream media propaganda to roll out the controlled demolition of the financial system for “The Great Reset” folks; firstly, Russia did not invade Ukraine; secondly, the Federal Reserve System is one big fat giant fiat ponzi scheme; and it is artificially manipulated by the banksters; and their 99 year lease has expired in 2012;

The good news is the United People’s Front banking committee is working hard to get the SA people’s bank online within the next week or so; details will be forthcoming soon;

And, our gold, silver and platinum trading platform should also be online in the next month; we have our own alternative great reset by, for and of the people planned; the cabal need slaves but we don’t need the cabal; the people shall govern soon…

The Importance of Edward Mandell House

In 1913, Colonel Edward Mandell House helped to pick the charter members of the original Federal Reserve Board.

Edward Mandell House (originally “Huis” which became “House”) was born July 26, 1858 in Houston, Texas. He became active in Texas politics and served as an advisor to President Woodrow Wilson, particularly in the area of foreign affairs. House functioned as Wilson’s chief negotiator in Europe during the negotiations for peace (1917-1919), and as chief deputy for Wilson at the Paris Peace Conference. He died on March 28, 1938 in New York City.

Edward and his father had friends in the Ku Klux Klan. The Klan dispensed vigilante justice after the Civil War. In 1880 a new legitimate group was in charge of dispensing justice in Texas — the Texas Rangers. Many of the Texas Rangers were members of the Klan. Edward was the new master. Edward gained their loyalty by stroking their egos. Edward would use his money and influence to try and make them famous. Edward eventually inherited the Texas Ku Klux Klan.

Edward Mandell House helped to make four men governor of Texas: James S. Hogg (1892), Charles A. Culberson (1894), Joseph D. Sayers (1898), and S. W.T. Lanham (1902). After the election House acted as unofficial advisor to each governor. Hogg gave House the title “Colonel” by promoting House to his staff.

Edward wanted to control more than Texas, Edward wanted to control the country. Edward would do so by becoming a king maker instead of a king. Edward knew that if he could control two or three men in the Senate, two or three men in the House; and the President, he could control the country.

Edward would influence the candidate from behind the scenes. The people would perceive one man was representing them, when in reality; an entirely different man was in control. House didn’t need to influence millions of people; he need only influence a handful of men. Edward would help establish a secret society in America that would operate in the same fashion — the Council on Foreign Relations.

Edward Mandell House was instrumental in getting Woodrow Wilson elected as President. Edward had the support of William Jennings Bryan and the financial backing of the House of Rockefeller’s National City Bank. Edward became Wilson’s closest unofficial advisor.

Edward Mandell House and some of his schoolmates were also members of Cecil Rhodes Round Table group. The Round Table Group, the back bone of the Secret Society, had four pet projects, a graduated income tax, a central bank, creation of a Central Intelligence Agency, and the League of Nations.

Between 1901 and 1913 the House of Morgan and the House of Rockefeller formed close alliances with the Dukes and the Mellons. This group consolidated their power and came to dominate other Wall Street powers including: Carnegie, Whitney, Vanderbilt, Brown-Harriman, and Dillon-Reed.

The Round Table Group wanted to control the people by having the government tax people and deposit the people’s money in a central bank. The Group would take control of the bank and therefore have control of the money. The Group would take control of the State Department and formulate government policy, which would determine how the money was spent.

The Group would control the CIA which would gather information about people, and script and produce psycho-political operations focused at the people to influence them to act in accord with Round Table Group State Department policy decisions.

The Group would work to consolidate all the nations of the world into a single nation, with a single central bank under their control, and a single International Security System. Some of the first legislation of the Wilson Administration was the institution of the graduated income tax (1913) and the creation of a central bank called the Federal Reserve.

An inheritance tax was also instituted. These tax laws were used to rationalize the need for legislation that allowed the establishment of tax-exempt foundations. The tax-exempt foundations became the link between the Group member’s private corporations and the University system.

The Group would control the Universities by controlling the sources of their funding. The funding was money sheltered from taxes being channelled in ways which would help achieve Round Table Group aims.

https://cal-mystuffs.blogspot.com/2008_11_30_archive.html

http://www.gemworld.com/EdMandellHouse.htm

Our Comment: At some point Woodrow Wilson realized what he had done as is evident in the following quote, but by then it was too late;

“A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the world– no longer a government of free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of small groups of dominant men.” — Woodrow Wilson

“This [Federal Reserve Act] establishes the most gigantic trust on earth. When the President [Wilson} signs this bill, the invisible government of the monetary power will be legalized….the worst legislative crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking and currency bill.” — Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr., 1913

The 1913 Plot To Enslave Humanity

One of the most educational books we learnt from was  HOW I CLOBBERED EVERY BUREAUCRATIC CASH-CONFISCATORY AGENCY KNOWN TO MAN

… a Spiritual Economics Book on $$$ and Remembering Who You Are by: Mary Elizabeth: Croft;

On page 21 she writes: “Colonel Edward Mandell House is attributed with giving a very detailed outline of the plans to be implemented to enslave the American people. He stated, in a private meeting with Woodrow Wilson (President 1913 – 1921),

Very soon, every American will be required to register their biological property (that’s you and your children) in a national system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a charge back for our fiat paper currency.

Every American will be forced to register or suffer being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattels (property) and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading (Birth Certificate) to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, secured by their pledges.

They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debts to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges.

This will inevitably reap us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud, which we will call “Social Insurance.” Without realizing it, every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and we will employ the high office (presidency) of our dummy corporation (USA) to foment this plot against America. – Colonel Edward Mandell House

This is why I coach those who intend to ‘marry’ not to sign anything. Centuries ago, a man put a ring on a woman’s finger and declared, “With this ring, I thee wed”. Family members were the witnesses and that was it. There was no state-issued licence to sign … frightful! Children can be taken from their parents because of the marriage licence. Do not invite into your private contract a third party which happens to be public, cares not about the interests of the other two parties, and has every legal right to force them to acquiesce to its demands. Your marriage ceases to be your own; the third party will tell you if and when you can end the marriage; the third party will dictate that your children will:

1. require a birth certificate and SSN/SIN

2. require a gov’t-directed (AMA/CMA) doctor to attend to his health,

3. be vaccinated by mandate,

4. attend the Public Fool System,

5. be prescribed and drugged by Ritalin,

6. sign up with the armed forces, etc.

Your child will be a ‘ward of the state’ and the state will have prior say in what IT thinks is best for your child – you will not have jurisdiction over him.

The birth certificate created a FICTION (the name of the baby in upper case letters). The state/ province sells the birth certificate to the Commerce Department of the corporations of USA/CA, which in turn places a bond on the birth certificate thereby making it a negotiable instrument, and placing the fiction, called a STRAWMAN, into the warehouse of the corporations of USA/CA.

Representation for the created fiction was given to the BAR (British Accredited Registry/Regency), owned and operated by the Crown, for the purpose of contracting the fiction (which most of us think is ourselves) into a third party action.

Do not underestimate the power behind this trick. It is to con us into contracting with the feds so that they can ‘legally’ confiscate our property. All these contracts have only our signatures on them because corporate fictions cannot contract (only natural beings have the right to contract – and the right not to contract).

Because there is no full disclosure – we are never told that we have just signed away what we believe to be our property – these contracts are fraudulent, and hence, we are still the lawful owner and the profit earned by the feds from selling securities (our property) belongs to us and must go into a fund for our benefit, otherwise it would be fraud. Not wanting to be charged with fraud, the feds had to create a remedy for us… and hope we wouldn’t discover it.

For decades, through its ‘public’ school system, the government has managed to deceive us about some very important facts. All facets of the media (print, radio, television) have an ever-increasing influence in our lives and are controlled by government and its agencies, via the issuance of licences. We have slowly and systematically been led to believe that any form of our names represents us, which is not so.”

Read more at: https://spiritualeconomicsnow.info/

Comment: This modern day slavery has since spread it’s tentacles to the entire world; this is what we are in the process of unbinding for South Africa while restoring the Republic and laying the foundations for our vision of an alternative society with the United People’s Front committees, coalitions, alliances and the free and independent kingdoms, republics and states within the New South African Republic – the people shall govern;

Situation Update, March 29, 2022 – Putin gives FRIDAY deadline for DUMPING the dollar

https://www.brighteon.com/d1806d17-f98d-451c-ab25-3269d38d0c49

channel image

Health Ranger Report
Published Yesterday |

Regardless of what you think about Putin’s morals or ethics, he is a genius strategist whose intellect is vastly superior to Joe Biden’s. Putin latest move threatens the very future of the dollar (fiat) currency and may spell the beginning of the end for the dollar.

Read more at https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-03-29-putin-sets-deadline-for-dropping-the-dollar-requiring-rubles-for-energy.html

International and Public Declaration of Possession by Right

Thursday, March 24, 2022

By Anna Von Reitz

As of Midnight GMT on 24 March 2022 all rights, interests, assets, and physical titles, claims, and possessions of the United States, Incorporated, and its franchises and derivatives, and all similar rights, interests, assets, and physical titles, claims, and possessions of the United States of America, Incorporated, and its franchises and derivatives, both insolvent incorporated foreign Debtors/DEBTORS, revert to the ownership and possession of The United States, our National Government, and The United States of America, our unincorporated Federation of States, which are the Priority Creditors of these corporations in their respective jurisdictions.

As of this date and time, these incorporated entities have ceased to exist, and only the Principals remain. Please understand that our respective American Governments are the Priority Creditors of all British Territorial and Municipal United States persons, including incorporated entities of all kinds.

These corporations, their franchises, successors, derivatives and assigns are hereby Nationalized under the Due Course of International Law and by Operation of Law that returns all Delegated Powers to the Delegators upon contractual Failure to Perform. This is the direct result of Gross Breach of Trust and violation of Commercial Service Contract, fiscal incompetence, and numerous acts of crime against the American People and States who are owed good faith and service from these organizations and the other Principals who are actually and contractually responsible for them. Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals; Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents.

This is also your International Notice that Federal Reserve Notes are a domestic currency of the British Territorial United States that have been misused and misrepresented as international currency and which have been passed off as currency of our country, The United States. These notes are not the Reserve Currency, which remains defined as the American Silver Dollar. Federal Reserve Notes have been funded via imposition of an undisclosed scheme to extract the value of labor from living people, resulting in both enslavement and involuntary peonage. Federal Reserve Notes cannot serve as legal tender as they are value-based upon criminal activities.

All production of Federal Reserve Notes must cease as of Midnight GMT 24 March 2022; properly serialized Federal Reserve Notes will be repatriated and exchanged for new American Silver Certificates for domestic use on a 1 to 1 basis, and with a new international currency species backed by refined petroleum, and with gold-backed Unidollars which will serve as an additional Reserve Currency benefiting all countries worldwide. Lawful coinage will also be reissued under the authority of our unincorporated Federation of States doing business since 1776 as The United States of America.

It is of paramount importance that everyone realize that there are two or more entities operating as “the” United States and as “the” United States of America and these are not our country nor are they our government. They are foreign services contractors that are supposed to be working in accord with and in obedience to their constitutional obligations, but for some years now, they have operated in fraud, added unauthorized layers of bureaucracy, promoted fraud against their employers, and extended “emergency powers” to themselves that do not exist.

These persons are criminals and are engaged in known criminal activities while acting under color of law and pretending to either be our government or to be associated with our government so as to steal our identities and access our credit and illegally, unlawfully, and immorally use our assets as collateral for their debts. These Debtors/DEBTORS have then contrived to confuse our people with their citizenry, so as to bring false claims of indebtedness against our Good Names and estates.

Nobody born on American soil should be presumed to be any form of United States Citizen, U.S. Citizen, citizen of the United States, or Municipal United States PERSON. All United States District Attorneys are to be on-call and required to produce admissible and verifiable evidence in all District Court cases necessary to ascertain the actual political status of Defendants/DEFENDANTS and are also required to prove voluntary and knowing acceptance of Federal citizenship obligations on the part of Defendants in order to establish jurisdiction for any District Court or enfranchised State-of-State Superior Court.

All foreign countries and nations are asked to assist us in disciplining and/or apprehending criminals who are misrepresenting themselves as Americans and/or mischaracterizing Americans as some form of United States citizenry.

All foreign countries and nations are asked to observe that Federal Reserve Notes are a domestic British Territorial currency that have to be repatriated and verified through the issuing Treasury and must have serial numbers that attach to verified accounts in order for repatriation and full face value exchange for international hard currency issued by the American Government to occur. In the case of counterfeit bills a 20% Finder Fee will be paid.

These arrangements are being made in the Public Interest of this country and all other countries that have been accepting Federal Reserve Notes without knowing their actual provenance, their status as a foreign domestic currency of the British Territorial United States, and without knowing the illegal basis of their valuation.

We are holding these persons and their legal tender in receivership.

Declared by: James Clinton Belcher, Head of State for The United States of America and Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary for The United States of America as of this 23rd day of March in the year of 2022, and so said, so signed, and so sealed.

Source: http://www.paulstramer.net/2022/03/international-and-public-declaration-of.html

End the Fed and Get More Doritos

By Ron Paul, MD

Ron Paul Institute

March 22, 2022

…Congress should also restore a sound monetary policy by auditing, then ending, the Fed, as well as by repealing both legal tender laws and capital gains taxes on precious metals and cryptocurrencies. Ending the era of the welfare-warfare state and fiat currency can lead to a transition to a new era of liberty, peace, prosperity — and full bags of Doritos.

Read more at: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/03/ron-paul/end-the-fed-and-get-more-doritos/

SAJurA Comment: when the UPF Financial Oversight Committee is in place and all Oversight Committees are ready then we too will be auditing the South African Reserve Bank and ending our Fed and rolling out an asset-backed lawful money, not legal tender, not fiat currency, not debt-based currency; no more hypothecation of debt, no more fractional reserve but full reserve and no more creating money “out of thin air”;

“The issue which has swept down the centuries and will have to be fought sooner or later is the people versus the bank.” – Lord Acton