Russian President Vladimir Putin claimed that the United States dollar is done and that it is going to lose its place of dominance on the global scale. Putin added that Moscow would cooperate with its allies to build a secure system of international settlements that are not dependent on the dollar or the euro.
Out of all the losers of the “war” in Ukraine, the U.S. seems to be coming out on top. Massive and expensive weapons packages don’t seem to be helping and for the U.S. not being involved directly in the conflict, it sure seems to be losing at least the proxy war.
If the members of the Bar Association are literally just actors and the courtroom is just a stage, then what is really going on? Racketeering under color of law.
As I told you….and as others are now reporting —see what is motivating this crime spree and remember and it has been this way, more or less, for a hundred and sixty years:
“The Judge, Prosecutor and defense attorney all share in 10-20 basis points each on the securities created on court cases (the CRIS system)- so they each have a financial interest in your guilt- THEY ARE RAILROADING.”
[And not on the tracks. They are charging over a million dollars for each felony charge and now up to fifty thousand for every misdemeanor, so it’s not a small conflict of interest for them. It’s huge. A Judge gets $10,000.00 and the Prosecutor and Defense Attorneys get $5,000.00 each off of every misdemeanor, $200,000.00 per felony for the Judge and $100,000.00 each to the Prosecutor and Defense Attorney per felony.]
“Now, more info has come to light that the sheriff is ALSO paid a percentage on every guilty verdict that comes out of the prosecutor’s office.
Our ENTIRE justice system is human trafficking FOR PROFIT under corporate veils….God help us.”
This is how and why they have a 96% plus conviction rate.
This is how and why our people and our country have been railroaded and coerced and falsely convicted under color of law for six generations.
And this is how it is all coming down straight onto the shoulders of the military and the military district personnel in charge of this whole horrorshow.
In all the Territorial States-of-States the seized property has to be purchased (under Constitutional provisions) at fair market value—- that is, all confiscated property has to be purchased at fair market value.
But who do they pay for the confiscated property? The victims never see a dime. No, the payment goes to the Presumed Trustees — the State Trust operators or the U.S. Trustees.
So they steal your property and labor and put it in a trust named after you. You go hungry to bed and often to prison on the False Presumption that you are a “rebel” and “enemy” — a presumption that they set up with malice aforethought.
And they reap the benefit and put it in a Slush-Investment Fund that they control, and they say it’s all for your benefit, but you are never told a thing and never see a dime.
For those of you who need to form a better, more accurate picture of exactly how this whole racket has been working ever since the Civil War — watch the Tom Cruise movie “American Made” — based on a true story, and not that far from the truth.
These same bribe and payola schemes were used to seduce the Union Generals and politicians after the Civil War, who all became wealthy men, along with all their “district” level appointees and hangers-on who made up the political parties and got that substitution scheme going.
They stashed their ill-gotten gains in gold and silver and by 1913 had hatched a plan to vastly increase the value of their precious metals holdings.
They would launch a private military-controlled bank scrip called the Federal Reserve Note and force everyone to accept it as “legal tender”. The Federal Reserve (promissory note) was born.
The plot was simple enough. They would issue the fiat “money” and let nature take its course, letting the currency devalue as all fiat money does, until there would be a fiat currency collapse at a time estimated to be a hundred years in the future.
Meantime, by a process of seigniorage recoupment and inflation, the banks would become wildly wealthy, gradually eating away the original 1:1 parity with the United States Silver Dollar until nothing remained to be extracted and siphoned off.
Thanks to crazy last minute “spending” by the Biden Administration, which should not be allowed access to our credit at all, the last time we checked, over $80,000.00 fiat Federal Reserve “Dollars” were pegged against each United States Silver Dollar.
Starting out at a 1:1 exchange rate in 1934, this means that the fiat Federal Reserve Notes are now worth 1/80,000th of an actual Silver Dollar and that is the actual toll resulting from repeated cyclical episodes of inflation, bankruptcy, wild spending, all aided and abetted by counterfeiting on a vast scale, all used to keep the payola and bribery scams coming.
Sheerly by chutzpah and trading on the good name and reputation of their American Employers, the fiat money they issued lasted twenty-three years longer than anticipated.
And now, it’s about to collapse. It took trillions of dollars-worth of international counterfeiting by the Obama Administration, and huge payoffs to all the corporations and institutions involved in the pandemic, but together with the collapse of the fraudulent mortgage system and other illegal acts of private asset securitization, it’s ripe.
Nobody needs to pretend that they are surprised.
The Perps anticipate that their investments in gold and silver will increase at least 10,000 times what their grandfathers paid for the metals.
Unfortunately, just like they lied about everything else, they lied about the worldwide availability and amount of gold and silver already mined and purified. As late as 2011, Lord Sassoon was declaring that “only 1500 tonnes of gold had been mined in the history of the world”.
Either the members of Parliament were kept as ignorant as everyone else, or such statements must be read as private jokes.
Their plan to wildly profit from the perceived scarcity and “value gain” of precious metals resulting from the fiat money collapse— and their plan to sell the metal back to the grandsons of the men they stole it from in the first place – has back-fired.
In a twist of fate worthy of Divine Providence, there is too much gold, and not enough silver. They can collapse the gold and silver market just as they have collapsed the fiat money system, but the problem is that they cannot collapse both “value standards” at once.
This severely limits their ability to continue on with payola schemes and counterfeiting operations and more substitution schemes aimed at our Federal Republic.
Both Federal Subcontractors operating as foreign commercial corporations in the business of providing governmental services have recently undergone bankruptcy and have been operated in liquidation and receivership (respectively) by the United States Trustees, a shadowy, unelected, and unauthorized part of the equally unauthorized Department of Justice.
As you recently saw in the Article naming the members of the so-called “National Security Council” these political appointees and hired Agency Personnel are people you have never heard of, who never ran for any public office, and who operate unaccountably behind a phalanx of “National Security Interests” and corporate goon squads.
And just as the National Security Council has nothing to do with our National Security, the Department of Justice has nothing to do with Justice, and the United States Trustees should not exist, because of all the same conflicts of interest that plague the rest of the so-called “Justice System” in this country.
To fix this entire problem requires reorganization of the military services, control of their paymaster, SERCO, INC., shutting down over 500 unauthorized Agency Subcontractors, de-privatizing and de-politicizing organizations like the Federal Bureau of Investigations and FEMA — and completely revamping and redefining the monetary system worldwide.
From our lips to God’s ears, this is what has to be done to restore sane governance and prevent the spectre of perpetual war becoming a reality.
See this article and over 4000 others on Anna’s website here: www.annavonreitz.com
Comment: Note that this CRISPR fraud scheme is happening in every country who’s courts are BAR members; and, even by their rules it is a well-established principle of law that:
He who sells justice for money is guilty of barratry (piracy).
And, if you do not believe us then try find an original court order in your local court’s files…
Once in a great while, I run across reports that cover so much information that is difficult and piecemeal to assemble otherwise, that I find myself thinking, “God bless you for doing this! God bless you for doing this!”
Getting information — correct, up to date information — about the shareholders — especially shareholders in the central banks, is like finding and pulling hen’s teeth, so the accomplishment here should be regarded as something a miracle, especially as it reveals lots of other juicy relationships that not only reveal the banking cartel associations, but the commercial and commodity rigging relationships, too.
Please read, read, read and make copies for future generations.
The Federal Reserve Cartel – Eight Families own the USA, BIS, IMF, World Bank
Herland Report: Who owns the Federal Reserve? Read the story on the role of BIS, the World Bank and IMF in controlling world assets: They are the Goldman Sachs, Rockefellers, Lehmans and Kuhn Loebs of New York; the Rothschilds of Paris and London; the Warburgs of Hamburg; the Lazards of Paris; and the Israel Moses Seifs of Rome.
Many of the bank’s stockholders reside in Europe.
The US government had a historical distrust of BIS, lobbying unsuccessfully for its demise at the 1944 post-WWII Bretton Woods Conference.
Instead the Eight Families’ power was exacerbated, with the Bretton Woods creation of the IMF and the World Bank.
Bretton Woods became a boon to the Eight Families. The IMF and World Bank were central to this “new world order”, writes Dean Henderson at The Herland Report and Free21.
The Four Horsemen of Banking (Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup and Wells Fargo) own the Four Horsemen of Oil (Exxon Mobil, Royal Dutch/Shell, BP and Chevron Texaco); in tandem with Deutsche Bank, BNP, Barclays and other European old money behemoths.
Companies under Rockefeller control include Exxon Mobil, Chevron Texaco, BP Amoco, Marathon Oil, Freeport McMoran, Quaker Oats, ASARCO, United, Delta, Northwest, ITT, International Harvester, Xerox, Boeing, Westinghouse, Hewlett-Packard, Honeywell, International Paper, Pfizer, Motorola, Monsanto, Union Carbide and General Foods.
The Federal Reserve Cartel: Who owns the Federal Reserve? Their monopoly over the global economy does not end at the edge of the oil patch.According to company 10K filings to the SEC, the Four Horsemen of Banking are among the top ten stock holders of virtually every Fortune 500 corporation.
So who owns the Federal Reserve and are the stockholders in these money center banks? This information is guarded much more closely.
My queries to bank regulatory agencies regarding stock ownership in the top 25 US bank holding companies were given Freedom of Information Act status, before being denied on “national security” grounds.
This is rather ironic, since many of the bank’s stockholders reside in Europe. One important repository for the wealth of the global oligarchy that owns these bank holding companies is US Trust Corporation – founded in 1853 and now owned by Bank of America. A recent US Trust Corporate Director and Honorary Trustee was Walter Rothschild.
Other directors included Daniel Davison of JP Morgan Chase, Richard Tucker of Exxon Mobil, Daniel Roberts of Citigroup and Marshall Schwartz of Morgan Stanley. J. W. McCallister, an oil industry insider with House of Saud connections, wrote in The Grim Reaper that information he acquired from Saudi bankers cited 80% ownership of the New York Federal Reserve Bank– by far the most powerful Fed branch- by just eight families, four of which reside in the US.
The Federal Reserve Cartel: Who owns the Federal Reserve? They are the Goldman Sachs, Rockefellers, Lehmans and Kuhn Loebs of New York; the Rothschilds of Paris and London; the Warburgs of Hamburg; the Lazards of Paris; and the Israel Moses Seifs of Rome.
CPA Thomas D. Schauf corroborates McCallister’s claims, adding that ten banks control all twelve Federal Reserve Bank branches.
He names N.M. Rothschild of London, Rothschild Bank of Berlin, Warburg Bank of Hamburg, Warburg Bank of Amsterdam, Lehman Brothers of New York, Lazard Brothers of Paris, Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York, Israel Moses Seif Bank of Italy, Goldman Sachs of New York and JP Morgan Chase Bank of New York.
Schauf lists William Rockefeller, Paul Warburg, Jacob Schiff and James Stillman as individuals who own large shares of the Fed. The Schiffs are insiders at Kuhn Loeb.
The Stillmans are Citigroup insiders, who married into the Rockefeller clan at the turn of the century. Eustace Mullins came to the same conclusions in his book The Secrets of the Federal Reserve, in which he displays charts connecting the Fed and its member banks to the families of Rothschild, Warburg, Rockefeller and the others.
Their corporate media arm is quick to discredit any information exposing this private central banking cartel as “conspiracy theory”. Yet the facts remain.
The House of Morgan story: The Federal Reserve Bank was born in 1913, the same year US banking scion J. Pierpont Morgan died and the Rockefeller Foundation was formed. The House of Morgan presided over American finance from the corner of Wall Street and Broad, acting as quasi-US central bank since 1838, when George Peabody founded it in London.
The Federal Reserve Cartel: Who owns the Federal Reserve? Peabody was a business associate of the Rothschilds. In 1952 Fed researcher Eustace Mullins put forth the supposition that the Morgans were nothing more than Rothschild agents.
Mullins wrote that the Rothschilds, “…preferred to operate anonymously in the US behind the facade of J.P. Morgan & Company”. Author Gabriel Kolko stated, “Morgan’s activities in 1895-1896 in selling US gold bonds in Europe were based on an alliance with the House of Rothschild.”
The Morgan financial octopus wrapped its tentacles quickly around the globe. Morgan Grenfell operated in London. Morgan et Co ruled Paris. The Rothschild’s Lambert cousins set up Drexel & Company in Philadelphia.
The Federal Reserve Cartel: Who owns the Federal Reserve? The House of Morgan catered to the Astors, DuPonts, Guggenheims, Vanderbilts and Rockefellers. It financed the launch of AT&T, General Motors, General Electric and DuPont. Like the London-based Rothschild and Barings banks, Morgan became part of the power structure in many countries.
By 1890 the House of Morgan was lending to Egypt’s central bank, financing Russian railroads, floating Brazilian provincial government bonds and funding Argentine public works projects. A recession in 1893 enhanced Morgan’s power.
That year Morgan saved the US government from a bank panic, forming a syndicate to prop up government reserves with a shipment of $62 million worth of Rothschild gold. Morgan was the driving force behind Western expansion in the US, financing and controlling West-bound railroads through voting trusts.
In 1879 Cornelius Vanderbilt’s Morgan-financed New York Central Railroad gave preferential shipping rates to John D. Rockefeller’s budding Standard Oil monopoly, cementing the Rockefeller/Morgan relationship. The House of Morgan now fell under Rothschild and Rockefeller family control.
The Federal Reserve Cartel: Who owns the Federal Reserve? A New York Herald headline read, “Railroad Kings Form Gigantic Trust”. J. Pierpont Morgan, who once stated, “Competition is a sin”, now opined gleefully, “Think of it.
All competing railroad traffic west of St. Louis placed in the control of about thirty men.” Morgan and Edward Harriman’s banker Kuhn Loeb held a monopoly over the railroads, while banking dynasties Lehman, Goldman Sachs and Lazard joined the Rockefellers in controlling the US industrial base.
The Federal Reserve Cartel: Who owns the Federal Reserve? So, who owns the Federal Reserve? In 1903 Banker’s Trust was set up by the Eight Families. Benjamin Strong of Banker’s Trust was the first Governor of the New York Federal Reserve Bank.
The 1913 creation of the Fed fused the power of the Eight Families to the military and diplomatic might of the US government.
If their overseas loans went unpaid, the oligarchs could now deploy US Marines to collect the debts. Morgan, Chase and Citibank formed an international lending syndicate.
The House of Morgan was cozy with the British House of Windsor and the Italian House of Savoy. The Kuhn Loebs, Warburgs, Lehmans, Lazards, Israel Moses Seifs and Goldman Sachs also had close ties to European royalty.
By 1895 Morgan controlled the flow of gold in and out of the US. The first American wave of mergers was in its infancy and was being promoted by the bankers. In 1897 there were sixty-nine industrial mergers. By 1899 there were twelve-hundred.
In 1904 John Moody – founder of Moody’s Investor Services – said it was impossible to talk of Rockefeller and Morgan interests as separate. Public distrust of the combine spread.
Many considered them traitors working for European old money. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil, Andrew Carnegie’s US Steel and Edward Harriman’s railroads were all financed by banker Jacob Schiff at Kuhn Loeb, who worked closely with the European Rothschilds.
Several Western states banned the bankers. Populist preacher William Jennings Bryan was thrice the Democratic nominee for President from 1896 -1908. The central theme of his anti-imperialist campaign was that America was falling into a trap of “financial servitude to British capital”.
Teddy Roosevelt defeated Bryan in 1908, but was forced by this spreading populist wildfire to enact the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. He then went after the Standard Oil Trust. In 1912 the Pujo hearings were held, addressing concentration of power on Wall Street.
That same year Mrs. Edward Harriman sold her substantial shares in New York’s Guaranty Trust Bank to J.P. Morgan, creating Morgan Guaranty Trust.
Judge Louis Brandeis convinced President Woodrow Wilson to call for an end to interlocking board directorates. In 1914 the Clayton Anti-Trust Act was passed. Jack Morgan – J. Pierpont’s son and successor – responded by calling on Morgan clients Remington and Winchester to increase arms production.
He argued that the US needed to enter WWI. Goaded by the Carnegie Foundation and other oligarchy fronts, Wilson accommodated. As Charles Tansill wrote in America Goes to War, “Even before the clash of arms, the French firm of Rothschild Freres cabled to Morgan & Company in New York suggesting the flotation of a loan of $100 million, a substantial part of which was to be left in the US to pay for French purchases of American goods.”
The House of Morgan financed half the US war effort, while receiving commissions for lining up contractors like GE, Du Pont, US Steel, Kennecott and ASARCO. All were Morgan clients.
Morgan also financed the British Boer War in South Africa and the Franco-Prussian War. The 1919 Paris Peace Conference was presided over by Morgan, which led both German and Allied reconstruction efforts. In the 1930’s populism resurfaced in America after Goldman Sachs, Lehman Bank and others profited from the Crash of 1929.
The Federal Reserve Cartel: Who owns the Federal Reserve? House Banking Committee Chairman Louis McFadden (D-NY) said of the Great Depression, “It was no accident. It was a carefully contrived occurrence…The international bankers sought to bring about a condition of despair here so they might emerge as rulers of us all”.
Sen. Gerald Nye (D-ND) chaired a munitions investigation in 1936. Nye concluded that the House of Morgan had plunged the US into WWI to protect loans and create a booming arms industry.
Nye later produced a document titled The Next War, which cynically referred to “the old goddess of democracy trick”, through which Japan could be used to lure the US into WWII.
In 1937 Interior Secretary Harold Ickes warned of the influence of “America’s 60 Families”. Historian Ferdinand Lundberg later penned a book of the exact same title. Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas decried, “Morgan influence…the most pernicious one in industry and finance today.” Jack Morgan responded by nudging the US towards WWII.
Morgan had close relations with the Iwasaki and Dan families – Japan’s two wealthiest clans – who have owned Mitsubishi and Mitsui, respectively, since the companies emerged from 17th Century shogunates.
When Japan invaded Manchuria, slaughtering Chinese peasants at Nanking, Morgan downplayed the incident. Morgan also had close relations with Italian fascist Benito Mussolini, while German Nazi Dr. Hjalmer Schacht was a Morgan Bank liaison during WWII.
After the war Morgan representatives met with Schacht at the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) in Basel, Switzerland. The House of Rockefeller BIS is the most powerful bank in the world, a global central bank for the Eight Families who control the private central banks of almost all Western and developing nations.
The first President of BIS was Rockefeller banker Gates McGarrah- an official at Chase Manhattan and the Federal Reserve.
McGarrah was the grandfather of former CIA director Richard Helms. The Rockefellers- like the Morgans- had close ties to London. David Icke writes in Children of the Matrix, that the Rockefellers and Morgans were just “gofers” for the European Rothschilds.
The Federal Reserve Cartel: Who owns the Federal Reserve? BIS is owned by the Federal Reserve, Bank of England, Bank of Italy, Bank of Canada, Swiss National Bank, Nederlandsche Bank, Bundesbank and Bank of France.
Historian Carroll Quigley wrote in his epic book Tragedy and Hope that BIS was part of a plan, “to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole…to be controlled in a feudalistic fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert by secret agreements.”
The US government had a historical distrust of BIS, lobbying unsuccessfully for its demise at the 1944 post-WWII Bretton Woods Conference.
Instead the Eight Families’ power was exacerbated, with the Bretton Woods creation of the IMF and the World Bank.
The US Federal Reserve only took shares in BIS in September 1994. BIS holds at least 10% of monetary reserves for at least 80 of the world’s central banks, the IMF and other multilateral institutions.
It serves as financial agent for international agreements, collects information on the global economy and serves as lender of last resort to prevent global financial collapse. BIS promotes an agenda of monopoly capitalism. It gave a bridge loan to Hungary in the 1990’s to ensure privatization of that country’s economy.
It served as conduit for Eight Families funding of Adolf Hitler- led by the Warburg’s J. Henry Schroeder and Mendelsohn Bank of Amsterdam. Many researchers assert that BIS is at the nadir of global drug money laundering.
It is no coincidence that BIS is headquartered in Switzerland, favorite hiding place for the wealth of the global aristocracy and headquarters for the P-2 Italian Freemason’s Alpina Lodge and Nazi International.
Other institutions which the Eight Families control include the World Economic Forum, the International Monetary Conference and the World Trade Organization.
Bretton Woods was a boon to the Eight Families. The IMF and World Bank were central to this “new world order”. In 1944 the first World Bank bonds were floated by Morgan Stanley and First Boston.
The French Lazard family became more involved in House of Morgan interests. Lazard Freres- France’s biggest investment bank- is owned by the Lazard and David-Weill families- old Genoese banking scions represented by Michelle Davive.
The Federal Reserve Cartel: Who owns the Federal Reserve? A recent Chairman and CEO of Citigroup was Sanford Weill. In 1968 Morgan Guaranty launched Euro-Clear, a Brussels-based bank clearing system for Eurodollar securities. It was the first such automated endeavor. Some took to calling Euro-Clear “The Beast”.
Brussels serves as headquarters for the new European Central Bank and for NATO. In 1973 Morgan officials met secretly in Bermuda to illegally resurrect the old House of Morgan, twenty years before Glass Steagal Act was repealed.
Morgan and the Rockefellers provided the financial backing for Merrill Lynch, boosting it into the Big 5 of US investment banking. Merrill is now part of Bank of America.
John D. Rockefeller used his oil wealth to acquire Equitable Trust, which had gobbled up several large banks and corporations by the 1920’s.
The Great Depression helped consolidate Rockefeller’s power.
His Chase Bank merged with Kuhn Loeb’s Manhattan Bank to form Chase Manhattan, cementing a long-time family relationship.
The Kuhn-Loeb’s had financed – along with Rothschilds – Rockefeller’s quest to become king of the oil patch. National City Bank of Cleveland provided John D. with the money needed to embark upon his monopolization of the US oil industry.
The bank was identified in Congressional hearings as being one of three Rothschild-owned banks in the US during the 1870’s, when Rockefeller first incorporated as Standard Oil of Ohio.
One Rockefeller Standard Oil partner was Edward Harkness, whose family came to control Chemical Bank.
Another was James Stillman, whose family controlled Manufacturers Hanover Trust. Both banks have merged under the JP Morgan Chase umbrella.
Two of James Stillman’s daughters married two of William Rockefeller’s sons. The two families control a big chunk of Citigroup as well.
In the insurance business, the Rockefellers control Metropolitan Life, Equitable Life, Prudential and New York Life. Rockefeller banks control 25% of all assets of the 50 largest US commercial banks and 30% of all assets of the 50 largest insurance companies.
Insurance companies- the first in the US was launched by Freemasons through their Woodman’s of America- play a key role in the Bermuda drug money shuffle.
Companies under Rockefeller control include Exxon Mobil, Chevron Texaco, BP Amoco, Marathon Oil, Freeport McMoran, Quaker Oats, ASARCO, United, Delta, Northwest, ITT, International Harvester, Xerox, Boeing, Westinghouse, Hewlett-Packard, Honeywell, International Paper, Pfizer, Motorola, Monsanto, Union Carbide and General Foods.
The Rockefeller Foundation has close financial ties to both Ford and Carnegie Foundations. Other family philanthropic endeavors include Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, General Education Board, Rockefeller University and the University of Chicago – which churns out a steady stream of far right economists as apologists for international capital, including Milton Friedman.
The Federal Reserve Cartel: Who owns the Federal Reserve? The family owns 30 Rockefeller Plaza, where the national Christmas tree is lighted every year, and Rockefeller Center.
David Rockefeller was instrumental in the construction of the World Trade Center towers.
The main Rockefeller family home is a hulking complex in upstate New York known as Pocantico Hills. They also own a 32-room 5th Avenue duplex in Manhattan, a mansion in Washington, DC, Monte Sacro Ranch in Venezuela, coffee plantations in Ecuador, several farms in Brazil, an estate at Seal Harbor, Maine and resorts in the Caribbean, Hawaii and Puerto Rico.
The Dulles and Rockefeller families are cousins. Allen Dulles created the CIA, assisted the Nazis, covered up the Kennedy hit from his Warren Commission perch and struck a deal with the Muslim Brotherhood.
Brother John Foster Dulles presided over the phony Goldman Sachs trusts before the 1929 stock market crash and helped his brother overthrow governments in Iran and Guatemala. Both were Skull & Bones, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) insiders and 33rd Degree Masons.
The Rockefellers were instrumental in forming the depopulation-oriented Club of Rome at their family estate in Bellagio, Italy. Their Pocantico Hills estate gave birth to the Trilateral Commission. The family is a major funder of the eugenics movement which spawned Hitler, human cloning and the current DNA obsession in US scientific circles.
John Rockefeller Jr. headed the Population Council until his death. His namesake son is a Senator from West Virginia. Brother Winthrop Rockefeller was Lieutenant Governor of Arkansas and remains the most powerful man in that state.
In an October 1975 interview with Playboy magazine, Vice-President Nelson Rockefeller- who was also Governor of New York- articulated his family’s patronizing worldview, “I am a great believer in planning- economic, social, political, military, total world planning.”
But of all the Rockefeller brothers, it is Trilateral Commission (TC) founder and Chase Manhattan Chairman David who has spearheaded the family’s agenda on a global scale.
He defended the Shah of Iran, the South African apartheid regime and the Chilean Pinochet junta. He was the biggest financier of the CFR, the TC and (during the Vietnam War) the Committee for an Effective and Durable Peace in Asia- a contract bonanza for those who made their living off the conflict.
Nixon asked him to be Secretary of Treasury, but Rockefeller declined the job, knowing his power was much greater at the helm of the Chase.
Author Gary Allen writes in The Rockefeller File that in 1973, “David Rockefeller met with twenty-seven heads of state, including the rulers of Russia and Red China.” Following the 1975 Nugan Hand Bank/CIA coup against Australian Prime Minister Gough Whitlam, his British Crown-appointed successor Malcolm Fraser sped to the US, where he met with President Gerald Ford after conferring with David Rockefeller.
We send our greetings and heartfelt sympathy for the sacrifices of the Russian people. We, too, have been the victims of the same commercial mercenary forces responsible for the proliferation of the bioweapons laboratories in Ukraine under the puppet Zelensky “government”, but for a far longer period of time.
Our investigations confirm the following facts:
(1) All the operating parties are commercial corporations of one kind or another, not lawful national governments at all. As a result, the problem is not political. It is criminal.
(2) These offending corporations which include WHO, NATO, AUSTRALIA, DOD, CDC, NIH, UN CORP, Pfizer, Astrazeneca, Moderna, etc., etc., are all subject to involuntary dissolution.
(3) All these corporations have their genesis in the Jurisdiction of the Air which is administered under Ecclesiastical Law.
(4) Under Ecclesiastical Law, the Pope and the Church of Rome are specifically and explicitly responsible for dissolving any corporation caught engaging in unlawful activities. (This is a higher standard for them, than merely “illegal” activities.)
(5) This is because the Church of Rome and the Pope have created all forms of corporations — C-Corps, S-Corps, Cooperatives, Foundations, LLC’s, Statutory Trusts, etc. — and by Maxim of Law, they are responsible for what they create.
(6) Our lawful government operating in international jurisdiction as The United States of America (Unincorporated) has already brought a demand before the Vatican Chancery authorities and the Office of the Pope for the dissolution of these corporations and the punishment of their officers.
(7) We are asking for the dissolution of the corporations, the confiscation of their assets for the benefit of the victims, the removal of the corporate veil, the denial of bankruptcy protection, the seizure of the personal fortunes of the officers involved, their prosecution for actual crimes, and additionally, the removal of their privilege to create or operate any corporation ever again.
(8) This effort can be bulwarked and given wings by the Russian Patriarch and other religious leaders and organizations worldwide who have a voice in their Ecumenical capacities to bring political and diplomatic force to bear on the Pope and the Vatican Chancery Court. The religious institutions of each country can also be instrumental in bringing legal action under the dissolution laws of each country and state.
(9) Please do not attack our country under the False Presumption that we are responsible for the Zelensky government or the foreign corporations that have committed these heinous and mindless acts of terror. You will find that these entities are not “American” — they are all Municipal or British Crown Corporations, who have employed individual Americans, but are not American in origin or under American direction.
(10) Also note that the same circumstance applies to these foreign corporations sending tanks to Ukraine and other acts of war — they are all acting in a private capacity as commercial corporations. All so-called “American troops” are not acting as American military units. They are all acting as mercenaries employed by the offending foreign commercial corporations that have been masquerading as our government.
(11) If we can all act together to dissolve these corporations and punish the criminal wrong-doers responsible for misdirecting them, there will be no further need for war — and no more lies and no more enmity.
(12) Please remember that the lawful American Government and the lawful Russian Government have been Allies since 1858, with the establishment of the American-Russian Alliance. We remember it thankfully and hope that our good faith and honor can still be respected in spite of the way that these international criminals have insinuated themselves and pretended to “represent” our government.
Thank you, and please feel free to contact us for additional information and initiatives being used to bring these criminals to justice.
The firm, BlackRock Inc., the world’s largest asset manager, invests a staggering $9 trillion in client funds worldwide, a sum more than double the annual GDP of the Federal Republic of Germany.
This colossus sits atop the pyramid of world corporate ownership, including in China most recently. Since 1988 the company has put itself in a position to de facto control the Federal Reserve, most Wall Street mega-banks, including Goldman Sachs, the Davos World Economic Forum Great Reset, the Biden Administration and, if left unchecked, the economic future of our world. BlackRock is the epitome of what Mussolini called Corporatism, where an unelected corporate elite dictates top down to the population.
How the world’s largest “shadow bank” exercises this enormous power over the world ought to concern us. BlackRock since Larry Fink founded it in 1988 has managed to assemble unique financial software and assets that no other entity has. BlackRock’s Aladdin risk-management system, a software tool that can track and analyze trading, monitors more than $18 trillion in assets for 200 financial firms including the Federal Reserve and European central banks. He who “monitors” also knows, we can imagine. BlackRock has been called a financial “Swiss Army Knife — institutional investor, money manager, private equity firm, and global government partner rolled into one.” Yet mainstream media treats the company as just another Wall Street financial firm.
There is a seamless interface that ties the UN Agenda 2030 with the Davos World Economic Forum Great Reset and the nascent economic policies of the Biden Administration. That interface is BlackRock.
First, the Gubmint steals your credit to bail out banks and insurance corporations.
Second, the banks and insurance companies steal your bank deposits to pay back the Gubmint.
Third, it all comes down to crooks bilking you in your own name. Crooks who are pretending to “represent” you.
Crooks who are impersonating you.
Brace for losing every cent you have deposited in commercial banks and in “equitable” consideration, you will be given shares in the bankrupt bank that stole your deposits.
How’s that for compensation?
You will get more shares based on the size of the deposits you lose. And this has been advertised since 2010.
Did you know you were buying shares in a bankrupt bank?
Did you know your deposits became bank property the moment you walked away with a receipt in your hand?
Did you know you were loaning the bank your home when they offered you a home loan?
All those IRS garnishments were the obligations of the bank? Not yours?
And what about all the investments made in your name? What became of them?
Your “shares” again?
Naught into naught is naught. Naught divided by naught is naught.
Every positive number is greater than every negative number.
Every debt creates an equal credit.
Fraud vitiates everything.
Don’t take any wooden nickels and I would not accept any bank shares, either, because the shareholders become responsible for the debts of the bank.
Ever heard of the Trojan Horse? Gifts that kill are all too common to this day.
Renowned geopolitical and financial cycle expert Charles Nenner says his analysis shows there is big trouble coming for the U.S. dollar. The dollar’s reserve currency status is on its way to being a thing of the past. Nenner explains, “The dollar is still up. We have a target on the dollar of 113 (on the USDX). It’s now around 110, but it’s not going to be surviving as the major currency. People don’t trust what is going on in the United States. . . . We have seen this happen to other countries. We saw this happen to the British.
They are going to go to another major currency. The BRIC countries and China are preparing to have an anti-dollar. I have told you for years that the dollar is not going to crash, but now it is time. In a year or so, they will really be getting into trouble with the dollar. If the dollar goes down, of course, the inflation goes even higher. So, actually, there is no way out anymore.
Every Federal Reserve President has said let’s keep it going. The dollar is going to collapse, but not in my lifetime, and now there is almost nothing left to do anymore. . . . If you forgive the student loans, you will have a big problem. First of all, it’s impossible. They pretend nothing will come out of it, but it will destroy the economy. When they get out of college, students make 4 or 5 times what other people earn, and it is being paid by the simple people. You are going to have more social unrest than you have ever seen.”
Nenner says a big crash is inevitable. Nenner says, “Soon the pensions are going to be in trouble. The buying power is going to be in trouble. This is simply a situation that has been crated for . . . many years. There is simply no way out. We have to crash. We have to get a depression. The whole economy will have to start all over again.”
Nenner predicted in May that a “Third of the global population will be killed in next war cycle.” The only good news is that it has been pushed back a little and will not start at the beginning of 2023. Nenner says, “We are going to continue on this pace for war, and it is going to explode in the second half of 2023.”
Nenner says you have seen the lows in interest rates, and the long-term trend is up. Nenner has been out of the bond market for close to a year.
Nenner has never been more bullish on gold and silver. He says because of the massive money printing, there will be massive inflation. Nenner says, “This happened to the Dutch economy. It happened to the British Empire. That’s how it goes. At the end they always print money, and they don’t deserve it. It’s hard to say, but this usually ends in a war. . . . You have to buy gold and silver. . . . Gold will be up strong up until 2027, but you have to have a strong stomach to take the ups and downs.”
There is much more in the 42 min. interview. Join Greg Hunter of USAWatchdog.com as he goes One-on-One with renowned cycle analyst and financial expert Charles Nenner. (9.6.22)
Comment: The Fed and SARB are joined at the hip; and there are too many cabal elements in South Africa to unplug from the FED and join the alternative systems such as BRICS; there is no “BRICS” only “BRIC” – the other bricks were sold off to third parties long ago; as a result we will tank along with the US because only Pravin and Trevor know how the federal ponzi scheme and bills of exchange fraud works and they do the cabal’s bidding…
The Illuminati who were smart enough to figure out that money was a scam (and they wanted in on it) and smart enough to figure out that conventional religion was another control racket, and also smart enough to realize that governments were just another “concession”— somehow failed to pass the final test.
The Illuminati — the Illuminated Ones — insofar as the institutional fraud games were concerned, just went on to create more of the same themselves. Oh, they called their indoctrination centers by other names, and they set up brotherhoods by other names, too, based on other premises, but it was still the same-old-same-old — baffle ’em with BS and “initiation” rites and compartmentalize knowledge so that nobody knows what the other hand is doing, except the men at the top.
If they all knew what they were doing, they’d stop.
The excuse that the conventional religions and institutions give for their predatory and dishonest behavior is the same excuse given by the Illuminati who are trying to destroy conventional governments and religions: without us, they all say, there would be chaos, there would be no organization to society, anarchy would reign supreme.
In full view of the selfish, ugly, violent, egotistical world they have all created, what’s so bad about the Wild West? Our ancestors survived it.
A long rifle, six gun, pick, and shovel, carried by a faithful mule, got many a pilgrim through the worst of it. As recently as 1911 when the Great Flood hit Black River Falls, Wisconsin, I have proof that people could survive; my Grandmother spent the whole winter in a horse barn with four small children, two horses, and a cat who caught her own suppers.
It wasn’t pretty, and they nearly starved in the spring when their supplies ran out and the roads were still impassable —- but God sent an early crop of dandelions and Grandma made dandelion fritters with the last of the bacon grease and flour. They were all still eating when the rescue party arrived in March.
We can and we did survive without the government, without church services, and without money. In our own lifetimes, the Federal Government has been shut down repeatedly for as long as 120 days at a stretch, and nobody but the government workers noticed.
There is, as FDR, that old devil, noted —- nothing to fear but fear itself. Pack your buckboard with a little common sense and get ready.
Those who have been reading my articles for a long time know that I have repeatedly told everyone that the Plan was to move the base of Deep State Operations to China — the parasites knew it was getting too hot for comfort in “the US” and they needed a new base of operations for their criminal empire.
Beginning with Ronald Reagan’s outreach to China and Nixon’s full blown cooperation, the move began. The Petrodollar which benefited the crude oil producers in the Mideast, and the crude oil refineries in the US, placed the US as the pivot point of the new world economy that Ronnie and Tricky Dick created. China needed oil and oil products — refined oil products.
All the while that the mainstream media was whining endlessly about oil shortages and excusing the skyrocketing prices, they neglected to mention that it was crude oil that was hard to find, because “the US” was producing and shipping out all the refined oil products it could make as fast as it could ship them.
During the same exact years we were suffering oil embargos and paying $5 per gallon at the pump back when $5 still bought something, we were in fact exporting refined oil products to China and Europe at utterly unprecedented rates.
We were among the Top Three oil exporting nations in the world for decades. Who knew?
To hear the mainstream media spin it, you’d think we were poor little old helpless America, horribly oil dependent, hardly able to buy a quart of oil. And don’t throw me in that Briar Patch, yes, Boss, anything but that…. while we’ve been sitting on crude oil resources of our own that would make Midas blush.
Mr. Trump’s “miracle” of oil independence was no miracle. It was just common sense.
Anyway, China was groomed like a prospective child bride dondled on Uncle Ernie’s knee, and the Chinese Communist Party went right along with the CIA sponsored scheme. The CCP sold them the Chinese Central Bank, and then, they used that to buy the Central Bank of the Philippines. Imagine that?
Well, THEY gave the banks a license to create money out of thin air. How long do you think it took them to employ that license to do things like buy out the Central Bank of China?
It’s not a coincidence that Mr. Riyadi “only” had 700 tons of gold on reserve in Indonesia and claimed to have 750,000 tons. That’s a reflection of his prospective gain based on fractional reserve banking and trading platform contracts, plus interest, generated from “blocking” those 700 tons of gold for ten years.
Bless Lord James; he knew something horribly fishy was going on and he brought it forward — he just couldn’t put his finger on it as exactly as I have. And Riyadi wasn’t exactly lying, either, which is why he didn’t wind up in jail. He was only banking on a completely predictable outcome. Anyone with 700 tons of gold they could afford to lay idle for ten years was guaranteed that outcome by Lloyds of London. Riyadi knew it.
How could Lord James not know it? For the same reason that Pope Benedict XVI stared at us wide-eyed and said, “Nobody told me!”
The CIA by various means, “one thing and another”, bought the Central Bank of China and then the Central Bank of the Philippines; when things got “difficult” in the late 1990s and early 2000’s, they used False Flags and the U.S. Military to straighten things out — mainly, access to Iraqi oil, gold, and artifacts.
They also obtained and began trading on our SKRs —- Safekeeping Receipts. These are receipts that verify the existence of gold deposits in various banks around the world. These particular deposits actually belong to The D’avila Family Trust and to The United States of America — our Federation of unincorporated States, but the CIA had a co-depositor in the woodpile.
The Roman Catholic Church apparatus had the gold deposited by Severino Sta. Romano, a defrocked Roman Catholic Friar with a taste for booze and intrigue, but there was another hand in the mix — a CIA Handler named Giovanni Baptista (sometimes Babtista) Richello, and it was through Richello’s part as a Witness to the deposits, that the CIA gained access to the SKR’s.
Just like Mr. Riyadi, they have been trading on our gold deposits and keeping the cream ever since, using the wealth to pay off other governments, fund Black Ops, and provide absolutely amazing retirement programs for themselves —- and it’s all been done “legally” —- if you buy into their legal presumptions, which we don’t.
This past week, I have received word that Interpol and various other police and law enforcement organizations around the world have been sicced on the CIA and its clandestine commandeering of what they call “the Legacy Trust” or “Historic Trust” assets, and also on those bankers who collaborated with this scheme.
All I can say is that it has been seventeen years since the CIA went totally rogue, and it’s about time for a worldwide Come to Jesus meeting. Having foreign interests secretively buying out the Central Banks of entire countries (and using our money to do it, without our permission) undermines all forms of national sovereignty, and all forms of trade agreements, which of course, is what the Illuminati have been pushing since 1772. No wonder they are coming out of the woodwork like carpenter ants on a holiday.
—————————-
See this article and over 3700 others on Anna’s website here: www.annavonreitz.com
May 2013 – SA Real Estate Investor – Money grows on trees
(This post is old but just as valid today until we End the Fed, which is a non-permanent non-banking debt system, and move to an alternative permanent value-backed real money and real banking system.)
The banking and Financial system globally is under scrutiny as scandal after scandal rocks what we had always assumed was a trustworthy industry, solid as rock. But things have changed. There is little doubt that the irresponsible practice of securitization and inter-bank lending brought about the global credit crunch. After setting in motion the subprime crisis that dumped the global economy into the worst recession in living memory, banks were exposed for manipulating the Libor and Euribor interbank interest rates- providing false figures on key interest rates upon which mortgages and loans are priced – affecting millions of families and hundreds of thousands of companies, large and small, across the globe. As one commentator noted: “This dwarfs by orders of magnitude any financials cam in the history of the markets. In addition, the information age has brought to the man in the street the knowledge that “money” is no longer backed by gold reserves, but fabricated through the fractional reserve banking system. Given how pervasive the financial system is – affecting every aspect of our lives – it has become critical that we move out of our comfort zone where ignorance was bliss. We need to become far more proactive and involved, understanding thoroughly how the system works. This is the only way in which we can shift from being victims of a system we have helped to create through ignorance, complacency and greed, to becoming empowered consumers and users of these systems, understanding the rules so we can play the game or step outside the game for our own collective best interests, and the interests of generations to come.
Understanding the rules
We cannot play on an equal footing in the global financial system if we don’t understand the rules. While learning the rules requires time, effort and dedication, it is absolutely necessary if we are to become empowered players, instead of victims. It is not possible to explain the intricacies of the entire global financial system in one article, but there are a few concepts that, once understood, will help us to understand the basic tenets of the system, notably the fractional reserve banking system and securitization.
The fractional reserve system
In previous articles in REIM, we revealed that banks do not actually lend out money they already possess, but rather “create” the money loaned to borrowers, using the “promise to pay” signed by the borrower. In other words, “money” is created through debt. This is called a ‘fractional reserve’ banking system, and it is used by governments, central banks and financial institutions across the globe. On a national scale, central banks print money that has no intrinsic value, based on a “promise to pay” issued by a government. Because this new “money” has no intrinsic value, it derives its value by literally taking value from the money already in circulation, and this is what is called “inflation”. The money already in circulation is worth ever less to give value to new money that is printed. This practice was taken to extreme in Zimbabwe not so long ago, when the government’s practice of simply printing more money at a rate well in excess of economic growth, sent inflation to levels above 1 000%, rendering the money already in circulation worthless. Of course, today, they do not really actually “print” more money, but simply “create” the money through a “deposit entry”, even though no deposit was made by anyone! The same happens when a borrower approaches a bank for a loan. The bank does not actually have the money it “loans” to the borrower. They simply “create” money, through similar electronic “deposit entries” or “book entries”, simply based on a borrower’s “promise to pay”, with no actual deposit being made by anyone, anywhere. This raises a number of issues, including the legal validity of a “loan” and the legality and the morality of charging interest on such a “loan”. It has been contested in a number of court cases that a “loan” agreement cannot exist legally under these circumstances, because the bank did not “lend” something they had prior title, ownership and rights to. The “money” lent to the borrower did not exist before the borrower signed the all-important “promise to pay”, but was “created” based on the borrower’s “promise to pay”. How can a loan agreement exist when nothing was loaned? This, furthermore, raises issues around the charging of interest. How can the bank charge interest on a “loan” that is not legally valid? If the “money” loaned is “created” out of nothing more than a “promise to pay” – which belongs to the borrower – and the bank does not loan its own money to the borrower, why is interest charged by the bank? “A management fee payable to the bank for managing the system seems more appropriate,” comments Robert Vivian, Professor of Finance and Insurance at the School of Economic and Business Sciences at the University of the Witwatersrand.
Securitization
Another hot topic over the last few years is the practice of securitization. Banks securitize loans by bundling them together, using a special purpose vehicle (SPV), and selling them to third party investors, who trade them on the capital markets. For example, in the home loan market, the borrowers’ promissory notes are backed by collateral through the mortgage contraction the property. As such, these become “mortgage-backed securities”. The bank approaches another institution that buys and sells mortgage-backed securities. It “sells” the buyer’s mortgage-backed security to this institution for the full amount – the principal and interest – payable by the buyer over the period of the mortgage loan. This is up to three times the amount of the principal debt. Since the bank is paid in advance, it makes a tidy profit without using or risking its own money. However, legally, once a bank securitizes a loan, it loses all rights to it – i.e. the bank is no longer the owner of the debt. Should the borrowers default on their loans, the debt to the SPV and its investors are covered by insurance policies, called “credit default swaps” in the US and other countries. While the use of this insurance has not been confirmed in South Africa, it stands to reason, according to legal experts, that an SPV trading on a stock exchange would be required to have this insurance in place. The South African Securitization Forum has confirmed that the implication of this is that the bank cannot, for example, repossess
the property if the borrower defaults on repayments, because the bank no longer has any rights to the property that is the collateral for a “loan” which has been securitized and now belongs to another entity. Quite simply, there can be no legal case against the defaulting borrower, because all parties have been settled. The bank was settled when the mortgage-backed security was sold, and the investors were settled through an insurance policy. Several recent court rulings in a number of states in the US have, essentially, declared the practice of securitizing home loans illegal, and as a result numerous banks have stopped foreclosure procedures on home-owners who have defaulted on their mortgage repayments. The implications are staggering: four million people in the US have had their homes repossessed illegally and the banks have been forced to pay out $8.5 billion in settlements.
“How can a loan agreement exist when nothing was loaned? And how can the bank charge interest on a “loan” that is not legally valid? ”
The situation in South Africa
How do these practices in the global financial system impact South Africa? South Africa has one of the most advanced financial systems in the world, which is why we survived the global economic crisis better than most developed countries. But this does not mean there is nothing to be concerned about. The fractional reserve system is used extensively in South Africa.
According to Russell Lamberti, writing on Mises.co.za/blog, the blog of the Mises Institute South Africa (www.mises.co.za): “Since 2000 the SARB [South African Reserve Bank] probably printed about R100 billion out of thin air. This allowed the commercial banks to use about R40 billion to fractionally leverage at about 40:1 and create about R1.6trillion in additional money out of thin air (that’s R1,600,000,000,000).” This means that South Africa has quadrupled its money supply in the last decade and, of course, the value of this new money must be derived from the money in circulation, creating inflation.
He adds that: “Since 2000, the US Fed balance sheet grew 370%. Over the same time the SARB balance sheet increased from R76bn to R440bn, about 480%. In other words, since 2000 the SARB balance sheet has grown 1.3 times more than the Fed balance sheet.” The fractional reserve system is also used by our banks to “create” money based on the borrowers’ “promises to pay”, which raises the issues of the legal validity of the loans and legality and morality of charging interest when “nothing” was loaned, because the money “loaned” did not belong to the bank, but was “created” ex nihilo (out of nothing) based solely the borrower’s “promise to pay”.
The Banks Act states that a bank cannot act as an agent or intermediary for a third party, such as a securitization SPV, without the express written consent of the customer. However, according to the South African Banking Association’s website, local banks securitize loans worth about R30 billion a month. The issue here is that is a bank securitizes a loan, it loses all rights to the asset. Tis means the bank cannot, for example, repossess property put up as collateral on a loan which has been securitized, because the bank no longer has any rights to the debt. It could well mean that thousands of homes may have been illegally repossessed by banks in South Africa too. The issue has already been tested in court, and on a number of occasions, it has resulted in a bank abandoning the foreclosure proceedings, because it was no longer the lawful owner of the debt. These practices are also being challenged in the High Court by New ERA (New Economic Rights Alliance), a non-profit organization supported by 150 000 people, which argues that if a loan has been securitized, not only has the borrower’s legal status with the bank changed, but the debt with the bank no longer exists. Their case is supported by extensive evidence and research with specific reference to South African economics and South African law and presented by lawyers acting pro-bono. The banks have emphatically argued that they cannot understand New ERA’s papers and the court ruled that New ERA must amend its papers, “removing all the evidence”. New ERA has said it will file amended documents with renewed ferocity, “to protect millions of South Africans from what we believe are blatant and unscrupulous actions of the banks.”
Follow the case on http://www.newera.org.za. REIM asked the banks and the major role players the following questions about securitization.
1. Can you provide us with an indication of the value of loans securitized and what percentage of these loans are home loans?
2. Does a consumer have the right to know if their loan has been securitized? Or is there a clause in the credit agreement that the client signs that provides the bank with the rights to securitize the loan? If so, can you provide a sample of the wording used? If not, how is the client informed?
3. Can a consumer choose not to have their loan securitized?
4. How can a consumer trace the securitization of his/her loan?
5. How do the banks ensure compliance with the legislation that credit agreements that have been sold or traded are registered with the NCR?
6. How is the legal standing of a South African citizen’s loan affected if the loan has been securitized?
7. How would the debt counseling process be affected by securitization?
The Banking Association of South Africa did not bother to acknowledge or respond to numerous emailed requests for information. The National Credit Regulator (NCR) –legally mandated to protect the interests of South African credit consumers – replied: “The NCR views this matter in an extremely serious light and is giving it the requisite attention. For fear of compromising the project the NCR is not at liberty to discuss any details at this stage”. Frightening. Especially given the fact that the National Credit Act, Sec 69(4) requires that all credit agreements that have been sold or traded(i.e. securitized) are to be registered with the National Credit Regulator.
“If the ownership of the debt shifts, it could mean the banks have no legal status over the debt, because they do not own the debt.”
Humbulani Salani, spokesperson for FNB Legal, simply responded: “We can confirm that currently FNB does not have any home loan securitization outstanding in the market. When securitization transactions were entered into by FNB in the past, it did not breach any law. Securitization is an industry matter. Steven Barker, Standard Bank’s Head of Home Loans, replied: “Only a small portion of Standard Bank’s Home Loans form part of a securitization arrangement. The customer agrees up front that the bank may cede its rights and delegate its obligations under any loan agreement to a third party. Where a loan is securitized there is generally a cession of the rights under the mortgage bond registered at the Deeds Office. The terms and conditions of the loan agreement are not affected by the securitization and a customer is required to repay the loan as set out in the loan agreement. The debt counseling process and any rights under the National Credit Act is not impacted. Further, Standard Bank complies with its reporting requirements under the Act.”
Absa noted that, currently, their total residential mortgage book amounts to approximately R233bn and only about 2% of this has been securitized. “Worth mentioning is that the performance of South African residential mortgaged backed securitization transactions have been superior to those in the US over the last 10 years. This is primarily due to South Africa’s very well-regulated securitization market where transactions are monitored by the SARB, the JSE, international rating agencies and the NCR. Fitch Ratings recently released a report confirming that EMEA (Europe, the Middle East and Africa) residential mortgaged backed securitization transactions (from 2000to 2011) had significantly lower losses than their US counterparts.” With regard to the questions about the consumer’s rights, Absa stated the following: “The customer will receive a letter from Absa to advise the customer [in the event] of the securitization of the loan and thereafter the credit provider’s details are reflected in all communications to the customer. Usually there is an express provision for a credit provider to transfer its rights and obligations. It should be noted that a credit provider has a common law right to transfer rights without consent. The NCA did not remove this right.”
Furthermore, Absa notes that “The consumer remains indebted under the loan, albeit to a different creditor and, save for this the terms and conditions of the loan do not change. The debt counseling process is not affected by securitization and the consumer is still entitled to exercise the rights he/she has in terms of the National Credit Act. ”Deborah Solomon, founder of the DCI, the debt counseling industry portal that has become the springboard to better debt management for thousands of overly indebted consumers, offered a different view. “The NCR is aware of the process called ‘securitization’ and have stated that they are investigating how this fits into the National Credit Act.
We have also brought the matter of securitization to Minister Rob Davies’ attention and will hopefully get some answers from the Minister’s office. We have also requested further information from the NCR regarding the compliance of the banks in terms of registering credit agreements that have been sold or traded with the NCR, but nothing has been forthcoming as yet. In terms of the NCA, the banks must give the debt counselors information as per their request. But the banks all have one ‘template answer’ and obviously feel that they do not have to answer these types of questions. It is another point which we have raised both with the NCR and with the Minister,” says Solomon.
She notes that from a debt counselor’s perspective, securitization has huge implications, as the counselor needs to know who the debt belongs to, to ensure negotiations and payments. “If we do not know who the real owner of the debt is, how can we make a judgment call on the outstanding ownership of the debt?” In terms of the effect of securitization on the debt counseling process, Solomon says that it could mean that a credit agreement is illegal. “If the ownership of the debt shifts, it could mean the banks have no legal status over the debt, because they do not own the debt.
The new holder or owner of the debt would also need to be a registered credit provider in terms of the NCA. Of course, a debt counselor would look at the debt differently if they knew it was securitized and would question the legality of the action on behalf of the consumer.” Solomon further notes that consumers absolutely have the right to know if their loan has been securitized. “If the bank has securitized a debt, made money from your signature without your consent or knowledge, and then try to take legal action against you should you default on the loan, it is 100% your right as a consumer to know this. Maybe this could be the reason why the banks have not embraced the NCA or tried to window dress the debt counseling process, because they know that should the truth be revealed, they could stand to lose more than what they are currently worth.”
Anyone who has ever had a Bank loan or, is about to apply for one, really must read “The Banker And The Attorney” story…
The banker was placed on the witness stand and sworn in. The plaintiff’s (borrower’s) attorney asked the banker the routine questions concerning the banker’s education and background.
The attorney asked the banker, “What is court exhibit A?”
The banker responded by saying, “This is a promissory note.”
The attorney then asked, “Is there an agreement between Mr. Smith (borrower) and the defendant?”
The banker said, “Yes.”
The attorney asked, “Do you believe the agreement includes a lender and a borrower?”
The banker responded by saying, “Yes, I am the lender and Mr. Smith is the borrower.“
The attorney asked, “What do you believe the agreement is?”
The banker quickly responded, saying, “We have the borrower sign the note and we give the borrower a check.”
The attorney asked, “Does this agreement show the words borrower, lender, loan, interest, credit, or money within the agreement?”
The banker responded by saying, “Sure it does.”
The attorney asked, `”According to your knowledge, who was to loan what to whom according to the written agreement?”
The banker responded by saying, “The lender loaned the borrower a $200,000 check. The borrower got the money and the house and has not repaid the money.“
The attorney noted that the banker never said that the bank received the promissory note as a loan from the borrower to the bank. She asked, “Do you believe an ordinary person can use ordinary terms and understand this written agreement?”
The banker said, “Yes.”
The attorney asked, “Do you believe you or your company legally own the promissory note and have the right to enforce payment from the borrower?”
The banker said, “Absolutely we own it and legally have the right to collect the money.”
The attorney asked, “Does the $200,000 note have actual cash value of $200,000? Actual cash value means the promissory note can be sold for $200,000 cash in the ordinary course of business.”
The banker said, “Yes.”
The attorney asked, “According to your understanding of the alleged agreement, how much actual cash value must the bank loan to the borrower in order for the bank to legally fulfil the agreement and legally own the promissory note?”
The banker said, “$200,000.“
The attorney asked, “According to your belief, if the borrower signs the promissory note and the bank refuses to loan the borrower $200,000 actual cash value, would the bank or borrower own the promissory note?”
The banker said, “The borrower would own it if the bank did not loan the money. The bank gave the borrower a check and that is how the borrower financed the purchase of the house.“
The attorney asked, “Do you believe that the borrower agreed to provide the bank with $200,000 of actual cash value which was used to fund the $200,000 bank loan check back to the same borrower, and then agreed to pay the bank back $200,000 plus interest?”
The banker said, “No. If the borrower provided the $200,000 to fund the check, there was no money loaned by the bank so the bank could not charge interest on money it never loaned.”
The attorney asked, “If this happened, in your opinion would the bank legally own the promissory note and be able to force Mr. Smith to pay the bank interest and principal payments?”
The banker said, “I am not a lawyer so I cannot answer legal questions.”
The attorney asked, ” Is it bank policy that when a borrower receives a $200,000 bank loan, the bank receives $200,000 actual cash value from the borrower, that this gives value to a $200,000 bank loan check, and this check is returned to the borrower as a bank loan which the borrower must repay?”
The banker said, “I do not know the bookkeeping entries.” | The attorney said, “I am asking you if this is the policy.”
The banker responded, “I do not recall.”
The attorney again asked, “Do you believe the agreement between Mr. Smith and the bank is that Mr. Smith provides the bank with actual cash value of $200,000 which is used to fund a $200,000 bank loan check back to himself which he is then required to repay plus interest back to the same bank?”
The banker said, “I am not a lawyer.”
The attorney said, “Did you not say earlier that an ordinary person can use ordinary terms and understand this written agreement?
The banker said, “Yes.”
The attorney handed the bank loan agreement marked “Exhibit B” to the banker. He said, “Is there anything in this agreement showing the borrower had knowledge or showing where the borrower gave the bank authorisation or permission for the bank to receive $200,000 actual cash value from him and to use this to fund the $200,000 bank loan check which obligates him to give the bank back $200,000 plus interest?”
The banker said, “No.”
The lawyer asked, “If the borrower provided the bank with actual cash value of $200,000 which the bank used to fund the $200,000 check and returned the check back to the alleged borrower as a bank loan check, in your opinion, did the bank loan $200,000 to the borrower?”
The banker said, “No.”
The attorney asked, “If a bank customer provides actual cash value of $200,000 to the bank and the bank returns $200,000 actual cash value back to the same customer, is this a swap or exchange of $200,000 for $200,000.”
The banker replied, “Yes.”
The attorney asked, “Did the agreement call for an exchange of
$200,000 swapped for $200,000, or did it call for a $200,000 loan?”
The banker said, “A $200,000 loan.”
The attorney asked, “Is the bank to follow the Federal Reserve Bank policies and procedures when banks grant loans.”
The banker said, “Yes.”
The attorney asked, “What are the standard bank bookkeeping entries for granting loans according to the Federal Reserve Bank policies and procedures?” The attorney handed the banker FED publication Modern Money Mechanics, marked “Exhibit C”.
The banker said, “The promissory note is recorded as a bank asset and a new matching deposit (liability) is created. Then we issue a check from the new deposit back to the borrower.”
The attorney asked, “Is this not a swap or exchange of $200,000
for $200,000?”
The banker said, “This is the standard way to do it.”
The attorney said, “Answer the question. Is it a swap or exchange of $200,000 actual cash value for $200,000 actual cash value? If the note funded the check, must they not both have equal value?”
The banker then pleaded the Fifth Amendment.
[The Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides, “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” tinyurl.com/ntusype]
The attorney asked, “If the bank’s deposits (liabilities) increase, do the bank’s assets increase by an asset that has actual cash value?”
The banker said, “Yes.”
The attorney asked, “Is there any exception?”
The banker said, “Not that I know of.”
The attorney asked, “If the bank records a new deposit and records an asset on the bank’s books having actual cash value, would the actual cash value always come from a customer of the bank or an investor or a lender to the bank?”
The banker thought for a moment and said, “Yes.”
The attorney asked, “Is it the bank policy to record the promissory note as a bank asset offset by a new liability?”
The banker said, “Yes.”
The attorney said, “Does the promissory note have actual cash value equal to the amount of the bank loan check?”
The banker said “Yes.”
The attorney asked, “Does this bookkeeping entry prove that the borrower provided actual cash value to fund the bank loan check?”
The banker said, “Yes, the bank president told us to do it this way.”
The attorney asked, “How much actual cash value did the bank loan to obtain the promissory note?”
The banker said, “Nothing.”
The attorney asked, “How much actual cash value did the bank receive from the borrower?”
The banker said, “$200,000.“
The attorney said, “Is it true you received $200,000 actual cash value from the borrower, plus monthly payments and then you foreclosed and never invested one cent of legal tender or other depositors’ money to obtain the promissory note in the first place? Is it true that the borrower financed the whole transaction?”
The banker said, “Yes.”
The attorney asked, “Are you telling me the borrower agreed to give the bank $200,000 actual cash value for free and that the banker returned the actual cash value back to the same person as a bank loan?”
The banker said, “I was not there when the borrower agreed to the loan.”
The attorney asked, “Do the standard FED publications show the bank receives actual cash value from the borrower for free and that the bank returns it back to the borrower as a bank loan?”
The banker said, “Yes.”
The attorney said, “Do you believe the bank does this without the borrower’s knowledge or written permission or authorisation?”
The banker said, “No.”
The attorney asked, “To the best of your knowledge, is there written permission or authorisation for the bank to transfer $200,000 of actual cash value from the borrower to the bank and for the bank to keep it for free?
The banker said, “No.”
The attorney said, “Does this allow the bank to use this $200,000 actual cash value to fund the $200,000 bank loan check back to the same borrower, forcing the borrower to pay the bank $200,000 plus interest?”
The banker said, “Yes.”
The attorney said, “If the bank transferred $200,000 actual cash value from the borrower to the bank, in this part of the transaction, did the bank loan anything of value to the borrower?”
The banker said, “No.” He knew that one must first deposit something having actual cash value (cash, check, or promissory note) to fund a check.
The attorney asked, “Is it the bank policy to first transfer the actual cash value from the alleged borrower to the lender for the amount of the alleged loan?”
The banker said, “Yes.”
The attorney asked, “Does the bank pay IRS tax on the actual cash value transferred from the alleged borrower to the bank?”
The banker answered, “No, because the actual cash value transferred shows up like a loan from the borrower to the bank, or a deposit which is the same thing, so it is not taxable.”
The attorney asked, “If a loan is forgiven, is it taxable?”
The banker agreed by saying, “Yes.”
The attorney asked, “Is it the bank policy to not return the actual cash value that they received from the alleged borrower unless it is returned as a loan from the bank to the alleged borrower?”
The banker replied “Yes“.
The attorney said, “You never pay taxes on the actual cash value you receive from the alleged borrower and keep as the bank’s property?”
“No. No tax is paid.”, said the crying banker.
The attorney asked, “When the lender receives the actual cash value from the alleged borrower, does the bank claim that it then owns it and that it is the property of the lender, without the bank loaning or risking one cent of legal tender or other depositors’ money?”
The banker said, “Yes.”
The attorney asked, “Are you telling me the bank policy is that the bank owns the promissory note (actual cash value) without loaning one cent of other depositors’ money or legal tender, that the alleged borrower is the one who provided the funds deposited to fund the bank loan check, and that the bank gets funds from the alleged borrower for free? Is the money then returned back to the same person as a loan which the alleged borrower repays when the bank never gave up any money to obtain the promissory note? Am I hearing this right? I give you the equivalent of $200,000, you return the funds back to me, and I have to repay you $200,000 plus interest? Do you think I am stupid?”
The banker, In a shaking voice the banker cried, saying, “All the banks are doing this. Congress allows this.”
The attorney quickly responded, “Does Congress allow the banks
to breach written agreements, use false and misleading advertising, act without written permission, authorisation, and without the alleged borrower’s knowledge to transfer actual cash value from the alleged borrower to the bank and then return it back as a loan?”
The banker said, “But the borrower got a check and the house.”
The attorney said, “Is it true that the actual cash value that was used to fund the bank loan check came directly from the borrower and that the bank received the funds from the alleged borrower
for free?”
The banker, “It is true“, said the banker.
The attorney asked, “Is it the bank’s policy to transfer actual cash value from the alleged borrower to the bank and then to keep the funds as the bank’s property, which they loan out as bank loans?”
The banker, showing a wince of regret that he had been caught, confessed, “Yes.“
The attorney asked, “Do you believe that it was the borrower’s intent to fund his own bank loan check?”
The banker answered, “I was not there at the time and I cannot know what went through the borrower’s mind.”
The attorney asked, “If a lender loaned a borrower $10,000 and the borrower refused to repay the money, do you believe the lender is damaged?”
The banker thought. If he said no, it would imply that the borrower does not have to repay. If he said yes, it would imply that the borrower is damaged for the loan to the bank of which the bank never repaid. The banker answered, “If a loan is not repaid, the lender is damaged.”
The attorney asked, “Is it the bank policy to take actual cash value from the borrower, use it to fund the bank loan check, and never return the actual cash value to the borrower?”
The banker said, “The bank returns the funds.”
The attorney asked, “Was the actual cash value the bank received from the alleged borrower returned as a return of the money the bank took or was it returned as a bank loan to the borrower?”
The banker said, “As a loan.“
The attorney asked, “How did the bank get the borrower’s money for free?”
Since the creation of the US Federal Reserve over a century ago, every major financial market collapse has been deliberately triggered for political motives by the central bank. The situation is no different today, as clearly the US Fed is acting with its interest rate weapon to crash what is the greatest speculative financial bubble in human history, a bubble it created. Global crash events always begin on the periphery, such as with the 1931 Austrian Creditanstalt or the Lehman Bros. failure in September 2008. The June 15 decision by the Fed to impose the largest single rate hike in almost 30 years as financial markets are already in a meltdown, now guarantees a global depression and worse.
The extent of the “cheap credit” bubble that the Fed, the ECB and Bank of Japan have engineered with buying up of bonds and maintaining unprecedented near-zero or even negative interest rates for now 14 years, is beyond imagination. Financial media cover it over with daily nonsense reporting , while the world economy is being readied, not for so-called “stagflation” or recession. What is coming now in the coming months, barring a dramatic policy reversal, is the worst economic depression in history to date. Thank you, globalization and Davos.
This is our Fiduciary for The United States of America [Unincorporated], Anna Maria Riezinger, making history cancelling two 1934 Gold Bonds with the assistance of the Financial Director of The Global Family International Trade Bank. We are privileged to witness and to have video of this historic event. As we witness history being made, it is now time to Intend, Create, and Manifest our future.
A “shelf corporation” is slang for a corporation that exists only on paper. It has a name, an address (usually in an otherwise vacant house or office), a Registered Agent, a President, a Secretary, a Treasurer, a stated line of business — and nothing else. These are also called “dummy corporations”.
Also in slang, these are used as “storefronts” for all sorts of purposes. To protect assets. To hide actual ownership interests. To launder money. To act as asset holders during bankruptcy proceedings to hide assets that would otherwise be subject to the bankruptcy. To “represent” other similarly-named businesses and organizations for purposes of deceit or substitution. Most recently, shelf corporations have made the news as mortgage holders and mortgage servicing companies and have been used as illegal transfer agents in equally illegal mortgage title foreclosures.
Shelf corporations create a “Business Person” that can be used to do dirty work under cover of the “corporate veil” and then, when the heat is on, they can close up shop, go bankrupt, or simply “sunset” by failure to re-register and pay the fees.
The Scottish Interloper doing business as “The United States of America — Incorporated” from 1868 to 1907 was a Shelf Corporation. The name was deceitfully similar to the name of our unincorporated Federation of States, which allowed them to access our credit and steal our identity like any other Credit Card Hacker.
Eventually, this dummy corporation from Scotland substituting itself for our actual government acquired so much debt that it was bankrupted by the banks that were extending credit to it “in our names” and those private banks operating under the deceitful name of the “Federal Reserve” took over the Scottish Interloper together with all the business names and assets it had acquired via fraud from us during Woodrow Wilson’s Administration.
In this way, the “Federal Reserve” which was really just a private consortium of banks, took over what appeared to be the government, and the criminality that has infested Washington, DC, ever since the end of the Civil War began in earnest.
The banks wasted no time in consolidating their hold on the politicians and members of the military brass, both by carrots and sticks, and settled in to loot the country and the people via a “legal tender laws” and “progressive taxation” and “controlled inflation of the currency”. They also broadly practiced “unlawful conversion” whenever possible.
This is the underlying crime used to kidnap land and soil assets via a process of incorporation and traffick them out into the international jurisdiction of the sea, where they can more readily be seized upon and plundered “legally”.
Given this history, it should be no surprise that the same charlatans have used incorporation and shelf corporations to steal your identity and credit and to enslave you with their debts.
Here is a famous transcription of comments made by Colonel Mandell House, one of the chief conspirators during a meeting with then-President Woodrow Wilson. This came across my desk again this morning and prompted me to bring your attention to this key time and the issues it generated:
“…Birth Certificates will be delivered to us…to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges…..They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser…Afterall this is the only logical way to fund government by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges….This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fund which we will call ‘Social Insurance.’… Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur
in this manner; every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly…The people will become helpless and without any hope for their
redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.”
So what was the “dummy corporation” he referred to?
A new version of the Scottish Interloper calling itself “the” United States of America, Incorporated. The only difference was dropping “The” as part of the name of the offending shelf corporation. Within twenty years, it would be bankrupted for profit, too, as part of the Great Depression engineered by the Federal Reserve Banks.
Yes, the member banks of the “Federal Reserve” created the Great Depression, and then stepped forward as the solution to the problem they created. They created the bank runs prior to The Crash in 1929 to spook the herd and scare the politicians. Then they created The Crash by selling out of the stock market en masse and by prior agreement. In this way, they reduced stock prices to pennies on a dollar, destroyed all the smaller investors, and left themselves in position to come back in and buy up everything for nothing.
They are all poised and ready to do it again.
But, fool me once, shame on you…. fool me twice, shame on me.
When they pull the plug this time, they are all going down for it — and somewhere in the back of their brains there is an alarm bell ringing, a prickle up the back of their necks, something telling them that despite their nearly infinite arrogance — the ax is going to fall.
On them.
Couldn’t happen to nicer people.
But I digress…. it’s the rest of the Colonel’s comments that are the centerpiece to think about. Just as the Conspirators used Shelf Corporations to steal the identity and credit of our Federation of States immediately after the Civil War — and more to the point — our foreign Federal Government Subcontractors ever since, they also used shelf corporations to steal your identity, too.
By a secretive and undisclosed process of “registration” which gives up your ownership interest in whatever is “registered”, the members of the military and the Federal Reserve Banks planned —with malice aforethought— to pull off the biggest asset heist in history. They planned the “legal” enslavement of this entire country, and using that as a fulcrum, they then used the same simple diabolical fraud scheme to enslave most of the known world.
Soon after you were born, and without any disclosure to your parents, you were “registered” as a British Territorial Person — a Foreign Situs Trust, which is a form of corporation — a shelf corporation — owned by the British Territorial State-of-State organization operating in your State of the Union.
You were born, for example, as a Texan — but registered as a British Territorial Person operated under the same name.
The American named Albert Francis Smith looks and sounds identical to the British Territorial Person — a shelf corporation created by the State of Texas — also called “Albert Francis Smith”.
The only difference is that the American is a living baby with a Proper Name and a birthday, while the British Territorial Person — a shelf corporation — has a birthdate — when the file and the “Birth Certificate” were created a few days or weeks later.
This British doppelganger is presumed to be the inheritor of your name and estate. After seven years, the State-of-State franchise declares him “missing, lost at sea” and an entity with your name which has died intestate as a child, leaves behind an “infant decedent estate” to be administered by the members of the Bar Associations as they see fit.
Now, it’s a dead shelf corporation with your name attached to it and the probate judges dressed in black can do whatever they like with it and its assets —if it has any.
Of course, they self-interestedly presume that all your assets including your body were donated to the British Territorial doppelganger when they administer his estate in their foreign courts. He was a British Subject. He was a ward of their State of State organization. He’s their Cash Cow. And he’s “presumed” to be both dead and intestate, so he can’t possibly show up and protest what they are doing, can he?
And neither can the American he was named after, because the American was just a baby when all this happened.
This is identity theft and human trafficking, unlawful conversion, fraud, inland piracy and so much more.
This scheme was brought to our shores by the U.S. Military and the Federal Reserve Banks as a plan to use shelf corporations as a means to defraud us individually in the same manner that they used shelf corporations to steal the identity and credit of our lawful unincorporated government. It was primarily advanced by our British Territorial Subcontractors operating as “the” United States of America.
Later, 1937, the Pope’s Municipal Government got into the same scheme and set up its own set of shelf corporation doppelgangers operating under names like MELINDA ANNE PIKE.
Today, the Municipal Federal Reserve Corporation has been bankrupted in turn, and as a result, Chase Manhattan Bank owns the name “FEDERAL RESERVE” and JP Morgan owns the name “FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD OF GOVERNORS”.
What a tangled web we weave, when first we practice…. to deceive….
Deliberate self-interested deceit leading to False Claims in Commerce, Identity Theft, Fraud, Unlawful Conversion and Inland Piracy is the essential problem for all these shelf corporations from 1850 to today. The Federal Reserve, past and present, is responsible for this. The other Principals — foreign Governments relied upon to honor our Constitutional Agreements and Treaties with them — are responsible for this.
And at the end of the day, fraud vitiates everything they have done, nullifies everything they’ve said, demands the return of every penny they’ve stolen and coerced under false pretenses for 160 years.
Possession by pirates does not change ownership.
The foreign shelf corporations are recognized for what they are. The incorporated foreign Federal Subcontractors are recognized for what they are. And the role of the Federal Reserve in this entire nasty enslavement-by-registration scheme is laid bare for what it is.
This international criminal cartel that operated under the corporate veil to impersonate and steal the credit and identity and resources of this country and its people is no longer protected by any secrecy.
Anyone “registering” any babies in this country is likely to be shot in the coming days and those using the “name of” the Federal Reserve and those manipulating the stock markets and those manipulating the currency and counterfeiting “US DOLLARS” and those thinking that they will gain an ownership interest in living people by shooting them up with genetically engineered bits of DNA or RNA, had better think again.
Government Central Banks were created to control the flow of commodities— and money and credit currencies , like wheat and sow bellies, are commodities. This is state-sanctioned crime, because commodity rigging is a crime—- if Joe Blow does it.
This is why commodity brokers and stock brokers are licensed, too. This is why Central Banks and Stock Exchanges are (supposed to be) regulated.
Merchant banks are created to engage in international trade, which is what we think of as private business between unincorporated entities, using asset-backed money to trade goods and services. It is called “trade” because actual physical assets are being exchanged. My bag of peanuts for your apple is barter; my apple for your silver dime is trade.
Commercial banks deal in various kinds of “commercial paper”—- stocks, bonds, certificates, insurance, debentures, promissory notes and credit instruments such as Letters of Credit, for example. These banks serve incorporated entities since commerce itself is defined as business between two incorporated entities.
Now that you can observe this for yourselves you will better understand it when I say all the commercial banks worldwide are bankrupt and all the central banks are guilty of mammoth crimes beyond the state sanctioned variety crimes they are allowed to indulge in.
As a result, the International Trade Banks are the only ones still standing and capable of translating values. The form this takes does not matter so long as people still have access to abundant cash assets —- without which everyone would be enslaved.
Read that — digital currency is okay so far as it goes— your funds are routinely translated into digits as it is, so it isn’t that digital currency is bad—- it’s that banks controlling the flow of digital currency, banks with the ability to shut down your accounts without agreement, banks that can arbitrarily turn your credit cards on and off, would have complete coercive economic power if we do not immediately and with prejudice insist on maintaining a cash economy wherein people have physical control over defined asset-backed cash currency.
And all this, plus the biggest bust in commodity rigging history and crimes beyond the scope of this quick summation — is what the PTW are arguing and struggling over.
Meantime, note that Goldman-Sachs, the IRS, and the Territorial (British) Federal Reserve have so far moved to China—- obviously planning to set up shop there and do the same things to Chinese workers that they have done here.
Really? Will China be foolish enough to eat the Tapeworms? Stay tuned. We fully intend to take up the criminal nature of these entities with the Chinese Government.
—————————-
See this article and over 3600 others on Anna’s website here: www.annavonreitz.com
Attention: Prosecutor Karim A.A. Kahn,QC; H.E. Joan E. Donoughue, H.E. Kiril Gevgorian, H.E. Cardinal Dominique Mamberti, Lord High Steward Ivan Talbot, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Antonio Guterres Secretary General of the United Nations, Bank of International Settlements, Lord Mayor of Inner City of London, and other Interested Parties:
Consider this lesson in Black Magic to be a necessary part of educating oneself to face off the powers of evil in the modern world.
It’s the end of World War II. Seventeen countries in western and southern Europe teetered on the edge of an Abyss. General George Marshall came up with a Plan to rebuild those countries and their economies and here is how it worked.
A very large amount of privately held gold belonging to the D’Avila Family Trust was “blocked” for fifty (50) years — meaning that the Depositors were denied access to or any ability to move their gold held by banks for a period of fifty years from the date of deposit.
The banks, thus assured of having that gold underwriting their extension of credit promptly issued ten times the value of the gold deposits as credit available to the ravaged countries and their governments under the theory of Fractional Reserve Banking.
Fractional Reserve Banking says, well, on any given day, only about 1/10th of the people will want to take cash out of their accounts, so, we can safely loan out 90% of our “reserves” as credit at interest.
So, in this crazy (and technically illegal) system, the bank gets to create 10X as much credit as the value of the assets that underwrite the bank and keep only the 100% of the gold or other commodity asset, plus 11% of the credit amount as “cash”, to pay off those depositors who at random ask for cash back from their deposits.
The banks are “betting on the margin” in other words and reaping large returns on the interest being paid on these “loans” of credit that is, technically, owed to the heirs of the D’Avila Family Trust and their beneficiaries and not to the banks at all. The banks have nothing at risk and no actual ownership interest in anything.
In 1851 the Spanish Courts ruled that the D’Avila assets came from non-criminal origin and the administrator of the Trust was allowed to deposit these assets in the global banking system. The original agreement for this privilege was for 50 years from the last deposit that happened on October 7th, 1941, so the heir could not remove these assets until October 7th, 1991. The outbreak of World War II changed everything, the United States of America, the Allied Nations, and Non-Allied Nations were seeking a way to rebuild the world after two world wars, the solution was the D’Avila assets. These Assets were transferred to Severino Garcia STA Romana as the asset owner so these assets could be traded for 50 years to fund a global project to rebuild the world. It took some time to plan and position these assets due to World War II and the recovery of assets from Germany and Japan that belonged to the D’Avila Trust. The 50-year agreement was extended to 2005 as the trading of these assets likely did not start until 1955.
All the D’Avila Family Trust assets were placed on deposit as of 1941, so the heirs went hungry to bed for sixty-four years, waiting for 2005 to roll around, and the promised end to the “block” on their funds. They also held the reasonable expectation that at least some of the interest that was collected by the banks would be returned to the Trust, and that they would: (1) be able to enjoy a reasonable standard of living for themselves, and (2) would be able to fulfill the Trust Indenture, which requires the funds to be used to “uplift” humanity.
2005 came and went. More excuses and more shuffling took place. The “arrangement” provided a 5-year window period that extended another five years to 2010, with the understanding that the deposits would finally be released to the control of the heirs and beneficiaries. 2010 came and went. More shuffling. More excuses.
The fact is that the World Bank and IBRD and BIS and all these other banks had grown used to having control of the D’Avila Trust assets secured in their vaults and they had found ways to benefit themselves by manipulating markets and seizing actual physical assets in exchange for loans of “credit” that never even belonged to these banks. All that credit is owed to the Trust, minus reasonable and customary bank and brokerage fees.
By 2005 and 2010, however, it was apparent that the banks couldn’t possibly pay back the D’Avila Trust both the gold and the credit owed from all the interest collected on all those loans, plus keep on glutting themselves, so negotiations came to a standstill. In 2005, the so-called “Off Ledger” — blocked asset accounts, were left in Limbo Land, all the banks and all the governments without a contract to use the gold any longer continued as if they had a contract in place.
What has ensued ever since has been a Bank Club Fest of criminality, greed, unaccountability, lies, and excuses. They all know where the gold that underwrites their banks came from. They all know that the gold assets must be freed up and that the profits from the interest must be shared with the Trust. Most of all, they all know that the accounting is due.
And they are all sitting there, including Karen Hudes, shrugging like so many monkeys, trying to pretend, “Well, hey, this depository account hasn’t been touched in fifty years…. must be “abandoned”….”
That’s their favorite excuse for stealing money, especially money held in Escrow accounts and Slush Funds that the Depositors of the actual assets are never told about.
When you have more than one person, one bank, one agency, one government acting together to prevent the asset owner and/or Heirs from recovering their assets, it is called a conspiracy, a criminal act that has no statute of limitations. Because these assets were placed under Severino Garcia STA Romana as the asset owner and he died in 1974, the assets are protected under an estate with a court appointed Attorney in Fact that has been ordered by the Federal Court of the United States of America to Discover, Collect and Settle the Estate of Severino Garcia STA. Romana. The Claimant against this Estate is the D’Avila Family Trust –the source of the assets deposited by Severino Garcia STA. Romana in the first place.
The actual heir of the D’Avila Family Trust who has the General Power of Attorney for the Trust (there are other heirs, but he holds the GPA) went to Federal Court and to International Courts, and he won his cases to recover these assets from the agencies and banks holding these assets.
The banks are still trying to avoid the judgment in favor of the heirs (STA Romana Family), and claimants (Avila Family) and the actual Beneficiaries — that is, all the people of the Earth.
So, that makes the Banks and everyone protecting the Banks in this matter criminals– unless they immediately Cease and Desist their obstructionist activities and release the D’Avila Depository Accounts and make available the pre-paid credit owed back to the Trust, in recompense for blocking these accounts and extending credit at interest based on these assets since 1941.
How would you feel if you deposited your money in a bank, and that bank arbitrarily blocked your access to your money for eighty years? And then lied about it and said that they don’t know who the Depositor is? That the funds are “abandoned”?
I am the Assign of the D’Avila Trust in my capacity as the Fiduciary for The United States of America, speaking on behalf of the Heirs and Beneficiaries, all living people of this country and ultimately, the planet: it’s time for this criminal nonsense to end, and literally everyone in the world has a stake in helping me to end it.
There are more than 5,000 Family and Institutional Trusts which the banks are attempting to commandeer in this way.
Money is a symbol. Life is the only value. And the debt owed back to the living people is long past due.
The actual ownership interest is known. It has been adjudicated. There is no confusion about it. Not one peso has been “abandoned”. Each bank and each government is responsible and liable.
On the back side of the overall transaction, the interest and return has been paid by living people who didn’t owe the governments that have benefited from the Marshall Plan and the European Economic Recovery Plan a single penny. All that debt was foisted off on individual living people by means of legal chicanery and commercial deceit.
The actual physical assets belonging to families have been seized under conditions of fraud and deceit by banks trading on the assets of the D’Avila Family Trust, in direct violation of the Trust Indenture, which directs this money to be used to uplift humanity and to break the chains of ignorance and poverty.
The banks had the use of the credit generated from the D’Avila Trust assets to use and invest for free, yet they charged rates in usury above 500% on many mortgages that the living people never owed.
These banks have been protected in these outrageous crimes by the members of the Bar Associations, by military contractors, and by politicians who have benefited themselves at the cost of millions of lives, homes, and families.
As I speak, thousands of Americans are being physically evicted from their homes for not paying mortgages that those Americans never owed. Armed thugs acting under color of law have trespassed on private property at the behest of these banks, which are benefiting from the assets of the D’Avila Family Trust and inflicting this crime on the living people that the Trust assets are supposed to help and uplift.
Shame on the Generals who have participated in and allowed this for a cut of the action.
Shame on the Roman Catholic Church and its Collection Agency known as the Internal Revenue Service and the IRS, both, and its venal abusive claim to own the names of living people and to use those names and the assets attached to them as collateral and as the basis of labor contracts without disclosure and without permission.
Shame on the banks and the bankers who have taken such a gross advantage of the D’Avila Family Trust and the Heirs and the intended Beneficiaries of the Trust, with the help of corrupt and incorporated British Crown Corporations that have engineered much of this Crime Against Humanity.
Shame on everyone who has attempted to further block the Heir’s access to their own deposits and to claim that any of these funds are abandoned.
Shame on those who have whipped and beaten and harassed and evicted and stolen the physical assets of the living people using credit and collecting usury based on the use of assets that never belonged to them.
The return on these assets from 153 countries is owed the D’Avila Family Trust and is owed to the intended Beneficiaries of the Trust – which includes all of humanity. Full recompense is due to all the people who have been the victims of the selfishness, trickery, and False Claims in Commerce promoted by these banks.
The Federal Court Order discovery so far has uncovered (below) the banks holding assets covered by the Estate of Severino Garcia STA. Romana. There are still many more banks and accounts holding assets that will be discovered as we continue the discovery as ordered by the Federal Courts:
1. ABN- Amro Bank NV Netherlands (Netherlands, Amsterdam)
2. ABN- Amro Bank Netherlands (Netherlands, Bussum Branch)
3, ABN- Amro Bank Netherlands (Singapore Branch)
4. Agricultural Bank of China (Singapore)
5. Alliance Bank Malaysia Berhad (Kuala Lumpur)
6. Allgemeine Privatkunden Bank (Berlin, Charlottenburg)
7. ANZ Bank Malaysia Berhad (Kuala Lumpur Branch)
8. Arab Bank of Italy (Rome, Italy)
9. Arab Bank of New York (New York)
10. Arab Malaysia Berhad (Kuala Lumpur Branch)
11. Arab Bank PLC (Singapore Branch)
12. Banco Espirito Santo (Lisboa Branch)
13. Banco Central De Resarva De EI Salvador (El Salvador Branch)
14. Bangkok Bank (Kuala Lumpur Branch)
15. Bangkok Bank (Thailand, Bangkok Branch)
16. Bangkok Bank (Hongkong, Main Office)
17. Bangkok Bank Public Company Limited (Singapore Branch)
18. Bank of America National Association (Singapore Branch)
19. Bank of Ayudhya Public Company Limited (Phongpheng Ayudhya Thailand)
20. Bank of Baroda (Bangkok, Thailand)
21. Bank of Canada (Ontario, Canada)
22. Bank of China (Beijing, China Branch)
23. Bank of China (Beijing, main office)
24. Bank of China (Seoul Branch)
25. Bank of China (Shanghai, China)
26. Bank of China (Onsan Branch, Korea)
27 Bank of China (Shanghai & Shenzhen China)
28. Bank of China (Guangdong Branch China)
29. Bank of China (Jakarta Branch Indonesia)
30. Bank of China (Hongkong Branch)
31. Bank of China (Vietnam Branch)
32. Bank of China (Tokyo Branch)
33. Bank of China (Minato, Japan)
34. Bank of China (Singapore Branch)
35. Bank of China (Bangkok, Thailand)
36. Bank of China & Bank of Communication (Guldin Branch, China)
37. Bank of Communications (Singapore Branch)
38. Bank of East Asia Limited (Shenzhen Branch, China)
39. Bank of Estonia (Eesti Pank, Estonia)
40. Bank of Indonesia (Indonesia)
41. Bank of Israel (Israel)
42. Bank of Mongolia (London England Branch)
43. Bank of Japan (Tokyo Head Office)
44. Bank of Negara Malaysia (Kuala Lumpur)
45. Bank of Negara Malaysia (Sarawak Branch, Malaysia)
46. Bank of the Sierra (Porterville, California USA)
47. Bank of Taiwan (Singapore Branch)
48. Bank of Tokyo – Mitsubishi (Hongkong Branch)
49.Bank of Tokyo – Mitsubishi (Tokyo, Japan)
50. Bank of Walnut Creek (Dorville, California USA)
51. Bank of the West (San Francisco, California USA)
52. Bank of, the West (Beverly Hills, California USA)
53.Bank of Yokohama (Hongkong Branch)
54. Bank of Thai Public Company Limited (Bangkok Thailand)
55. Bank of Sierra Leone (Sierra Leone)
56. HypoVereinsbank (Germany)
57. Banco Intesa (Milan, Italy Branch)
58. Barclays Bank (Amsterdam Netherlands)
59. Barclays Bank (Bangkok Thailand)
60. Barclays Banks (Beijing, China)
61. Barclays Bank (Birmingham, U.K)
62. Barclays Bank (Doha, Qatar)
63. Barclays Bank (Dubai, UAE)
64. Barclays Bank (Dublin Ireland)
65. Barclays Bank (Frankfurt, Germany)
66. Barclays Bank (Geneva, Switzerland)
67. Barclays Bank (Hongkong)
68. Barclays Bank (Jakarta, Indonesia)
69. Barclays Bank (Johannesburg South Africa)
70. Barclays Bank (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia)
71. Barclays Bank (Labuan Malaysia)
72. Barclays Bank (Greater London, England)
73. Barclays Bank (London, England)
74. Barclays Bank (Lausanne, Switzerland)
75. Barclays Bank (Luxemburg)
76. Barclays Bank (Madrid, Spain)
77. Barclays Bank (UK)
78. Barleys Bank (Milan, Italy)
79. Barclays Bank (Moscow, Russia)
80. Barclays Bank (Mumbai, India)
81. Barclays Bank (Paris, France)
82. Barclays Bank (Seoul, Korea)
83. Barclays Bank (Shanghai, China)
84. Barclays Bank (People’s Republic of China)
85. Barclays Bank (Singapore)
86. Barclays Bank PLC (Singapore)
87 Barleys Bank (Sydney, Australia)
88. Barclays Bank (Taipei, Taiwan)
89. Barclays Bank (Tel Aviv, Israel)
90. Barclays Bank (Tokyo, Japan)
91. Barclays Bank (Zurich, Switzerland)
92. BMO Bank of Montreal (Alberta, Calgary, Canada)
93, BMO Bank of Montreal (British Colombia, Canada)
94. BMO Bank of Financial Group. (Toronto, Ontario Canada)
95. BMO Bank of Montreal (Waterloo, Ontario Canada)
96. BMO Bank of Montreal (Quebec, Canada)
97. BMO Bank of Montreal (Nova Scotia, Canada)
98. BNP Paribas (Bahrain Branch)
99. BNP Paribas (Hongkong Branch, Takoo Place Office)
100. BNP Paribas (King Fahd Rd, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia)
101. BNP Paribas (Milano Branch, Italy)
102. BNP Paribas (Rome, Italy Head Office)
103. BNP Paribas Asset Management (Madrid, Spain)
104. BNP Paribas (Singapore)
105. Bulgaria National Bank (Bulgaria)
106. Cassa Di Risparmio Di Ferrara (DI Ferrara, Head Office Italy)
107. Cambodian Commercial Bank (Cambodia Head office)
108. Cambodian Asia Bank (Phnom Penh, Kingdom of Cambodia)
109. Cambodia Asia Bank (Battambang Branch, Cambodia)
110. Cambodia Asia Bank (Siem Reap Branch, Cambodia)
111. CIBC Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (Canada)
399. National Bank of Munich (Munich, Switzerland)
400. Credit Suisse Bank (Basle, Switzerland)
401. National Bank of Malawi (Malawi)
402. National Bank of Uzbekistan
403. ING (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
404. Indosuez Bank (Central Hong Kong)
405. Hyakugo Bank (Japan)
406. Deutsche Bank (Germany)
407. FIM Bank Plc. (Malta)
408. Ngan Hang Dong A Eastern Asia Commercial Bank (Hanoi, Vietnam)
409. Vietnam International Bank (Hanoi, Vietnam)
410. Honk Kong Bank (Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)
411. Dominion Charter Merchant Ltd. (London, England)
412. Development bank of Japan (Tokyo, Japan)
413. Development Bank of Singapore (Singapore)
414. Daichi Kangyo Bank Limited (Tokyo, Japan)
415. Copenhagen Industrial Bank (Denmark)
416. Central Bank of Argentina
417. Central Bank of Austria
418. Central bank of Brazil
419. Banquo De France (Paris, France)
420. Bank of Israel (Jerusalem, Israel)
421. Bank of Foreign Trade of Vietnam (Ho Chi Mihn City, Vietnam)
422. ANZ Bank (Shanghai, China)
423. ANZ Bank (Seoul, Korea)
424. American Express Bank (Central Hong Kong)
425. Alliance Bank Malaysia Berad (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia)
426. Agricultural Bank of China (Singapore)
More banks and institutions will be added to this list as the recoupment and discovery progresses. Meantime don’t buy any wooden nickels. There may be Filipinos who are D’Avila family members, and if so, that will be established by blood tests and DNA — not through any claims based on Ferdinand Marcos’ position as a family attorney.
Please bear in mind that although the D’Avila Family Trust is very large, there are other trusts that are also very large that have been arbitrarily encumbered by these miscreants. The V.K. Durham Trust is an American Silver Trust that has been similarly held captive, cheated, and plundered by these criminals. The Guadalupe Hidalgo Treaty Trust Assets have been illegally cashiered by the Bank of England, and the list goes on.
These issues are not unique to America. An estimated ten billion metric tons of gold are owed to the people of Germany and Russia, last seen disappearing into the vaults of the Bank of England.
It is to everyone’s advantage to spread this information far and wide and to bring pressure to bear upon the militaries and the politicians and the banks responsible for this continuing criminality and failure to perform according to our law and custom. Depositors are owed the return of their deposits, otherwise, they would have no reason to deposit any assets with banks in the first place.
Like the institution of government — if a government does not protect you and your assets, it has no valid purpose. A bank that exists to control, encumber, and steal depositor’s money, whether those deposits are small or large, has no valid purpose.
Please join our effort to end this grotesque corruption, end all false claims that the Second World War is in any way unsettled, and demand restoration of private assets to the lawful owners.
You can help me in my role as Fiduciary and Assign overseeing this mess by sharing this information and by properly informing law enforcement and miliary and political leaders as well as bank officers. This has, thus far, been a tremendous effort as the heirs and actual trustees have been left without the means to fight this gigantic theft and fraud.
Put yourselves in their shoes. You are fabulously wealthy, but you live like a serf, and have no money to fight the banks. You want to fund humanitarian projects all over the world and fulfill your ancestors’ dream of “breaking the bonds of poverty and ignorance” but you are prevented from doing this by white collar criminals who use your own assets to pay off other criminals to persecute and intimidate you.
Despite all this, the Heir of the D’Avila Family Trust has won his cases and deserves our support, both in enforcing the law, and on a one-to-one level. It costs money and takes skill and time to prosecute these banks, and at the end of the day, we are left with a piece of paper looking for the enforcement of the court’s orders. We are left to enforce it ourselves, which costs more time, more skills, more money.
Banks need to be regulated. They cannot otherwise be trusted. If the D’Avila Family Trust assets can be stolen by the Bank Mob, why couldn’t yours be stolen, too? Quite aside from the humanitarian and development support that the trust can and will provide each one of us, we all have a vested interest in honest banks and honest business practices. The world cannot long survive or be at peace without these basics in place.
I personally believe that much of the corruption and the violence of the past two hundred years lays at the feet of corrupt banks, corrupt militaries, and corrupt politicians who have undermined proper accounting standards, deregulated the banks and the securities exchanges, and promoted a lawless business environment.
If you are sick and tired of being the goat in this situation, join us. Send your thoughts, your prayers, and any reasonable donation you can make toward ending this to:
Anna Maria Riezinger, In care of: Box 520994, Big Lake, Alaska 99652.
Let’s ask “cui bono” of the $33 trillion in added debt and the $9 trillion added to GDP: to whose benefit?
I’ve been thinking about how hard it is to get our heads around big numbers. Technical analyst Sven Henrich (@NorthmanTrader) recently provided one method to grasp the immense wealth of Elon Musk: How to become as wealthy as Elon Musk? Easy. Get paid $1 Million every single day. For 750 years in a row and you’re there.
How can we get a handle on the $33 trillion we’ve added in total debt since 2010? We can start by noting that’s a 60% increase in debt in about a decade, while the population of the U.S. rose by 7%.
Are we 60% better off than we were 12 years ago? How do we measure “better off”? GDP went up by 60% as well, but are we 60% more efficient or 60% more productive? Has the purchasing power of our wages gone up 60%? Can we buy 60% more with a day’s earnings?
I think it’s fair to say “no” to all these questions. We’ve added $33 trillion in debt to more or less tread water.
Does it illuminate the $33 trillion to say that’s $100,000 of debt for every one of the 330 million Americans? Are we each $100,000 better off for borrowing $33 trillion? Well, a few folks have benefited. The top 400 wealthiest folks have seen their wealth skyrocket by trillions of dollars, from roughly 8% of GDP in 2010–way up from a paltry 2.5% in 1985–to about 18% of GDP, which is now $24 trillion. That works out to $4.3 trillion.
I think it’s fair to say that hyper-globalization and hyper-financialization has generated hyper-wealth and hyper-inequality.
How can we, the living people, tear apart the corporations that are feasting on our bodies, minds, and material assets —-and making a bid to reduce living men and women to the status of animals?
Interestingly, the Pope and the Roman Curia are responsible for defining and regulating all corporations on Earth. That’s why they get a cut of the taxes paid by corporations. Obviously, they are falling down on the job, or they are directly responsible for this latest Tidal Wave of Corporate Criminality, in which case…. holding all those gentlemen accountable would be highly desirable.
You may also remember that the United Nations has historically taken a dim view of Colonialism, but nearly all its member nations have fallen victim to Colonialism’s incorporated Cousin, Territorialism. And they are facing yet another even more oppressive form of the same disease: Regionalism.
Corporatism, or as I call it, “Corporate Feudalism” is the belief that the world would be better off if it were completely controlled by mindless, faceless, unaccountable, and uncontrolled corporations which are single-mindedly motivated by only one goal: profit.
You may have noticed that a basic principle has been breached and that the world of corporations, which is fictional, is somehow bleeding over into the actual world where people live, breathe, and eat and love and fornicate and die. Who is responsible for that breach?
The Pope and his Cardinals and members of the Curia have already been identified and mentioned as part of the problem, but who else?
The Lord Mayor of London, who is in charge of the Magicians known as “twisters” or “attorneys”—- or as our ancestors called them, “Masters of Deceit”. They are the ones who are supposed to be maintaining “the Bar” between fact and fiction, life and corporation.
They are doing a very poor job at the same time that the Pope and the Curia are on strike. In fact, in courts around the world, they are deliberately impersonating living people as CORPORATIONS.
That is, the attorneys are committing crimes of personage, and they are getting away with it.
And who is responsible for that?
Ah, the military and the police and the politicians. The three monkeys and their football.
So what we really need is a “DEFUND” button on the bottom of our computer console, we grab the purse strings back from the politicians, and all this nastiness is over.
But who is giving the politicians access to our money and credit to use against our best interests without our consent in the first place?
The banks.
It all comes down to —- and on —- the banks, because the banks are enabling all this crime.
The Bankers are the Enablers, the Politicians are the Corporate Mouthpieces misdirecting the police and military to take orders from the Attorneys, who are committing crimes of personage against the living people, to enrich the Pope and his pals, the Roman Curia, and all their cronies.
There the condition of the world is, all neatly summarized. We know what’s wrong. We know who is at the bottom of it. Now, what are we going to do about it?
—————————-
See this article and over 3600 others on Anna’s website here: www.annavonreitz.com
Talk of a looming recession is rampant around the globe, and now a major U.S. bank has issued its own dire forecast for the global economy.
It’s been over a month since Russia invaded Ukraine, leading to an unforeseen and prolonged fallout for the global economy. Combined with an inflation problem that was already spiking the prices of virtually every commodity, global institutions have begun ringing the alarm bells that we are on the brink of a long-anticipated recession.
In an investment strategy report sent to clients on Thursday, Bank of America analysts warned that “inflation always precedes recessions” and that tighter monetary policies being put in place to control surging prices make a “recession shock” very likely.
SA Jural Assembly Comment: This is more lamestream media propaganda to roll out the controlled demolition of the financial system for “The Great Reset” folks; firstly, Russia did not invade Ukraine; secondly, the Federal Reserve System is one big fat giant fiat ponzi scheme; and it is artificially manipulated by the banksters; and their 99 year lease has expired in 2012;
The good news is the United People’s Front banking committee is working hard to get the SA people’s bank online within the next week or so; details will be forthcoming soon;
And, our gold, silver and platinum trading platform should also be online in the next month; we have our own alternative great reset by, for and of the people planned; the cabal need slaves but we don’t need the cabal; the people shall govern soon…
Giftoftruth Southern Africa 